Fw: [外絮] 勇士或許會考慮交易David Lee

看板G-S-WARRIORS (金洲 勇士)作者 (Saxon)時間12年前 (2013/05/26 21:08), 編輯推噓5(508)
留言13則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1HeWFrqz ] 作者: xpu (叉批U) 看板: NBA 標題: [外絮] 勇士或許會考慮交易David Lee 時間: Sun May 26 20:45:35 2013 Source:http://tinyurl.com/np5zzbs The Golden State Warriors went on a fantastic run through the 2013 NBA Playoffs, fueled by a superstar-like performance from Stephen Curry and hot-shooting from the rest of the team as well. They proved they are a young team with a ton of talent that we should keep an eye on for the future as they develop and grow. 今年NBA季後賽讓Curry發光發熱 這使得他們得開始放眼未來的發展和成長。 One of the most impressive things about what the Warriors were able to accomplish is that they did it with the only player on their roster to make the All-Star Game, David Lee, rarely playing and playing at way less than full healthy when he did get on the floor. Head coach Mark Jackson brilliantly made the move to play Harrison Barnes at the power forward and playing a small-ball lineup. Lee是勇士輪替中唯一打過明星賽的,而他卻沒有完全健康的出賽 Mark Jackson巧妙的利用Barnes打PF,並且打起小球戰術。 Though it may be a bit of over-reaction, the fact that the Warriors were able to succeed without Lee on the floor has to raise questions about how much value he actually adds to this team. He averaged a double-double this season, can score, and is an above-average rebounder, but he’s also an incredibly poor defender and can sometimes disappear on offense. 也許我們過度反應了,事實上勇士缺少Lee還是可以成功的, 但現在的問題在於,它帶給勇士全隊的價值、以及貢獻度有多大等等。 Lee這季平均有Double-Double,他可以得分,籃板也是聯盟平均值以上的, 但他的防守卻也是非常糟糕的,而且有時進攻端會神隱。 It may be an unpopular idea, but the Warriors should, at the very least, see what Lee’s value is on the trade market this summer. Golden State faces a tough cap situation this off-season that may make it hard to retain some of their key players from this year’s run in the postseason like Jarrett Jack and Carl Landry. Trading Lee, who is due $13 million next season, would alleviate some of those constraints and give them something in return. 也許這想法不切實際,但金州會考慮的。 他們會看看Lee在自由市場的評價如何,畢竟他們想留下Jack還有Landry, 把Lee交易掉,勇士就有13M可以運用,這將使他們更容易留下Jack&Landry。 Trading Lee would also let the Warriors see how effective this small-ball scheme could be for them with Barnes developing as an undersized power forward. Lee puts up solid stats and helped the Warriors often this past season, but it’s worth looking into what Golden State could get in a trade for him and what they could do without him in the lineup. 交易他可以讓勇士看到小球戰術的奧義,又可以培育出小Size的大前鋒Barnes 但壞處是,他能換來什麼好球員呢? 以及沒有Lee的勇士又會變得怎樣呢? -- 板上都熱火文...貼個少數人關心的球隊吧。 話說這有可能嗎? 為了留下兩個超好用板凳,什麼交易流言都開始來了呢! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 49.158.67.196

05/26 20:46, , 1F
去火箭?
05/26 20:46, 1F

05/26 20:46, , 2F
台灣之友 大衛李
05/26 20:46, 2F

05/26 20:47, , 3F
跟湖人換 Gasol 雙贏
05/26 20:47, 3F

05/26 20:47, , 4F
湖人 MWP換Lee 湖人小虧
05/26 20:47, 4F

05/26 20:48, , 5F
跟費城人交易克里夫李
05/26 20:48, 5F

05/26 20:48, , 6F
或是Clark+Jamison 換 Lee 湖人大虧
05/26 20:48, 6F

05/26 20:48, , 7F
Barnes 大學的時候 也是打PF嗎???
05/26 20:48, 7F

05/26 20:49, , 8F
但勉為其難接受
05/26 20:49, 8F

05/26 20:49, , 9F
如果勇士為了留下兩大板凳交易Lee 卻還留著畢俊希
05/26 20:49, 9F

05/26 20:49, , 10F
交易lee是頭腦壞了嗎? 球隊的基石咧~~
05/26 20:49, 10F

05/26 20:49, , 11F
喔喔 勇士會出手跟湖人S&T魔獸嗎???
05/26 20:49, 11F

05/26 20:49, , 12F
那勇士的管理階層真的都可以FIRE了
05/26 20:49, 12F

05/26 20:50, , 13F
真正的毒瘤是RJ..超貴
05/26 20:50, 13F

05/26 20:50, , 14F
跟裕隆交換李起義 勇士賺到飯局
05/26 20:50, 14F

05/26 20:50, , 15F
畢俊希下季也不便宜好像要8、9M...雖然說是華人之光
05/26 20:50, 15F

05/26 20:51, , 16F
但跟真正的華人之光李大衛比 還是差遠了阿
05/26 20:51, 16F

05/26 20:51, , 17F
強烈建議 我湖嘎獸換大衛李+咖哩 我湖小虧
05/26 20:51, 17F

05/26 20:52, , 18F
但勉為其難接受 考慮到咖哩作為摳比接班人
05/26 20:52, 18F

05/26 20:52, , 19F
Barnes LEE CURRY 這三人是勇士的未來啊
05/26 20:52, 19F

05/26 20:52, , 20F
又可以讓嘎獸去勇士當一哥 只好忍痛接受交易
05/26 20:52, 20F

05/26 20:53, , 21F
要丟的是Richard Jefferson ...
05/26 20:53, 21F

05/26 20:53, , 22F
要交易也是痛痛人Bogut吧 怎麼會是Lee...
05/26 20:53, 22F

05/26 20:54, , 23F
我覺得RJ肯定丟啦 但可能連消息都懶得放吧XD
05/26 20:54, 23F

05/26 20:56, , 24F
巫師三劍客
05/26 20:56, 24F

05/26 20:56, , 25F
Randy Johnson <-> Gasol
05/26 20:56, 25F

05/26 20:59, , 26F
李大衛 <======> Ebanks 迷迷;雙贏
05/26 20:59, 26F

05/26 21:00, , 27F
除非總管瘋了
05/26 21:00, 27F

05/26 21:00, , 28F
那是因為後來有Bogut撐上來 不然季賽Lee是很重要的
05/26 21:00, 28F

05/26 21:01, , 29F
大衛李交易慈世平 迷迷:大虧 勉強同意
05/26 21:01, 29F

05/26 21:01, , 30F
當然如果Bogut能維持健康 那Lee可以考慮賣掉
05/26 21:01, 30F

05/26 21:02, , 31F
就攻守端Bogut的影響力是比Lee有過之無不及
05/26 21:02, 31F

05/26 21:03, , 32F
勇士兩大毒瘤卡了兩千萬就是沒人要 所以明年薪資很慘
05/26 21:03, 32F

05/26 21:03, , 33F
如果為了要留下JACK 的確把LEE交易掉是個選項
05/26 21:03, 33F

05/26 21:04, , 34F
降薪熱火收
05/26 21:04, 34F

05/26 21:04, , 35F
某隊兩大毒瘤卡了五千萬就是沒人要 所以每年薪資很慘
05/26 21:04, 35F

05/26 21:04, , 36F
沒有LEE有門票?
05/26 21:04, 36F

05/26 21:05, , 37F
不過要是沒換到好用的苦工的話 禁區會更大洞
05/26 21:05, 37F

05/26 21:06, , 38F
怎麼不留LEE 考慮交易Landry?
05/26 21:06, 38F

05/26 21:06, , 39F
其實有Lee的禁區本來就是洞XD
05/26 21:06, 39F

05/26 21:08, , 40F
季後賽不就是少了lee,所以只能賭外線兩隻的準頭?
05/26 21:08, 40F

05/26 21:08, , 41F
因為Landry比LEE健康吧
05/26 21:08, 41F

05/26 21:08, , 42F
借轉勇士版,感謝
05/26 21:08, 42F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 轉錄者: jerk0204 (36.236.24.133), 時間: 05/26/2013 21:08:46

05/27 01:25, , 43F
我記得季中有個Landry的訪問才談到過生涯初期的大傷限制
05/27 01:25, 43F

05/27 01:25, , 44F
了他的發展...
05/27 01:25, 44F

05/27 01:49, , 45F
這篇竟然在總板有三篇回文XDD
05/27 01:49, 45F

05/27 03:47, , 46F
那都是亂回的
05/27 03:47, 46F

05/27 03:49, , 47F
交易lee太扯了,誰來搶板?
05/27 03:49, 47F

05/27 04:15, , 48F
亂回也挺娛樂的啊(?) 第三篇有些討論也蠻有趣的
05/27 04:15, 48F

05/27 04:16, , 49F
我是覺得內線Bogut主防守Lee主籃板對大部分隊伍還夠用
05/27 04:16, 49F

05/27 04:19, , 50F
只是喊著要交易Lee的論點著重在Barnes的培養 這方面Lee留
05/27 04:19, 50F

05/27 04:20, , 51F
隊的話就要看教練怎麼安排了 我蠻喜歡季後賽這樣場場視對
05/27 04:20, 51F

05/27 04:22, , 52F
手調整陣容的作法 可是整個例行賽教練團根本沒打算更改先
05/27 04:22, 52F

05/27 04:23, , 53F
發過 自然被拿出來討論的就是占位子占空間占薪資的Lee了.
05/27 04:23, 53F

05/27 04:26, , 54F
另外球團應該也蠻頭痛國王想挖我們助教這事 平常看到畫戰
05/27 04:26, 54F

05/27 04:26, , 55F
術板的都是他XD
05/27 04:26, 55F
文章代碼(AID): #1HeWbWt7 (G-S-WARRIORS)
文章代碼(AID): #1HeWbWt7 (G-S-WARRIORS)