[外電] Why didn’t Miami know Pierce would …

看板Celtics (波士頓塞爾提克)作者SexyCassell (其實我很帥)時間16年前 (2010/04/25 17:44)推噓11(11推 0噓 22→)

留言33則, 15人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

Why didn’t Miami know Pierce would shoot step-back? http://tinyurl.com/29vq52l 關於隊長在G3的關鍵最後一擊，熱火教練的決策似乎是讓熱火的球迷怒火中燒......囧但熱火的教練也有他的考量，要不要犯規是見仁見智，但三巨頭同時在場上也讓對手投鼠忌器，沒有包夾顯然是怕顧此失彼。偏偏三巨頭在第四節的狀況都還不錯 XD ---------------------------------------- After Paul Pierce hit a buzzer-beater that ended the game, demoralized the Miami Heat and — fairly certainly — cemented the series, there were a couple points of emphasis regarding what the Heat DIDN’T do. First, they didn’t foul, despite having a foul to give. That one’s understandable, as an ill-advised foul at the wrong time would send Pierce to the line with a chance to end the game. As for the second point of emphasis – why didn’t the Miami Heat know exactly what Paul Pierce was going to do? Heat coach Erik Spoelstra claimed ignorance. (ESPNBoston) PP關鍵的最後一擊結束了比賽。身為對手的邁阿密熱火，首先──他們明明還有犯規可以使用，但是他們並沒有這麼做，而他們沒有犯規是可以被理解的，在錯誤的時間犯規將讓PP有機會在罰球線上結束比賽。重點是在為什麼邁阿密熱火竟然會不知道PP的最後一擊是如何出手的？以下是熱火的教練Erik Spoelstra的說法...... ※ “They have so many different late-game situations, if you go through their [game video] edits, there’s no pattern,” said Spoelstra. “They have so many proven 25-point-per-game scorers on their roster, they just usually go with the hot hand. “We anticipated it would be a Pierce-[Kevin] Garnett pick-and-roll. Instead they [isolated] it and gave [Pierce] a shot there at the end. They are one of the most difficult teams to get a read on. We’ve spent a lot of time trying to do that.” 熱火的教練表示：「塞爾提克有太多不一樣的關鍵出手模式，你以為你只要看過他們的 video就可以了？事實上沒有規則可循，他們有太多每場可以幹25分以上的球員，他們只要把球給手風正順的球員就可以了。當時......我們原本預計是PP和KG的pick-and-roll 但沒想到是清開場面把球直接給PP......」 Really, Erik? You’ve watched Paul Pierce over and over and over on tape, and you didn’t know his go-to move was the step-back jumper to his right? You didn ’t know that — when Pierce is hot — the Celtics are going to isolate him up top and let him go to that very same step-back jumper he loves so dearly? With one minute left in the game — I shit you not, there was a full minute left — I told my friends, who were watching the game with me, that Pierce was going to end the game with a step-back jumper, off the dribble, going to his right. I acted out the exact same move Pierce proceeded to make a minute later, and ended the game with. My friends, not Celtics fans, wondered how I knew Pierce would shoot that exact shot, but it was easy: When Pierce has it going, that is his shot. His money ball, his Ole’ Faithful, his Mr. Reliable. But Spoelstra somehow thought Pierce and Garnett were going to run a pick-and-roll? C’mon, Spoelstra, you’re better than that. 但我(原作者)說：Erik Spoelstra你是腦殘嗎？你真的看過PP的video嗎？你會不知道Paul Pierce的帶一步橫移的中距離跳投？你真的沒想到讓Paul Pierce在那個位置拿球就是要讓他出手嗎？天殺的你為什麼會覺得是PP要和KG pick-and-roll......？ So Dorell Wright backpedaled, expecting a KG screen to come for Paul Pierce, and then Pierce did what everyone in the world besides the Miami Heat expected him to do. Step-back, game over. Step up your scouting, Heat. Pierce’s stepback is one tendency you absolutely should have known. # -------------------------------------------------- GO GO CELTICS. YOU CANNOT HANDLE THE TRUTH ! 熱火球迷生氣了....XD 超賽低調點結束這系列吧：) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.136.109.67 ※ 編輯: SexyCassell 來自: 220.136.109.67 (04/25 17:48)

→

piercepaul

04/25 17:57, , 1^F

04/25 17:57, 1^F

→

piercepaul

04/25 17:58, , 2^F

04/25 17:58, 2^F

推

mikazeray

04/25 17:59, , 3^F

04/25 17:59, 3^F