Re: [新聞] 雅虎:老鷹和76人正在商討Teague換Noel

看板Hawks作者 (水霖鴿)時間9年前 (2016/06/04 09:25), 編輯推噓3(306)
留言9則, 3人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
Covington & Stauskas could be involved in 76ers’& Hawks' Noel-Teague Trade http://goo.gl/Fw4TT7 (NBCSports) So, how do Covington and Stauskas fit in this trade? Covington – under contract for the next two years at $1,015,696 and $1,087,745 – is also more valuable than Teague in a vacuum. Sure, Covington could use more minutes at power forward, but he can also play the small forward. Teams can’t get enough 3-and-D wings. Trading Noel for Teague would be bad. Trading Noel and Covington for Teague would be comical. Covington的約還有兩年 可以分擔PF跟SF的位置 對於兩邊來說 其實在側翼的3分球及防 守上都略嫌不足 Noel跟Teague單換其實並不好 但Noel+Covington換Teague就更滑稽了 Stauskas is far more expendable after two seasons of minus outside shooting. But just 22 and on his rookie-scale contract, he still has positive value. Stauskas在過去兩個球季是離外圍投射越來越遠 但因為他的年紀(22)跟新人約 仍舊有他 的交易價值 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 就中段Covington的部分 猜測一下作者想法 Hawks:失去Teague 補進Noel+Covington Teague原先的三分能力不見得能補上 尤其是老 鷹這種高流動性的球隊 而且外線被射爆的場景還歷歷在目 Noel跟Covington都較 偏禁區球員 外線防守是否更薄弱了? 76ers:只補進Teague 雖然內線球員還有Embiid跟Okafor 但少了Noel+Covington兩個先發 76人能找到適合的陣容嗎? 狀元能無縫接軌來補上欠缺的側翼防守跟3分嗎? 只有 Teague是不夠的 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.248.120.105 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Hawks/M.1465003551.A.053.html

06/04 13:49, , 1F
Covington不算禁區吧,今年後來都是Grant打四號,
06/04 13:49, 1F

06/04 14:17, , 2F
我對他的印象比較像內線XD 不過的確是三號
06/04 14:17, 2F

06/04 14:18, , 3F
不然我不太確定作者寫的滑稽是指哪一點
06/04 14:18, 3F

06/04 17:42, , 4F
他是指每個球隊都不會嫌3D球員多,所以原本丟個Noel換J
06/04 17:42, 4F

06/04 17:42, , 5F
T就已經虧,再丟一個3D球員就更可笑了
06/04 17:42, 5F

06/04 17:59, , 6F
OK 感謝指正~~
06/04 17:59, 6F

06/04 17:59, , 7F
終於搞通了XD
06/04 17:59, 7F

06/10 13:08, , 8F
我對Convington的印象只有他最後幾秒投一顆無關緊要的lo
06/10 13:08, 8F

06/10 13:08, , 9F
go shot搞掉了我一張彩券
06/10 13:08, 9F
文章代碼(AID): #1NKYuV1J (Hawks)
文章代碼(AID): #1NKYuV1J (Hawks)