[外電] Miles Bridges vs. Mikal Bridges

看板ChicagoBulls (芝加哥 公牛)作者 (ILA)時間7年前 (2017/12/29 01:12), 編輯推噓10(10016)
留言26則, 7人參與, 7年前最新討論串1/1
無聊+-看 大概翻一下重點 有的用我的話沒照字面翻 College basketball tale of the tape: Miles Bridges vs. Mikal Bridges https://goo.gl/8aRQL2 Joe Boozell | NCAA.com Last Updated - Dec 27, 2017 23:15 EST In the third edition of our tale of the tape series, we’ll break down college basketball’s most talented Bridges: Miles and Mikal. Check out our DeAndre Ayton vs. Marvin Bagley and Trae Young vs. Collin Sexton film studies if you missed them. Let’s get to it. 以上沒什麼 Stats Here's what Miles and Mikal have done this season. We're using per-40 averages to adjust for different minute loads. Miles Bridges vs. Mikal Bridges PLAYER POINTS REBOUNDS ASSISTS STEALS BLOCKS FG% 3FG% Miles Bridges 23.5 9.2 3.2 0.9 1.8 46.8 33.8 Mikal Bridges 22.3 7.5 2.6 2.6 1.9 51.4 46.0 Miles has a slight edge in the traditional counting stats – points, rebounds and assists – but Mikal has been significantly more efficient, and has made more of a defensive impact. Mikal’s advantages stand out more than Miles’. Slight edge: Mikal 兩人PER40數據 Miles得分、籃板、助攻傳統數據較優,但Mikal效率比較高且防守更有影 響力 數據:Mikal稍占優勢。 Strength/Athleticism Miles is a straight-up powerhouse. His combination of strength and explosiveness is unparalleled. This dunk highlight reel speaks for itself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhkAqSLB68Q
The 40-plus-inch vertical leap is tantalizing, but it’s not that rare. What is rare? To parlay those hops with the strength of a Michigan State linebacker. You don’t just see Miles’ dunks – you hear them. He uses that strength and athleticism combination in more pragmatic ways, too – Miles can get to the paint whenever he feels like it, and if an opponent is daring enough to switch a smaller defender onto him, Miles bullies him for a bucket. Slot a less coordinated big onto him, and he leaves him in the dust. Miles’ athletic gifts make the game much, much easier for him. Mikal is a different kind of athletic – he’s more graceful than Miles, but doesn’t have the same pure power. He’s not weak by any means – Mikal is wiry, and doesn’t lose any ground when banging with bigger players in the post. But he’s also not backing anyone down on the other end, like Miles can. Mikal has better side-to-side quickness; that’s evident in his perimeter defense. But if we’re grading these guys on an athletic scale of one to 10, Miles is a 10. Mikal is a nine. Slight edge: Miles 力量&運動能力 Miles的身材(我覺得身材很像PJ Tucker)是他最大優勢,善於利用他的力量跟運動能力, 如果面對比Miles小號的防守者,Miles會打爆他,而面對比較大的防守者,會讓他看不到 車尾燈過他,Miles善用體能天賦,讓他比賽打起來很輕鬆。 Mikal的運動能力是不同類型的,較優雅,沒有像Miles力量那麼大。 但這不表示他很弱, 他很強硬,在低位面對大號球員不會退卻,就像Miles那樣不會認輸。 Mikal是side-to- side比較快的,從他的防守就能看的出來。 如果在運動能力上給這兩人評分,Miles10分 Mikal 9分。 力量&運動能力:Miles稍占優勢。 Outside Shooting It’s bonkers how much Mikal has improved his outside jumper between now and when he was a freshman. He played 20.3 minutes per game on Villanova’s national title squad. Outside of the talent ahead of him, Mikal’s suspect jumper was the biggest reason he didn’t play more. He shot 29.9 percent from 3 on less than two attempts per game. Now, he’s shooting 46 percent from deep on 5.3 attempts per game, and confidence oozes from him. His coach believes in his stroke, too – so much that Jay Wright draws up several plays per game specifically designed to get Mikal an open 3. This, right here, is beautiful. Omari Spellman acts like he’s going to set a ball screen for Jalen Brunson, but veers off at the last minute to set a pin down pick for Mikal. Johnathan Williams creeps too far up onto Brunson, and Brunson’s man is lost – he chases Spellman on the roll. This confuses Rui Hachimura, who hesitates for a split-second. Too late. Mikal’s lightning-quick release earns him bonus points, by the way. He swishes this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pmukx6YJoHs
Mikal is a textbook off-the-catch sniper, and his off-the-dribble game is improving. This is lofty praise, but his development at Villanova is Kawhi Leonard-esque. 外圍投射 Mikal的外圍投射進步很多,大一3分場均出手低於兩次命中率29.9%,現在(大三)場均 出手5.3次命中率46%,Mikal是off-the-catch射手的教科書,他的off-the-dribble也有 進步,作者給他很高的讚美,說他的發展過程就像是Villanova的可愛一樣。 And to Miles’ credit, he’s a much better shooter than most predicted when he arrived at Michigan State. Miles shot 39 percent from 3 last year – he’s down to 34 as a sophomore, but he’s certainly not lacking in confidence. Neither is Tom Izzo. Check out this elaborate sequence against Rutgers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=79&v=b0oODJD4Sos
Kenny Goins nails Miles’ defender with back-to-back picks, and it gives him just enough breathing room to fire. Because he’s playing more small forward this year, Miles is being asked to do more wing stuff – like pop off of screens and be the primary ball-handler in screen-roll actions. He’s fared well, but he’s a natural power forward. His release isn’t as fluid as Mikal ’s, and he’s not nearly as efficient. Miles is a passable outside shooter; Mikal has turned into an elite one. Miles進Michigan State時,外線比預期的更好一些,去年3分命中率39%,但今年掉到34% 。今年SF位置上出賽較多,也被要求做更多側翼的工作,像pop off of screens和擋 拆持球者的工作,Miles的出手不像Mikal流暢,效率也不高。 Miles的外圍投射還OK,Mikal是傑出的。 外圍投射: Mikal勝出一籌 Slashing This isn’t a huge part of either player’s game. The difference? It should be a bigger part of Miles’ game, because he’s better at it. Good luck stopping this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=66&v=lxQV9E-uM2s
Here, there are three guys in position to stop him, but Miles just lowers his head and plows though them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=24&v=lxQV9E-uM2s
Part of the reason Izzo can play Miles out of position is because he can space the floor and get to the rim at will. He’s not a great ball-handler, but he’s a capable one; combine that with his football build and explosiveness, and Miles could live at the free-throw line. He’s only getting there 2.7 times per game this season – part of that is Michigan State ’s personnel, but Miles could stand to attack the basket more. The Spartans use Miles as an off-ball cutter and a ball-screen facilitator. Mikal plays with one of the best point guards in the country in Brunson, so he mostly just needs to worry about curling around screens, spotting up, and attacking defenses already in disarray thanks to Brunson or Phil Booth. As we saw last year – when Michigan State wasn’t as talented as it is now – that you can run an NCAA tournament-caliber offense through Miles. Mikal has played on three great teams, and has thrived in a secondary offensive role. But we’ve never seen him be the guy. Miles’ transcendent athletic package makes life easier for everyone on the floor. Edge: Miles 切入能力看影片,作者表示不用怎麼比,這就是Miles的優勢 Perimeter Defense Mikal has been an outstanding perimeter defender from the moment he put on a Villanova jersey. At 6-7 with a 7-foot wingspan, he’s got the prototypical build of a wing stopper. But his timing and instincts are what set him apart. The below sequence is remarkable for a few reasons. Mikal shuts down three different players in a 13-second clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EpdxRQnsQQ
Mikal is originally guarding the ball-handler, and dodges the screen to stay at his man’s hip. The Villanova big switches, so Mikal takes his man without hesitation, effectively stopping any post entry. Then, he helps Donte DiVincenzo when his man has a step, and recovers back to his own in a pinch. First: it’s incredible that Mikal can guard pretty much anyone on the floor, as we see here. It doesn’t matter if he’s a back-to-the-basket center, a wing, or a speedy point guard. Second: Mikal knows exactly when he should switch onto someone else’s guy, and exactly when he should stunt and recover. His combination of athletic tools and feel is off the charts, and it ’s why he’s the best perimeter defender in the country. Opponents score 87.2 points per 100 possessions with Mikal on the floor; no other Wildcat has a defensive rating below 90. Miles is a good defender – he’s stout in the post thanks to his strength, and can stay with smaller guys thanks to his speed. But he doesn’t have the defensive instincts or lateral quickness Mikal does, and simply isn’t as much of a disruptor on that end. Big edge: Mikal 外圍防守 看上面影片 Mikal是傑出的外圍防守者,身高6呎7,7呎翼展,球場上的防守時機與直覺讓他與眾不同 ,他每100次進攻讓對手只得到87.2分。 Miles是個好的防守者,守低位他有身材優勢,守較矮小球員他的速度可以跟上,但是他沒 有Mikal的防守直覺跟橫向移動的速度,不像Mikal可以給對手很大的困擾。 外圍防守:Mikal大勝 Interior Defense Man, this one is hard. Miles is a cinder block as a post defender. Let’s say DeAndre Ayton has the ball with his back to the basket, seven feet away from the hoop. Miles has a better chance to hold firm due to his build. But Mikal can get up like Miles can, and has better rim-protecting instincts. On the first possession of the St. Joseph’s game, Mikal is guarding the opposing center, but doesn’t abandon him and still blocks the shot. To do this without selling out and leaving the big open for an offensive putback is rare: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvZgjtHwvEM
You don’t see that kind of stuff from Miles, but he’s also not as prone to getting backed down by a strong, skilled center as Mikal is. Mikal is the better weakside helper. Miles is the better post defender. Side note: you could play either of these guys at center on defense, and probably be fine. That’s crazy. Edge: Draw 內線防守 Mikal弱邊防守比較好,Miles低位防守比較好,Mikal有比較好的護框直覺,Miles的身材 優勢可以扛住大號球員。 內線防守:平手 Playmaking Perhaps the biggest knock on Mikal: he’s never been asked to be a distributor, so he’s never shown he can do it. Then again: Brunson is the Villanova point guard, so why would he? Miles is at his best when he sets a ball screen, catches a pass with a head of steam, and either rumbles to the rim for a dunk or kicks out to an open shooter. That’s what made him so lethal as a small-ball four as a freshman; we haven’t seen it as much as a sophomore because of the position switch, but it’s there. The proof is in the assist totals: Miles has averaged more than Mikal every step of the way. Considering how much he’s grown as a shooter, expect Mikal to add this to his game at some point. But right now, Miles is the more proven playmaker. His vision is an underrated aspect of his game. Edge: Miles 組織進攻 Mikal還沒展現出這方面的能力,因為沒被要求這麼做過 Miles現階段組織進攻的能力就是比Mikal好,數據或球場上的打法可以證明他組織進攻的 能力,他球場上的視野是被低估的。 組織進攻:Miles勝 Overall So, so tough. Let’s put it this way. If you have an average surrounding roster and need a guy to take you to the NCAA tournament, Miles is the better choice. But if you have a star player, a star coach and other quality role players? Mikal is the killer sidekick that can raise you to a national championship level. Mikal probably couldn’t have led Michigan State to the 2017 NCAA tournament, but Miles wouldn’t fit into No. 1 Villanova’s scheme as well as Mikal does. Truly, it’s a toss-up. But Mikal’s two best skills (perimeter defense and outside shooting) are absolutely essential in modern basketball, and he has significant edges in both categories. Slight edge: Mikal 總結 假設有一支由平均等級球員組成的球隊,需要一個人帶球隊進去NCAA錦標賽,Miles是比較 好的選擇。 但如果是有個明星球員、明星教練和一些好的角色球員的球隊呢? Mikal是個 可以讓球隊上升到國家冠軍等級的隊友。 Mikal或許不能帶領Michigan State打進NCAA錦 標賽,但Miles也不像Mikal適合第一種子Villanova的體系。 勝負難分,但Mikal有兩種最好的技術(外圍防守和外圍投射),本質上是適合現代籃球的, 且他在兩個類別中有突出的優勢。 總結:Mikal好一點 我個人看兩個人的比賽也覺得Mikal比較好 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.165.84.193 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/ChicagoBulls/M.1514481170.A.749.html

12/29 01:29, 7年前 , 1F
12/29 01:29, 1F

12/29 02:04, 7年前 , 2F
感謝s大用心!!!
12/29 02:04, 2F

12/29 02:09, 7年前 , 3F
Mikal的防守意識跟站位真是出色,整篇外電看下來,再
12/29 02:09, 3F

12/29 02:09, 7年前 , 4F
輔以一些比賽影片,我也喜歡Mikal多一點
12/29 02:09, 4F

12/29 08:53, 7年前 , 5F
Knox跟上面兩位相比呢,差異在何處
12/29 08:53, 5F

12/29 08:59, 7年前 , 6F
Mikal+1 他的臂展看起來也很長 加上他的投射能力
12/29 08:59, 6F

12/29 08:59, 7年前 , 7F
應該會比較適合公牛 Miles的高光很多都是切入或灌籃的體能球
12/29 08:59, 7F

12/29 09:00, 7年前 , 8F
進到更高層級 很可能會吃鱉 所以我也傾向選Mikal補SF的洞
12/29 09:00, 8F

12/29 09:48, 7年前 , 9F
Knox身材最好 身高6呎9可以打到4號 才18歲 體能一樣很
12/29 09:48, 9F

12/29 09:48, 7年前 , 10F
好 外圍投射不穩 這3個中外線最差的 最大優勢是他最年
12/29 09:48, 10F

12/29 09:48, 7年前 , 11F
輕 還沒長完 如果能加強外線 防守更認真點 他的天花板
12/29 09:48, 11F

12/29 09:48, 7年前 , 12F
應該最高
12/29 09:48, 12F

12/29 10:28, 7年前 , 13F
多謝解答,看來側翼好貨還不少呢
12/29 10:28, 13F

12/29 11:18, 7年前 , 14F
說好貨還不太算吧 只是潛力股 最好就是合格先發 但不會是核心
12/29 11:18, 14F

12/29 11:19, 7年前 , 15F
核心只有前4名 所以大概只有看別人選的份了吧
12/29 11:19, 15F

12/29 20:26, 7年前 , 16F
Mikal+1但Miles的體能令人流口水
12/29 20:26, 16F

12/30 21:25, 7年前 , 17F
不知道專業的大大覺得Jaren Jackson Jr.怎麼樣?之前
12/30 21:25, 17F

12/30 21:25, 7年前 , 18F
有打爆過Bagely,看高光也是體能勁爆
12/30 21:25, 18F

12/30 21:42, 7年前 , 19F
12/30 21:42, 19F

12/31 11:40, 7年前 , 20F
我也蠻喜歡Jaren Jackson的 他防守不管單防 站位都蠻好
12/31 11:40, 20F

12/31 11:40, 7年前 , 21F
的 缺點是外線還很不穩但他才18歲 是可期待越來越好
12/31 11:40, 21F

12/31 11:45, 7年前 , 22F
Bagley那場也不算被打爆 那場出賽10分鐘就被隊友戳傷眼
12/31 11:45, 22F

12/31 11:45, 7年前 , 23F
睛下場 得到4分6板效率還是蠻高的 但Jackson單防他幾球
12/31 11:45, 23F

12/31 11:45, 7年前 , 24F
都守下來了
12/31 11:45, 24F

12/31 11:48, 7年前 , 25F
如果繼續贏下去 要選到Jackson是不太可能的
12/31 11:48, 25F

12/31 13:19, 7年前 , 26F
以目前的態勢看 順位可能落在10~17左右 這區間2.3號人選不少
12/31 13:19, 26F
文章代碼(AID): #1QHIOIT9 (ChicagoBulls)
文章代碼(AID): #1QHIOIT9 (ChicagoBulls)