May 1 ; Houston 9, Chi Cubs 3

看板Cubs作者EdJay (會冷會冷果實能力者)時間20年前 (2005/05/05 00:41)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串1/1

May 1, 2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E Chi Cubs 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 12 1 Houston 1 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 X 9 11 2 Chi Cubs AB R H RBI BB SO LOB AVG Hairston, 2B 5 0 2 0 0 0 4 .266 Perez, SS 3 1 1 0 0 0 2 .366 Patterson, CF 4 0 1 0 0 1 4 .283 Lee, 1B 3 1 1 2 2 0 3 .416 Ramirez, 3B 5 0 1 0 0 0 5 .239 Burnitz, RF 5 0 2 0 0 1 3 .304 Hollandsworth, LF 4 0 0 0 1 1 4 .236 Barrett, C 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 .240 Prior, P 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 .444 a-Cedeno, PH 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 .333 Rusch, P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 b-Macias, PH 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 .174 Ohman, P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 Totals 37 3 12 2 3 3 31 a-Singled for Prior in the 6th. b-Grounded into a double play for Rusch in the 8th. BATTING 2B: Ramirez (7, Oswalt), Prior (1, Oswalt), Hairston (6, Oswalt). HR: Lee (8, 3rd inning off Oswalt, 1 on, 1 out). TB: Hairston 3; Perez; Patterson; Lee 4; Ramirez 2; Burnitz 2; Barrett 2; Prior 2; Cedeno. RBI: Lee 2 (30). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Lee 3; Hairston 2; Barrett; Ramirez; Hollandsworth 2. S: Perez; Patterson. GIDP: Macias. Team LOB: 13. FIELDING E: Hairston (1, throw). Outfield assists: Hollandsworth (Bagwell at home). Houston AB R H RBI BB SO LOB AVG Taveras, CF 5 2 2 0 0 0 2 .275 Biggio, 2B 5 2 2 0 0 1 1 .273 Bagwell, 1B 3 0 1 1 2 1 3 .266 Lamb, LF 5 1 2 5 0 0 2 .262 Lane, RF 4 1 1 0 1 0 3 .293 Ensberg, 3B 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 .254 Everett, SS 4 1 1 3 0 2 3 .240 Chavez, C 4 1 1 0 0 2 2 .310 Oswalt, P 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 .133 Springer, P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 a-Burke, PH 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 .233 Wheeler, P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 b-Vizcaino, PH 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 .312 Harville, P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 Franco, P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 Totals 35 9 11 9 6 9 19 a-Struck out for Springer in the 6th. b-Walked for Wheeler in the 7th. BATTING 2B: Ensberg (4, Rusch). 3B: Biggio (1, Rusch). HR: Lamb (1, 5th inning off Prior, 3 on, 2 out), Everett (2, 5th inning off Prior, 2 on, 2 out). TB: Taveras 2; Biggio 4; Bagwell; Lamb 5; Lane; Ensberg 2; Everett 4; Chavez. RBI: Bagwell (14), Lamb 5 (10), Everett 3 (11). 2-out RBI: Lamb 5; Everett 3. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Taveras. Team LOB: 8. BASERUNNING SB: Taveras (8, 2nd base off Prior/Barrett). FIELDING E: Everett 2 (2, fielding, fielding). Outfield assists: Taveras (Ramirez at home).~三場被他殺三個 Orz~ DP: (Harville-Everett-Bagwell). Chi Cubs IP H R ER BB SO HR ERA Prior (L, 3-1) 5.0 7 8 8 3 7 2 3.75 Rusch 2.0 4 1 1 2 2 0 2.35 Ohman 1.0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.00 Houston IP H R ER BB SO HR ERA Oswalt (W, 4-2) 5.0 10 3 2 2 1 1 3.29 Springer 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2.61 Wheeler 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1.50 Harville 1.1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2.84 Franco 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.45 Oswalt pitched to 2 batters in the 6th. WP: Oswalt. IBB: Bagwell (by Rusch). HBP: Perez (by Harville). Pitches-strikes: Prior 107-78, Rusch 50-27, Ohman 15-8, Oswalt 86-54, Springer 10-7, Wheeler 15-9, Harville 20-13, Franco 9-6. Ground outs-fly outs: Prior 1-7, Rusch 2-1, Ohman 0-3, Oswalt 10-3, Springer 0-2, Wheeler 0-2, Harville 2-2, Franco 0-2. Batters faced: Prior 26, Rusch 11, Ohman 4, Oswalt 28, Springer 3, Wheeler 3, Harville 7, Franco 2. Inherited runners-scored: Springer 2-0, Franco 3-0. Umpires: HP: Dana DeMuth. 1B: Marty Foster. 2B: Rob Drake. 3B: Laz Diaz. Weather: 70 degrees, cloudy. Wind: 14 mph, Out to LF. T: 2:52. Att: 38,014. 小普這場被砲轟在第五局挨了一發滿貫和一發三分砲單局掉了 7 分總計主投五局掉了 8 分這都是他個人生涯最糟的成績而在這場大爆炸之前小普投了 19 局也不過只有 2 分的自責分小熊開局靠著金手李持續火熱的全壘打表現先是以 2 比 1 取得領先隨後拉米打出二壘安打並想靠著 Burnitz 的二壘安打衝回本壘得分不過卻死在太空人中外野手 Willy Taveraz 的傳球上不管你是不是對他很熟至少這個系列賽後你應該會對他的名字有點印象了因為和太空人三場比賽中他每一場都殺了一個跑者在本壘前貝克爺:"他像是每天一顆的維他命一樣，每天都殺一個跑者。" 五局滿壘一出局小普先是三振掉 Bagwell 不過 Lamb 在球數絕對落後的情況下打出滿貫全壘打隨後小普接連保送了兩名打者再被 Everett 敲了支三分彈小熊馬上以 3 比 8 落後貝克爺:"那發生在兩好球沒有壞球的情況下，我不記得我上次看到能從球數絕對落後下打出滿貫砲是什麼時候了。" 總之小普這場控球不太理想失投球過多 Lamb 那球要塞內角直球卻跑到紅中 Everett 那球則是偏高的 curve 被打出去都是沒投好導致另外小熊還是沒能利用壘包上的跑者來拿到分數適時的安打總是難產其中 Patterson 三次得點圈打擊的機會都沒能打出安打從 Oswalt 手中打出 10 支安打其實算是很不錯的表現不過卻只拿了 3 分其中有一分還是非自責分而 Oswalt 的右腳踝也因為扭傷而退場對太空人的系列戰以 1 勝 2 敗作收 -- 唔~~五月到了論文截稿日期也快到了我恐怕沒能力每天全文翻譯之後恐怕將挑重點翻譯就好請見諒!! -- [Theory] 1. No theory is perfect and forever. 2. It is legal and, indeed, desirable to question any accepted theory. 3. Any theory is better than no theory at all. 4. It is crucial to persevere to prove the worth of a new theory. ~~by Adrian Bejan~~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.203.175.199