[外電] Nate on the Point Guides

看板BLAZERS (波特蘭 拓荒者)作者 (目標:季後賽我來啦)時間17年前 (2008/11/05 12:43), 編輯推噓8(8012)
留言20則, 8人參與, 7年前最新討論串1/1
http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/11/4/653849/tom-penn-s-black-eye-will I talked with Coach briefly about how things are progressing at the 1. One thing I have noticed about Nate is that he is always very careful to back his point guards. This was most obvious with Jack last year but noticeable already this year as well. Generally Nate backs all of his players, but I sense that he is even more careful to do so with point guards. I asked simply, "How would you assess the point guard play after 3 games?" and Nate gave me a look like he was kind of surprised I was asking that. He said, all things considered, it was pretty solid. Nate had talked earlier about how Brandon faced very tough matchups in the first 3 games and I asked whether he thought Blake had it even tougher than Brandon. Nate agreed that Blake probably had it as bad or worse than Brandon, facing Fischer, Parker and Nash -- and, importantly, 3 well-oiled offensive systems. Areas for the point guards to work on are "controlling the ball" and "working on establishing the role of the point guard in the offense." It's a little bit unclear to me what he means by the second point. Does he want a more proactive point guard that doesn't just turn things over to Brandon? Does he simply want better ball movement, something that a point guard can help develop? Something else? It wasn't clear. Nate said that it's still "very early" and, with new faces on the roster, they still need "to learn about each other." Roster turnover is arguably trickiest for the point guard to deal with. He needs to catalogue his teammates' tendencies, where they like the ball, when they like the ball, where they will float to, how they will run through picks. In my opinion, Blake has not looked good, at all, but perhaps roster turnover provides an explanation. I asked Nate about how the backup spot is evolving. He backed Sergio. I asked him how fans should read Sergio's variable playing time. Nate went back to the idea that it's early and he's taking a look at different groups of players. I asked him about what the ideal role for a backup point guard will be this season, when we face off against playoff teams down the stretch and Martell is back healthy. Nate said pretty flatly "10 minutes" and that his priorities are continuity/consistency in the starting lineup, plenty of minutes for Rudy, and plenty of minutes for Travis. Bad news for Bayless. Not great news for Sergio. -- Nate想的果然跟我相反,養新人PG那麼在意失誤,那難怪Sergio和Bayless 打球都這麼小心翼翼,這樣會扼殺他們的活力的 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 221.169.172.177

11/05 12:44, , 1F
也難怪blake先發地位不動如山啦。哈哈
11/05 12:44, 1F

11/05 13:15, , 2F
不太喜歡這樣子的發展阿~~~~ 這樣跟KP想得不太一樣吧
11/05 13:15, 2F

11/05 15:04, , 3F
難怪blake的先發位置那麼穩...可是他不是答案阿
11/05 15:04, 3F

11/05 15:23, , 4F
[看來不弄個大牌後衛Nate~就還是繼續看BLAKE先發了
11/05 15:23, 4F

11/05 19:04, , 5F
從第二段來看,Nate是認為Blake前三場會碰上麻煩
11/05 19:04, 5F

11/05 19:05, , 6F
主要在於三隊水銀洩地盤的攻擊系統 (非戰之罪?zz)
11/05 19:05, 6F

11/05 19:06, , 7F
Nate認為現在賽季還早,他還在觀察不同的球員組合
11/05 19:06, 7F

11/05 19:09, , 8F
他認為roster(Bayless?)還需要多記住隊友打球的習慣
11/05 19:09, 8F

11/05 19:11, , 9F
往好處想是可以保護Bayless,讓他多熟悉不要因失誤多喪失
11/05 19:11, 9F

11/05 19:12, , 10F
自信....不過這樣看來 11月應該PG都會保持目前這樣的輪替
11/05 19:12, 10F

11/05 19:15, , 11F
然後11月我們的PG還要碰到Deron*1 Nash*1 Paul*2
11/05 19:15, 11F

11/05 19:16, , 12F
狀元Rose也會碰到一次,12/1會對上A.I.~ 一整個歡樂 orz
11/05 19:16, 12F

11/05 19:34, , 13F
太保守了吧,馬刺養Parker還不是放他在場上衝
11/05 19:34, 13F

11/05 19:35, , 14F
人家可是冠軍隊,拓荒者應該更有耐心練新人吧
11/05 19:35, 14F

11/05 22:49, , 15F
馬刺99/00年第一輪,00/01年第三輪,01選parker@28th
11/05 22:49, 15F

11/05 23:00, , 16F
01/02年第二輪(應該),02/03年冠軍
11/05 23:00, 16F

11/05 23:01, , 17F
嗯..我想說的是 馬刺養parker的時候也不是冠軍隊就是了XD
11/05 23:01, 17F

11/06 01:16, , 18F
03冠軍賽Parker被罵翻,那時還是在養阿
11/06 01:16, 18F

12/11 05:21, 7年前 , 19F
然後11月我們的PG還 https://daxiv.com
12/11 05:21, 19F

04/20 03:06, 7年前 , 20F
[看來不弄個大牌後衛N http://yaxiv.com
04/20 03:06, 20F
文章代碼(AID): #194IHSL7 (BLAZERS)
文章代碼(AID): #194IHSL7 (BLAZERS)