[情報] 財政公平競賽問答集
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896/premier-league/2011/05/11/2481714/how-
will-chelsea-manchester-city-be-allowed-in-the-champions
11 May 2011 15:46:00
Following on from Goal.com UK's series of features on Uefa's new Financial
Fair Play (FFP) rules, we invited readers to ask chief correspondent Wayne
Veysey about European football's governing body's plans and how they will
affect clubs' spending.
FFP will come into effect on June 1 and is designed to prevent teams from
falling into financial oblivion, with the intention that all clubs across
the continent will be breaking even in three years, though there are still
plenty of questions surrounding how exactly it will impact teams and their
transfer plans.
@thestrettyender: What do they mean by not spending more than they earn?
Does that mean we'l never see a transfer for more then 80 mil quid?
Wayne Veysey: No, not at all. If, for example, Real Madrid negotiate a
series of bumper commercial and media contracts, or sell a few ￡20m
players, it can happen. A club can technically spend ￡100m on a player if
they earn enough revenue to do so, from commercial sources or transfers.
@faizarsyadw: So clubs are still allowed to do crazy signings if its from
revenues?
WV: Yes, that is right. If Real Madrid earn ￡200m a year from bona fide
commercial deals, they can go transfer mad. Some of the rich clubs have
considerably larger revenue than others. Real, Barca & MUFC stand out.
@philim88: So in other words you can only spend what you bring?
WV: Nearly. You can lose an aggregate €45m between 2011-14 & €30m
between 2014-17 if funded by a lender, like Sheikh Mansour at Manchester
City.
@NourAgha: What if two clubs announce a transfer deal for a certain value,
and exceed it secretly where one club continues to pay the other.
WV: All financial accounts are audited by independent experts and have to
be available to Uefa experts too.
@obumosigwe: How will Chelsea and City be allowed to play in the Champions
League next year with their crazy spending?
WV: FFP is phased in from next month over a period of 3 years. The first
possible exclusions from Champions League or Europa League will be in the
2014-15 season.
@mohza: What punishments do clubs face if they do not meet the rules?
WV: The ultimate sanction is exclusion from European competition.
@swagadore: Apparently there are 29 loopholes around it. How robust do you
think the rules are?
WV: I believe it is robust but might need adjusting as market conditions
change and clubs find the loopholes you suggest. Uefa can't be too
draconian.
@I_Am_Tzar: How does it affect the likes of Man City and Chelsea, in terms
of wage budget and transfers?
WV: Considerably. There's no way either will be spending ￡100m on players
this summer unless they have something up their sleeve or a fire sale.
@BennetDladla: Do you honestly think uefa would exclude teams like Man
United, Chelsea, Real Madrid, Barcelona and Inter if they ALL didn't
comply with FFP?
WV: As an absolute last resort, yes I do. Otherwise, the rules are
meaningless & Uefa lose all credibility
@jonnyno1: Can you explain how this rule influences wages?
WV: Top players will still get top wages but there will be less money
swimming around the football pool so there will be - in effect - a soft
wage cap.
@andyh_75: Is Uefa legally allowed to impose financial limitations and
spending on clubs?
WV: Uefa is the governing body. It makes the rules. 27 clubs have not been
given a licence to play in Euro competition in last 5 years.
@TimSmith18: Will small clubs or big clubs benefit more from the rules in
the long term?
WV: The well-run clubs will benefit, large or small. I predict a small
narrowing of the gap between rich and poor. But the likes of Manchester
United and Real Madrid will still rule.
@andyh_75: What stops say Man City owners buying their own products, VIP
tickets etc to increase revenue?
WV: Uefa have a panel of experts to investigate this. Anything much above
market value, such as stadium naming rights, will set alarm bells ringing.
@MHD_Rashed: Can clubs reject these rules? And isn't it possible they can
create their own rich clubs' league?
WV: The rules have been unanimously approved. Uefa say all the clubs want
this. There is no chance of a breakaway league at this point.
@Frank_Bear: This is just a Bosman for the CL. All that'll happen is
transfer fees will come down and wages go through the roof?
WV: Interesting thought but I don't agree that transfer fees will go down.
Wages will only go up for tiny elite.
@Gbeng10434: What happens if a team that spends so much is unable to
generate enough, will they be allowed to take loans to buy players?
WV: This is one possibility, yes. A ban on buying players is certainly one
sanction the FFP panel can enforce.
@borgeh1: Why don't Uefa introduce a wage and transfer cap instead, so
that no transfers exceed a certain fee and wages to be reviewed annually?
WV: Uefa say the whole point is not to punish players or teams but just
introduce more financial discipline.
@aleem21010: How will it affect new signings? Will top players take a pay
cut to move to new clubs?
WV: Very possibly. I expect squads will be trimmed and there will be a
greater spread of talent
@mdescotes: Will this not also greatly affect mid and lower table teams
who are trying to grow without Champions League and huge media deals?
WV: If they're living within their means, they should benefit. For
example, a Stoke will be playing a Chelsea who have had to rein in
spending.
@todanik: Don't you think this will only bring back the idea of the
breakaway series mentioned some few years back?
WV: Because the Champions League is the king, it would require quite a few
top clubs failing to meet FFP rules for a parallel league to happen.
@saminda14: What does the new rules means for Man Utd debts? Will they be
able to spend in the summer?
WV: Yes, Manchester United will be able to spend. Their debts must be
reined in long-term and a number of methods could do this, for example the
Glazers sell or put cash in.
@DON_SMILEY: Is there an actual limit to what a club can spend now? Is
there a limit on the players' wages?
WV: There are no limits on spending or wages. If Real Madrid or Barca can
justify buying Cesc Fabregas for ￡80m, via revenue stream then no problem.
@Swagadore: It doesn't take into account all finances though, I heard. So
if Roman Abramovich wants to build a new stadium for Chelsea he can do
that.
WV: Yes, that is correct. Stadium expenditure and youth development do not
count towards FFP.
@jackwidnell: Are there any English clubs that would have failed over the
last three years?
WV: Loads. 14 out of 20 Premier League clubs, I believe, would have failed
over last 3 years if the rules had been in operation.
@agscuderia: Don't you think ultimately fans will suffer? Higher prices
for tickets, merchandise, membership and almost everything.
WV: There is that fear, yes, and in many ways it is justified. But if fans
are taken for granted, they stay away eventually.
-------
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2557/news/2011/05/11/2478867/how-will-10-of-
europes-biggest-clubs-cope-with-financial
11 May 2011 08:35:00
A club's annual financial statement provides a picture, but not the
complete picture, of their ability to comply with Uefa's new rules. For
example, youth development and stadium expenditure are included in a
club's accounts but will not count towards financial fair play.
Here, Goal.com analyses the most recently published accounts of 10 of
Europe's biggest clubs and provides a verdict from an independent expert
on how well placed they are to meet the new requirements.
Note that all figures are taken from club accounts published for 2010, and
that the profit/loss figure is not a calculation of turnover minus wages,
but more complex than that.
Chelsea
======================
REVENUE
Turnover ￡205.8m
Matchday ￡67.2m
Media ￡82.3m
Commercial ￡56.3m
----------------------
EXPENDITURE
Wages ￡172.6m
======================
￡70.9m loss
Verdict:
“If Chelsea do go on a summer spending spree without recouping some of
their expenditure, then all bets could be off in terms of financial fair
play. However, up until now, it looks to me as if they have been boxing
rather more clever than many people have assumed. They are indeed well on
course to break even, despite the astonishing expenditure in January,
through things like improved commercial deals, profit on player sales,
reduction in bonuses, and there is evidently some method in their apparent
madness.”
(Swiss Ramble, football finance blogger)
--
http://jamescaesar.pixnet.net/album/photo/110781933
永遠以摸過它為榮
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.254.0.60
推
05/12 09:53, , 1F
05/12 09:53, 1F
Chelsea 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
31
53
23
28