[情報] CPO購買案投票未通過

看板Chelsea作者 (首席百人隊長)時間14年前 (2011/10/27 22:16), 編輯推噓4(405)
留言9則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://www.chelseafc.com/page/LatestNews/0,,10268~2495932,00.html 61.6 PER CENT VOTE FOR PROPOSAL TO CPO Posted on: Thu 27 Oct 2011 At today's (Thursday's) general meeting of Chelsea Pitch Owners (CPO), 61.6 per cent of votes cast on Chelsea Football Club's proposals to buy the freehold land on which the Stamford Bridge stadium sits were for the proposal. However as 75 per cent of votes were needed, the proposals fail to pass. Chelsea FC is naturally disappointed with the result. A large number of fans supported our proposals but it was always going to be difficult when we had to have a 75 per cent majority of voting shareholders accepting them. We approached this process with transparency and the will to do what is best for Chelsea Football Club and while we will remain as ambitious as ever, this decision could slow down our progress. Chelsea FC chairman Bruce Buck said: 'Obviously we are disappointed but we recognise and we respect totally that the shareholders of Chelsea Pitch Owners have spoken. We will meet with Mr Abramovich and the rest of the board and we will decide what action, if any, we will take going forward. 'I don't view this as an us and against you, we against they situation. We are all Chelsea fans and I can only hope that on Saturday we can get together and support this club and beat Arsenal.' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.macchelsea.com/index.php?id=6770555114409537434 球會購回球場失敗 Friday 28 Oct 2011 03:12 | 新聞 卻爾西球場業權人協會(Chelsea Pitch Owners, CPO)的會員大會已結束,會內 並已進行是否接受球會購回史坦福橋球場建議的投票。結果球會的嘗試以失敗告終。   球會官網宣布CPO與會者中,61.6%投票支持出售股權予球會。雖然已佔多數,但 仍未足夠規定的75%,因此球會未能成功購得球場業權。   對此球會主席巴克向《天空體育》表示:「我們失望但我們尊重CPO股權持有人 的意見,並會以此考慮我們如何發展下去。整個董事局會討論此事,也會與阿布拉莫 維奇先生討論,然後我們會決定採取甚麼行動。此時作任何猜測也沒有意思,因我們 仍未知道。」   巴克甚至表示球會很有可能會留在原址。「對於球場我們可做的不多,但我們仍 要決定是否有必要搬遷,若我們遷至一個55000或60000座位的球場我們能否填滿它。 留在這裡的可能性一向都很大,是的。」   對於有報導指他收到不少惡言相向的電郵,巴克指他並不介意。 「卻爾西球迷是很激情的,並且對史坦福橋和這球會的傳統與歷史有一份很強的 歸屬感。這一點我認同的,我也有這種歸屬感,因此不介意他們的人身攻擊。」  「我不認為我們必須處理此事上太急進。我們有足夠時間討論此事。除非我們認為 這建議會被接納,否則我們不會提出來,而有約63%或64%的確接受了,已多於半數。 我們一向都知道要達到75%是很難的。我想卻爾西有一天能成為歐洲頂級球會之一, 而如果遷至一個大球場能達到這個目標,我認為我們應該這樣做。」 http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/7269209/Blues-regroup-after- vote-loss Last Updated: October 27, 2011 6:06pm -- ╔══╗╔╗╔╗╔══╗╔╗ ╔══╗╔══╗╔══╗ ║╔═╝║╚╝║║╔═╝║║ ║╔═╝║╔═╝║╔╗║ ║║ ║╔╗║║╔═╝║║ ╚═╗║║╔═╝║╚╝║ ║╚═╗║║║║║╚═╗║╚═╗╔═╝║║╚═╗║╔╗║ ╚══╝╚╝╚╝╚══╝╚══╝╚══╝╚══╝╚╝╚╝ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.47.1.215

10/27 23:05, , 1F
今天就在等這一刻,蠻驚訝CPO成員有61.6%支持球場的
10/27 23:05, 1F

10/27 23:08, , 2F
回購案,雖然我覺得很矛盾,但是還是很高興車車能繼續
10/27 23:08, 2F

10/27 23:08, , 3F
以大橋為家。
10/27 23:08, 3F

10/27 23:13, , 4F
搬家當然可以,交出新球場的所有權再說
10/27 23:13, 4F

10/27 23:14, , 5F
把BBC白城總部買下來蓋新球場如何 φ(._. )>
10/27 23:14, 5F

10/27 23:17, , 6F
把伯爵宮拆掉如何
10/27 23:17, 6F

10/27 23:42, , 7F
那唐寧街10號好了 ( ′▽`)-o█ █o-( ̄▽ ̄")
10/27 23:42, 7F

10/28 10:30, , 8F
那都離Chelsea太遠了
10/28 10:30, 8F

10/28 10:32, , 9F
BBC白城就在QPR旁邊,搬去的話我怕QPR球迷都不敢來看球
10/28 10:32, 9F
※ 編輯: JamesCaesar 來自: 114.47.3.128 (10/28 19:22)
文章代碼(AID): #1EgMVOU1 (Chelsea)
文章代碼(AID): #1EgMVOU1 (Chelsea)