皇帝頭號粉絲死性不改

看板Lakers (洛杉磯 湖人)作者 (混世魔王樊瑞)時間16年前 (2010/06/21 14:22), 編輯推噓13(13040)
留言53則, 19人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/16825/rebounds-not-legacies- the-story-for-lakers http://tinyurl.com/27ejqjt Rebounds, not legacies, the story for Lakers June, 18, 2010 Jun 182:18AM ETEmail Print Comments103 By John Hollinger LOS ANGELES – It was fitting that an offensive rebound provided what proved to be the title-clinching play. And it was equally fitting that all the basketball gods made a mockery of all our non-stop chatter about individual legacies when a team-wide Lakers effort that won them Game 7 in spite of, rather than because of, their best player. All night long, the Lakers had battled to overcome a mystifying inability to shoot straight by sheer brute force, grabbing 23 of their own misses and maintaining possession four other times on balls knocked out of bounds. So when Kobe Bryant forced a long 3 under duress with 28 seconds left, it was only natural that Pau Gasol – for the ninth time – came down with it. Gasol held off Rajon Rondo for the rebound, passed it back to out to Bryant at the free-throw line, and then Bryant drove the lane to draw a foul. Had Boston secured the rebound, they would have had the ball with a chance to tie and send the game to overtime. Instead, Bryant’s free throw put the Lakers up 81-76, and the Celtics never had the ball with a chance to tie again. It all started when the Lakers caught Boston in a bad match-up coming upcourt. Kevin Garnett ended up guarding Derek Fisher in the left corner, leaving Rondo frantically trying to switch men with Rasheed Wallace and Paul Pierce. He ended up on Gasol near the foul line as the Celtics went to trap Bryant in a pick-and-roll and then, as the shot went up, under the rim. Rondo had inside position, but being a foot shorter proved problematic. Gasol reached up with one arm, held Rondo off with the other, and claimed the rebound near the baseline. “We were trying to trap and we got caught,” said Rivers. “I thought Rondo boxed him out. He went over his back, but they’re not going to call that with the size advantage.” “I just wanted to go get it,” said Gasol. “ I was able to box him out and hold him with one arm. I was pretty proud of that play because those little play, those little thing make a huge different, especially at that point of the game.” For the game L.A. kept possession 27 times out of a possible 62 caroms, an exorbitant Offensive Rebound Rate of 43.5% -- a normal total is barely half of that. It couldn’t have come at a better time. L.A. shot a horrid 32.5% from the field and 67.6% from the line, but won by securing 22 possessions more than Boston between its rebound and turnover advantages. Of course, rebounding has been an issue the entire Finals – the team with more rebounds won every game. Even more atypically, the team with more offensive rebounds won six of the seven. Offensive rebounds typically correlate with losing, because you can’t get an offensive rebound unless you miss a shot, and usually the team with more offensive rebounds gained that distinction by missing a great many more shots. True to that trend, L.A. missed more shots than Boston tonight, but the offensive boards allowed them to attempt so many that it didn’t matter. With Kendrick Perkins absent, L.A.’s size put even more pressure on the Celtics defensive rebounders, especially on the opening minutes. Seven-footer Andrew Bynum ganged up with Gasol to regain possession on the first eight Laker misses before Boston finally claimed a carom – a missed free throw that Rasheed Wallace rebounded at knee-level. “I thought the lack of size was the difference,” said Rivers. “Our guys battled down there, but 23-8 on offensive rebounds, and the 37-17 discrepancy in free throws, that makes it impossible to overcome.” The rebounding battle became so important because the Lakers couldn’t get out of their own way on offense. Bryant deserved his Finals MVP award but Game 7 was a stinker for him, shooting 6-of-24 with just two assists and committing four turnovers. Instead, it was his teammates who picked him up. Which leads us to the big takeaway from L.A. boarding its way to the title: Reminding us that this is a team sport. The silly “Kobe has five, Michael has six” debates we had all week now seem more ludicrous than ever after his teammates bailed him out on a night that would allegedly decide his legacy. Yes, the ring’s the thing, and even Bryant couldn’t resist noting that he now has one more of them than Shaquille O’Neal. But this isn’t tennis or golf – individuals don’t win championships. Teams do. Bryant helped prove it when he suffered consecutive first-round exits prior to Gasol’s arrival. As brilliant as Bryant has been at times in these Finals, it’s noteworthy that his best Finals performance (Game 5) came in defeat, and his worst in the deciding victory. Instead it was L.A.’s cavalry that rode to the rescue. Artest, whom Laker coach Phil Jackson called the team’s MVP tonight, suffocated Paul Pierce on defense and scored 20 points, including a back-breaking 3 with a minute left. Derek Fisher hit a difficult 3 to tie the game midway through the fourth, Gasol owned the glass in the fourth quarter, and Sasha Vujacic stepped out of the freezer to hit two title-clinching free throws with 11 seconds left. That’s not a knock on Bryant. That’s just how it’s usually been done … far more frequently than most people care to remember. Take Jordan, for instance. He clinched his first title as a mostly-bystander watching a monstrous fourth quarter from John Paxson … and the second with five reserves leading a 16-point comeback against Portland in Game 6 ... and the third watching Paxson nail the game-winner in Phoenix. In fact, if a player had his legacy defined tonight it wasn’t Bryant, who was the third-best player on his own team, but Gasol. Lambasted for his lack of toughness and fortitude in the 2008 Finals, and earlier in this series, he dominated the fourth quarter with nine points, six rebounds, two assists and a blocked shot. Perhaps that’s why he seemed more emotional than usual in the aftermath. “He was the one guy I felt really played with good energy," said Lakers coach Phil Jackson. As a result, the Lakers are champions, no matter how ugly it might have looked in stretches -- "It wasn't well done, but it was done," said Jackson. And in the end, it wasn't done by legacies or superstars, but by the very basic fact that the Lakers earned so many shots they couldn't help but get at least a few them to the bottom of the net. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 210.208.16.196

06/21 14:27, , 1F
籃板多阿,怎樣XD
06/21 14:27, 1F

06/21 14:32, , 2F
Hollinger整天舔LBJ的LP是有得到什麼好處嗎
06/21 14:32, 2F

06/21 14:33, , 3F
不過我承認我沒看這篇不知道他在說啥
06/21 14:33, 3F

06/21 14:34, , 4F
科科
06/21 14:34, 4F

06/21 14:36, , 5F
他說了些甚麼?懶得看英文XD
06/21 14:36, 5F

06/21 14:36, , 6F
大致上是kobe打很爛 然後斷章取義一下賽後採訪(完)
06/21 14:36, 6F

06/21 14:39, , 7F
就說kobe很爛靠隊友撿子彈才有冠軍,喬神總決賽也常常看
06/21 14:39, 7F

06/21 14:39, , 8F
隊友表演,所以隊友很重要,籃球是打團隊的,LBJ沒戒指不是
06/21 14:39, 8F

06/21 14:39, , 9F
他的錯XD(最後一句是我加的XD)
06/21 14:39, 9F

06/21 14:41, , 10F
科科 通通都不是LBJ的錯 都是別人的錯 尤其是West XDDD
06/21 14:41, 10F

06/21 14:48, , 11F
看完啦,大致上是在講Game7的事情吧
06/21 14:48, 11F

06/21 14:49, , 12F
賽程進行中心理層面上你會覺得某幾場比較重要
06/21 14:49, 12F

06/21 14:49, , 13F
但就統計上,每一勝的比重都一樣
06/21 14:49, 13F

06/21 14:50, , 14F
his best Finals performance (Game 5) came in
06/21 14:50, 14F

06/21 14:50, , 15F
defeat, and his worst in the deciding victory.
06/21 14:50, 15F

06/21 14:50, , 16F
這種論點不就跟那些酸民講的一樣,似乎再說KB表現好
06/21 14:50, 16F

06/21 14:51, , 17F
對勝敗影響不大,關鍵在隊友,尤其是Gasol
06/21 14:51, 17F

06/21 14:51, , 18F
基本上要贏球最好是紅花綠葉都要開放
06/21 14:51, 18F

06/21 14:52, , 19F
也許Hollinger喜歡MJ或LBJ那種一夫當關的英雄
06/21 14:52, 19F

06/21 14:52, , 20F
但很多酸民訐譙KB的不就是他老想嘗試當這種英雄
06/21 14:52, 20F

06/21 14:52, , 21F
他這樣就錶到JORDAN了喔..JORDAN1996年 FINAL最後一場
06/21 14:52, 21F

06/21 14:53, , 22F
表現跟KOBE差不多......
06/21 14:53, 22F

06/21 14:54, , 23F
KB不用暴氣,恆定演出,加上隊友的幫忙就會贏
06/21 14:54, 23F

06/21 14:55, , 24F
可能對Hollinger只有贏的場次才有貢獻吧
06/21 14:55, 24F

06/21 14:56, , 25F
以LAL贏的另三場球,雖然有老漁等等,KB比重還是最大
06/21 14:56, 25F

06/21 14:57, , 26F
也許以後LAL改以Gasol為中心的打法也有可能奪冠
06/21 14:57, 26F

06/21 14:57, , 27F
畢竟在這個系列戰還不是這樣... 雖然未來樂觀其成啦
06/21 14:57, 27F

06/21 14:58, , 28F
要是能跟河流一樣,每場都有不同致勝武器多好
06/21 14:58, 28F

06/21 14:58, , 29F
而且他應該只看數據不看防守吧
06/21 14:58, 29F

06/21 14:59, , 30F
大蓋火鍋多一點 抄截多一點 籃板(今年不算)多一點就好
06/21 14:59, 30F

06/21 14:59, , 31F
他說G7是靠籃板贏的,有籃板是因為投籃不進
06/21 14:59, 31F

06/21 15:00, , 32F
所以KB在最後一場抓了15個籃板真對不起他阿
06/21 15:00, 32F

06/21 15:01, , 33F
以BOS的防守水準,就是投籃很難進才更要掌握好籃板
06/21 15:01, 33F

06/21 15:01, , 34F
真希望未來三年別在Finals看到LBJ
06/21 15:01, 34F

06/21 15:01, , 35F
每波攻擊給自己多一次機會,就算命中率低也還有機會
06/21 15:01, 35F

06/21 15:02, , 36F
這就是Hollinger所謂的how ugly it might have looked
06/21 15:02, 36F

06/21 15:07, , 37F
最大的差別在於湖人打贏bos 騎士輸給了bos
06/21 15:07, 37F

06/21 15:08, , 38F
在他們的邏輯裡 KOBE有貢獻=其他人沒貢獻 只要其他人
06/21 15:08, 38F

06/21 15:09, , 39F
明年的目標就設定成在總冠軍賽打倒lbj好了(菸)
06/21 15:09, 39F

06/21 15:09, , 40F
有一點貢獻 就等於KOBE沒貢獻 or KOBe的貢獻不重要
06/21 15:09, 40F

06/21 15:10, , 41F
要在Finals打敗LBJ 也得要LBJ有能耐站在Finals阿XD
06/21 15:10, 41F

06/21 15:32, , 42F
藍球本來就是五個人打 隊友打好隊贏球當然重要
06/21 15:32, 42F

06/21 15:32, , 43F
難道這位大球瓶以為NBA FINALS是鬥牛嗎?
06/21 15:32, 43F

06/21 16:14, , 44F
這個評論者也是酸民一個
06/21 16:14, 44F

06/21 16:48, , 45F
對我而言在主將狀況不佳時有人能跳出來接管 這就是一個
06/21 16:48, 45F

06/21 16:48, , 46F
團隊
06/21 16:48, 46F

06/21 16:48, , 47F
Hollinger就喜歡推廣他所謂的進階數據嘛 除非在籃板
06/21 16:48, 47F

06/21 16:49, , 48F
助攻上的數據能更詳細,不然再怎麼權重去加加減減,意義
06/21 16:49, 48F

06/21 16:50, , 49F
都不會多大啦!騎士總管努力了幾年?? 陣容不夠好嗎??
06/21 16:50, 49F

06/21 17:36, , 50F
總之就是湖人拿冠軍 騎士提早去看世足賽 還要爭什麼?
06/21 17:36, 50F

06/21 17:37, , 51F
KOBE還在g7卡位搶籃板球的時候 喇叭已經在家裡看冠軍賽了
06/21 17:37, 51F

06/21 17:38, , 52F
Hollinger不意外 每天只知道捧LBJ的LP
06/21 17:38, 52F

06/21 23:25, , 53F
看標題就猜是火靈哥了...
06/21 23:25, 53F
文章代碼(AID): #1C7mKjMX (Lakers)
文章代碼(AID): #1C7mKjMX (Lakers)