[外電] Real GM關於公牛選秀的文章
看板ChicagoBulls (芝加哥 公牛)作者AhUtopian (It's my Life)時間12年前 (2013/07/09 23:24)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則, 0人參與討論串1/1
概要:
作者分析了2003年Paxson掌權以來以來的公牛選秀,然後去分析了每次選秀,公牛的
順位能選到的球員,還有之後的順位有無更好的選擇,結果是我們有60%的選秀都能選
到那個順位所能選到的最好的三名球員之一;當然作者自己設定了一些規則,他也排
除選完才交易來的選秀、跟交易出去的回報。
NBA Draft: Chicago Bulls Arguably The Best Drafting Team in the NBA Since
2007:
[We touched base on this before last year and another good post recently
about how great the Bulls are at drafting. The reality is that if you compare
each team, the Bulls depending on how Teague turns out this season are
arguably the best drafting team since 2007. Here is this recent post on
another site that adds to this]
Chicago Bulls - Reviewing the Success Rate of the Bulls in the Draft
A lot has been made out about how good John Paxson and Gar Forman are at
drafting. It’s obvious that they have made some really good picks, but I
thought it’d be interesting to go back and review exactly how good their
picks actually are. The format I created to do this was to highlight what
pick the Bulls had and who they selected at that pick. Then I listed of ALL
the better players that were drafted after that pick. Before we review the
picks, here are my ground rules:
Rules:
1. Hindsight IS NOT 50/50. It is irrelevant that scouts had Tyrus Thomas
pegged as a top 5 pick and Paul Millsap as a second round pick. The goal
is to draft the best player possible, regardless of draft stock. Results are
all that matter. No excuses.
2.If a player drafted after a Bulls pick is debatably better, but not clearly
better, he will not be counted as a better prospect. For example, guys like
Igoudala or Josh Smith will not be counted as better players than Deng.
Another example is Sefolosha and Ronnie Brewer. It’s too close to call, and
both players have had moments of looking superior. Conversely, I will try to
control my own personal bias as much as possible. I.E. I thought Ben Gordon
was more valuable to the Bulls than Luol Deng, but Deng clearly has better
value and respect around the league and therefore will be considered a better
player than Gordon.
3. Reputation matters. Brandon Roy, despite having to retire early, will be
considered a miss since for several years he was an All-Star caliber player
and had enormous trade value.
4. Player position doesn’t matter. I.E. Having Rose already on the roster
doesn’t excuse the Bulls from not drafting Jrue Holiday.
5. Although Mirotic looks like a great pick, he will not be taken into
consideration since his rating is TBD. By the same token, Teague, despite
looking like a bad pick will also not be taken into consideration since he is
still really early in his career.
6. No “what ifs”. I believe that Ben Gordon would have had a much more
successful career had he stayed in Chicago. But he didn’t. So it doesn’t
matter.
7. Picks made specifically for another team will not be considered (I.E.
Aldridge, Bonner, Vroman, etc)
Now let’s review the picks:
2003: Kirk Hinrich (7th Pick)
Better Picks: David West (18), Josh Howard (29)
Comments: Some will disagree about Howard. Though his prime was short, his
peak value was higher than Hinrich’s.
Mario Austin (36th Pick)
Misses: Steve Blake (37), Willie Green (41), Zaza Pachulia (42), Keith Bogans
(43), Matt Bonner (45), Mo Williams (47), Kyle Korver (51)
2004: Ben Gordon (3rd Pick)
Better Players After Him: Deng (7), Andre Igoudala (9), Al Jefferson (15),
Josh Smith (17), Kevin Martin (26)
Comments: Though Gordon had an incredibly successful rookie campaign and a
memorable career in Chicago, all of these players listed afterwards have gone
on to have better careers and have better trade value.
Luol Deng (7th Pick)
Better Players After Him: Al Jefferson
Chris Duhon (39th Pick)
Better Players: Trevor Ariza (44)
2005: No Picks
2006: Tyrus Thomas (via trade for 2nd pick)
Better Players: LaMarcus Aldridge (2), Brandon Roye (6), Randy Foy (7), Rudy
Gay (8), JJ Redick (11), Rajon Rondo (21), Kyle Lowry (24), Paul Millsap (47)
,
Thabo Sefolosha (13th Pick)
Better Players: Rajon Rondo (21), Kyle Lowry (24), Paul Millsap (47)
2007: Joakim Noah (9th Pick)
Better Players: None
Aaron Gray (49th pick), JamesOn Curry (51st Pick)
Better Players: Ramon Sessions (55)
2008: Derrick Rose (1st Pick)
Better Players: None
Comments: Bulls deserve credit for this, as Rose really wasn’t the clear cut
first pick. Had Beasley been selected it could have set the franchise back a
decade.
Omer Asik (36th Pick via trade)
Better Players: None
2009: James Johnson (16th Pick)
Better Players: Jrue Holiday (17), Ty Lawson (18), Jeff Teague (19),
Darren Collison (21), BJ Mullens (24), Roddy Beaubois (25), Taj Gibson (26),
DeJuan Blair (37), Marcus Thornton (43), Chase Budinger (44), Danny Green (46)
Taj Gibson (26th Pick)
Better Players: Marcus Thornton (43)
2009: Jimmy Butler (30th Pick)
Better Players: Chandler Parsons (38th Pick)
Comments: Many will likely disagree with this, and this may change by next
season, but Parsons had a statistically better year than Butler and has been
in the rotation much longer.
Statistics:
Obviously the goal is to get the best player at your pick, however, generally
I think if you pick one of the top 3 best players at your pick then you’ve
drafted successfully. So let’s take a look.
Bulls Drafted Best Player Available: 13%
Bulls Drafted Top 3 Player: 60%
Drafted an All-Star: 20%
Number of All-Stars They Missed: 5 (David West, LaMarcus Aldridge, Brandon
Roy, Rajon Rondo, Jrue Holiday
Player Is Still in the League: 87%
Success Rate (top 3 best player) in 1st Round: 60%
Success Rate in 2nd Round:60%
Conclusions:
Apart from Tyrus Thomas and James Johnson, the Bulls have drafted superbly.
Drafting is clearly this front-office’s number one strength, which in my
opinion is why they should hold on to the Charlotte Bobcat’s pick. Since the
Bulls haven’t shown great skill in trades for established players and in
Free-Agency, they probably should focus even more on trading and buying draft
picks whenever the opportunity arises. While it’s clear that the Bulls draft
incredibly well, it would be interesting to see where exactly they rank
amongst the rest of the league. If I get a chance, I’d actually like to do
this same thing for all the other teams in the league during this time span
to see how other teams rank. The one thing that doesn’t line up, however, is
that many teams have management changes since 2003.
Credit: HomoSapien on RealGM
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 124.109.115.225
ChicagoBulls 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
10
25