[外電]我們對DeJuan Blair有興趣?

看板BLAZERS (波特蘭 拓荒者)作者 (CHUNGHUA)時間13年前 (2013/02/12 20:14), 編輯推噓12(12029)
留言41則, 10人參與, 最新討論串1/1
大過年的難得有我們的乳摸,想說來PO文一下好了XD 原文網址如下 http://ppt.cc/QCma Broussard: Blazers Interested In Spurs F DeJuan Blair? Chris Broussard of ESPN.com reports on Twitter that the Portland Trail Blazers could have interest in San Antonio Spurs forward DeJuan Blair. Will San Antonio finally part with DeJuan Blair? Word is he could be gone before 2/21. San Antonio talked with Toronto weeks ago but nothing brewing now. San Antonio offered DeJuan Blair to Detroit but nothing. Hear Boston, Miami, Portland could have interest. Back in December, Blazers GM Neil Olshey said in a radio interview that his team could look to add rebounding help at the deadline or in the summer. Blair, 23, is averaging 5.3 points and 3.9 rebounds per game in 13.9 minutes in 38 appearances this season. Blair was a 2009 second-round pick who was red flagged because he has, um, unusual knees. The Blazers passed on Blair three times. At the time, then Blazers coach Nate McMillan told Blazersedge that Portland "didn't have Blair on our board. We thought he would be gone." Kevin Pelton of ESPN.com (Insider) writes that Blair is a good "buy low" target... As silly as the notion of "showcasing" players sounds, the psychological impact of the recency effect suggests it makes sense to make the last impression of a player on the block a positive one. Showcasing a bad player won't work, but feeding minutes to a trade candidate buried on the bench is perfectly sensible because most players perform better with regular playing time. Blair is a perfect example. He's been in and out of the rotation all season, which has made it difficult for him to live up to his track record of solid production in terms of points, rebounds and high-percentage shooting. Given heavy minutes the next couple of weeks, Blair easily could come up with a couple of double-doubles to tempt teams looking to shore up their frontcourt for the stretch run. 大意: 我們與老賽及熱火是對Blair有興趣的三支球隊之一,而GM Neil Olshey在接受電台 採訪時,想在交易截止日截止日前或是今年夏天FA市場為球隊找來能幫助籃板球的 球員 各位看官們,你們怎麼看??? 然後Blazer's edge的主編之一Dave在這乳摸出來後有發表一篇文章 http://ppt.cc/s086 Trade Rumors: The Blazers, The Spurs, and the Dance for Free Agents 這篇文章有指出,Blair應該適合我們,但如果交易他來,他會影響到我們下季的薪資 空間,但Dave有提到,我們可以交易Freeland(!!!)到馬刺,因為Freeland下季的薪水 是2.9M,如果交易他,我們會增加將近3M的空間,然後我們可以開9~10M左右的OFFER 搶Splitter,考量到馬刺可能沒多少空間可以留下他,如果說9~10M可以搶到Splitter ,而剩下的5M左右空間就可以好好補強板凳,如果以原本的13.5M薪資空間,一旦開 9~10M的空間搶Splitter或是其他不錯的球員,那麼剩下的3.5M就不容易補強板凳了 所以他認為Freeland是個重要的關鍵... 各位看官們,你們又怎麼看呢??? 我個人私心不要交易Freeland阿... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.141.176.2

02/12 21:04, , 1F
要先想想Splitter值不值這個價碼
02/12 21:04, 1F

02/12 21:10, , 2F
Freeland是芬蘭來的那個吧..我也覺得不要交易..這樣國際
02/12 21:10, 2F

02/12 21:10, , 3F
我喜歡的程度當然是Freeland最高
02/12 21:10, 3F

02/12 21:10, , 4F
球員會不會都不想來阿拓...來了感覺上都不被重用
02/12 21:10, 4F

02/12 21:10, , 5F
但是如果可以不丟Freeland有辦法得到Blair那也不錯
02/12 21:10, 5F

02/12 21:12, , 6F
Freeland是英國啦 只是名字像芬蘭XD
02/12 21:12, 6F

02/12 22:27, , 7F
Splitter值不值得這價碼我是不清楚,不過現在這市場禁區
02/12 22:27, 7F

02/12 22:29, , 8F
球員價格普遍偏高,不過還是很希望Freeland能爭氣點證明
02/12 22:29, 8F

02/12 22:30, , 9F
06年KP用第一輪選一個名不見經傳的英國小子是對的
02/12 22:30, 9F

02/12 22:41, , 10F
芬蘭那隻是Koponen
02/12 22:41, 10F

02/12 22:45, , 11F
現在簽約權在小牛那裡
02/12 22:45, 11F

02/12 23:03, , 12F
不過Blair的防守實在也是並不怎麼樣,外加又不高...
02/12 23:03, 12F

02/12 23:28, , 13F
首相完全是弱化板的JJ 連中距離都沒有 千萬不要...
02/12 23:28, 13F

02/12 23:29, , 14F
感覺像是下一季JJ可能太貴,所以找籃板能力也不錯且價碼相
02/12 23:29, 14F

02/12 23:30, , 15F
對低很多的Blair來,彌補下季JJ留不住的缺....
02/12 23:30, 15F

02/13 01:13, , 16F
JJ 太貴~的話~我是覺得可以先簽後換...
02/13 01:13, 16F

02/13 01:14, , 17F
或是就直接練 Leonard和Freeland 然後FA找1,3號替補..
02/13 01:14, 17F

02/13 03:00, , 18F
要Blair不如留JJ,完全弱化版跟原本說換JJ希望拿七呎C不同
02/13 03:00, 18F

02/13 03:00, , 19F
另外剔牙哥是可考慮 但是價格如上也太貴....
02/13 03:00, 19F

02/13 03:05, , 20F
另外Blair到期約 FA再拿就好 真要薪資空間3M可換別人
02/13 03:05, 20F

02/13 03:07, , 21F
JJ去留就暑假再說了 首相則FA再拿 不得已要省薪資Freeland
02/13 03:07, 21F

02/13 03:09, , 22F
可拿去換籃網的M. Brooks之類的到期約 可留或者清薪資
02/13 03:09, 22F

02/13 21:41, , 23F
我是覺得想要Blair的用意倒不是要取代JJ,Blair不是先發
02/13 21:41, 23F

02/13 21:42, , 24F
的料,想要他應該有像當初GM在快艇時簽下R.Evens當板凳
02/13 21:42, 24F

02/13 21:43, , 25F
籃板癡漢,但進攻有好一點的,我們先發還是需要一個7呎
02/13 21:43, 25F

02/13 21:43, , 26F
大個
02/13 21:43, 26F

02/14 02:12, , 27F
Blair籃板也還好阿...寧願要Freeland或者Leonard
02/14 02:12, 27F

02/14 23:11, , 28F
用千萬搶Splitter 代表千萬留不下JJ嗎? JJ行情好成這樣?
02/14 23:11, 28F

02/15 08:30, , 29F
q大~Blair剛進馬刺的前2年打先發C籃板很猛的,但這2年可
02/15 08:30, 29F

02/15 08:32, , 30F
能資質到頂了外加達不到波波的要求,然後馬刺找來屌爺後
02/15 08:32, 30F

02/15 08:32, , 31F
就被冰了,另外第二篇外電的作者並不是説要拿Freeland去
02/15 08:32, 31F

02/15 08:33, , 32F
跟Blair交換,而是他認為如果把Freeland交易出去可以清出
02/15 08:33, 32F

02/15 08:35, , 33F
將近3M的新資空間,這樣對於下季的補強空間也比較大
02/15 08:35, 33F

02/15 08:36, , 34F
d大~我想並不是説JJ行情好到千萬也簽不下來,我們有大鳥
02/15 08:36, 34F

02/15 08:38, , 35F
這優勢,只要肯花大錢是一定留的下來,但重點在於現在這
02/15 08:38, 35F

02/15 08:39, , 36F
些外電記者+我們的制服組甚至於AGG都認為球隊需要找個7呎
02/15 08:39, 36F

02/15 08:40, , 37F
的先發C,那麼80%~90%得打替補的JJ要用多少錢留下來?
02/15 08:40, 37F

02/15 08:42, , 38F
在來,或許是因為合約年想拼大約所以JJ願意打C,但如果
02/15 08:42, 38F

02/15 08:43, , 39F
已經拿到複數年合約的JJ是否還願意打C?JJ接受訪問時都説
02/15 08:43, 39F

02/15 08:46, , 40F
他天生是打4號的,所以要不要留JJ,然後價碼多少是否合理
02/15 08:46, 40F

02/15 08:46, , 41F
我想是現在制服組在評估的
02/15 08:46, 41F
文章代碼(AID): #1H6Z9195 (BLAZERS)
文章代碼(AID): #1H6Z9195 (BLAZERS)