[閒聊] 為何當初Williams和Kimi的合約沒有談成?

看板FORMULA1 (F1 賽車)作者Pepe1981 (20100402)時間13年前 (2013/01/14 23:22)推噓13(13推 0噓 17→)

留言30則, 13人參與討論串1/1

Kimi Raikkonen returned back to F1 in Lotus, but he would originally had wanted to drive in Williams. Kimi重返F1後在Lotus車隊，但他原本想在Williams開車 Raikkonen,who was looking for a new F1-contract visited Williams-team's factory in Britain at the end of year 2011. 正在尋求一份新的F1合約的Kimi，在2011年底拜訪了Williams車隊位於英國的工廠 Adam Parr, who back then was Williams-team's second boss and chairman of the board, he remembers very well how the team's board had heated discussions about whether or not hire Raikkonen. Williams車隊的第二個老闆(車隊CEO?)且為董事會主席的Adam Parr，他記得很清楚車隊董事會討論是否雇用Kimi時有多激烈 “One member said that we have to hire him. Another member said that it would be the worst mistake we have ever done,” Parr told Autosport. 一名董事會成員說:我們必須雇用他(Kimi)。另一名成員說:這(雇用Kimi)會是我們犯過最糟糕的錯誤。Adam Parr告訴Autosport。 “I myself wanted to hire him, but in the end I came to the conclusion that it would be too risky. 我自己想雇用他，但最終我得到的結論是雇用他太過冒險 “His eagerness and determination made an impression on me, however his value was still a mystery for us and we didn't even know how good car we could give him,” Parr told. 他的渴望和決心給我留下印象，然而他的價值對我們而言仍然是個迷，我們甚至不知道我們能給他多好的車。Parr說。 Last season proved that Williams made a mistake when they didn't hire Raikkonen. 上個賽季證明Williams沒有雇用Kimi錯了 http://ppt.cc/3PGc 作為Kimi的車迷，我不認為Williams錯了 08、09年Kimi被媒體所塑造出來的形象就是: 沒有動力、沒有研發能力、沒有回饋數據能力、不會調教賽車、不會和技師溝通... 大概除了曾和Kimi合作過的Martin Whitmarsh和Norbert Haug外，沒人敢雇用Kimi吧而Williams自從和BMW拆夥後，加上金融海嘯...現在也自身難保簽的車手要自帶贊助，Frank Williams也將車隊上市來籌措資金可以想見他們經濟狀況的困窘而經濟狀況也沒好到哪去的Lotus竟然願意賭一把簽Kimi 誤打誤撞進了Lotus 沒想到車還不錯該說上天眷顧呢還是Kimi這人傻人有傻福 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.252.61.215

→

corlos

01/14 23:24, , 1^F

01/14 23:24, 1^F

推

SuperAguri

01/14 23:26, , 2^F

01/14 23:26, 2^F

→

corlos

01/14 23:27, , 3^F

01/14 23:27, 3^F