Re: [新聞] 雅虎:老鷹和76人正在商討Teague換Noel
Covington & Stauskas could be involved in 76ers’& Hawks' Noel-Teague Trade
http://goo.gl/Fw4TT7 (NBCSports)
So, how do Covington and Stauskas fit in this trade?
Covington – under contract for the next two years at $1,015,696 and
$1,087,745 – is also more valuable than Teague in a vacuum. Sure, Covington
could use more minutes at power forward, but he can also play the small
forward. Teams can’t get enough 3-and-D wings. Trading Noel for Teague would
be bad. Trading Noel and Covington for Teague would be comical.
Covington的約還有兩年 可以分擔PF跟SF的位置 對於兩邊來說 其實在側翼的3分球及防
守上都略嫌不足 Noel跟Teague單換其實並不好 但Noel+Covington換Teague就更滑稽了
Stauskas is far more expendable after two seasons of minus outside shooting.
But just 22 and on his rookie-scale contract, he still has positive value.
Stauskas在過去兩個球季是離外圍投射越來越遠 但因為他的年紀(22)跟新人約 仍舊有他
的交易價值
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
就中段Covington的部分 猜測一下作者想法
Hawks:失去Teague 補進Noel+Covington Teague原先的三分能力不見得能補上 尤其是老
鷹這種高流動性的球隊 而且外線被射爆的場景還歷歷在目 Noel跟Covington都較
偏禁區球員 外線防守是否更薄弱了?
76ers:只補進Teague 雖然內線球員還有Embiid跟Okafor 但少了Noel+Covington兩個先發
76人能找到適合的陣容嗎? 狀元能無縫接軌來補上欠缺的側翼防守跟3分嗎? 只有
Teague是不夠的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.248.120.105
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Hawks/M.1465003551.A.053.html
推
06/04 13:49, , 1F
06/04 13:49, 1F
→
06/04 14:17, , 2F
06/04 14:17, 2F
→
06/04 14:18, , 3F
06/04 14:18, 3F
推
06/04 17:42, , 4F
06/04 17:42, 4F
→
06/04 17:42, , 5F
06/04 17:42, 5F
→
06/04 17:59, , 6F
06/04 17:59, 6F
→
06/04 17:59, , 7F
06/04 17:59, 7F
推
06/10 13:08, , 8F
06/10 13:08, 8F
→
06/10 13:08, , 9F
06/10 13:08, 9F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
Hawks 近期熱門文章
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
11
28