Deadline Looms Large For Celtics?

看板Celtics (波士頓 塞爾提克)作者 (mon.)時間17年前 (2009/02/17 00:02), 編輯推噓8(8012)
留言20則, 8人參與, 最新討論串1/1
這是我看的一篇文章 不知道可型不可以行 Deadline Looms Large For Celtics http://celtics.realgm.com/articles/369/20090213/deadline_looms_large_for_celtics/ With the trade deadline looming for the Celtics and all other NBA teams, Boston general manager Danny Ainge continues to maintain that he doesn't foresee anything any changes to his roster. Of course, Danny says this every year. And if you believe that, then you'll believe that Jason Varitek is happy he didn't accept his arbitration offer from the Red Sox. The truth of the matter is that without some depth off the bench heading forward, I maintain this team will not repeat as NBA champions. Wednesday night for example, the Celtics won a key game on the road in New Orleans, but Ray Allen went down with a hyper-extended thumb and Gabe Pruitt started to begin the second half. They don't have any length or scoring up front off the bench either. Danny has already looked into Dikembe Mutombo, whom I think he should've signed, as well as inquired about Reggie Miller, Alonzo Mourning, P.J. Brown, (and behind closed doors with) Stephon Marbury. There are some possibilities that would work for this team, and do fly when using RealGM.com's handy Trade Checker. So, Danny, if you're reading this, I pass these ideas along to you: Option 1 Joe Smith, the veteran forward from Oklahoma City, has been mentioned as a possibilty and could be obtained in a package involving guard Gabe Pruitt and forward Brian Scalabrine. Now why would Oklahoma make the deal? Smith is going to walk at the end of the year, and the Thunder would get a young guard with some upside in Pruitt and Scalabrine, who can hit the three and play some defense. The Celtics, of course, would get a 6'10" forward that could be a vital player behind Kevin Garnett. Smith is a player that has length/height, and can score and rebound the basketball. The second part of this option would be to send guard Tony Allen to Orlando for a guy that Ainge has always coveted, guard J.J. Redick. Allen is a better all-around player than Redick, especially defensively, and can take the ball to the hole. However, Redick can nail down the three with ease and would help the Celts spread their offense, while also giving them a pure shooter and scorer off the bench. Option 2 The Celtics could swap forward Glen Davis and center Patrick O'Bryant to Philadelphia for ex-Celtic center Theo Ratliff and Donyell Marshall. This one isn't as likely as Option 1, and it all depends on how the Celtics view Davis and his upside. But, in this deal you'd have the ideal backup for Perkins in Ratliff, who was hurt during his first tenure here, and Marshall would give them a "long" player off the bench, who can definitely score and be a terrific presence. From Philly's end it seems like a no-brainer, as they would acquire a guy to be Elton Brand's understudy in Davis. Again, this deal works using RealGM's Trade Checker. Once again, to complete this plan you could make the Redick swap involving Allen. Now you've retooled the bench with Marshall, Ratliff, and Redick. Either scenario would give the Celtics some veteran options and flexibility off their bench. And need I mention that Marbury's name hasn't even been included in either plan. Come Game 7 against the Lakers in June's NBA Finals, if the starters rest on the bench to begin the second quarter, and the Celtics come in with Donyell Marshall, Theo Ratliff, J.J. Redick, Eddie House, and Stephon Marbury, Celtic nation will feel a lot more comfortable. Copyright c 2000 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.53.83.154

02/17 00:13, , 1F
.......都是找老人
02/17 00:13, 1F

02/17 00:16, , 2F
不過真能換成這些人,至少板凳成熟度很高
02/17 00:16, 2F

02/17 00:32, , 3F
能加人就不錯了哭 看看安吉怎麼做?
02/17 00:32, 3F

02/17 00:32, , 4F
要是 真換來 Joe+JJ 那我們會更有深度
02/17 00:32, 4F

02/17 00:33, , 5F
但是JJ跟House...要搶球投嗎??
02/17 00:33, 5F

02/17 00:33, , 6F
要是能用House+吉祥物 換Joe TA 換 JJ 就完美
02/17 00:33, 6F

02/17 00:34, , 7F
至於 選項2 ...Marshall還能動嗎??這是疑問
02/17 00:34, 7F

02/17 00:35, , 8F
Ratliff防守是沒下滑多少 但禁區就已經夠沒攻擊立了.
02/17 00:35, 8F

02/17 00:36, , 9F
Perk + Ratliff上場時 真的就變成波士頓跳投隊了
02/17 00:36, 9F

02/17 00:39, , 10F
怎麼換我都覺得不會變強...囧
02/17 00:39, 10F

02/17 00:40, , 11F
一直覺得JJ的防守不符合BOSTON的標準...
02/17 00:40, 11F

02/17 00:41, , 12F
更何況房子的三分算表現不錯
02/17 00:41, 12F

02/17 00:48, , 13F
應該是想讓jj+house成為雙箭頭
02/17 00:48, 13F

02/17 00:57, , 14F
不過Ratliff跟Marshall,甚至是Marbury的狀況都是未知
02/17 00:57, 14F

02/17 00:58, , 15F
JJ的防守真的是個問題至少目前是如此...
02/17 00:58, 15F

02/17 00:59, , 16F
真的比較好的話就是換來Smith~~~
02/17 00:59, 16F

02/17 13:50, , 17F
JJ可以讓他找到他大學的感覺~也可以練練看控球~
02/17 13:50, 17F

02/17 19:30, , 18F
聽起來都不錯 有JJ和joe 戰鬥力不輸去年太多
02/17 19:30, 18F

02/17 19:32, , 19F
但少了吉祥物的高度 TA的速度 防守可能....
02/17 19:32, 19F

02/18 16:18, , 20F
補誰都好 來點新氣象吧!!
02/18 16:18, 20F
文章代碼(AID): #19cOuGaJ (Celtics)
文章代碼(AID): #19cOuGaJ (Celtics)