Re: 杜拜男網賽決賽
看板Federer作者iliketea (He got 16, going on 17)時間13年前 (2011/02/27 18:30)推噓11(11推 0噓 26→)留言37則, 13人參與討論串3/8 (看更多)
針對前前有板友說 Rog 在場上想辦法...恩...
大略翻一下
Rickyroger
Djokovic's game in the first set was even better than his game at the AO
against Roger. By a good bit. 91% first serves or so at one point. And the
best I've ever seen him hit the ball. Ever.
不管誰輸誰贏,稱讚Djokovic,沒有很難
Djo第一盤擊球狀態是有史以來我看過的最好,最好!
If people ever wonder what "the zone" is, that was it right there in that
first set.
大家如果還在想說啥叫"神領域",第一盤就是。
MARCIAF said it beautifully; that all the while it seemed Roger was simply
trying to find a way back into the match, as though he wanted to push
"restart". This had everything to do with Novak. Not the result entirely, but
definitely the start and the first set.
Rog想把比賽歸零重新開始,但Djo不准
Also, if Roger did talk things out with Paul, I didn't see it. Novak most
certainly spoke to Vajda a good deal. Lovely graphic shown where 73% of all
balls were hit to Roger's backhand, and you could see Roger trying his best
to run around it but Novak was always on the front foot on serve and Roger
was always on the back foot with his poor serving, hence Novak feasted on
that equation.
我沒看到Rog跟Annacone的戰術。但 Novak 肯定跟他的教練說的可清楚了:73% 的球
打向 Rog 的反拍,Rog 雖然很努力奔跑救球,但 Novak 發球好,Rog 則相反;正重他的
下懷。
Now onto what Roger did wrong. I can understand that Roger really was dealing
with a better player on the day, but I was so disappointed in how he didn't
use the court at all. He still moves so well, but never changes it up. What a
waste. I hardly saw him slice today. Instead he took Novak on in groundstroke
exchanges. A Novak who simply thinks he can beat anyone. The only way you get
a person of the zone is to change things up, not mildly, but radically. Chip
everything. Charge on every second serve return. Serve a slow first serve.
Slice every backhand for a whole game. Just bust the opponent out of the
beautiful world he is living in.
來談談 Rog 做錯了什麼,可以看出 Rog 今天就是在打個神魂附體的選手,但我不免失望
他居然打法這樣單調。他移位依然很棒,但都沒有變化。今天幾乎都沒看到切球,相反地
只看到他在底線跟 Novak 對幹,跟一個信心高漲的 Novak 對幹。把這種人把神壇上請下
來的唯一方法就是改變節奏,不是只變一點,而要變很大。切切切,二發都給他切回去,
發超慢速一發,就是把他的狀態給攪亂。
I saw none of that. Roger was content to simply try and beat Novak at his own
game, which ironically, for the better part of the 2000s, was his own game,
which is why he is struggling to let go of it. Paul would have been pulling
his hair out (whatever's left of it).
今天啥都沒看到,Rog 就只就想在底線擊潰 Novak,但令人莞爾的是自21世紀以來這底線
大部分菁華還都是他自己的 XD 也說明了為啥他很難放棄。
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Roger's problem now is just one
thing; lack of an ability to truly THINK on the court in terms of match
dynamics. He simply does not change things up. He does not see subtle things
his opponents are doing anymore to be able to adjust on the fly. He just eggs
on with the same game. Where Paul has helped immensely until now is in
helping Roger reach that level of "minimal excellence". Roger, since
Annacone, moves, better, hits better, volleys better, and even has a better
second serve, which guarantees him a path to finals/SFs. But when he has to
meet someone at the same level, the younger guy does two things better:
之前說過了現在再說一遍,Rog 現在的問題只有一個那就是在場上當比賽進行他無法清楚
的思考。他就是沒有不同的戰術,他沒看到對手做的一些細微的事情,然後就此因應,他
就是在孵同樣的打法。教練到目前為止幫他最多得就是讓他各項技術都好一點。Rog 自從
請他之後移位有快一點,擊球更好一點,截擊友準確一點,甚至二發都更有攻擊性,這都
讓他可以邁向四強或決賽。但當他必須打一個跟他一樣好的人,年輕人這做兩個事:
1) Keeps up his level from better mental focus
因為專注力好,整場都保有高水準
2) Sees changes quickly and adapts better
看到些微變化就能立即做調整
At that highest of high levels, that's what makes the difference. Not a
faster serve or quicker feet. Just an ability to focus hard and think. Either
this is age-related or he has distractions we just don't know about. But that
is his problem. Hardly anything particularly technical. It doesn't matter
that today he hit more BHs DTL than yesterday or whatever. He's playing at an
excellent level again so those are not the things that make the difference.
在最高最高的水準,這就是決定勝負的所在,不是發球或移位;就是個專注的能力。是老
化還是心有旁鶩我們不得而知,但這是他的問題,這都不是技術面的。這跟他今天打的帥
氣反拍直線比昨天多無關,他狀態還是不錯所以這些都沒關係。
He needs to feel fresher point to point. Easier said than done. I'm sure this
is it. I'll admit this was the first match of his I saw at this tournament,
but it's what I think.
他必須每球都腦筋清楚,但說比做容易。
(最後兩句棄翻,因為怕被噓 XD)
筆者是打過網球而且少年時期曾被教主延攬到佛羅里達,只因父母不肯而作罷
現在是醫生,類似怪醫豪斯里的Wilson這樣 XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.230.125.167
推
02/27 20:40, , 1F
02/27 20:40, 1F
→
02/27 20:40, , 2F
02/27 20:40, 2F
→
02/27 20:45, , 3F
02/27 20:45, 3F
推
02/27 23:50, , 4F
02/27 23:50, 4F
推
02/28 00:13, , 5F
02/28 00:13, 5F
→
02/28 00:18, , 6F
02/28 00:18, 6F
→
02/28 00:19, , 7F
02/28 00:19, 7F
→
02/28 00:19, , 8F
02/28 00:19, 8F
→
02/28 00:21, , 9F
02/28 00:21, 9F
→
02/28 00:22, , 10F
02/28 00:22, 10F
→
02/28 00:23, , 11F
02/28 00:23, 11F
→
02/28 00:24, , 12F
02/28 00:24, 12F
→
02/28 00:25, , 13F
02/28 00:25, 13F
→
02/28 01:03, , 14F
02/28 01:03, 14F
推
02/28 04:04, , 15F
02/28 04:04, 15F
→
02/28 04:04, , 16F
02/28 04:04, 16F
→
02/28 04:05, , 17F
02/28 04:05, 17F
推
02/28 15:33, , 18F
02/28 15:33, 18F
→
02/28 15:34, , 19F
02/28 15:34, 19F
推
02/28 17:07, , 20F
02/28 17:07, 20F
→
02/28 17:08, , 21F
02/28 17:08, 21F
→
02/28 17:11, , 22F
02/28 17:11, 22F
→
02/28 17:12, , 23F
02/28 17:12, 23F
→
02/28 17:15, , 24F
02/28 17:15, 24F
→
02/28 17:18, , 25F
02/28 17:18, 25F
推
02/28 18:36, , 26F
02/28 18:36, 26F
推
02/28 18:57, , 27F
02/28 18:57, 27F
→
02/28 18:58, , 28F
02/28 18:58, 28F
→
02/28 18:58, , 29F
02/28 18:58, 29F
→
02/28 21:25, , 30F
02/28 21:25, 30F
推
02/28 22:20, , 31F
02/28 22:20, 31F
推
02/28 23:41, , 32F
02/28 23:41, 32F
推
03/01 04:54, , 33F
03/01 04:54, 33F
→
03/01 04:55, , 34F
03/01 04:55, 34F
→
03/01 04:55, , 35F
03/01 04:55, 35F
→
03/02 09:56, , 36F
03/02 09:56, 36F
→
03/02 09:56, , 37F
03/02 09:56, 37F
討論串 (同標題文章)
Federer 近期熱門文章
3
5
19
19
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
582
628