[情報] 俱樂部收購案，伯利隊即將勝出

04/30 02:11, 3年前 , 1^F

04/30 02:11, 1^F

→

JamesCaesar

04/30 02:30, 3年前 , 2^F

04/30 02:30, 2^F

推

04/30 02:44, 3年前 , 3^F

04/30 02:44, 3^F

推

04/30 02:51, 3年前 , 4^F

04/30 02:51, 4^F

→

04/30 02:51, 3年前 , 5^F

04/30 02:51, 5^F

推

04/30 02:55, 3年前 , 6^F

04/30 02:55, 6^F

→

04/30 02:55, 3年前 , 7^F

04/30 02:55, 7^F

→

04/30 02:56, 3年前 , 8^F

04/30 02:56, 8^F

→

04/30 02:56, 3年前 , 9^F

04/30 02:56, 9^F

→

faelone

04/30 03:12, 3年前 , 10^F

04/30 03:12, 10^F

→

faelone

04/30 03:13, 3年前 , 11^F

04/30 03:13, 11^F

推

04/30 03:26, 3年前 , 12^F

04/30 03:26, 12^F

→

04/30 03:27, 3年前 , 13^F

04/30 03:27, 13^F

推

04/30 03:34, 3年前 , 14^F

04/30 03:34, 14^F

→

04/30 03:35, 3年前 , 15^F

04/30 03:35, 15^F

推

04/30 03:37, 3年前 , 16^F

04/30 03:37, 16^F

→

04/30 03:38, 3年前 , 17^F

04/30 03:38, 17^F

推

04/30 04:33, 3年前 , 18^F

04/30 04:33, 18^F

推

trent427

04/30 08:43, 3年前 , 19^F

04/30 08:43, 19^F

推

grace0805

04/30 10:01, 3年前 , 20^F

04/30 10:01, 20^F

→

grace0805

04/30 10:01, 3年前 , 21^F

04/30 10:01, 21^F

推

starW

04/30 11:21, 3年前 , 22^F

04/30 11:21, 22^F

推

trent427

04/30 12:55, 3年前 , 23^F

04/30 12:55, 23^F

推

04/30 15:21, 3年前 , 24^F

04/30 15:21, 24^F

→

04/30 15:22, 3年前 , 25^F

04/30 15:22, 25^F

推

04/30 15:24, 3年前 , 26^F

04/30 15:24, 26^F

推

04/30 15:28, 3年前 , 27^F

04/30 15:28, 27^F

→

04/30 15:28, 3年前 , 28^F

04/30 15:28, 28^F

https://bbs.hupu.com/53389820.html https://theathletic.com/3282051/2022/04/30/explained-ratcliffe-boehly-and -a-dramatic-twist-in-the-race-to-buy-chelsea/ By Matt Slater - Apr 30, 2022 The Athletic 從消息源得知，拉特克里夫這個報價是直接交給切爾西管理層的，而不是雷恩集團。在這家美國商業銀行宣佈伯利勝出數小時後，他們似乎不知道拉特克里夫出價的細節。公平地說，拉特克里夫的聲明中沒有太多細節 — 它更像是一份使命聲明，而不是一份全額資助的合約 — 但毫無疑問，他們沒有預見到這一點。 The Athletic 得知拉特克里夫本週才決定加入競爭，但他已經迅速行動，準備提出他認為最具吸引力的報價。例如，他已經與英國政府進行了溝通，英國政府對這筆交易擁有否決權。據了解他本週一直在倫敦，可能是在與幫助他的銀行人士交談。不過，他還沒有找到時間對任何球迷群體談話。一位與拉特克里夫打過交道的消息人士表示：“如果拉特克里夫真的想贏，他就能贏，因為他將得到英力士的支持，而且他可以增加企業信貸額度，為此次收購提供資金。和他不同，伯利和其他人必須與他們組織的成員打交道。” 英力士去年的稅後利潤為17億英鎊。毫無疑問拉特克里夫可以負擔得起切爾西，他也有信心在幾天內完成這筆交易。畢竟時間是短暫的，切爾西之所以能繼續參加各項賽事是因為他們得到了特許經營，它將在五月底到期。所以理論上，拉特克里夫還有時間，但前提是雷恩集團願意告訴其他幾家競購方這筆錢是來自英國最富有的體育迷的42.5億英鎊，而這位體育迷恰好是一位支持英國脫歐、揮舞著旗幟的愛國者。 https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/-b2068974.html Nick Purewal 30 Apr 2022 Sir Jim Ratcliffe's last-minute bid for Chelsea FC has received serious consideration in the race to buy the Stamford Bridge club, the PA news agency understands. Todd Boehly's consortium is understood to remain on course to be confirmed as the preferred bidder and then handed the opportunity to seal a Stamford Bridge takeover. Stamford Bridge bosses had not expected Ratcliffe to make such a late, dramatic entrance into the race however, with the British tycoon understood to have met with Blues chairman Bruce Buck on Thursday. https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345543876268032 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345545268772864 下午6:13 · 2022年4月30日 Pagliuca's plans for renovating Stamford Bridge lacked a clear roadmap and no written confirmation of if/how he planned to scale back Atalanta was provided. A public statement reaffirming his commitment only provided more questions. Broughton's bid required partial funding via loans. This counted against the bid in a decision based on fine margins. The “celebritizion” (as one Raine source put it) of the bid wasn't well received either and was seen as a move to turn the sale into a popularity contest. https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345546665439232 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345548041117698 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345550108905473 But above all else, Boehly's bid just stood out. One of the reasons why is because, in each area suitors were asked to focus on, the group provided real experts. The bid is a collective effort with Clearlake the majority owner but a range of impressive voices inputting. Behdad Eghbali is pretty hands on and engaged. He's a big football fan also. But Boehly, as minority owner, plans to assume day to day control. Jonny Goldstein (and the support of David Hickey) really impressed Chelsea. As previously reported, the Boehly group always had the strongest and most detailed plans for the redevelopment of Stamford Bridge. They have been confident for weeks of winning. https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345551627296768 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345553049169920 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345554345209860 Jim Ratcliffe's last-minute ￡4.25bn bid took Boehly, and the two failed suitors, by surprise. Ratcliffe initially expressed interest in March but then decided not to formally bid. Last week he then saw a window of opportunity as the sale dragged on. Interestingly, sources tell me Ratcliffe bypassed Raine, and by dealing directly with Chelsea was confident in entering the race. He has not to date been told his bid is too late. But Chelsea will prioritise Boehly meaning Ratcliffe has a lot out of his control. Two other points which are key: Ratcliffe bid isn't astronomically higher than Boehly's since price includes charitable donation. And Ratcliffe, like Pagliuca with Atalanta, must address ownership of Nice. That makes completing a CFC sale in days (as he says he can) unlikely. https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345555867684865 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345557247705088 Ratcliffe's offer clearly puts pressure on Boehly to wrap up l sale quickly. And it's clear Chelsea and Abramovich (who failed to agree a price with Ratcliffe in 2019) are open to abandoning the formal sale process and considering 'rogue' bids if it doesn't work out with Boehly. But to again reiterate, Boehly is the preferred bidder and the group is confident that Ratcliffe's offer won't affect anything. They have always said, if selected, they see no reason why they can't complete the sale before Chelsea's special license expires on May 31.

推

04/30 21:12, 3年前 , 29^F

04/30 21:12, 29^F

→

04/30 21:13, 3年前 , 30^F

04/30 21:13, 30^F

推

teata

04/30 21:52, 3年前 , 31^F

04/30 21:52, 31^F

推

04/30 21:55, 3年前 , 32^F

04/30 21:55, 32^F

https://news.sky.com/story/preferred-chelsea-bidder-offers-premier-league -reassurance-over-investors-12603467 Mark Kleinman - Sunday 1 May 2022 17:14, UK Sources close to the consortium, which is spearheaded by Todd Boehly, the LA Dodgers part-owner, said it had offered a total price that was slightly higher than the ￡4.25bn publicly pledged by Sir Jim Ratcliffe, the chemicals tycoon who tried to gatecrash the auction on Friday. An insider suggested that Sir Jim and his Ineos group would need to table a substantially higher offer in order to persuade Mr Abramovich and his advisers to stand a chance of entering negotiations about a deal. The Premier League is said to be "advanced" in its scrutiny of the Clearlake consortium under its Owners And Directors Test, with questions now submitted to the group relating to the final financial structure of the takeover and the precise stakes that would be owned by each of the investors. Mr Boehly's bid would see voting rights shared equally between him and California-based Clearlake. Clearlake, which has no direct ownership pedigree in major sports assets, would own a majority of the shares in Chelsea, Sky News revealed last week. One person close to the process said it was likely that two separate licences would ultimately be issued by the government: one to implement the transaction itself, and the other to release the proceeds of the sale. https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1521421578491281408 https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1521422842079887360 https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1521425601919340544 下午5:29 · 2022年5月3日 Chelsea Supporters' Trust confirm they have held talks with Sir Jim Ratcliffe and his team but say no further meeting scheduled. Dom Rosso, CST vice-chair, said: “While the CST has had initial talks with Sir Jim Ratcliffe and his team, no further meeting is yet in the diary.” It seems Ratcliffe is trying to position himself in case there is an 11th-hour hitch during the exclusivity period with the Boehly bid or if Chelsea have a dramatic late change of heart. This all seems very dramatic but I am told that at least one of the other two consortiums remain on standby in case the Boehly bid breaks down, which you would expect given all the work they put in. https://twitter.com/NizaarKinsella/status/1521528748671225856 上午12:34 · 2022年5月4日 If Boehly's bid somehow collapses, there's expectations from both Broughton and Pagliuca that they get brought back in. This is instead of Sir Jim Ratfcliffe who has circumvented Raine's structured process with a late approach directly to Chelsea. It all feels a little bit messy. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/chelsea-sale-hits-snag-over-fears-roman -abramovich-wants-1-6bn-loan-repaid-sxjn5h8d7 Martyn Ziegler, Matt Lawton, Steven Swinford, Matt Dickinson Tuesday May 03 2022, 5.50pm BST The sale of Chelsea has hit a serious obstacle over fears that Russian-born owner Roman Abramovich is attempting to renege on his promise to write off a ￡1.6 billion debt. It is understood that Chelsea told the government — as well as the rival bidding groups — last week that they want to restructure the way the club is being sold, which would include paying off the debt from Chelsea's parent company Fordstam Ltd to a Jersey-based company Camberley International Investments, which appears to be linked to Abramovich. Government insiders are increasingly concerned about whether the deal will be done in time to safeguard Chelsea's future and ability to compete next season. https://twitter.com/draper_rob/status/1521507190045122560 https://twitter.com/draper_rob/status/1521507191567564801 下午11:09 · 2022年5月3日 If Roman Abramovich now wants his ￡1.6bn loan paid back as @TimesSport is reporting, then Chelsea have a huge existential problem. UK Govt have always insisted this can't/won't happen. Clock is ticking on May 31st deadline but it's more serious than a complex delay. The Premier League meet on June 8th to constitute the new league for 22-23. If Chelsea aren't licensed to operate by then - and they are only licensed now on UK Govt sufferance - then they can't be part of PL. Simples… https://twitter.com/draper_rob/status/1521513298281312263 https://twitter.com/draper_rob/status/1521513299929673731 https://twitter.com/draper_rob/status/1521507194893647873 If Abramovich thinks UK Govt will blink because they don't want to see Chelsea fold/go into administration, then he's gambling hugely on Govt's malleability. (A good bet, you might say). But be in no doubt, if he wants debts repaid, Chelsea future is at stake with clock ticking An aside: Intriguing how last-minute Ratcliffe bid mimicked the Abramovich's language. Ratcliffe wants proceeds to go to 'Charitable Trust to support victims of the war'. Abramovich initially wanted to set up foundation 'for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine'. Almost as tho bid was tailor-made to be what Abramovich wanted And yet all along it's been clear neither Roman, not Ratcliffe get to decide where that money goes. It's for UK Govt to decide. IF Roman agrees to sale. Right now, that's a sizeable IF… https://twitter.com/draper_rob/status/1521513301603241985 https://twitter.com/draper_rob/status/1521513303406751745 Imagine if it came down to May 30th and there was genuine chance Chelsea could fold but somehow a Ratcliffe bid could save the day if only the UK Govt agreed to a let the proceeds to an independent charitable foundation? Well, that would be better than letting Chelsea fold… And who could object, if this war comes to a close and politics changes, to Roman Abramovich being trustee of that foundation? That way we could see Roman as the true humanitarian he is, rather than the sanctioned Putin crony who gained his wealth 'easy to rig auction' https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1521510618729168897 下午11:22 · 2022年5月3日 Basically, it feels fairly clear that the Govt won't be extending that May 31 deadline - certainly not to examine where a loan may or may not be going following a change of plan at Abramovich's end. Assuming, of course, there has been a change of plan

推

trent427

05/03 23:50, , 33^F

05/03 23:50, 33^F

推

05/04 00:12, , 34^F

05/04 00:12, 34^F

推

05/04 00:22, , 35^F

05/04 00:22, 35^F

https://twitter.com/draper_rob/status/1521540125867401222 上午1:20 · 2022年5月4日 My understanding on Chelsea bid is that owners' + directors' test has been completed by PL on Boehly consortium. I wouldn't anticipate any issues (tho that hasn't been confirmed, it's just my best guess). So really Boehly bid is good to go if Roman + UK Govt give https://twitter.com/NickPurewal/status/1521546391386046467 上午1:45 · 2022年5月4日 Roman Abramovich is understood to expect his ￡1.5billion loan to CFC to be frozen on the club's sale. Abramovich is thought to have been advised that Government sanctions block him writing off the Chelsea debt as planned. Story for @pasport

推

05/04 02:41, , 36^F

05/04 02:41, 36^F

→

05/04 03:12, , 37^F

05/04 03:12, 37^F

→

05/04 03:12, , 38^F

05/04 03:12, 38^F

推

05/04 03:23, , 39^F

05/04 03:23, 39^F

推

05/04 05:46, , 40^F

05/04 05:46, 40^F

→

05/04 05:47, , 41^F

05/04 05:47, 41^F

→

05/04 05:47, , 42^F

05/04 05:47, 42^F

https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1521609600100974593 上午5:56 · 2022年5月4日 Latest on CFC sale for @CBSSportsGolazo ˙Boehly bid may take on debt at book value ˙Gov. will block sale if Camberley receive funds ˙Broughton bid on standby ˙Ratcliffe told existing process will run its course ˙Consequences if license expires

推

05/04 07:45, , 43^F

05/04 07:45, 43^F

→

05/04 07:46, , 44^F

05/04 07:46, 44^F

推

05/04 15:36, , 45^F

05/04 15:36, 45^F

→

05/04 15:37, , 46^F

05/04 15:37, 46^F

https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1521790520045015040 下午5:55 · 2022年5月4日 Tom Crotty, director of communications + corporate affairs at INEOS, has confirmed to me this morning that Raine have told Jim Ratcliffe that his 11th-hour bid for Chelsea is not currently part of the process, but has also confirmed Ratcliffe is refusing to give up. Story later https://twitter.com/TeleFootball/status/1521823514248024069 https://twitter.com/AbsoluteChelsea/status/1521833575779295232 https://twitter.com/AbsoluteChelsea/status/1521833577243152387 https://twitter.com/AbsoluteChelsea/status/1521837663812300801 下午8:06 · 2022年5月4日 Exclusive by @Tom_Morgs and @Matt_Law_DT: Chelsea sale could be smoothed by 'Brexit-style backstop' to solve loan impasse Sources close to Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich say it was never his intention to leave the government with the impression he wanted to repay the loan to himself but the dispute seems to surround whether the UK can legally freeze the loan. It was suggested a change in approach may have been triggered by authorities in Jersey swooping two weeks ago to target Camberley International Investments, an offshore account which is believed to be linked to Abramovich. The Premier League has already carried out background checks on Todd Boehly and would be able to sign off the deal in a matter of days when an agreement is reached.

推

05/04 20:21, , 47^F

05/04 20:21, 47^F

https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1521870956486172673 https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1521872677681700866 下午11:14 · 2022年5月4日 Sir Jim Ratcliffe will re-submit his Chelsea bid if Todd Boehly doesn't complete his takeover in the period of exclusivity - despite being told to "forget it" by Raine. Worth adding the Boehly group are progressing step by step and the expectation remains they will complete. Ratcliffe chances rest on something going wrong or Chelsea performing a big U-turn and even then he might not get into the process. Pagliuca and Broughton bids on standby. https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1521889594957963264 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1521889598837821443 上午12:28 · 2022年5月5日 The Ratcliffe bid can't force their way into the process solely by criticising Clearlake or other aspects of their 'rival' bid. Clearlake as majority owner was always Boehly and Wyss' plan. They see value in minority ownership. There is clearly a broader debate to be had over private equity firms owning clubs. But Clearlake have made a commitment until at least 2032 so can hardly be accused of entering with short-term goals. Behdad Eghbali is going to be highly engaged if the group is successful. https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1521902641458171904 上午1:20 · 2022年5月5日 Tom Crotty, director of communications and corporate affairs at INEOS who has worked with Ratcliffe for 20 years, said: "We've had an email to say 'forget it, you're not in the process'. But we're not giving up because we believe what we've got is a bid that makes good sense." https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/e75b38fc-cbcd-11ec-a118-514c2c06bc05 Matt Lawton, Martyn Ziegler - Wednesday May 04 2022, 8.30pm BST They were dismayed to be told last week that Abramovich now wanted to restructure the purchase agreement, with a requirement for Chelsea's parent company, Fordstam, to pay off the debt held in trust at the Jersey-based Camberley. But sources close to the process have told The Times that the sale can be completed with no money being paid to Camberley until the government is satisfied none of the ￡1.6 billion will go to Abramovich or his beneficiaries. Instead, more than ￡2.5 billion for the purchase of the club will be paid to the government, allowing ministers to donate ￡1 billion to the Ukraine crisis. The remainder will be held until other issues with the trust are resolved. Both the Boehly group and Chelsea were confident on Wednesday night of the government issuing a licence for the completion of the sale, even though a solution to the loan problem has not been found.

推

05/05 17:14, , 48^F

05/05 17:14, 48^F

→

05/05 17:14, , 49^F

05/05 17:14, 49^F

https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1522158096587624448 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1522158098277974017 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1522158099934724098 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1522158101624938496 下午6:15 · 2022年5月5日 Boehly-Clearlake takeover of Chelsea is now very close to completion. Raine sources tell me Wednesday talks were “highly productive and no alternative options are being explored.”Sources within Boehly-Clearlake say they've remained “calm” and are confident they will own CFC. The handling of Abramovich's 1.6bn in loans has provided some late drama. Boehly-Clearlake bid initially presumed a debt-free purchase. If funds covering debt are frozen by the government then 1.6bn will remain in limbo for now. That will be enough to complete a sale by May 31. This plan doesn't fully resolve the debt (the original hope). But it does suspend it and allow a sale to go through. It will be interesting to see what happens if/when sanctions against Abramovich are lifted. Boehly-Clearlake, like Broughton, were never prepared to engage (or pay) Camberley. The main reason is because they couldn't do any due diligence and be sure who the money would go to.

推