[外電] Sources: Marbury, Celtics interested …

看板Celtics (波士頓 塞爾提克)作者 (巴拉圭)時間17年前 (2009/01/02 19:13), 編輯推噓21(21082)
留言103則, 16人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Source: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3804977 ********************************************************************** Sources: Marbury, Celtics interested in deal By Marc Stein ESPN.com (Updated: January 1, 2009, 11:43 PM ET) ********************************************************************** Nearly one year since Stephon Marbury last played in a regular-season game, signals are getting stronger that the New York Knicks' outcast will eventually make his comeback with the Boston Celtics. 距離馬大少最後一次站在球場上,算算也快一年了,不過這幾天最新的傳聞,莫過於 馬大少即將有可能加入超賽。 That still depends largely on Marbury's ability to negotiate his release from the Knicks after weeks of fruitless and oft-contentious buyout talks, but sources with knowledge of the situation told ESPN.com this week that Boston is Marbury's preferred destination if he manages to become a free agent and that the Celtics are indeed hopeful of signing him. 經過最近許多有關馬大少與尼克高層的談判,這一切還要看馬大少是否有辦法說服尼克 高層。但根據這禮拜的ESPN報導,表示說馬大少最有可能的下一站,便是超賽。前提當然 包括他是否可以成為自由球員,或是超賽願不願意簽他。 Celtics general manager Danny Ainge did not immediately respond to a request for comment on a New Year's Day holiday for the entire league and has generally refused to address the possibility of signing Marbury. Yet it's believed that the Celtics' concerns about their depth, after losing James Posey and P.J. Brown from last season's title team, have swelled noticeably since they followed up the best 29-game start in NBA history at 27-2 by losing three of the next four games on the road. 超賽總理AINGE並沒有出面回應此說法,也拒絕表示任何有關馬大少的交易。但是自失去 去年戰將POSEY與BROWN後,超賽這一季雖然開季29場贏了27場,只輸兩場。但自從前29場 後,他們接下的四場球賽,卻輸了三場。 With Brown telling the New Orleans Times-Picayune on Wednesday that he is "officially retired" and Dikembe Mutombo having re-signed earlier this week with the Houston Rockets, Marbury easily ranks as the most accomplished low-cost veteran that the Celtics can add to their bench in-season. Boston also knows it would have the option to simply release Marbury without significant salary-cap consequences if he fails to click as a backup or proves unwilling to accept a secondary role. 當BROWN向紐澳良宣布他的退休與木桶伯加入火箭後,馬大少卻是一個有經驗的老將, 可以補強超賽的板凳,主要還是覺得若馬大少若無法有所貢獻,超賽高層有權把馬大少 放掉。 It appears that the biggest obstacle to such a move is Marbury actually securing a buyout from the Knicks in a timely fashion as opposed to reservations Boston might have about Marbury's impact on team chemistry. 看來目前最難的地方還是馬大少要如何解決他與尼克間的談判。 Although it has been widely assumed that Celtics forward Kevin Garnett would resist a reunion with the controversial point guard -- after Marbury broke up their Minnesota parternship in less than three seasons together by forcing a trade to New Jersey -- one Celtics source insists that Garnett has voiced no opposition to the idea of signing Marbury for the rest of the season to strengthen Boston's backcourt depth behind starters Rajon Rondo and Ray Allen. When asked specifically about the likelihood of Marbury joining the Celtics this season, the source predicted that "it will happen." Joining the NBA's reigning champions would certainly back up Marbury's recent claim at halftime of a Knicks-Lakers game in Los Angeles that "the team I'm going to go to, a lot of people will be shocked." The 31-year-old hasn't officially played for New York since Jan. 11 of last season and began this season on the inactive list while awaiting a buyout. Marbury was then barred from contact with the team in late November after a dispute over Knicks coach Mike D'Antoni's offering him the chance to start playing again following the Knicks' two trades on Nov. 21, which left them short of available players. The Celtics lack size more than anything off the bench, which should explain their interest in Brown and Mutombo. But Marbury -- when he's right -- is a proven scoring threat who can also handle pressure on the ball, freeing up Eddie House to focus on his preferred role of designated shooter. The Celtics also clearly have the strong team culture -- with Garnett, Paul Pierce, Ray Allen and coach Doc Rivers -- to take on the various challenges of a Marbury dice roll. "All the people who say nobody wants me on their team, [that] I'm all different things -- a cancer -- that's not what's going on," Marbury said at the game in L.A. earlier this month when surrounded by reporters. One source close to Marbury cautioned that it would be premature to say that he's narrowed his wish list down to the Celtics, but one Western Conference executive said of the notion that Marbury is Boston-bound: "I've heard the exact same thing." The fact remains, though, that Marbury has to extricate himself from the Knicks before he can make any firm future plans. Media outlets in New York have reported in recent days that Knicks president Donnie Walsh is planning to seriously rekindle buyout talks now that the calendar has flipped to 2009, but one theory in circulation holds that the Knicks have dragged out Marbury's release this long in part because they don't want to see him wind up as a contributor in a championship race with a team from the same division. The Celtics have also yet to make either of their two scheduled regular-season visits to Madison Square Garden. The first is Sunday and the second is Feb. 6. In buyout negotiations to date, Marbury has refused to surrender more than $1 million of his $20.8 million salary and, at last report, was no longer offering to give back that much. The Knicks have reportedly asked Marbury to give up at least $3 million for the right to choose his next team, although they could be moved to lower those demands if a trade materializes that requires New York to open Marbury's roster spot. Assuming that Marbury does eventually secure a buyout from the Knicks, it would appear that his options are scarce should the Celtics ultimately decide not to take the gamble. Orlando and Phoenix are among the top teams needing guard help which have publicly declared their intent to steer clear of Marbury. Miami is often mentioned as a possible destination, but the luxury-tax implications from signing Marbury and the Heat's status as a rebuilding team make it a questionable fit. It is unclear whether the Los Angeles Lakers -- who recently lost backup point guard Jordan Farmar until mid-February at the earliest because of knee surgery -- would be a Marbury bidder. ESPN.com reported in mid-November that Dallas planned to investigate the possibility of signing Marbury if he became available -- with Mavericks owner Mark Cuban and Marbury having built a casual friendship over the years -- but that was before J.J. Barea emerged as a reliable contributor off the Mavs' bench. Club sources, meanwhile, have maintained from the start that the Mavs would likely pass on the tricky prospect of bringing in Marbury to back up Jason Kidd, given what happened after those two were traded for each other in the summer of 2001. Kidd led New Jersey to back-to-back appearances in the NBA Finals in 2002 and 2003; Marbury experienced only moderate success in 2½ seasons with Phoenix before a 2004 trade to the Knicks which has delivered little beyond a steadily deteriorating relationship with his hometown team. In a first-person weblog entry for the New York Post on Wednesday, Marbury discussed his ongoing exile from the Knicks. "People who know me know I'm in the best shape of my life," Marbury wrote. ". . . Bottom line, I came to camp with the right attitude, in shape and ready to play. I didn't come to be a distraction. "I didn't want to be a distraction for the team first and me second. I honestly came to help the team win. Real talk. I was willing to put in the work necessary to earn my starting spot and humble enough to accept coming off of the bench. "It was unfortunate that the coach wanted to go in a different direction and didn't want me to be part of the team. I just wish it had been handled correctly from jump. I could understand the fact they didn't want Chris Duhon looking over his shoulder, but if you don't want me just pay me and let me go. I just want to play basketball." -- Only the strong survive- Iverson ═█┘     W ● ●︵ ● ●)) <\ / \\ />>/ ╲> >> ========= http://www.wretch.cc/blog/AWEI3 ========= -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.71.2.41 ※ 編輯: Paraguay 來自: 219.71.2.41 (01/02 19:21)

01/02 19:22, , 1F
是有一定風險...但是呢 這也是不錯的方法啊
01/02 19:22, 1F

01/02 19:22, , 2F
既期待又怕受傷害
01/02 19:22, 2F

01/02 19:22, , 3F
就像阿泰加盟火箭後....沒鬧過什麼問題啊
01/02 19:22, 3F

01/02 19:23, , 4F
所以若要加入...就要先好好溝通..@@
01/02 19:23, 4F

01/02 19:24, , 5F
除非他真的想消失在球場...否則以現在的狀況而言
01/02 19:24, 5F

01/02 19:25, , 6F
是他只能想打球 而不是他可以鬧啤氣的時候 科科
01/02 19:25, 6F

01/02 19:48, , 7F
我覺得只要尼克將他釋出 我們就會簽他= =
01/02 19:48, 7F

01/02 19:48, , 8F
我比較擔心的是他的打球風格...
01/02 19:48, 8F

01/02 19:54, , 9F
所以這張照片的組合要重聚了嗎? http://0rz.tw/965h2
01/02 19:54, 9F

01/02 20:10, , 10F
本來覺的 它會稿壞球隊 但是想想 他可以和失誤allen
01/02 20:10, 10F

01/02 20:11, , 11F
一起組成替補亂幹球大隊 也不錯 替補除了失誤allen
01/02 20:11, 11F

01/02 20:11, , 12F
真的沒有一個有獨自取分能力
01/02 20:11, 12F

01/02 20:12, , 13F
我怎麼覺得walker還比較有用?
01/02 20:12, 13F

01/02 20:12, , 14F
且marbury 又有很強的助攻能力
01/02 20:12, 14F

01/02 20:13, , 15F
可以把powe的得分能力發揮在最高點
01/02 20:13, 15F

01/02 20:13, , 16F
就怕他不傳球....Y
01/02 20:13, 16F

01/02 20:18, , 17F
一場有七次以上 應該是很會傳球.....
01/02 20:18, 17F

01/02 20:19, , 18F
不然 賽隊 替補中真的沒一個有自己的得分能力
01/02 20:19, 18F

01/02 20:36, , 19F
如果價錢問題不用celtics負擔太多 那來了算是好事
01/02 20:36, 19F

01/02 20:37, , 20F
celtics現在還滿依賴Rondo 要是他受傷確實會影響大局
01/02 20:37, 20F

01/02 20:40, , 21F
我們是垂涎他的進攻~助攻次數是也挺多的~
01/02 20:40, 21F

01/02 20:40, , 22F
要是成真 就只缺中鋒小前鋒的破洞了 加油安吉
01/02 20:40, 22F

01/02 20:41, , 23F
我覺得能先補油漆區的還是先補比較好...
01/02 20:41, 23F

01/02 20:50, , 24F
價錢不說..他能來也不錯啊,光是替補pg就補上太多了
01/02 20:50, 24F

01/02 20:57, , 25F
隊上有四個歐死踏 戰力真的很可觀
01/02 20:57, 25F

01/02 21:03, , 26F
老實說會覺得marbury不傳球應該有不少是成見
01/02 21:03, 26F

01/02 21:03, , 27F
別忘了之前某幾隊4 5星的下場
01/02 21:03, 27F

01/02 21:04, , 28F
在隊上有不爭球三巨頭情況下,給marbury持球應該剛好
01/02 21:04, 28F

01/02 21:04, , 29F
marbury只是待過的隊伍戰績都不好...事實上
01/02 21:04, 29F

01/02 21:05, , 30F
它能傳球 能得分 給他當替補應該還不錯
01/02 21:05, 30F

01/02 21:05, , 31F
如果marbury願意打替補,光這心態就沒理由拒絕他吧
01/02 21:05, 31F

01/02 21:05, , 32F
不然powe house那種得分能力 能看嗎= =
01/02 21:05, 32F

01/02 21:06, , 33F
不過就不知道marbury防守到底怎樣了= =
01/02 21:06, 33F

01/02 21:06, , 34F
我剛才原本想po文討論一下 後來打消念頭
01/02 21:06, 34F

01/02 21:07, , 35F
有查一下 生涯平均抄截有一個 籃板不到4個的樣子
01/02 21:07, 35F

01/02 21:07, , 36F
不過要看他的團隊意識啦 數據不代表什麼
01/02 21:07, 36F

01/02 21:09, , 37F
況且marbury就算想亂 他應該也不敢 三巨頭
01/02 21:09, 37F

01/02 21:10, , 38F
畢竟他跟kg過去是隊友...沒啥不好談的..又有冠軍誘因
01/02 21:10, 38F

01/02 21:10, , 39F
個個比他地位高....自然能壓住他
01/02 21:10, 39F
還有 24 則推文
01/02 21:18, , 64F
如果真的守 house能夠過半場? 有看過house打球的人
01/02 21:18, 64F

01/02 21:18, , 65F
不然如果只是單純要過半場 已經有Pruitt了
01/02 21:18, 65F

01/02 21:18, , 66F
房子站得分控衛 TA小前鋒 禁區-empty
01/02 21:18, 66F

01/02 21:18, , 67F
應該很清楚 如果真的去守house 真的連半場都難過
01/02 21:18, 67F

01/02 21:18, , 68F
的確 房子運半場非常之抖
01/02 21:18, 68F

01/02 21:19, , 69F
Pruitt有外線 組織能力也是有一點
01/02 21:19, 69F

01/02 21:19, , 70F
連ray和pp過半場能力都超過house了= = kg或許也能贏
01/02 21:19, 70F

01/02 21:19, , 71F
不過運半場有RAY PP TA分擔 目前看起來就還可以
01/02 21:19, 71F

01/02 21:20, , 72F
到時後季後賽或者真的派專人去守house 那就麻煩了
01/02 21:20, 72F

01/02 21:20, , 73F
但是如果RAY和PP能夠少了這些責任會更好
01/02 21:20, 73F

01/02 21:21, , 74F
誰不希望三巨頭能夠將實力發揮到最好?
01/02 21:21, 74F

01/02 21:21, , 75F
doc只在領先10分以上才會叫pruitt.....
01/02 21:21, 75F

01/02 21:22, , 76F
Pruitt是不錯 不過沒經驗 河流也不是很喜歡他的感覺
01/02 21:22, 76F

01/02 21:22, , 77F
沒有想要練他吧@@
01/02 21:22, 77F

01/02 21:23, , 78F
找馬大少來 很多問題都可以解決 如果他認真打球的話
01/02 21:23, 78F

01/02 21:23, , 79F
我倒覺得 有慢慢在練他啦 這種事情就是需要時間
01/02 21:23, 79F

01/02 21:23, , 80F
就是不知道= =
01/02 21:23, 80F

01/02 21:24, , 81F
找馬大少當替補 的確會有很大的效益
01/02 21:24, 81F

01/02 21:24, , 82F
如果馬大少來 可以擺雙衛嗎? XDDD
01/02 21:24, 82F

01/02 21:24, , 83F
賽隊也真的需要有自己取分的替補...替補都是一堆有外
01/02 21:24, 83F

01/02 21:24, , 84F
不過球賽....總是會有但書的...
01/02 21:24, 84F

01/02 21:24, , 85F
線 但沒自己得分能力的人 這真的很危險
01/02 21:24, 85F

01/02 21:25, , 86F
TA可以 不過他要先失誤
01/02 21:25, 86F

01/02 21:28, , 87F
缺點就是後場會太矮...
01/02 21:28, 87F

01/02 21:28, , 88F
marbury不矮吧? 我記錯嗎? 因為很久沒看到他了
01/02 21:28, 88F

01/02 21:29, , 89F
控球後衛最高應該也6-4 加TA也6-4
01/02 21:29, 89F

01/02 21:29, , 90F
現在得衛通常都有6-6以上
01/02 21:29, 90F

01/02 21:30, , 91F
要防守就會有一定的困難
01/02 21:30, 91F

01/02 21:30, , 92F
馬大少6-2
01/02 21:30, 92F

01/02 21:30, , 93F
我是認為加入他應該沒問題 且它也不是那種會亂幹球的
01/02 21:30, 93F

01/02 21:30, , 94F
反正1~3號跟4~5號都各要找一個 才比較完整
01/02 21:30, 94F

01/02 21:31, , 95F
把吉祥物換去當其他隊的吉祥物 如何?
01/02 21:31, 95F

01/02 21:34, , 96F
如果他肯認真打替補的話...與其讓TA亂幹 還不如給他
01/02 21:34, 96F

01/02 21:34, , 97F
就算是自幹也是有分命中率的XD
01/02 21:34, 97F

01/02 22:54, , 98F
沒什麼意思,誕可是大家不覺得傳球跟助攻還是有差別嗎
01/02 22:54, 98F

01/02 22:55, , 99F
01/02 22:55, 99F

01/03 00:27, , 100F
亂就給他亂阿 把他當Bobby Jackson用也不錯
01/03 00:27, 100F

01/03 00:47, , 101F
Nick Van Exel用也不錯
01/03 00:47, 101F

01/03 00:48, , 102F
Jason Terry 用也不錯
01/03 00:48, 102F

01/03 02:22, , 103F
以前他打夢幻隊的時候超猛的 整隊幾乎都靠他在得分
01/03 02:22, 103F
文章代碼(AID): #19NVRJS2 (Celtics)
文章代碼(AID): #19NVRJS2 (Celtics)