[評論] 戰術下格格不入的 大本

看板Arsenal作者 (Bob)時間15年前 (2011/05/13 19:41), 編輯推噓18(18030)
留言48則, 12人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Nicklas Bendtner: a perfectly good square peg in a highly unsuitable round hole by GilbertoSilver Gunnerblog http://gunnerblog.com/?p=2815 Nicklas Bendtner has always been a divisive figure at Arsenal. For some fans, he represents a much-needed Plan B: powerfully built and good in the air, he provides an antidote to the tippy-tappy build-up we occasionally over-indulge in; a bulldozer in the box. Nicklas Bendtner 在 Arsenal 的定位很模糊。有的球迷認為他能帶來不可或缺的戰術B :強而有力的空霸,帶給過度拘泥於地面傳導戰術的我們另一種截然不同的進攻策略;就 像在禁區裡的推土機。 For others, he represents all that’s wrong with this Arsenal side: over-confident and seemingly lazy, his occasional outbursts in the press suggest a young man who would be better served by showing some humility and making the most of his limited ability. 對於另一方的球迷而言,只要他在 Arsenal 裡就是個錯誤:過度自信、看起來有點懶散, 時常地在媒體前表示感受,意味著年輕的他若再稍微謙虛一點、再強化自己有限的能力, 才會受到合理的對待。 The truth is probably somewhere in between. I think those who call Bendtner lazy are making a misjudgment. His bulk means that he’s never going to scamper about the pitch like a more sprightly player. However, he does get through a shift, especially when asked to play wide. Not many centre-forwards would chase back to support a full-back as often as Bendtner does. 實際上的答案可能就在兩者之間。我認為聲稱 Bendtner 懶散的人太過武斷了。高大的體 格就意味著,他不可能在球場上活躍地奔跑而成為輕盈快速的球員。然而,他還是能做出 跑動,特別是在邊鋒的位置時。沒有一個球員像 Bendtner 一樣,要這麼頻繁地回防來協 助後衛群。 When played through the middle, his ‘laziness’ is a misdiagnosis of something we rarely see at Arsenal: a desire to remain a focal point of the attack in and around the box. 只要過了中場,說他“懶散”絕對是嚴重的誤判,因為我們能在他身上看到的是:渴望 在禁區內外帶來進攻的威脅。 We have, of course, already stumbled upon the principle problem with Bendtner: his deployment in the wide positions, to which he is plainly unsuited. In fact, it’s one of the main reasons that the big man could be on the move this summer. Speaking to Danish TV station TV2, he said: 當然,我們無意中都能發現 Bendtner 的問題癥結所在:把他放在兩翼,完全格格不入。 事實上,這也是主要的理由使得這名高中鋒今夏可能離去。他接受丹麥電視台 TV2 訪問 “I need to have a talk with him [Wenger] because I’m not satisfied with playing on the right wing, which I’ve done more or less all season long. 『我必須和 教授 討論一下,因為我不太滿意被安排在右邊鋒的位置,就如過去或多或少 被安排必須如此。』 I’m concentrating on getting our Champions League place and then we’ll do the evaluation at the end of the season. 『我目前要專心地拼歐冠資格,之後到賽季末才會開始會談。』 It’s certainly not the best thing for me but it’s not up to me and sometimes you have to adapt to what the manager says.” 『這確實非我所擅長的但也輪不到我來決定,而且你得聽命於 教練 的指示。』 It’s unclear as to why Arsene chooses to play Bendtner wide. It doesn’t seem to be part of a developmental plan, as with Theo Walcott. Arsene is still insistent Theo will end up as a striker, and that playing on the wing is in part a ploy to teach him aspects of the game which will benefit him when he emerges from his right-flank cocoon as a serviceable centre-forward. 就連為什麼 教授 要把 Bendtner 放在邊鋒也同樣令人困惑。看起來不像是有計劃性的策 略,如同在 Theo Walcott 身上一樣。教授 仍堅持 Theo 會成為射手球員,而安排他在 邊鋒是為使他能掌握比賽的全貌而逐漸成長,且能從隱蔽的右邊鋒位置突然變成帶來致命 一擊的前鋒球員。 Bendtner, however, is a pure box player. He doesn’t have the pace to beat a man. He doesn’t have the skill to outfox a defender. What he does have is the power and presence to make a nuisance of himself and get on the end of crosses. That is his game. Relative to the rest of the squad, he lacks finesse. He is, whatever he may think, more Andy Carroll than Zlatan Ibrahimovic. 然而,Bendtner 只是個純禁區前鋒。他沒有速度的優勢,也沒有華麗的腳法來戲耍後衛。 他所有的是力量、帶給後衛壓迫感、以及接應傳中球。這才是他的優勢。和隊友們相比, 他沒有什麼技巧來對付敵人。無論他認為自己是什麼角色,他更像是 Andy Carroll 而非 Zlatan Ibraimovic。 That’s not to say he lacks ability. I’m always surprised that Bendtner is considered a bit of a joke by so many fans both within and outside the club. Perhaps that’s due to a couple of high profile misses, but his goalscoring record generally speaks for itself. Even this season, when he has struggled for form and fitness, he is a goal away from double figures. And that’s having made just 14 starts. 我不是要批評他缺少能力。我只是很訝異,無論是槍迷也好,足球迷也好,大部分都認為 他是個笑話。也許是因為倍受注目的失誤之故,但他還是用進球的事實來證明自己。即使 是努力復健才回到狀態的本季,他仍有 9球的進帳。記住,他才先發 14場而已。 So why does he find himself continually out of position? Simple: there are better players ahead of him. Many scoffed when Arsene identified Robin van Persie as the man to fill the lone striker role, but he has shown he has the ability to be devastatingly effective in that position. Crucially, he also has the immaculate first touch required to bring other players in to the game. Bendtner doesn’t, and our passing game can occasionally break down when he is employed as the focal point of the attack. 那麼,為什麼他不在正確的位置上呢?很簡單:有太多比他好的球員可以選。有人譏笑地 說,教授 盲目地認為只有 Robin van Persie 才能放在單前鋒的位置,但 RVP 卻有效率 地展現自己的得分能力。更殘酷的是,RVP 還有著超群的射門腳感。Bendtner 沒有,且 進攻傳球時,常常在他負責最關鍵一腳的時候就浪費掉了。 Essentially, he’s a square peg in a round hole. He’s a centre-forward in a team who doesn’t really cross the ball. And when they do cross it, it’s the 6’3” Bendtner doing the crossing. Deploying him on the flank might make sense if we were to launch raking cross-field passes on to his head. But that just isn’t our game. 基本上來說,他在陣容裡就是被犧牲的一環。他立身於一個不常禁區傳中的球隊裡,扮演 著高中鋒的角色。即使真的有禁區傳中球,也只有 6呎3吋 的 Bendtner 一個人能爭頂。 若是我們經常 45度斜向傳中球給他,在邊鋒位置的他才會有意義。但那不是我們的風格。 (暗示大本根本不該浪費在邊鋒位置,而是該好好地在禁區接球) For his own sake, it may well be time to move on. For Arsenal too, it makes sense. At 23, Bendtner is still a promising international striker who could command a decent fee. With Marouane Chamakh now in the squad, we have another striker who can be a threat in the air. We might be better off replacing Bendtner with a pacy forward who can run the channels - and, if really necessary, play wide. 就他自己的理由來說,或許是時候求去(離開)了。對 Arsenal 也是如此。23歲的Bendtner 依然是個有潛力的國家隊球員,也能爭取體面的轉會費。由於 Marouane Chamakh 已加盟 ,我們也有了一名空霸球員。我們或許會更滿意於,用 Bendtner 來換取擅長跑動的前鋒 ,若是真的有需要,並要求新球員能大範圍地移動。 Bendtner says if he could choose where to go it’d be Barcelona. I’d like to play for them too, mate, but it doesn’t make it any more likely to happen. If he wants to fulfill his potential - and, if you listen to him, he’s got plenty of it - he needs to go to a club where he’ll play regularly. I can see him doing well in the Bundesliga, or at a mid-level Premier League club like Newcastle, who certainly need a new number nine. Bendtner 說若能選擇加盟的球隊,他會選擇 Barca。傻孩子,我也想和他們踢球阿,但 那是不可能發生的。若想要發展他的潛力-若你有仔細聽他說,他已經聽過太多遍了-他 必須選擇能讓他經常上場的球隊。我能想像他在德甲有所表現,或者在英超的中游球隊如 :Newcastle,一個亟需新No.9 的球隊。(因為Carroll離開) Bendtner has the kind of personality that will enjoy proving his critics wrong, and I don’t doubt he’s capable of it. Just perhaps not at Arsenal. And certainly not on the wing. Bendtner 有著喜歡證實批評是錯誤的特質,我不懷疑他的本事。只是不會發生在Arsenal ,更不會在邊鋒的位置證實自己。 *************************************** 堅持 4-3-3,大本 勢必被犧牲... 但在一切都還不確定前(能否保住前三還是未知數), 也不太可能見到新的戰術策略,像是雙前鋒。 轉會消息實在擾人,可我們也很清楚 大本 目前的定位很模糊。 專心保住英超前三才是重點!!!(不然第四要踢歐冠資格賽太費力了) Goal! Goal! Arsenal! We r the Champions ! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.41.62.232

05/13 20:27, , 1F
如果要踢歐冠資格賽,那亞洲行要怎麼辦啊?還想說來亞洲
05/13 20:27, 1F

05/13 20:27, , 2F
撈點錢,讓溫格教授能運用多一點資金的,如果因為排名
05/13 20:27, 2F

05/13 20:27, , 3F
第四,而打亂一些計畫,那比失去冠軍還得不償失啊...。
05/13 20:27, 3F

05/13 20:47, , 4F
本來還在爭冠的 現在已經要保三了...
05/13 20:47, 4F

05/13 21:23, , 5F
我記得幾年前教授有解釋過為什麼是B52打邊鋒
05/13 21:23, 5F

05/13 21:23, , 6F
他說因為B52比R10還更願意回防.....
05/13 21:23, 6F

05/14 00:13, , 7F
不要打433不就有解了 多簡單
05/14 00:13, 7F

05/14 10:11, , 8F
不打433,小西的特點就不明顯了,魚與熊掌啊
05/14 10:11, 8F

05/14 10:57, , 9F
中場只剩兩個名額,中衛沒人,442不適合現在陣容...
05/14 10:57, 9F

05/14 11:05, , 10F
還是老問題,要陣還是要人
05/14 11:05, 10F

05/14 11:07, , 11F
433能帶來局部區域優勢,很適合控球型以地面傳導為主的球
05/14 11:07, 11F

05/14 11:08, , 12F
隊,442更多是體現球員個人持球或突破能力
05/14 11:08, 12F

05/14 11:10, , 13F
按照目前人員情況,433明顯要優於442,只好犧牲大本了
05/14 11:10, 13F

05/14 12:53, , 14F
大本的情況就像你要D.Howard去打控球後衛一樣..
05/14 12:53, 14F

05/14 13:14, , 15F
433不是不行,而是我們還沒有巴薩的球員陣容默契+技術
05/14 13:14, 15F

05/14 17:48, , 16F
選陣形是以自身得攻守平衡、以及隊內現有球員位置分佈衡量所
05/14 17:48, 16F

05/14 17:50, , 17F
做的取捨,一套陣形不同球隊本就有不同演繹,這跟巴薩默契技
05/14 17:50, 17F

05/14 17:51, , 18F
巧沒甚麼關係,阿森納球員在你說得這兩點上其實同樣非常傑出
05/14 17:51, 18F

05/14 17:53, , 19F
只是球隊幾個關鍵問題已經不是單純換442還是433就能解決,這
05/14 17:53, 19F

05/14 17:55, , 20F
一切的問題部長都可以解決。
05/14 17:55, 20F

05/14 17:55, , 21F
六年我們這兩個陣形各主踢過3年,另包含4411 451切換,但問
05/14 17:55, 21F

05/14 18:40, , 22F
...部長這個推文怎麼沒回應了....
05/14 18:40, 22F

05/14 18:41, , 23F
(接看看)題並不在陣型,而是在球員間的跑補位,對於槍
05/14 18:41, 23F

05/14 18:42, , 24F
手而言,跑位與持球分球才是球隊進攻的重點,陣型什麼的
05/14 18:42, 24F

05/14 18:43, , 25F
除非有特定戰術外,否則對於球隊的變化沒有那麼大。
05/14 18:43, 25F

05/14 18:44, , 26F
另外4411 451甚至433,其實後防的問題仍然在那,這問題
05/14 18:44, 26F

05/14 18:44, , 27F
仍需要教授去思考該怎麼樣透過轉會去彌補,陣容的變化
05/14 18:44, 27F

05/14 18:44, , 28F
也沒有辦法根本上的解決問題(我想部長的意思應該是降吧X
05/14 18:44, 28F

05/14 18:44, , 29F
D)
05/14 18:44, 29F

05/14 20:23, , 30F
題一直在陣容深度不夠、無法長久維持球員信心(關鍵出局),防
05/14 20:23, 30F

05/14 20:25, , 31F
守臨場準備不足等問題上反覆,第1點也許可用引援補足,第2點
05/14 20:25, 31F

05/14 20:30, , 32F
最難處理跟建議,第3點就是平時訓練練習方式或練習不足問題
05/14 20:30, 32F

05/14 20:42, , 33F
第4點就是領導力問題,很難具體同第2點最難處理。也或許教練
05/14 20:42, 33F

05/14 20:43, , 34F
團早已針對這些問題作改善,但情況就是一樣,那就是教練團需
05/14 20:43, 34F

05/14 20:43, , 35F
淚推部長
05/14 20:43, 35F

05/14 20:44, , 36F
要重新改組,不然Rice這幾季就不會一直被質疑,不然這幾季一
05/14 20:44, 36F

05/14 20:47, , 37F
就不會有一堆教授需要幫助得聲音。也或許問題一直就在教授身
05/14 20:47, 37F

05/14 20:48, , 38F
上,因為他過於理想化,不認為問題是問題。這點就沒辦法,除
05/14 20:48, 38F

05/14 20:50, , 39F
非上頭給壓力,或未來有新得教練成員幫忙教授改變某些固執
05/14 20:50, 39F

05/14 21:05, , 40F
總之,本季這當頭棒喝就是這麼痛,改變是註定得,等吧。至少
05/14 21:05, 40F

05/14 21:07, , 41F
目前為止,從教授發言看來最有心從1改善,那就足以保持期待
05/14 21:07, 41F

05/14 21:15, , 42F
Rice本季結束不是要退休了嘛?接任的人選有?
05/14 21:15, 42F

05/14 21:17, , 43F
傳聞只有兩位,u18主帥Steve Bould 跟 明古屋鯨巴主帥
05/14 21:17, 43F

05/14 21:20, , 44F
最近體週專訪老皮也有不少建議 http://tinyurl.com/3mh9dy5
05/14 21:20, 44F

05/14 22:57, , 45F
1是最主要的原因吧 背後的原因是$$?
05/14 22:57, 45F

05/15 11:14, , 46F
今天新聞Rice又要留任了
05/15 11:14, 46F

05/15 12:06, , 47F
Rice不是只扮演吉祥物的角色嗎?
05/15 12:06, 47F

05/15 22:26, , 48F
今晚藥水首發!!!
05/15 22:26, 48F
文章代碼(AID): #1DpHZlzM (Arsenal)
文章代碼(AID): #1DpHZlzM (Arsenal)