[問題] 敗拍 or 敗技術
敗拍 或 敗技術
花錢買拍好像是主流?(如:一隻boll zlc + t64*2
約一萬了。--沒人嚇到!)
但花錢請教練者就好像不多(十節課 六千~一萬間
猶豫了好幾個月!)
敗拍 或 敗技術之間應沒衝突,
敗器材就是一種享受。
敗技術則讓贏球機率可能增加(可能很快也可能慢)
只是敗拍敗多了 會否 等於技術會增長
見人見智。
器材很重要,但是否那麼重要?
如果不重要,大概要如何分大類即可?
如果很重要,那常換又代表什麼?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.161.211.168
推
09/12 13:16, , 1F
09/12 13:16, 1F
→
09/12 13:16, , 2F
09/12 13:16, 2F
推
09/12 13:16, , 3F
09/12 13:16, 3F
推
09/12 13:16, , 4F
09/12 13:16, 4F
推
09/12 13:17, , 5F
09/12 13:17, 5F
推
09/12 13:17, , 6F
09/12 13:17, 6F
→
09/12 13:17, , 7F
09/12 13:17, 7F
推
09/12 13:20, , 8F
09/12 13:20, 8F
推
09/12 13:22, , 9F
09/12 13:22, 9F
推
09/12 13:25, , 10F
09/12 13:25, 10F
→
09/12 13:26, , 11F
09/12 13:26, 11F
→
09/12 13:27, , 12F
09/12 13:27, 12F
→
09/12 13:28, , 13F
09/12 13:28, 13F
→
09/12 13:28, , 14F
09/12 13:28, 14F
→
09/12 13:29, , 15F
09/12 13:29, 15F
→
09/12 13:29, , 16F
09/12 13:29, 16F
推
09/12 13:30, , 17F
09/12 13:30, 17F
推
09/12 13:31, , 18F
09/12 13:31, 18F
→
09/12 13:32, , 19F
09/12 13:32, 19F
推
09/12 13:35, , 20F
09/12 13:35, 20F
推
09/12 13:38, , 21F
09/12 13:38, 21F
→
09/12 13:39, , 22F
09/12 13:39, 22F
推
09/12 13:54, , 23F
09/12 13:54, 23F
→
09/12 13:54, , 24F
09/12 13:54, 24F
→
09/12 13:56, , 25F
09/12 13:56, 25F
→
09/12 13:56, , 26F
09/12 13:56, 26F
推
09/12 14:10, , 27F
09/12 14:10, 27F
→
09/12 14:11, , 28F
09/12 14:11, 28F
推
09/12 14:27, , 29F
09/12 14:27, 29F
→
09/12 14:39, , 30F
09/12 14:39, 30F
推
09/12 14:47, , 31F
09/12 14:47, 31F
→
09/12 14:54, , 32F
09/12 14:54, 32F
推
09/12 14:55, , 33F
09/12 14:55, 33F
→
09/12 14:57, , 34F
09/12 14:57, 34F
→
09/12 15:00, , 35F
09/12 15:00, 35F
→
09/12 15:01, , 36F
09/12 15:01, 36F
→
09/12 15:03, , 37F
09/12 15:03, 37F
推
09/12 15:07, , 38F
09/12 15:07, 38F
→
09/12 15:08, , 39F
09/12 15:08, 39F
→
09/12 15:12, , 40F
09/12 15:12, 40F
推
09/12 15:17, , 41F
09/12 15:17, 41F
→
09/12 15:19, , 42F
09/12 15:19, 42F
推
09/12 15:30, , 43F
09/12 15:30, 43F
推
09/12 15:37, , 44F
09/12 15:37, 44F
推
09/12 15:40, , 45F
09/12 15:40, 45F
→
09/12 15:48, , 46F
09/12 15:48, 46F
推
09/12 15:49, , 47F
09/12 15:49, 47F
推
09/12 15:50, , 48F
09/12 15:50, 48F
→
09/12 15:54, , 49F
09/12 15:54, 49F
推
09/12 16:21, , 50F
09/12 16:21, 50F
推
09/12 16:32, , 51F
09/12 16:32, 51F
推
09/12 16:38, , 52F
09/12 16:38, 52F
→
09/12 16:39, , 53F
09/12 16:39, 53F
→
09/12 16:40, , 54F
09/12 16:40, 54F
推
09/12 16:47, , 55F
09/12 16:47, 55F
推
09/12 17:09, , 56F
09/12 17:09, 56F
→
09/12 17:19, , 57F
09/12 17:19, 57F
→
09/12 17:21, , 58F
09/12 17:21, 58F
→
09/12 17:22, , 59F
09/12 17:22, 59F
→
09/12 17:23, , 60F
09/12 17:23, 60F
推
09/12 17:26, , 61F
09/12 17:26, 61F
推
09/12 17:31, , 62F
09/12 17:31, 62F
推
09/12 17:38, , 63F
09/12 17:38, 63F
推
09/12 18:03, , 64F
09/12 18:03, 64F
→
09/12 18:25, , 65F
09/12 18:25, 65F
稍總結推文
大致上有推文之鄉民,多數贊成敗技術為主、敗器材為輔。
想找教練有錢但不一定有閒,想找也不一定能符合自己的時間。
敗拍也是另一種"打球重點"還是很重要。
輸給伯伯 多數以為是"怪" 的因素居多。
但
桌球網的文章(不含精華區),
多數提問文章還是"問器材"為主,
回應多的也多數是回應"器材"相關問題。
所以"較有可能"讓
想打桌球的人,打不好的,打得好的都需要一支
無敵器材。尋尋覓覓,總是身旁少一支啊?
相信看了此篇的推文,應能讓"技術" 和 "器材"
稍稍平衡一下。
※ 編輯: msin 來自: 118.161.211.168 (09/12 19:18)
推
09/12 19:19, , 66F
09/12 19:19, 66F
→
09/12 19:19, , 67F
09/12 19:19, 67F
推
09/12 19:19, , 68F
09/12 19:19, 68F
→
09/12 19:19, , 69F
09/12 19:19, 69F
→
09/12 19:20, , 70F
09/12 19:20, 70F
→
09/12 19:20, , 71F
09/12 19:20, 71F
推
09/12 21:58, , 72F
09/12 21:58, 72F
推
09/12 23:18, , 73F
09/12 23:18, 73F
推
09/12 23:27, , 74F
09/12 23:27, 74F
→
09/12 23:34, , 75F
09/12 23:34, 75F
→
09/12 23:34, , 76F
09/12 23:34, 76F
tabletennis 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
43
64