[外絮]富比士:林可能是哈佛有史以來最蠢的畢業生

看板Jeremy_Lin (林書豪)作者 (無血之大戮)時間13年前 (2012/07/19 04:28), 編輯推噓22(361438)
留言88則, 46人參與, 最新討論串1/1
只翻譯重點. 他會哈佛商學院學生的最好的case study:如果你的眼光不夠遠,你會損失無數的金錢, 和巨大的影響力。 一個世界級的行銷機器應該就留在世界級的商業首都。就像他自己剛告訴雜誌的, 如果可以選的話,他想留在紐約。 比起第一次的合約,多了五百萬,這合約對尼克來講,就變成了真正的毒藥合約。尼克可 能要為這五百萬多付三千萬。 我可以理解為什麼火箭會提供這合約,但為什麼林書豪會拿這樣的合約? 我只可以想出兩個理由: 一個是財務的確定性。這是保證可以拿到的 但多拿了這五百萬,就代表linsanity的終結。如果他留在紐約,只要他有上個季末表現 的80%,以紐約媒體和尼克隊推銷的功力,他保證可以有數千萬的代言簽約。 沒有人在乎如果林帶領山貓贏得大家的尊重。這不會令人感到興趣。可口可熱不會因此而 付他千萬美金代言。 第二個是自我。 上次傳言林不爽尼克.林在twitter上的模糊字句的推文 "probably not" true 跟典型的明星的回言很像"i am sorry if anyone was offened" 別人設想他想當球隊的絕對核心(go-to-guy),而不想跟Melo和其他隊友合作。 這些設想全部都傷害到他的名聲。 大家喜歡他不是因為他是一個球星。 而是因為他曾經是一個失敗者(underdog) 但他謙虛,而且他贏了。 他的選擇 破壞了 媒體幫他曾經塑造的形象。 昨晚,主持人宣布林瘋狂的正式終結。但更確切的說,林把這個可能會帶來無限多黃金的 牌子,以五百萬美金最蠢的價格賤賣了。 http://www.forbes.com/sites/randalllane/2012/07/18/jeremy-lin-may-be-the- dumbest-harvard-grad-ever/2/ Jeremy Lin May Be The Dumbest Harvard Grad Ever Sorry for the harsh headline, but I’m having a hard time coming up with any other conclusion. While I haven’t checked the Harvard core curriculum lately, it must surely be light on math, psychology and logic, and completely devoid of Marketing 101. How else to explain the self-destructive actions of its most famous basketball alum, Jeremy Lin, who has taken the global phenomenon known as Linsanity and doused it with kerosene. After last night’s decision by the New York Knicks to let him walk to the Houston Rockets, almost all of the analysis has focused on Knicks owner Jim Dolan. He faced a vexing dilemma, given the back-loaded contract offer from the Houston Rockets that would have forced the Knicks to effectively pay $50 million for Lin’s services three years hence. (My friend Howard Beck of the New York Times provides a useful primer here.) How do you weigh Lin’s basketball and marketing potential against a very small sample set (he’s started all of 25 games in his career) and also against not just what he would be paid, but the larger ramifications of his contract down the line? Given that the adjectives associated with Dolan, backed up a dysfunctional track record, generally include illogical, vindictive, paranoid and dumb (and because I’m a lifelong Knicks fan, I’m being kind), he’s predictably being ripped apart. In the end, though, I’m more fascinated by the choices Lin made. Dolan will be rich and reviled no matter what he does. Lin may have signed a big contract, but he also just provided the folks at Harvard Business School with a brilliant case study how to cost yourself millions of dollars and scads of influence when you’re not looking at the big picture. To review, the point guard’s scrub-to-star rise in February – Linsanity! — has arguably been the best sports story of the year, played out on one of the biggest stages, Madison Square Garden. But the NBA’s complicated labor rules forced Lin to shop around his services in order to maximize his next contract with the Knicks. At first, he did so brilliantly, according to numerous reports, originally getting Houston to offer him roughly $5 million for his first two years of his contract (the maximum anyone was allowed), and then a $9 million balloon in the third year, with a team option for a fourth. Various Knicks sources, including their coach, playing poker as deftly as a late-night drunk at Circus Circus, announced that they would match it, and that was presumably that. A global marketing machine would remain in the global marketing capital, as had been his goal all along, Lin just told Sports Illustrated. And this where Lin flunked miserably. After the clumsy Knicks showed their hand, Lin and Houston agreed to add another $5 million to his guaranteed salary in third year – a true poison pill, since that extra $5 million would cost the Knicks an extra $20 million or so, courtesy of the NBA’s punitive new luxury tax, atop the effective $30 million bite they had already internalized. I get why Houston did it. But why did Lin, as an equal party to the new offer, go along? I can only offer two theories: Financial Certainty: With the revised offer, Lin guaranteed himself an extra $5 million in his pocket, three years from now. That’s serious scratch for a man who had been sleeping on his brother’s couch earlier this year. And given legitimate worries that he was way overperforming during his magical 25 game coming out, taking the sure thing now makes some sense. But why structure it in a way so punitive to New York? If it was all about certainty, Lin could have instead tried to guarantee that fourth year (or even a fifth year). At $9 million per, that’s way more downside protection, yet spreading it out in a way that didn’t push the Knicks toward the fiscal cliff. As for the upside, forcing the Knicks to even consider ending his tenure in New York is the truest definition of Linsanity. If Lin is even 80% as good as he showed in flashes last season, fronting a very good, very hyped Knicks team had the potential to bring him tens of millions in endorsements. But as Steve Herz, who cuts celebrity endorsement deals as president of IF Management previously told my colleague Tom Van Riper: “Lin leading the Charlotte Bobcats back to respectability wouldn’t be that interesting. It’s not something that Coca-Cola is going to play $10 million for.” Insert “Houston Rockets” into that sentence, and you get Lin’s new reality. Rather than the golden boy on an obsessed-over team in the world’s media capital, he’s now an above-average player on a below-average team in a low-profile city. Yes, Yao Ming made the Rockets popular in China. It’s another reason why Houston made a smart move here. But it doesn’t do much for Lin. Ego: If you believe “sources close to Lin,” he was offended that the Knicks didn’t court him pro-actively (ignoring the fact that the way the system was set up, they needed to let someone else make an offer if he wanted more money). Compounding matters, when he sent out a Tweet trying to clarify, Lin said that such blind item stories are “probably not” true – the kind of squishy response that conjures the classic celebrity “I’m sorry if anyone was offended” apology. Others have posited that he wanted to be the go-to guy on his team, versus share with ball hog Carmelo Anthony and the rest of the star-laden Knicks. Even speculation in these areas damages Lin’s brand. People didn’t fall in love with Lin because he was a star player. They loved him because he’s an underdog, he was humble and he won. The choice he just made, amid the circus he helped create, undermines all of those attributes. Last night, as I watched SportsCenter, the anchors declared these developments as the formal “end of Linsanity.” But it’s more accurate to say that Jeremy Lin sold it for a $5 million note three years from now – a monumentally foolish price for a brand that could have been golden. ※ 編輯: imgkiller 來自: 166.248.8.142 (07/19 04:31)

07/19 04:31, , 1F
純噓作者 我看他根本沒搞懂前因後果吧
07/19 04:31, 1F

07/19 04:31, , 2F
感謝翻譯,林書豪似乎沒有要很多的代言
07/19 04:31, 2F
※ 編輯: imgkiller 來自: 166.248.8.142 (07/19 04:34)

07/19 04:34, , 3F
要是他那麼看重名利 他根本不會去火箭
07/19 04:34, 3F

07/19 04:35, , 4F
而且是尼克放棄他的 怎變成他拋棄尼克勒? 超好笑= =
07/19 04:35, 4F

07/19 04:40, , 5F
其實Lin只想認真打球而已!
07/19 04:40, 5F

07/19 04:40, , 6F
很多人想讓他拿火箭第一次開的那份20m/3year+9m
07/19 04:40, 6F

07/19 04:41, , 7F
火箭自己要改他能怎樣.....尼克頻頻放話火箭提高很正常
07/19 04:41, 7F

07/19 04:42, , 8F
他想賺錢早就代言上百種商品了
07/19 04:42, 8F

07/19 04:43, , 9F
就說林書豪選火箭不是為了錢 這些記者都在跳針喔
07/19 04:43, 9F

07/19 04:43, , 10F
人紅自然是非也多 這是一種"privilege" 不紅也不會LIN
07/19 04:43, 10F

07/19 04:44, , 11F
所以這篇其實是在說他沒有像某些人說的那麼精啊XD
07/19 04:44, 11F

07/19 04:45, , 12F
一天到晚被這種腦包酸 阿我還想問作者 你哪間畢業的?
07/19 04:45, 12F

07/19 04:47, , 13F
尼克早就能先簽 是自己愛賭的 願賭又不服輸 現在圍剿林
07/19 04:47, 13F

07/19 04:49, , 14F
我倒覺得這篇表面上是酸 實際上是想突顯他的人格特質
07/19 04:49, 14F

07/19 04:52, , 15F
我也覺得這是反串欸XD 一個世界級的商業機器? XD
07/19 04:52, 15F

07/19 04:53, , 16F
這是從商學院追求財富的觀點提出觀點,正說明不是Lin的核心
07/19 04:53, 16F

07/19 04:53, , 17F
思考
07/19 04:53, 17F

07/19 04:53, , 18F
他已經賺到很多哈佛的一輩子賺不到的錢 23歲...
07/19 04:53, 18F

07/19 04:54, , 19F
他只是想要開心的打球,在尼克根本沒有他表達意見的權利
07/19 04:54, 19F

07/19 04:56, , 20F
如果用金錢跟名聲的角度來看,林留在尼克好得多
07/19 04:56, 20F

07/19 04:57, , 21F
LIN很多哈佛畢業的同學 現在應該還在還債吧 LIN 8m/y
07/19 04:57, 21F

07/19 04:58, , 22F
如果他一直受傷呢?先拿先贏吧! 在紐約那種地方名聲不一定好
07/19 04:58, 22F
※ 編輯: imgkiller 來自: 166.248.8.142 (07/19 05:09) ※ imgkiller:轉錄至看板 NBA 07/19 05:11

07/19 05:17, , 23F
我怎麼看都覺得這篇很酸啊~先酸他愛錢~再酸他愛權
07/19 05:17, 23F

07/19 05:32, , 24F
我的解讀是 1.多拿五百萬薪水,損失數千萬代言 ->不在乎錢
07/19 05:32, 24F

07/19 05:32, , 25F
內容破綻百出...真想噓這個作者....
07/19 05:32, 25F

07/19 05:33, , 26F
2.跑去火箭當老大,形象受損 ->不在乎形象
07/19 05:33, 26F

07/19 05:42, , 27F
林怎麼做都會被講話的
07/19 05:42, 27F

07/19 05:48, , 28F
富士比恐怕遭dolan入侵,拿錢幫尼克寫反擊文
07/19 05:48, 28F

07/19 05:49, , 29F
否則誰會問這麼蠢的問題?
07/19 05:49, 29F

07/19 06:15, , 30F
媒體的醜態!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
07/19 06:15, 30F

07/19 06:57, , 31F
富比世
07/19 06:57, 31F

07/19 07:02, , 32F
如果他只是想賺錢 他早就接一大堆代言了 不過還是感謝翻譯
07/19 07:02, 32F

07/19 07:09, , 33F
是反串嗎?很多人酸他愛$,但這篇說若他要$就該留紐約
07/19 07:09, 33F

07/19 07:10, , 34F
除非他太蠢,但,有可能嗎XD
07/19 07:10, 34F

07/19 07:30, , 35F
Lin只想打球 要賺錢早就有機會接代言了
07/19 07:30, 35F

07/19 07:40, , 36F
他只是去一個真正需要他包容他的地方,NYK剛好不是。
07/19 07:40, 36F

07/19 07:44, , 37F
富比士也跟華爾街金融那些捧過雷曼兄弟LP的人一樣還活在金
07/19 07:44, 37F

07/19 07:45, , 38F
融風暴前嗎?打出上季80%的成績就能延續林來瘋,那裏真的
07/19 07:45, 38F

07/19 07:47, , 39F
是紐約嗎?他們應該來台灣好好學習怎麼當一個慣老闆,英業
07/19 07:47, 39F

07/19 07:48, , 40F
達業績創歷史新高還嚷著要裁員,這才叫生意人!我認為LIN
07/19 07:48, 40F

07/19 07:49, , 41F
留在紐約的話,就算打出林來瘋時期2000%的功力,只要輸了
07/19 07:49, 41F

07/19 07:50, , 42F
一場,照要被酸到爆,不然怎麼叫Underdog?
07/19 07:50, 42F

07/19 08:46, , 43F
筆者完全不懂經濟跟行銷 回去重修邊際效益
07/19 08:46, 43F

07/19 08:58, , 44F
這樣講太不公平了吧!要比校友成就應該是同一屆的比
07/19 08:58, 44F

07/19 08:58, , 45F
跟林同年畢業的哈佛校友,有幾人年薪比他高的?比他紅的?
07/19 08:58, 45F

07/19 08:59, , 46F
相信富士比 這種文章比較有公信力 大家認了吧
07/19 08:59, 46F

07/19 08:59, , 47F
在NY是比較容易紅,但大家都知NY客也是最無情的
07/19 08:59, 47F

07/19 09:04, , 48F
富士比這篇文章是沒錯,不過林看的東西跟他們完全不一樣
07/19 09:04, 48F

07/19 09:04, , 49F
這點他們可能到死都不會了解
07/19 09:04, 49F

07/19 09:10, , 50F
這個作者是假設LIN的表現有原來表現的80%...沒表現的話呢
07/19 09:10, 50F

07/19 09:14, , 51F
只要瓜瓜還在 lin只能得十分 去火箭 可能可以得二十分
07/19 09:14, 51F

07/19 09:14, , 52F
反正打的好三年後尼克或許會簽他回來 怕啥
07/19 09:14, 52F

07/19 09:17, , 53F
林想賺錢的話就不會拒絕CAA了吧
07/19 09:17, 53F

07/19 09:43, , 54F
有人賠錢了嗎 好爽 哈哈~
07/19 09:43, 54F

07/19 10:16, , 55F
笑話~~我看是紐約媒體才需要林吧!!林需要的不是linsanity
07/19 10:16, 55F

07/19 10:18, , 56F
紐約這種嗜血的鳥地方還是趕快離開比較好
07/19 10:18, 56F

07/19 10:26, , 57F
那有史以來又有幾個哈佛畢業生賺得了那麼多錢
07/19 10:26, 57F

07/19 10:52, , 58F
無聊。尼克不提合約在先,難道叫球員去喝西北風?!加上
07/19 10:52, 58F

07/19 10:53, , 59F
他不是完全為了錢,要接代言在那最紅時候可以接很多。
07/19 10:53, 59F

07/19 10:55, , 60F
富比士觀點是錯的,他的觀點是以投資人方向去思考的
07/19 10:55, 60F

07/19 11:27, , 61F
白癡文耶,就算講商業面,對岸的贊助商更敢給,而且也不在乎
07/19 11:27, 61F

07/19 11:27, , 62F
LIN在哪隊
07/19 11:27, 62F

07/19 11:27, , 63F
純噓富比士
07/19 11:27, 63F

07/19 11:29, , 64F
反正到時候林低薪留在紐約沒辦法拿到千萬代言費作者又不
07/19 11:29, 64F

07/19 11:29, , 65F
會幫忙補
07/19 11:29, 65F

07/19 11:30, , 66F
講難聽點,不管他是哪國人,對岸的人就是愛他,他如果跟YAO一
07/19 11:30, 66F

07/19 11:32, , 67F
樣(影響力一定更大),有了對岸幾億人+亞裔..科科.Coca-Cola
07/19 11:32, 67F

07/19 11:34, , 68F
最好不會屌他
07/19 11:34, 68F

07/19 12:05, , 69F
林需要的不是錢,是尊重、珍惜與快樂打球的環境
07/19 12:05, 69F

07/19 12:18, , 70F
富士比:不向錢看就是蠢
07/19 12:18, 70F

07/19 13:18, , 71F
難道哈佛出來的都只知道錢嗎
07/19 13:18, 71F

07/19 13:22, , 72F
一開始說他愛錢現在又說他很蠢
07/19 13:22, 72F

07/19 14:23, , 73F
補噓一下 哈佛畢業的也沒幾個能在23歲傳到那麼多前
07/19 14:23, 73F

07/19 14:57, , 74F
林堂堂一個籃球痴漢是能有多精 每天都在想籃球而已= =
07/19 14:57, 74F

07/19 15:00, , 75F
他要的只是一個信任他 尊重他的球隊 做不到就少廢話
07/19 15:00, 75F

07/19 19:59, , 76F
合約最後只爽到火箭
07/19 19:59, 76F

07/19 20:00, , 77F
富士比可能是有史以來最爛的雜誌
07/19 20:00, 77F

07/19 20:04, , 78F
從這篇文章看得出來Nicks真的很需要Lin XD
07/19 20:04, 78F

07/19 20:04, , 79F
所以才會如此的生氣 XD
07/19 20:04, 79F

07/19 20:04, , 80F
我又沒噓到= =
07/19 20:04, 80F

07/20 05:48, , 81F
07/20 05:48, 81F

07/20 13:17, , 82F
其實這篇不是沒有他的道理 希望豪哥和他的經濟團隊可以別讓
07/20 13:17, 82F

07/20 13:17, , 83F
這篇說的事work
07/20 13:17, 83F

07/20 13:21, , 84F
少了紐媒的加持 但多了控球的機會 要場場都贏球才行啊!!!!!!
07/20 13:21, 84F

07/20 13:31, , 85F
總之不管別人怎麼說 把球打好才是最重要的
07/20 13:31, 85F

07/20 13:59, , 86F
休士頓唯一的缺點就是媒體不比紐約 剩下都是優點 這方面補足
07/20 13:59, 86F

07/20 14:00, , 87F
應該會很強大~~~~~
07/20 14:00, 87F

07/21 12:00, , 88F
point沒錯啊 只是結論錯了 這完全證明lin就是為好好打球
07/21 12:00, 88F
文章代碼(AID): #1G1nntTc (Jeremy_Lin)
文章代碼(AID): #1G1nntTc (Jeremy_Lin)