68強如何排名和怎麼選37支AT-LARGE

看板NCAA (美國大學體育協會)作者 (LUCIFER)時間14年前 (2011/03/15 18:10), 編輯推噓3(305)
留言8則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
我看了英文的維基 上面這麼寫 The NCAA has established Selection Committees for both the men's and women's tournaments. Teams that did not win their conference tournament may be eligible to earn an at-large berth. At-large berths are determined by record, ranking, strength of schedule, and many other factors. A key factor in determining at-large berths is the Ratings Percentage Index, popularly referred to as the RPI. One absolute rule is that a team with a losing record after the conference tournament (or regular season in the case of the Ivy League) is barred from consideration for an at-large berth. 他是根據戰績 排名 賽程強度 RPI值 RPI值: RPI = (WP * 0.25) + (OWP * 0.50) + (OOWP * 0.25) where WP is Winning Percentage, OWP is Opponents' Winning Percentage and OOWP is Opponents' Opponents' Winning Percentage. The WP is calculated by taking a team's wins divided by the number of games it has played (i.e. wins plus losses). 還真的很複雜 好像還包括主勝 客勝 中立場勝等因素 不曉得有沒有包含聯盟實力因素? 排名是如何排? 這邊指的排 是不是將68隊依種子序分成16個檔次[pot] 每個檔次四隊 然後抽籤排入進四個分區? [當然要打first four的另外排] -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.136.208.166

03/15 18:13, , 1F
RPI簡單這樣想 他的原意是鼓勵去挑戰更強的對手
03/15 18:13, 1F

03/15 18:13, , 2F
戰勝弱隊幫助不大 輸給強隊也敗的不多 想太複雜很辛苦的
03/15 18:13, 2F

03/15 18:14, , 3F
還有今年的37隊.....嗯 just business和政治鬥爭
03/15 18:14, 3F

03/15 18:15, , 4F
看的太認真會氣的燒起來
03/15 18:15, 4F

03/15 23:59, , 5F
基本上at large該進的都會進 會吵那些本來該進卻沒進的...
03/15 23:59, 5F

03/16 00:00, , 6F
那都是馬後砲. Commissioner 有提到, 唯一重點是盡量不要
03/16 00:00, 6F

03/16 00:00, , 7F
在前兩輪出現同分區對手對戰的可能性
03/16 00:00, 7F

03/16 00:25, , 8F
但今年的11,12,13,14,15會非常有趣 可能會很多dog barking
03/16 00:25, 8F
文章代碼(AID): #1DVpiQYz (NCAA)
文章代碼(AID): #1DVpiQYz (NCAA)