Re: [問題] 請教一個回場的問題

看板BASKET-RULES作者MILD8 (八星)時間16年前 (2009/06/25 15:31)推噓2(2推 0噓 5→)

留言7則, 2人參與討論串3/3 (看更多)

: 推 egg1225:原PO謝啦不過我還是有個疑問因為上一篇的原PO是說 06/25 15:08 : → egg1225:球從後場發出而A2從前場跳回後場在空中接到球 06/25 15:10 : → egg1225:這樣算不算是這條的例外那一款啊??? 06/25 15:10 : → egg1225:有點被搞混了= =" 06/25 15:11 回場違例，因球隊控制球始終為A隊。例外只限於在空中建立"新的"球隊控制球，即球權。附上FIBA 2008規則註釋，各位可以比較例1和例3的差異: Example 1: A4 in team A’s backcourt attempts a fast break pass to A5 in team A’s frontcourt. B3, in team B’s frontcourt (team A’s backcourt) jumps and intercepts(抄截) the pass while still airborne, after which B3 lands (a) With both feet in the team B backcourt. (b) Straddling(跨立) the centre line. Interpretation: No violation has occurred. When B3 established the first team control for team B while airborne, B3’s position relative to frontcourt/backcourt was not established until both of B3’s feet returned to the floor. In both (a) and (b), B3 is now considered to be legally in the team B backcourt. (a)與(b)均無回場違例，因球隊控制球原為A隊，B3在空中建立新的球隊控制球(球權)，其位置須待其雙腳落回地面始可判定。 Example 3: Thrower-in A4, in the team A frontcourt, attempts to pass the ball to A3. A3 jumps into the air, gains control of the ball and returns to the floor (a) With both feet in the team B backcourt. (b) Straddling the centre line. Interpretation: Team control in the frontcourt has already been established before A3 gained control of the ball while airborne. In both (a) and (b), a violation has occurred by illegally returning the ball to the backcourt. (a)與(b)均為回場違例，因球隊控制球並未改變，A3由前場起跳於空中接獲傳球，此時便視為球已進入前場，A3持球落於後場(包含跨立於中線)，便構成回場違例。 -- ζ 到了最後在身邊的只剩菸跟影子.. ξ -● http://www.wretch.cc/blog/MILD8 ν) √■＿ˍ▁▂▃▄▄▃ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.170.183.43