Washington Post >>

看板Agassi作者 (Soma)時間19年前 (2005/09/10 08:51), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2005/09/02/ DI2005090201791.html Tennis: U.S. Open 2005 Liz Clarke Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, September 9, 2005; 12:00 PM Washington Post staff writer Liz Clarke was online Friday, Sept. 9, at noon ET to chat about this year's U.S. Open tennis tournament Liz Clarke: Greetings from New York, where it's another lovely day--a stunning run of terrific weather for this tournament. The men's doubles final is underway now, and both women's semis will follow this afternoon, with Mary Pierce taking on Elena Dementieva, and Maria Sharapova facing Kim Clijsters. Am happy to chat about anything that's on your mind tennis-wise! Liz _______________________ Bethesda, Md.: What match is more memorable? The quarterfinal between Agassi and Sampas ('91 I think) or the match between Agassi and Blake? I'm going with the latter because it went five sets and ended with a tie break. It doesn't get any better than that. Liz Clarke: I agree with you. And if it gives both of us anymore clout, former pro Luke Jensen (French Open doubles champ in early 90s) agrees. I was talking to him yesterday Agassi/Blake, and he brought up the Agassi-Sampras QF as being terrific as well. But his view was that Agassi-Blake was more thrilling, and more memorable, because there were so many great rallies. In his view, Sampras's serve was so overwhelming, that the match was 'SERVE!' point over; 'Serve' point over! for long stretches. _______________________ Arlington, Va.: It's been a great Open on the men's side (I'm so glad I didn't go to bed after the second set of the Blake-Agassi match!)but please explain how anyone (i.e., USA & CBS commentators) can use the word "depth" with regard to the women's side. The early matches were boring, and it wasn't until this week that anything interesting happened for the women. Also, when someone comments that Serena needs to work on "fitness" does that mean she could stand to lose some pounds? Liz Clarke: You're so right. In fact I was on the verge of writing something about how very lop-sided the first week of women's matches were; as I recall from stats I compiled, the top 7 seeds after 3 rounds (once you take out Kuznetsova, who lost 1sr Round) had not lost a set. They were steamroll matches lasting less than an hour in general. Anyway, the day I was writing that, Sharapova nearly lost to Petrova, so I bagged the idea. but the point is valid from 10 or so back; there is not much depth, though unexpected results DO occur. re: serena, yes, I think fellow pros, commentators all feel that Serena is carrying too much weight to be as effective as she once was. but that's hardly the only issue. And I don't get the sense that it's meant as any aesthetic critique: Just that it's a favor in why she's not as quick on the court and gets visibly winded more easily. Look at the players having late-career resurgences: Agassi, Davenport; Pierce--all have trimmed down, both pounds and body fat, and credit their success, in large part, to that. _______________________ Arlington, Va.: What are your final predictions? Liz Clarke: ack. Is very hard to pick against Federer, of course. so Federer-Agassi final, with the Swiss winning. On women's side, I think Clijsters may just win her first Slam. Not that you're asking, but I predict Clijsters-Dementieva final, with Clijsters winning. _______________________ Rockville, Md.: I would have to say that the U.S. Open is my favorite of the 4 slams, mainly because it is viewable at convenient hours. I can never get in to the Aussie or French Open because by the time I get home at night, all matches are over and scores have been shown. Wimbledon is fun to watch as well for its historic feel and elegance, but it is still tough to wake up and get into matches early in the morning. I know that there is nothing that can be done, but do you believe this is a reason tennis isn't as big for US viewers as other sports are? Liz Clarke: Boy, I don't know about that. I wish it were that simple. I think the failure is more deep-rooting than the sport's often inconvenient times. It's still extremely popular in Europe and south America, but is dying in US. The sport is run by at least 3 entities--(women's tour; men's tour; International governing body; and here-USTA)--and they generally work at cross purposes. I think there's a brilliant dissertation topic for an MBA candidate in the marketing success of NASCAR (which was a fringe, regional sport 20 years so) and the marketing failure of tennis (which commanded a huge US audience a few decades ago, and let it erode). Just a thought. _______________________ Akron, Ohio: Just curious, if Jimmy Connors has made any comments on the amazing run of Andre Agassi? It brings back memories of Jimmy's run back when he was 39. Liz Clarke: Yes, so many former players, fans, journalists have invoked Connors' run in 1991 in wake of Agassi's charge here. Connors was scheduled to show up here at National Tennis Center last night for a gala in honor of World team Tennis, and I was among those eager to ask him his views on your topic. But he sent word he couldn't make it to NY. read into it what you will. he doesn't have much to do with tennis anymore; but he may have felt his place as the sport's defining, defiant lion was being eclipsed a bit. _______________________ San Francisco, CA: A legit question and a venting-steam question I don't expect you to answer. --How are unforced errors really determined? It seems like a subjective call to me. What makes a missed shot definitively unforced? -- How has Michael Barkann (USA Network) gotten himself an annual gig as the roaming reporter and post-match interviewer? He doesn't seem that knowledgeable about tennis (not that he needs to be to schmooze with Regis) and is just an idiot, in general. Liz Clarke: What a great 1st question. Unforced errors are indeed subjective and determined by a statistician, who watches match from box above court. I believe statistician is hired by IBM, which compiled official stats, but am not sure. I should find this out--as well as whether there is a checklist or criteria for defining unforced errors. great question. on your other comment, I'm not familiar with the person you mentioned. I will say, tho, that I've been so impressed with the insights of many of the former players who do commentary--P McEnroe, Mary Carillo, especially; J McEnroe; Courier, Tracy Austin. Oftentimes the courtside people are thrown into roles that they're not as well versed in. Don't know if you heard courtside post-match interview with Lleyton Hewitt after he won a tough 5-setter, but it was so lame that the audience booed the reporter. _______________________ Washington, D.C.: You really think Dementieva is going to win today? Sure, she beat Lindsay. But Lindsay was not playing her best and Dementieva did not look solid to me. Mary Pierce, on the other hand, is looking pretty solid. Liz Clarke: You are so right. Lindsay played horribly; gave the match away. And Pierce is the only SF who has yet to drop a set. And of course no one would place money on what I think :-). But I just think that Dementieva is an incredible fighter. She certainly has strokes as powerful as Pierce's; she wont be blown off the court. Everyone mocks her serve, which is a sad thing to behold. but it's so very peculiar that it can be, in some sense, a weapon in itself. if it clears the net, of course. _______________________ Philadelphia, Pa.: Liz - I've been enjoying your reports from Flushing. I am a former teaching pro and vet of many trips to Queens. If Agassi gets through Ginepri and assuming Federer beats Leyton, can Andre make it an intersting final or is Federer simply on another planet? Was the Agassi-Blake match the most energetic Open crowd you've witnessed? Ted R. and Johnny Mac loved it from the USA booth. Also, do you give your email address for non-chat business? Liz Clarke: Thanks for the kind words. This is a wonderful assignment and I am humbled every day trying to find words worthy of the matches. Re Andre, have spoken at length this week to his trainer, Gil Reyes, and Brad Gilbert, his former coach. Gilbert is esp emphatic that Agassi can rebound from the 5 setter with no problem. Says Agassi is a beast; with 4% body fat now; and given 2 1/2 days to rest, will be good as new. So if Federer wins, which i think he will, it will not be because Andre is old and weary (unless of course sciatica flares up, and then he is done). In my view, on anything other than clay, Federer truly is an alien--playing in an orbit no one can touch. and my email for anyone & everyone is Clarkel@washpost.com. many thanks _______________________ Washington, D.C.: Liz - I thought Connors was still involved in tennis through his participation on the Senior's tour. Is he done with that too? I went to the tour when Johnny Mac and Wilander brought it to DC. I don't think Agassi's run this year compares to Connors' since Agassi is still a top-5 player and Connors definitely was not in 1991. Liz Clarke: I am not sure about Connors' participation in seniors tour. I do know that he returned to Wimbledon for the first time in years this year b/c he had a paying gig as commentator for BBC. He was very prickly to everyone else; has no interest in promoting the game, or his role in it, as far as I can tell, unless money changes hands. I loved the heart he displayed on court but have been disillusioned by the heart of the man. as far as which run was more stunning--yes, what Connors accomplished at 39 in 1991, as a wild card, no less, is greater than what Agassi has done here. There's nothing freakish about what Agassi has done in that he is a top 10 player, getting top-10 results routinely. but what IS freakish, sad to say, is the grace and sportsmanship he brings to the game every time he steps on court. I wish that were not worth noting; but it is b/c it stands out so much by contrast to most of today's top athletes. _______________________ The Scene ... : Can you tell us what it's like to actually be at the Open? I've never been to a tournament -- only watch on TV -- and I'd love some up-close, behind-the-scenes descriptions! What are the players like? Do you have a favorite story from this tournament? Thanks so much! Liz Clarke: wow, I wish I had forever to answer you question b/c if you had told me at age 12, or 22, for that matter, I would ever be covering this, I might have fainted. First thing you must know if that the first week is the best. so come sometime in the first day or two; all the players are here, often playing on small side courts where seats are really close. they also practice here, and you can roam around and see them hit with hitting partners, coaches, usually relaxed and chatty. if I could I would take you to the players lounge, which is off limits to public. Reporters go there looking for coaches, trainers to explain what's going on with the athletes in terms of preparation, fitness, routine, etc. but as you troll for them, you cant help but glimpse other details. I have loved, for ex, seeing steffi graf wait in the hall leading to the court for agassi after his matches. She has their son jaden Gil with her, and he is a gem, and runs out to meet his dad, so excited, afterward. it is a private moment, so you feel a bit voyeuristic, but it is very sweet b/c all the little boy wants is to see his dad again. There's also a little playground outside players lounge for the children to play in, which is neat to see. even press conferences can be very revealing--as far as who has a sharp mind, sense of humor, etc - and you cant get all of this into a story. _______________________ Arlington, Va.: Are pro tennis players tested for steroids? Liz Clarke: yes they are , women and men alike, after matches adn during the season. on that front the biggest story this year has been the positive results of 4 argentinian men. Canas, for one, was just slapped with a 2 year suspension for it. _______________________ Arlington, Va.: Re: Serena's fitness - yes, she is so clearly out of shape. If you caught her at Wimbledon you saw she had a very noticeable pot belly! My question is what would she have to gain by trying to play anyway? $$? Points? Endorsement obligations? Liz Clarke: Oh I don't think there's any question about Serena's love of the game. And her love of competing. and winning. I certainly cant speak for her, but what I see is that she is transformed when she steps on court. as far as money, she has earned more than $15 million career earnings, which is surely dwarfed by her income from endorsements. Without results on court, the endorsements (as well as acting gigs) will gradually disappear. but I don't see any evidence that she's competing for $$. Surely she's not competing for points b/c she is playing so infrequently now. The question remains, tho, where does tennis fit in with all the other things Serena enjoys doing--acting, fashion design, reality TV show; celeb-about-town. _______________________ Arlington, Va.: Would you say that the National Tennis Center has been more crowded this year than in years past? I was surprised by how many people I saw on the grounds last week and how many empty seats I saw in Ashe for the late-night matches this week. Liz Clarke: Godd question that has drawn much comment. The grounds have been very crowded. and the tournament has set several attendance records this year. It's tricky to judge crowds based on the empty or full seats you see on TV screen b/c there is so much else going on at the same times. The second biggest court, Louis Armstrong, has overflowed for several matches. to me the key will be whether TV ratings improve. they hit an all-time low last year for mens and women's final. that is the surest measure of the game's popularity, at least in US _______________________ Arlington, Va.: Re: courtside reporter (CBS's) after the Heweitt-Dent match. I didn't realize that the crowd booed her but she got off lucky. I couldn't believe how stupid her comments and questions were and, moreover, I couldn't believe Hewitt's restraint and grace in his reply. (Though I don't think Hewitt has actually ever decked a reporter.) Liz Clarke: am so glad you heard this b/c I feared no one would know what I was referring to. (in short, hewitt just WON a dogfight against Taylor Dent, and the courtside reporter began her question to Hewitt: "So, he destroyed your confidence and exposed all your weaknesses! Your thoughts?" Hewitt was VERY restrained, let the crowd react for him, in a sense. He wasn't as kind in the press conference afterward...:-) _______________________ Washington, D.C.: Is Capriati ever going to come back, I miss her racquet throwing and loud and obnoxious antics. Liz Clarke: it's interesting how no one seems to care. you hear virtually NO one in the game even asking about her; there is more talk, stunningly, about whether Seles is coming back. but I did ask about Capriati just last week and was told she is still working out (tho no one has evidence of this), with an eye toward returning for 2006 Australian Open. She will be 30 then, I think. (shoulder surgery is what sidelined her, but many of her peers have returned far more quickly from comparable surgery) _______________________ Wyomissing, Pa.: What can be done with the schedule to bring the men's quarterfinal into a more friendly time instead of late-night TV. Liz Clarke: I am no wizard, but it should not be that hard. IF this were the NFL, for example, you couldn't imagine the commissioner leaving it up to fate--and factors beyond NFL's control--just what time the Super Bowl would start. In this case the start time of Agassi-Blake match depended on how long the previous match (Davenport-Dementieva) lasted. The women's match started late, for one, b/c afternoon match ran long. Then women's match ran long, as well. So, you could determine in advance that you wanted this much hyped QF to started at 9 p.m. for ex, or 8 p.m., and put it on Armstong Court. OR make it the first match of evening program on center court. the USTA is trying to get all featured matches on center court, understandably, but sometimes that results in a giant traffic jam and everyone is late. _______________________ Alexandria, Va.: On the subject of Serena's "potbelly".... Hello Mr. Meany ... I surely saw Davenports and Clijister's belly ... sooo that was just mean. Liz Clarke: yes, the issue is competitiveness here. not sveltness. Serena said just this week she learned long ago to "embrace my curves." I just don't know if she can embrace being ranked 8th for long....I hope she cant. _______________________ Arlington, Va.: I stayed up until the end -- at least here, there was no interruption in coverage other than the time it took me to turn the channel from USA to CBS. And Ted on USA did a very good job of explaining what was going on-of course if anyone was trying to tape the match on USA so they could get some sleep, then they would've missed the end. I was annoyed that the switch had to be made though, it was in mid-game. Furthermore, the commentating on CBS was not nearly as good (Patrick McEnroe is good, but the other guy with him was just awful compared to Ted Robinson for USA). Was the stadium sold out? It looked to me like there were quite a few empty seats right after the match ended...maybe people just left right at the end of the match? I can't imagine leaving before the end or it not being sold out. Tennis isn't in that much trouble, that two Americans (one being Agassi for crying out loud) in the quarters don't sell out the stadium, is it? Liz Clarke: The stadium was raucous til the end. But it's true that several thousand (a guess) left. the stadium holds 23,000 roughly. and it was at least 10% empty. The QF was a work night / school night, for what it's worth. And it ended past 1 a.m. Many fans here don't live in the immediate neighborhood; they come to Long Island from NJ, CT, Manhattan etc. So I am sure some HAD to leave, whether babysitter issues or what. It's just a shame the match started so late; esp a shame given that it was just the remedy tennis so desperately need for the current indifference of the game. such a pity. _______________________ Liz Clarke: it's time to sign off. While we chatted the Bryans won men's doubles 6-1, 6-4 over world's no 1 duo. So the US already has one title to celebrate. thanks so much for the terrific questions, thoughtful observations. I really enjoyed it. and enjoy the rest of the Open! Liz _______________________ Editor's Note: Washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control over Live Online discussions and choose the most relevant questions for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer questions. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.203.34.44
文章代碼(AID): #138YuhOa (Agassi)
文章代碼(AID): #138YuhOa (Agassi)