[外電]過往經驗說明該選rubio

看板Kings (沙加緬度國王)作者RonArtest93 (新阿泰)時間17年前 (2009/05/01 13:18)推噓16(16推 0噓 14→)

留言30則, 12人參與討論串1/1

http://0rz.tw/GrhNx (As I said last week, I don't believe in the concept of the jinx. Except in no-hitters. And when your boy is spitting game at a dame.) 如我之前所說我不相信所謂的詛咒除非自己不努力放棄了比賽 Okay, so Ricky Rubio is in the draft. His agent Dan Fegan asserts that he'll stay in. Remember the motive: Fegan wants Rubio in, so of course he'll tell Chad Ford today that he'll be staying in. But all the other indicators -- the so-called weakness of the lottery, the dearth of international prospects, the momentum from Beijing, the looming collective bargaining agreement -- have pointed to this outcome for a long time, so it seems more valuable, more true. OK 所以RUBIO確定參選了他的經紀人Dan Fegan斷言他會參選到底但從其他方面來看以往一直被認為是樂透區選秀的弱勢外籍球員未來發展性的不足從RUBIO北京奧運會上的一聲平地驚雷起還有一直被這次的選秀會討論者兩者對比之下顯得RUBIO更加有價值更珍貴 There has been debate, and there will continue to be debate, on whether the Kings, if so lucky to acquire the No. 1 pick, should choose Blake Griffin or Rubio. These matters can continue to be debated -- I have no answer there. Griffin is an amazing athlete and rebounder; this team needs athletes and rebounding. Rubio is a point guard with star potential. This team needs a better point guard, and needs some stars. The arguments can, and in fact should, rage. 這裡有個爭論而且會一直爭論下去如果國王得到PICK1 會選RUBIO OR BLAKE BLAKE是個有驚人體能和強勢籃板的傢伙這是國王目前也很缺乏的 RUBIO是個有天份的控球國王也正好缺少這樣的人 But in my mind, there's no question which direction Geoff Petrie goes if this situation arises: he's taking Rubio. 但在我心中 PETRIE最後無疑還是會挑RUBIO Let's start with a quote from Petrie's interview with Sam Amick, published today: 我們看看PETRIE之前的訪問是如何說的 Sometimes the conventional wisdom is right, and sometimes it's not. 有時傳統的選擇是對的有時則相反 In judging the worth or value of Griffin, you're basically putting conventional wisdom on trial. The consensus is and has been that Griffin is the best pro prospect in amateur or international basketball. Frankly, it will continue that way until Treviso at least, and probably until next October. He will be the preseason Rookie of the Year, whether he's picked #1, #2 or #10. He is the consensus' #1 pick. 在審視BLAKE對國王的價值之前最好拿掉一些成見會比較好外界一般認為 BLAKE會是業餘球賽跟外籍球員之中那顆最閃耀的星星我想一直到季前賽為止他的評價將不會改變不管他是否是第一順位他就是外界公認最好的那一個 How often has Petrie matched consensus? Jason Williams at #7? No. Peja Stojakovic at #14? No. Hedo Turkoglu at #16? No. Kevin Martin at #26? No. Jason Thompson at #12? No. You could argue that Spencer Hawes was a "consensus pick" at #10, and that both Quincy Douby and Francisco Garcia fell in their expected ranges. Gerald Wallace and Tariq Abdul-Wahad ... somewhere in the middle. The point is that Petrie is not terribly fond of the consensus, at least not in the mid-lottery or mid to late first round. He makes decisions regardless of popular opinion. 但 PETRIE哪次遵循傳統過? JW原本該在第七順位被選中嗎? PEJA原本被預期在14順位中選嗎? HEDO的16順位? JT跟KM的12跟26順位? 你可能會說HAWES10順位是符合期待的順位還有DOUBY GARCIA都低於原本期待的順位被國王撿走還有G挖跟Abdul-Wahad的中段順位………… Anyway 但至少我們知道PETRIE是不隨便向傳統靠攏的至少在第一輪樂透中段或是第一輪後段是如此 Will that translate to the #1 pick, or #2, 3 or 4? Will it translate for a 17-win team that needs to get better tout de suite? Will it translate to a team hemorrhaging cash? We don't know. No one knows. 選秀當天會做交易嗎? 換取球員或現金? 這我們不得而知 Looks at the major big men Petrie has sought out. Vlade Divac, a skilled passer. Chris Webber, a skilled passer and shooter. Brad Miller, a skilled passer and shooter. Spencer Hawes, a skilled shooter. Jason Thompson, a skilled passer and shooter. Griffin is many things ... but he has not shown himself to be a terribly skilled passer, and he's definitely not a shooter. He is not a Petrie big man. That doesn't immediately disqualify him, of course. You can't disqualify that kind of beast, nor would you want to. But he is not Petrie's Weird Science creation, that's for sure. 看看PETRIE喜歡的長人類型 DIVAC 會傳球 WEBBER&大米投籃手感柔軟&會傳球 HAWES 投籃手感柔軟 JT 投籃手感柔軟&會傳球 BLAKE? 他還沒證明他能傳球而且他也不太可能是個好的投籃者他不是PETRIE的菜不是輕視他的野獸威能只是PETRIE不尬意這類的 I keep looking back to 1998, the Williams draft. J-Wil wasn't a good shooter coming out of college. He wasn't necessarily a leader, or smart. He quite certainly was not a steady hand, or a great defender. Or a medicore defender. He had none of those classic point guard traits, none of that gravitas. He was a showman, that's it. A flashy, speedy, reckless, crazy as Natt showman. 回到1998 JWILL被選進來前在大學就不是個好的投籃者他不是個夠聰明的球員跟領袖他也不甚穩定或是有好的防守他沒有這些傳統後衛的特徵他是個喜歡秀的小子是個速度快瘋狂不計後果的SHOWMAN The team was coming off its worst season in a decade. It needed help. Remember -- the draft came before Webber, before even Vlade. And Petrie took Jason Freaking Williams. You see where his priorities lay, yeah? 國王正在最低迷的時期這需要救世主記得之前的WEBBER DIVAC JWILL 是如何被PETRIE看中的原因大家該知道他的優先考慮是什了吧 Rubio is the showman ... with gravitas. I don't see how Petrie walks away, even for a special talent like Griffin. I just can't imagine it. RUBIO也是個SHOWMAN 但是他更正經一點我認為PETRIE不可能放棄他即便是有 BLAKE這個強大誘惑我不能想像他沒選RUBIO -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.224.26.151

推

Yocoldagain

05/01 13:22, , 1^F

05/01 13:22, 1^F

推

garcia1114

05/01 13:32, , 2^F

05/01 13:32, 2^F

推

eliczone

05/01 15:25, , 3^F

05/01 15:25, 3^F