[翻譯] NBA Draft SuperThread

看板G-S-WARRIORS (金洲勇士)作者jerk0204 (saxon)時間16年前 (2009/04/19 22:42)推噓6(6推 0噓 10→)

留言16則, 4人參與討論串1/1

今天是季後賽開打的第一天，凌晨看了公牛跟超賽的對決，只能說季後賽的張力十足，比常規賽更加刺激。當季後賽進行的如火如荼，放假的勇士則要摩拳擦掌，精挑細選。 Final Lottery Standings and Chances to win #1 Pick. 1. Kings (16-64) -- 25 percent chance to win 2t. Wizards (19-61) -- 19.9 percent 2t.. Clippers (19-61) -- 15.6 percent 4. Thunder (22-58) -- 11.9 percent 5. Grizzlies (23-57) -- 8.8 percent 6. Timberwolves (24-56) -- 6.3 percent 7. Warriors (29-51) -- 4.3 percent ← 今年選秀順位落在這 8. Knickerbockers (31-50) -- 2.8 percent 9. Raptors (31-49) -- 1.7 percent 10t. Nets/Bucks (33-47) -- 1.1 percent/.8 percent 是的，勇士是今年的第七順位，有4.3%的機會選到狀元。 Our Percentages at winning the #2 or the #3 pick with a 7th placed lottery finish: 2nd Pick: 4.9% ← 在第7順位的位置下，抽中探花的機率 4.9% 3rd Pick: 5.8% ← 在第7順位的位置下，抽中榜眼的機率 5.8% 2009~10年球季預計的陣容如下： PG: None (Crawford/Watson) SG: Monta Ellis SF: Stephen Jackson PF: Anthony Randolph C: Andris Biedrins 6th Man: Corey Maggette 問題來了，勇士要選擇哪個位子的球員呢？問題來了，勇士要選擇哪個位子的球員呢？問題來了，勇士要選擇哪個位子的球員呢？ Why the Warriors should draft a PG ? 為什麼要選擇控球後衛？ If there's a position we are thin at it will be at the PG position. We are lacking Pass First or Court Vision while we have a more than adequate amount of scoring PG's. Our PG's: Ellis, Morrow, Watson, Crawford 如果真要去想說哪號位的球員最薄弱，那我會選擇一號位這個位子。我們缺乏以傳球為優先或是全場視野良好的後衛，相對之下，我們反而有太多得分型的控球後衛。我們的PG:Ellis, Morrow, Watson, Crawford。 Why the Warriors should draft a SG or SF ? 為什麼要選擇得分後衛、小前鋒？ My personal opinion is that we are OK at these positions especially at the 2, but we need a 2 or 3 who can defend man to man and possibly shoot the long ball. We can also go 2 or 3 if management's draft strategy is to go BPA (Best Player Available). Our 2's: Ellis, Morrow, Crawford, Belinelli, Jackson, Maggette, Azubuike Our 3's: Jackson, Maggette, Azubuike, Randolph [Possible 我認為我們在2、3號位上的球員是OK的，特別是2號位，但我們需要能在2、3號位上提供防守的球員，並要有長射能力。當然我們也可以去選2、3號球員，如果勇士決策階層的選秀策略是朝著BPA前進的話。(意指假設在選秀會中其他位子的人才都不出色，那就選個最厲害2、3號位球員吧，類似台語的:沒魚，蝦也好。) 我們的2號位球員:Ellis, Morrow, Crawford, Belinelli, Jackson, Maggette, Azubuike 我們的3號位球員:Jackson, Maggette, Azubuike, Randolph [Possible] Why the Warriors should draft a PF ? 為什麼要選擇大前鋒？ I also personally think we are fit in the future at PF, a combo of Wright and Randolph may set us for years IF we keep them. Regardless, if we win the lotto for the #1 we pick Griffin if we lose and go BPA we may pick another PF (Which I doubt). Our 4's: Randolph, Kurz, Davidson, Wright, Turiaf, (All 3's if we play small) 個人覺得目前在4號位的球員都很合適，有著Wright以及Randolph在四號位的一前一後，假設這兩位我們都能留住的話，他們可以替我們撐個幾年。不管怎樣，假如我們贏得了狀元籤，我們偷笑挑走Griffin；如果沒有狀元籤，那就朝著BPA的模式下挑一個比較好的大前鋒吧。(我懷疑還有誰可以挑) 我們的4號位球員:Randolph, Kurz, Davidson, Wright, Turiaf,(如果打小陣容就換3號) Why the Warriors should draft a C ? 為什麼要選擇中鋒？ The Warriors should draft a Center, but not as a starter, but a backup. This years draft is incredibly weak at the Center spot with only 2 1st round talents in Thabeet and Mullens. You do not draft a backup at #7, but once again if we go BPA and Thabeet is available at our slot not at #1 then he may be the pick. Our 5's: Biedrins, Turiaf, Randolph, (All 4's if we play small) 勇士應該要挑一個中鋒，但是用來當替補的。今年除了第一輪的Thabeet以及Mullens，其他中鋒弱到一個令人不敢置信的地步。當然你不會用第七順位去選一個替補，可是在 BPA的模式下那就該選擇Thabeet。我們的5號位球員:Biedrins, Turiaf, Randolph, (打小陣容換4號) Why the Warriors should Trade The Pick ? 為什麼要交易掉選秀權？ The Warriors should trade down if at our slot there is no perfect candidate to pick with (Mainly a non-top 3 pick). A trade down to the mid-later 1st would give us many specialists to pick and some pre-season high rated prospects such as Mullens, Teague, Aminu, Lawson, Collison. We can also trade for current NBA players who management target. 假設今年名單上都沒有可以選的人才(如果沒有前三順位)，那勇士就該交易掉選秀權。交易掉首輪中段的選秀權可以給我們的專家去挑選一些前一季的高順位的新秀，像是 Mullens, Teague, Aminu, Lawson, Collison 或是決策階層也可以用首輪選秀權去換當今的NBA球員。 (文章取自: http://0rz.tw/9XHZr ) -- 能推閃光，誰要推王? 能當禽獸，誰玩魔獸! ─所以我一直遲遲無法脫離WOW -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.228.35.34

推

RonArtest93

04/20 13:50, , 1^F

04/20 13:50, 1^F

→

RonArtest93

04/20 13:52, , 2^F

04/20 13:52, 2^F

→

RonArtest93

04/20 13:53, , 3^F

04/20 13:53, 3^F