[外電] What move should the Mavs have made?
看板Mavericks (達拉斯 小牛)作者popstarkirby (POP先生)時間17年前 (2009/02/20 09:47)推噓22(23推 1噓 35→)留言59則, 20人參與討論串1/1
http://tinyurl.com/abeat2
MFFLs are mad that the trading deadline passed without the Mavs making a
deal. Never mind that none of the other West contenders made a trade designed
to improve their championship chances this season.
Jerry Stackhouse for John Salmons would have been a great deal for the Mavs.
They tried to make it, which was only a reasonable offer because the Kings
were looking to unload salary. Sacramento got a better offer from the Bulls.
The other deal involving the Mavs that got significant buzz in the trade
rumor mill would have brought Vince Carter to Dallas. The Mavs refused to
part with Josh Howard. Do you blame Mark Cuban and Donnie Nelson for that?
As Donnie Nelson expressed today, the Mavs have two goals: be as good as
possible now while setting themselves up to be players in the Great Free
Agent Summer of 2010.
It's debatable that a Howard-for-Carter swap would have made the Mavs better
now, and there's no doubt he would have destroyed plans for 2010.
All the high-flying, rim-attacking Carter highlights might as well be in
black and white. He's a jump shooter now. When his shot is falling (like the
first quarter of the Nets' loss here last night), he can still light it up.
When it isn't (like the rest of the game), he's just a finesse guy who
doesn't play much defense. Man, do the Mavs need more finesse or what?!
Howard is wildly inconsistent and turns into a jumper-happy/lazy-defense dude
when he's at his worst. At his best, he's a slasher and disruptive defender
who can put up 24/10 lines like he had in last night's win.
Adding Carter would have wrecked the Mavs' financial flexibility. He's on the
books for $17 million in 2010-11, when he'll be 34 years old. Howard, on the
other hand, has a team option for that season.
MFFLs should have been mad if the Mavs pulled the trigger on that trade, not
because they passed.
等了整晚結果沒有任何關於小牛的交易發生
當下的想法跟多數外國網友一樣
這季小牛大概就這樣吧.....
很多問題球迷都看的出了
官方還是堅持"We like our team"
也許是找不到適合的交易對象
但這樣的小牛能走多遠呢?
官方的說辭一向很好聽
從開季看陣容
官方說陣容很好
當下看時的確是如此
加上新的教頭
對球季充滿期待
結果開季是....2勝7敗
小牛曾爬到第五
但也一度掉出前九
這支球隊的不穩
其實光"先發"以及"替補"
就可以長篇大論了
(請把Terry歸在先發)
0809的小牛比賽
贏的比賽幾乎是遵循這樣的模式
Dirk Kidd Josh Terry中三人以上爆走
或是
Dirk Kidd Josh Terry兩人以上爆走+板凳奇兵
看看我們先發球員的數據
(蛋皮可忽略)
再看看替補球員的數據
這是近幾年來
我看過差距大成這樣的陣容....
往好處想
Stackhouse要回來了
Wright近幾場表現不錯
還有一個永遠的潛力股
但永遠沒有球打的GG
小牛目前最穩的替補
(請把Terry列入先發)
大概就Bass吧
他大概是小牛目前
板凳上最有貢獻的球員
JJB Carroll Hollins
並不是說他們不好
在進攻端還是有一定威脅
但是防守端上慘不忍睹
+/-這種東西是拿來參考用
可是我還第一次看到
先發全+10~25
替補全-1x....
(昨天的比賽)
這問題...
一看就知道了
就是先發實力以及替補實力的懸殊
一個球隊不能天天期待有奇兵
要說的話
個人還是把現在的Wright跟Bass列入奇兵
JJB更不用說了...
看Wright打了一季球
目前還很難判斷他是否真有勝任先發SG的實力
還是偶有佳作而已
就算不勝任
教練已經這樣調度了一季
我只能說有種"奇妙"的感覺
Stackhouse Green為何被冰
也許永遠是個迷
為什麼教練獨愛JJB Wright?
也只有他自己知道
我知道的是
假設進了季後賽
這種靠先發爆氣的打法
我們能撐多久?
目前西區前九
扣掉自己
(每晚都在輸給自己....joke...別介意)
似乎是只有對拓荒者戰績比較好
小牛打不贏有傷兵的爵士
打不贏前一陣子還在掙扎的太陽
更別說被金塊完封
火箭隊我不知
打過才知道
黃蜂...
光一個CP3就整死小牛
湖人不用說了
王者與我們的差距
馬刺只要有TD
就是強勁對手
近幾場勝率是不差
但老樣子
看看贏的對手是誰
小牛如果想進季後賽
Cuban/Donnie如果那麼堅持
"We like our team"
那對手就該擺在季後賽中
要打的贏季後賽等級的隊
那才叫真實力
廢話不多說了
只是本人跟大多數外國網友一樣
不認為"靠化學作用"可以走多遠
看教練怎麼安排吧
交易日期截止了
去吵那些"我們原本可以做的交易"
也沒啥意義了
希望官方說的消息是好的
就期待Stackhouse可以提升這支球隊的競爭力
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.136.185.206
→
02/20 09:58, , 1F
02/20 09:58, 1F
推
02/20 09:59, , 2F
02/20 09:59, 2F
推
02/20 10:54, , 3F
02/20 10:54, 3F
→
02/20 10:54, , 4F
02/20 10:54, 4F
→
02/20 10:56, , 5F
02/20 10:56, 5F
推
02/20 12:42, , 6F
02/20 12:42, 6F
推
02/20 12:56, , 7F
02/20 12:56, 7F
→
02/20 13:03, , 8F
02/20 13:03, 8F
推
02/20 13:17, , 9F
02/20 13:17, 9F
→
02/20 13:18, , 10F
02/20 13:18, 10F
推
02/20 13:22, , 11F
02/20 13:22, 11F
→
02/20 13:26, , 12F
02/20 13:26, 12F
→
02/20 13:26, , 13F
02/20 13:26, 13F
推
02/20 13:55, , 14F
02/20 13:55, 14F
→
02/20 13:57, , 15F
02/20 13:57, 15F
→
02/20 13:58, , 16F
02/20 13:58, 16F
→
02/20 13:59, , 17F
02/20 13:59, 17F
推
02/20 14:03, , 18F
02/20 14:03, 18F
→
02/20 14:04, , 19F
02/20 14:04, 19F
推
02/20 14:26, , 20F
02/20 14:26, 20F
→
02/20 14:54, , 21F
02/20 14:54, 21F
→
02/20 15:03, , 22F
02/20 15:03, 22F
→
02/20 15:05, , 23F
02/20 15:05, 23F
推
02/20 15:11, , 24F
02/20 15:11, 24F
→
02/20 15:11, , 25F
02/20 15:11, 25F
→
02/20 15:12, , 26F
02/20 15:12, 26F
→
02/20 15:13, , 27F
02/20 15:13, 27F
推
02/20 15:22, , 28F
02/20 15:22, 28F
推
02/20 15:22, , 29F
02/20 15:22, 29F
推
02/20 15:22, , 30F
02/20 15:22, 30F
→
02/20 15:23, , 31F
02/20 15:23, 31F
→
02/20 15:23, , 32F
02/20 15:23, 32F
→
02/20 15:24, , 33F
02/20 15:24, 33F
→
02/20 15:24, , 34F
02/20 15:24, 34F
→
02/20 15:25, , 35F
02/20 15:25, 35F
→
02/20 15:26, , 36F
02/20 15:26, 36F
推
02/20 15:29, , 37F
02/20 15:29, 37F
→
02/20 16:40, , 38F
02/20 16:40, 38F
→
02/20 16:41, , 39F
02/20 16:41, 39F
→
02/20 16:42, , 40F
02/20 16:42, 40F
→
02/20 16:42, , 41F
02/20 16:42, 41F
推
02/20 16:42, , 42F
02/20 16:42, 42F
推
02/20 16:45, , 43F
02/20 16:45, 43F
推
02/20 16:51, , 44F
02/20 16:51, 44F
→
02/20 16:51, , 45F
02/20 16:51, 45F
→
02/20 16:52, , 46F
02/20 16:52, 46F
→
02/20 16:53, , 47F
02/20 16:53, 47F
→
02/20 18:25, , 48F
02/20 18:25, 48F
→
02/20 18:25, , 49F
02/20 18:25, 49F
噓
02/20 19:21, , 50F
02/20 19:21, 50F
推
02/20 21:30, , 51F
02/20 21:30, 51F
推
02/20 22:27, , 52F
02/20 22:27, 52F
推
02/20 22:48, , 53F
02/20 22:48, 53F
推
02/20 23:16, , 54F
02/20 23:16, 54F
推
02/20 23:37, , 55F
02/20 23:37, 55F
推
02/20 23:40, , 56F
02/20 23:40, 56F
→
02/20 23:40, , 57F
02/20 23:40, 57F
→
02/20 23:54, , 58F
02/20 23:54, 58F
→
12/11 21:54,
7年前
, 59F
12/11 21:54, 59F
Mavericks 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章