[閒聊] 今日討論區最火話題

看板Cavaliers (克里夫蘭騎士)作者scsa1001 (Wayne5)時間19年前 (2005/08/24 15:22)推噓5(5推 0噓 0→)

留言5則, 4人參與討論串1/1

Dickau, Watson, Payton, Jones, Pargo, etc... None of these guys are good enough to get us to the promised land.We know we need a PG,but why waste a few million on one of these scrubs and have to keep him around for the next 3 or 4 years? We may win a few more games next year with one of these guys,but so what? If i were Ferry,I wound wait this one out,go with what we can at PG,and try to get one or two more solid bench players taht can contribute for the next 2 or 3 years. I think most everyone agrees that the Cavs are still two or three years away, so why rush the PG position when we are solid at the other 4?There are always better players available at the trade deadlines and Im sure some guys will be available the next off season. Just an opnion, these guys are band-aids, and are not long term solutions. 在我們汲汲營營要找PG的同時,我看到了一個新鮮的觀點有一句話我覺得很關鍵 "在交易截止日前總是會有更好的選擇的" Snow也不是說如此的不堪用如果真的沒有非常適合的PG,不妨就將就將就用一下Snow吧! 就像是騎驢找馬的感覺在尋找交易的機會因為我覺得現在市面上的幾位PG都不是很好的answer 每個都有明顯的缺點不過話又說回來不找PG那又要找什麼呢? 我們還需要哪一個位置的替補嗎 2.3.4號的球員都足夠了現在也只差1號5號的球員要補了而且說真的騎士戰績上的壓力也滿大的今年再沒打好的話,LeBron約滿搞不好就走人了這樣看起來早一個稱職的PG也是有其急迫性的那到底要不要找PG?who? 提供一個觀點給大家參考參考 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.56.133.7 ※ 編輯: scsa1001 來自: 61.56.133.7 (08/24 15:49)