[情報] Westbrook won't be a Pacer

看板PACERS (印第安那溜馬)作者larson (哉哉)時間17年前 (2008/06/22 19:59)推噓3(3推 0噓 0→)

留言3則, 3人參與討論串1/1

http://0rz.tw/504iy Westbrook won't be a Pacer June 21, 2008 Posted by Mike Wells You can stop wondering if Russell Westbrook will be there when the Pacers pick at No. 11 on Thursday. 你可以不必期待Russell Westbrook是否會落到第11順位給溜馬了 Pacers president Larry Bird had hoped Westbrook would visit Tuesday after not working out for them because of an injury last week. 大鳥希望Westbrook下週二來做測試,因為他上禮拜因傷缺席 That plan got scrapped because I've been told Westbrook has been given a "promise" by a team picking higher than the Pacers. I'm not sure which team has given Westbrook the "promise." 這個計畫被捨棄了,因為有人跟我說已經有順位在溜馬之前的球隊給Westbrook 下了保證書,我不確定這是哪支球隊 Wouldn't it be something if Donnie Walsh took the player his former team has had its eye on for some time? 如果Walsh把他老東家球隊嚮往已久的球員給攔走了,這意味著什麼呢? That leaves D.J. Augustin at No. 11 for the Pacers if he's there, right? 那可能就會讓D.J. Augustin留給在#11的溜馬,對吧? You would think that, but I was talking to somebody in the organization last week about the whole point guard-best player available scenario. That person brought up a good point: Would you rather draft a point guard that's going to be just an average player in the NBA or take the best player available? 你可以怎麼想,但是上禮拜我跟球團的某位人士談論過本梯選秀控衛狀況,他提出了一個重點:你要選一個控衛而他將來只是個普通水準的球員,還是要挑一個能挑到的而又最好的球員呢? What if a player falls in their lap (think back to Danny Granger in 2005) at No. 11? You've got to pass on Augustin (if he's still there) and take the better overall player. 如果有個球員被低估了(就像05年的小葛一樣)而跌到了第11順位呢?那你一定得捨棄 Augustin(如果他也還沒被挑走)而挑選實力最好的球員 My man Steve from Area 51,52,53,55,58, draft picks have no financial value when it comes to trades. <這段前半老實說我不曉得在寫啥鬼?>除了說選秀權在交易價碼中的價值是0之外... -- 就算有病，只要肯面對… 仍然可以有幸福 from《天生一對 2 become 1》 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.113.90.160