Re: [外電] 一篇關於船長為啥最後沒有到騎士的內線 …
看板Cavaliers (克里夫蘭 騎士)作者arenasis (Mr.Vengeance)時間16年前 (2009/11/17 09:07)推噓12(12推 0噓 12→)留言24則, 9人參與討論串1/1
※ 引述《kart (=\)》之銘言:
: 不知道多少人有權限看這篇文章
: 不過還是貼出link來
那個...在台灣大概沒什麼人會願意付錢看ESPN專欄XD
不過RCF總是有好人會付錢貼給大家看,而且如果我沒算錯,k兄看到的是新編
版本,Hollinger又重寫過一次。
那最早的版本中,他推想什麼呢?
Charlotte didn't outbid Cleveland; ergo I believe Cleveland decided it
didn't want to do this trade. And to me, the biggest reason they'd say
no is because they're concerned that LeBron James might walk after this
season. In that scenario, Jackson moves from "final piece of the puzzle"
to "salary cap millstone," effectively preventing the Cavs from having
the cap space to sign a replacement for James should he bolt next summe
r.
There may be other issues here, obviously -- maybe they were just freaked
out by Jackson's persona, or thought he'd dominate the ball too much, or
didn't think he could guard 2s. Any of those reasons might be valid.
But with Jackson now headed to Charlotte after Cleveland seemingly balked
at acquiring him, it's now a fair question to ask: Are the Cavs so worried
about LeBron leaving that they need to keep their options open?
1.他"個人認為"騎士籌碼超過山貓,所以不促成交易是騎士制服組的決定。因為必
須替LBJ可能本季結束離隊做打算,一旦LBJ離隊,船長的薪水將是騎士最難清掉的
(約很長),會影響騎士續簽一個頂替LBJ掛投牌的球星。
2.最後他問:騎士真的擔心LBJ離隊擔心到要對這筆交易搖擺不定,以致打退堂鼓
來欲留後路嗎?
=========================================================================
照這種邏輯,那我可以說用長約續簽Varejao,是騎士早就掌握LBJ會續約無誤,並
把大V列為陪伴皇帝長期打拼的主要班底的動作嗎?
明年薪資空間預期的緊縮,讓很多支原本盤算先招攬LBJ,再簽一位A咖跟他搭配的
隊伍都夢碎了(我知道熱火還是可以)。但也別忘記騎士原先也希望續約LBJ再找
Bosh或鷹王來助拳,同樣也幾乎別肖想,薪資上限是公平的。如果說"LBJ一走,船
長薪資很難清",這是對的,但扯到影響騎士再找一位球星,這就過度推論了。假設
今天騎士促成交易,文章內容就會講騎士為留LBJ,不惜鋌而走險、孤注一擲...不
拉不拉的。
Hollinger後來大概知道自己寫的有點鳥,新編版刪去以上的敘述,只留下一句。
None of that, however, answers our biggest question about this trade: Why
is Jackson heading to Charlotte instead of Cleveland?
=========================================================================
: 我個人是認為當成花絮看看,不過我當初是贊成換來船長的
: 我覺得二三號位置多一個搖擺人可得分又有高度可防守是奪冠需要的
: 不管魔術湖人或是Boston這個位置上都是若干高個
: 我們雖然有這個位置上最強的LBJ,不過也不能一個當兩個用
: 雖然交易走West可能破壞掉Chemistry,不過既然想要奪冠
: 一些risk是該要take的~ 何況West現在真是狀況一片模糊....Orz
: 想想如果有LBJ和船長,還會怕阿泰和摳鼻,包皮和雷槍
: 或是兩千萬和卡特嘛?但是West就沒辦法,雖然West有West的功用
我是可換可不換,如果今天是交易大限,船長又是騎士再談判的最大交易對象,
我就希望騎士把他弄來。目前騎士仍然保存所有籌碼,假設交易大限後爆出制
服組又為了化學效應之類的理由,錯過盤來好手的機會,再批評Ferry也不遲。
值得一提的是,這次RCF的網友對船長交易是壁壘分明的兩派。很多人對West已
經抱持不安或甚至不滿,之所以沒很大爭議,只因交易的主角船長不是個非常吸
引人的角色,而且球隊戰績還算上軌道。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.70.15
推
11/17 09:20, , 1F
11/17 09:20, 1F
推
11/17 10:09, , 2F
11/17 10:09, 2F
推
11/17 11:04, , 3F
11/17 11:04, 3F
推
11/17 16:30, , 4F
11/17 16:30, 4F
推
11/17 17:29, , 5F
11/17 17:29, 5F
→
11/17 17:34, , 6F
11/17 17:34, 6F
→
11/17 17:34, , 7F
11/17 17:34, 7F
→
11/17 17:35, , 8F
11/17 17:35, 8F
→
11/17 17:36, , 9F
11/17 17:36, 9F
推
11/17 17:36, , 10F
11/17 17:36, 10F
→
11/17 17:37, , 11F
11/17 17:37, 11F
→
11/17 17:37, , 12F
11/17 17:37, 12F
→
11/17 17:37, , 13F
11/17 17:37, 13F
→
11/17 17:38, , 14F
11/17 17:38, 14F
→
11/17 17:40, , 15F
11/17 17:40, 15F
→
11/17 17:42, , 16F
11/17 17:42, 16F
→
11/17 17:54, , 17F
11/17 17:54, 17F
→
11/17 17:55, , 18F
11/17 17:55, 18F
推
11/17 18:36, , 19F
11/17 18:36, 19F
推
11/17 18:37, , 20F
11/17 18:37, 20F
推
11/17 18:59, , 21F
11/17 18:59, 21F
推
11/17 20:23, , 22F
11/17 20:23, 22F
推
11/17 23:15, , 23F
11/17 23:15, 23F
推
11/18 01:57, , 24F
11/18 01:57, 24F
Cavaliers 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
320
700