Re: [討論] 判例討論 (第一題答案勘誤!!)
: 1.檢查員判A4帶球走或出界，約在同時，A4投籃，或裁判員判B5向A6 犯規
: ANS：
由於superpitz的提醒，更正第一題解答的錯誤...
根據國際籃球規則詮譯2002 (Interpretation_2000)
裡面提到一個情況與此判例相類似
Situation: A4 commits a travelling violation. Before a team B player
has the ball at his disposal for the throw-in, B5 fouls A5
and this is team B's 5th foul.
(情況：A4發生帶球走步違例。在B隊球員擲界外球可處理前，B5對A5犯規，
這是B隊第五次全隊犯規。)
Interpretation:B5's foul is not penalised with two free throws as team B
was entitled to control of the ball at the same moment B5
committed the foul. The rights for throw-in by both teams
cancel each other, therefore the game is resumed with a
jump ball.
(解釋：因為在B5發生發生犯規的同一時刻，B隊已經有控球權，B5的犯規不處予
兩次罰球。雙方權利抵銷，比賽以跳球重新開始。)
故問題一，最終判決以跳球重新開始
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 218.184.196.204
推
推 140.112.243.7 05/20, , 1F
推 140.112.243.7 05/20, 1F
BASKET-RULES 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
