[轉錄][外電] No penalty for Rondo's hard fo …

看板ChicagoBulls (芝加哥公牛)作者hate2004 (祝你佛誕日快樂)時間16年前 (2009/04/30 15:16)推噓12(12推 0噓 2→)

留言14則, 11人參與討論串1/1

※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板] 作者: gaga19900329 (GagaKnight) 看板: NBA 標題: [外電] No penalty for Rondo's hard foul on Miller 時間: Thu Apr 30 13:48:08 2009 來源：http://tinyurl.com/csmjyl No penalty for Rondo's hard foul on Miller The NBA said Boston Celtics point guard Rajon Rondo won't be penalized for his hard foul on Chicago's Brad Miller in the closing seconds of Game 5. NBA當局宣布不會對Rondo在系列賽第五戰的犯規做出懲處。 NBA commissioner David Stern said Wednesday night in Atlanta before the Hawks-Miami Heat game that no flagrant foul call on Rondo was the right call. Stern說沒吹Rondo惡性犯規是個正確的判決。 "I was in Orlando, but I was reliably informed it was not a flagrant foul," Stern said. "Our referees do the best they can in these situations." 「那時我在奧蘭多，不過我確信這不是個惡性犯規」Stern說。「我們的裁判在當時的情況下做得很好。」 As result of the NBA's position, there will be no fine or suspension for Rondo or even flagrant foul points that could lead to a suspension if they accumulate. 所以，Rondo不會因為這次犯規被罰款或禁賽，或是被記一次惡性犯規(有可能導致被禁賽)。 With the Bulls trailing by two in the final seconds of overtime on Tuesday night, Miller had a clear path to the basket. But Rondo jumped and hit him across the face and the lay-in attempt sailed wide. 當公牛在比賽中落後兩分時，Miller得到了一個上籃的空檔，不過Rondo跳了過來，並且出手打中了他的臉，當然他的上籃也被毀掉了。 Though Rondo made contact with Miller above the shoulders, NBA executive vice president of basketball operations Stu Jackson said the play fell short of warranting a flagrant foul. 雖然Rondo與Miller在肩膀以上有肢體接觸，NBA籃球事務執行副總裁Stu Jackson說這個犯規仍不足以構成一個惡性犯規。 "We felt Rondo was making a basketball play and going for the ball after a blown defensive assignment by the Celtic team," Jackson said. 「我們覺得Rondo只是執行球隊的防守指令而已。」Jackson說。 "In terms of the criteria that we use to evaluate a flagrant foul penalty one, generally we like to consider whether or not there was a windup, an appropriate level of impact and a follow-through. And with this foul, we didn't see a windup, nor did he follow through. So for that reason we're not going to upgrade this foul to a flagrant foul penalty one." 「從我們用來判斷惡性犯規的標準來看，我們需要評估是否在還沒犯規前就有準備動作，或是在犯規後還有多餘的動作。而這個犯規顯然是兩者都沒有。所以我們並不會把這個犯規視為惡性犯規。」 Miller missed the free throws that could have tied it, and the Celtics won 106-104 to take a 3-2 lead in the best-of-seven series 最後Miller錯失了可以追平比分的罰球，Celtics在7戰4勝制的系列賽中以106-104取得了 3-2領先的優勢。 ---- NBA似乎總是不提出一個能在當下釐清爭議判決的方法？ ---- -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.43.157.193 ※ 編輯: hate2004 來自: 61.228.180.238 (04/30 15:17)