[外電] NBA CHAT WITH TRAVIS HEATH
http://0rz.tw/YCLBT
HOOPSWORLD資深作家Travis Heath,禮拜五在聊天室和球迷互動.
(以下內容,只選譯其中關於公牛隊的部分)
jj in berlin:
hi what about a tyrus thomas for A. Randolph + filler trade? I think randolph
would fit better into the bulls system and thomas would look grade in the GS
system.
berlin的jj:
拿Tyrus Thomas交易A. Randolph+充人數的其他球員,你覺得如何?我認為Randolph比較適
合公牛隊的體系,而Thomas在勇士隊將會很讚.
Travis Heath:
That would have to be some fairly substantial "filler" considering the
difference in salaries. That said, it's a trade both sides might consider.
Personally, I'd stick with Randolph if I was the Warriors because of his
relatively low salary and potential, but there's no doubt that Tyrus is the
better player right now. It's also worth noting that Randolph hasn't played
in three weeks due to injury and is expected to be out for awhile longer.
Not sure the Bulls pull the trigger on a deal for an injured player given
their recent surge. Wouldn't be surprised to hear the Amar'e to Chicago
rumors all the way up until the deadline again this year, though, and any
deal for Amar'e involving the Bulls would likely have to include Tyrus.
Travis Heath:
雙方薪資的不對等,會使得交易當中必須拿出一些其他的球員以平衡薪資.這就是說,"薪資
"(薪資差異)會是雙方交易的主要顧慮.
就我個人而言,如果我是勇士隊,Randolph的低薪和潛力將會讓我持續關注他.當然,就目前
來看,Tyrus Thomas的表現是相對比較好的.
Randolph最近三週因傷缺陣,而且看來將會持續更長一段時間.我並不確定公牛隊會在球隊
最近的出色狀態下,去交易一個有傷在身的球員.
在交易截止日以前,請別訝異,關於Amare Stoudemire交易到公牛隊的傳聞將會不斷的被炒
作,就像去年一樣.
即使每個關於Amare的交易傳聞,只要包括公牛隊,都免不了會提到Tyrus Thomas.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Andy in :
Please tell me the Lakers won't succeed in fleecing another cost-cutting team
to get Hinrich or Harris so there can be more competition in the WC playoffs.
Is the PG match-up the Nuggets best hope for dethroning them this year?
Andy:
請告訴我,湖人隊不會從另一個為了節省薪資成本而跳樓大拍賣的球隊換來
Hinrich(Bulls)或Harris(Nets),讓他們在季後賽擁有更好的兢爭力.
擁有適合的控球後衛會讓金塊隊有大好機會挑戰總冠軍嗎?
Travis Heath:
Chauncey would still have an advantage over either Hinrich or Harris, albeit
not as substantial of an advantage. The guy the Lakers are really going to
have to account for is Ty Lawson. He scorched the Lakers in the first
meeting, and that's certainly not unique as he's scorched a lot of teams this
season. His ability to get in the lane and change the pace will bother the
Lakers. On the flipside, the Lakers' length will wear on the Nuggets over
the course of a seven-game series, which is why the Nuggets are actively
trying to acquire more length.
Travis Heath:
Chauncey Billups不論在對上Hinrich/Harris時,仍然是有優勢的,儘管優勢不是那麼的多.
湖人真正必須面對(處理)的球員是Ty Lawson,他在首次迎戰湖人隊時,將他們殺得片甲不留
,而他這樣的表現在本季已經是稀鬆平常的事了,
Ty Lawson擾亂節奏的的能力會給湖人帶來大麻煩.
反過來說,湖人隊的板凳優勢在七戰四勝的系列賽中,會一步步地將金塊擊垮,這也是為什
麼現在金塊隊那麼亟於加強他們的板凳深度.
All that said, I don't think a trade of either Harris or Hinrich to the
Lakers is very likely. Can one construct a scenario where a trade of either
player to the Lakers could benefit Chicago or New Jersey financially?
Absolutely. However, there are a number of other teams that could offer
either Chicago or New Jersey the same opportunity and offer them what will
amount to a higher draft pick. As I've written before, these trade ideas are
extremely Laker-centric, which doesn't surprise me because if you put Lakers
and trade in the same sentence you are going to draw thousands and thousands
of pageviews for any writer who proposes or even discusses it.
總的來說,我不認為湖人交易Harris或Hinrich是恰當的.
我們有辦法提出一個交易方案是對同時符合公牛隊或籃網隊縮減薪資的需求嗎? 答案當然
是肯定的.(毫無疑問的)
但無論如何,聯盟當中還有許多其他的球隊可以對公牛隊或籃網隊提供一樣的(交易)機會,
而且附帶更高的選秀順位.
在我寫文章之前,我一點都不訝異這些傳聞的沸沸揚揚,因為只要鍵入"湖人隊"和"交易",
你就會看到許多相關的討論和揣測,而這些交易都是從非常極端地"湖人本位主義"
(Laker-centric)出發的.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Raj in Sacramento:
Jason Thompson over Gallanari anytime. Do u think Kings make a run at Tyrus
Thomas. Reke for 35 today @ Utah
沙加緬度的Raj:
Jason Thompson比Gallanari強多了,你認為國王隊會想辦法把Tyrus Thomas弄進來嗎
?(make a run...at意指追逐某個對象)
Travis Heath:
I'm a big fan of Jason Thompson. I think he'll be a nice player for a long
time. Not sure what Gallinari has to do with that, but maybe that's just me.
Travis Heath:
我是Jason Thompson的忠實球迷.我認為他將會成為一個優秀的球員,持續擁有好的表現.
就這點而言,我對Gallinari抱持著懷疑的態度,不過這可能只是我個人的看法.
As for the Kings making a run at Tyrus Thomas, they certainly have the pieces
to do it. I'm not sold on Tyrus yet, but I think the Kings would be smart to
at least find out what the Bulls' asking price is.
至於談到國王隊和Tyrus Thomas的部分,他們當然會有興趣,想要有所參與.
我個人到目前為止對Thomas是不太熱衷,但我想國王隊應該夠聰明,至少會先搞清楚公牛想
要得到的對價是啥.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Tony in Chicago, IL:
How interested do you think the Bulls are with the Morrison-Vujacic package
which was reportedly proposed from LAL? I know the Bulls would save some
money.
芝加哥的Tony:
你覺得有報導提出關於Morrison-Vujacic到公牛隊的包裹交易會成真嗎?
我知道公牛隊想省點錢.
Travis Heath:
I think this would probably be a last resort kind of option for the Bulls.
They will likely exhaust all other options before pulling the trigger on
something like this. Not saying it's impossible, but I also don't think it's
highly likely. I believe Chicago could get better value elsewhere. Keep in
mind, Vujacic is not expiring and is owed $5.5 million next season.
Travis Heath:
我認為這是對公牛隊來說,在相類似的選項中最不可能的.除非他們在同意這樣的交易前,
可能已經失去其他相類似的交易機會.
即使任何事都可能發生.但我還是認為這樣的可能性不大.
我相信公牛會從其他隊伍得到更好的對價,記住,Vujacic並不在合約年,而他明年的薪水是
550萬(美元).
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Roger in Orange County, CA:
What are the chances LA gets Kirk Hinrich?
加州橙郡的Roger:
你認為湖人得到Kirk Hinrich的機率有多高?
Travis Heath:
Less than 10 percent.
Travis Heath:
"低於10%."
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.45.174.60
推
01/30 15:12, , 1F
01/30 15:12, 1F
推
01/30 17:09, , 2F
01/30 17:09, 2F
※ 編輯: Holusong 來自: 114.45.174.60 (01/30 17:54)
推
01/30 18:46, , 3F
01/30 18:46, 3F
推
01/30 22:38, , 4F
01/30 22:38, 4F
→
01/30 22:38, , 5F
01/30 22:38, 5F
推
01/31 16:37, , 6F
01/31 16:37, 6F
→
01/31 16:40, , 7F
01/31 16:40, 7F
→
01/31 17:07, , 8F
01/31 17:07, 8F
推
01/31 17:28, , 9F
01/31 17:28, 9F
→
01/31 17:29, , 10F
01/31 17:29, 10F
推
01/31 18:50, , 11F
01/31 18:50, 11F
→
01/31 18:51, , 12F
01/31 18:51, 12F
推
01/31 18:54, , 13F
01/31 18:54, 13F
→
01/31 18:55, , 14F
01/31 18:55, 14F
→
02/01 07:58, , 15F
02/01 07:58, 15F
→
02/01 07:59, , 16F
02/01 07:59, 16F
→
02/01 11:04, , 17F
02/01 11:04, 17F
推
02/01 12:11, , 18F
02/01 12:11, 18F
推
02/01 12:13, , 19F
02/01 12:13, 19F
→
02/01 12:14, , 20F
02/01 12:14, 20F
→
02/01 12:14, , 21F
02/01 12:14, 21F
推
02/02 12:24, , 22F
02/02 12:24, 22F
→
02/02 12:25, , 23F
02/02 12:25, 23F
→
02/02 12:26, , 24F
02/02 12:26, 24F
推
02/02 15:00, , 25F
02/02 15:00, 25F
推
02/02 15:02, , 26F
02/02 15:02, 26F
→
02/02 15:12, , 27F
02/02 15:12, 27F
→
02/02 15:13, , 28F
02/02 15:13, 28F
→
02/02 15:14, , 29F
02/02 15:14, 29F
→
02/02 16:36, , 30F
02/02 16:36, 30F
→
02/02 16:36, , 31F
02/02 16:36, 31F
→
02/02 18:34, , 32F
02/02 18:34, 32F
ChicagoBulls 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章