[閒聊] 30Q：國王的長人夠軟Q嗎？

看板Kings (沙加緬度國王)作者santabrelai時間15年前 (2010/09/23 19:42)推噓12(12推 0噓 11→)

留言23則, 13人參與討論串1/1

http://0rz.tw/yWr8X 30Q: Is the Key Big Enough? 好的，30Q又來了，今天要來幹嘛呢？標題騙人，內容騙錢就是我們的任務。以下是騙錢列表 2009 2010 Hawes Dalembert Thompson Thompson May Landry Brockman Cousins Thomas*0.5 Whiteside Landry*0.5 由姓氏字數看來，2010年較大。以合約長度看來，2010年較長。從平均高度看來，2010年較高。 We're asking 30 questions about the Kings' 2010-11 season. 沒想到以上的文字竟然跟狗屁沒什麼兩樣。連鄰居還在上小學的兒子都能算得出來。 Just two years ago, the coach of the Kings (that'd be Reggie Theus) complained that outside of Ron Artest, a player on the fringe of the team's plans and a sure bet to be tradebait, Sacramento had no players to throw the ball to. A brouhaha erupted as this was widely perceived as an insult tossed at one Kevin Martin, who many felt had been the team's best player over the preceding 2007-08 season. 兩年之前，國王教頭Reggie Theus曾抱怨過，除了Artest這尊不在計劃中的待閃球員外，隊上沒有一個能夠好好處理球的傢伙。這些言論使認為他是在指責國王當年的最佳球員Kevin Martin。 Ignoring the controversy behind the nature of Theus' comments, the coach had argued he meant that, outside of Artest, the Kings had no one to give the ball to in the post. This -- this specific statement or (perhaps) complaint -- was dead-on accurate. The Kings had no one to play the post. The pivots were Mikki Moore, a set shooter with lobster claws for hands and a frame more spindly than a treble cleg; Brad Miller, less athletic at age 19 and 20 than Kevin Willis at age 47; and Spencer Hawes, a budding 19-year-old with skills, swagger and a complete lack of strength, rendering his post skills and swagger unusable against all post defenders outside of Pau Gasol, Brad Miller and Mikki Moore. The guards were Martin, who has never been accused of hogging the potato salad, and Beno Udrih, a lefty magician who likes physical contact less than does Christine O'Donnell. 讓我們先不要爭辯這些評論的對錯，他會這麼說，當然不會是空穴來風。除了阿泰之外，能殺到禁區裡的，真的沒有其他人。Mikki Moore ，一個排骨人，除了偶爾突然接獲傳球的灌籃，以及防守時的假倒，禁區裡看不大到他的身影。Brad Miller ，在他19或20 歲時，體能就無法比上47歲時的Kevin Willis。Spencer Hawes ？誰？你說誰？先發鋒線是悲慘的Miller+Moore。後衛則是一生都不會有過重危機的Kevin Martin，還有比起美女候選人Christine O'Donnell 更不喜歡肢體接觸的Beno Udrih。 Artest was indeed traded that summer, for Donté Greene and an Israeli cyborg to be named later. No beef other than lottery pick Jason Thompson was brought in to replace Ron-Ron. And outside Thompson's phenomenal work in securing the Jammin' James Bailey Hacker of the Year Award, the Kings were as close to haphephobic as any team in memory. The Kings had no one to throw the ball to in the post, and only Martin regularly attacked the paint, resulting in an absurd number of free throws by few lay-ups or (gasp!) dunks. Artest在夏天離開，換來了Donte Greene及一個將來的以色列小伙子。禁區的補強只有來自小學校的Jason Thompson。可能是史上攻勢最軟的國王完成，沒有人會打禁區。所有人都射啊射啊就射輸了比賽，唯一的籃框攻擊可能是KM寥寥無幾的上籃和屈指可數的灌籃（摸摸你的良心，那年你看KM灌了幾次！我的良心告訴我，我在當兵怎麼看比賽！）由82Games.dom得到的消息，那年灌籃/平均出手最多的人是Mikki Moore(17%)。平均每場他可由灌籃拿到0.8分。 (Note: this didn't exactly bear out in the data, as the Kings were middle-of-the-pack in the frequency in which their shots came at the rim. I would like to project this on Martin's attacking, as well as Thompson's electric offensive rebound/putback game, the too-hot-for-TV Bobby Brown experiment, a dose of Shelden Williams, Bobby Jackson, not to mention Hawes' unfailing program of at least trying to become a low post big man.) （以上數據有部份是過度渲染。事實上當年國王在籃框附近的出手頻率是聯盟中間值。我把這歸功於KM的進攻、JT的補進，Bobby Brown的腦充血，Shelden William、Bobby Jackson 的努力，還有偶爾還會嘗試打低位的Hawes。） The acquisition of Tyreke Evans changed things dramatically. As is noted in every third comment thread at Sactown Royalty, Evans led the league in lay-ups attempted last season. As a -- check his I.D.! -- 20-year-old rookie. While Evans didn't play in the post as often as some would have liked, his repeated dribble-drives served as a de facto post game for the Kings through February. A post game works in demanding defensive attention near the rim, theoretically leaving shooters open from outside and weakside scorers available in the paint. Reke's dribble-drive game does the same thing. Tyreke Evans的入隊改變了球隊的屬性，他的上籃出手次數是聯盟上季最多（命中率就...咳...咳）。不過他不是常用低位強打，而是用運球替國王製造出禁區攻勢。低位單打能讓外線射手或弱邊球員能找到機會，Reke的禁區穿梭也為我們帶來了同樣的像果。 The Kings enjoyed the new reality in the paint, even enough it didn't necessarily vault the team up the standings. Then, Martin was traded for Carl Landry. Landry was a beastly post scorer off the bench for Houston, racking up an absurd 8.1 attempts at the rim per 40 minutes in the first half of last season. (Evans, a higher-usage player, was at 9 rim shots/40 last season.) When the trade was executed, Evans and Paul Westphal alike commented that it'd be good to have a post scorer help balance the offense with Evans' play from a guard position. 國王很高興這個禁區革新，然而這不足以帶領國王一舉登天。接下來的KM交易換來了 Landry。Landry是個低位悍將，平均每四十分鐘他會在籃框附近出手8.1次（TE是9次）。這看來會是個變態的組合。 Only it didn't work like that. Evans, a less accurate shooter than Dick Cheney and Plaxico Burress combined, continued to drive, to shoot in the paint. Landry turned into a mid-range jump shooter. In Houston last season, Landry took about 2.85 shots at the rim for every long (16-23 foot) jumper. In Sacramento, he took (almost exactly) one rim shot for every one long jumper. 不過櫻木花道說過：「打籃球不是算數學。」（因為算數學算了一個小時算不出來就會像我一樣發瘋翻外電，但是打籃球不會。）這兩者的混合並沒有讓國王的禁區攻勢如水銀瀉地般一發不可收拾。Evans 依然切切切不停，Landry則轉成了一位跳投球員，在休士頓他的籃框出手/跳投出手是 2.85:1，到了沙城變成1:1。 When he joined Tyreke, a paint scorer, Landry went from post scorer to jump shooter. Instead of bolstering the post game, the combination of Evans and Landry served to dilute the lesser of the two, and push him away from the rim. 當他要和Tyreke合體，Landry的投射數量變多了，兩者的濃度並未加成，反而受到了不少稀釋。 Luckily for the Kings, Landry is a good shooter: he hit 44 percent of shots from 16-23 feet, a strong mark. But, of course, shots at the rim are more valuable -- they draw fouls more frequently and go through the hoop at the higher rate. (Landry's 70 percent conversion rate at the rim is far from surprising.) There's just a huge difference in the effectiveness of long jumpers and lay-ups. No surprise, really. Landry依然能為國王貢獻，他有四成四的投射命中率。可是攻禁區所得到的效益還是較大，賺犯規或命中率的提升都是令人開心的地方。上籃和跳投真的是差太多了。 Is Landry's backtracking reversible? When Landry and Evans play together -- as they figure to do in large doses this season -- can Landry remain a significant post presence? Or is this a physical necessity? Is it spacially infeasible to keep Landry in the post and Evans on a boulevard to the rim? Landry會在本季回歸嗎？Landry加TE的禁區連拳可以讓我們每場看球都笑得樂呵呵嗎？Landry還會是一個禁區的威脅嗎？還是這兩尊肉體就是無法一加一等於二呢？ And, perhaps most centrally of all, where does DeMarcus Cousins fit? 好的，接下來我們來討論表弟先生。 Cousins was drafted with the intent of creating a fatal guard-big pairing, a duo to rival all NBA duos. This is not hyperbole; this is what we all cheered for when Kahn picked Wes, when Stern read the card with a hint of whimsy. "The Kings select ... DeMarcus Cousins." BOOM. Kobe-Shaq. Magic-Kareem. Cousy-Russell. We saw the future, and it was wonderful. Cousins 的中選讓我們的幻想開始發酵，這正是典型的 G-C組合。當Kahn挑中Wes 的那一刻，當Stern 念出那一句的那一刻。DeMarcus Cousins！就像KO連拳、魔術與賈霸、庫西還有十一隻戒指。我們看到了未來，前景可期啊！ I, for one, didn't see the journey, didn't catch the section of the blueprint that explained how exactly Reke's big flying body careening toward the rim and Boogie's big static body dominating the area around the rim were going to coexist, going to help each other thrive. Luckily, we (or Mr. Westphal and Mr. Petrie, more precisely) have a few spits of time to figure that out. 然而這段奇幻旅程還沒有展開，我還沒有見到Reke和Boogie一起在籃框附近耍狠的畫面，他們又要如何幫對方加成。時間會讓我們看到這一切。 In the meantime, how Evans and Landry work together (or not) could be a decent indication of where this caravan's headed. 在此同時，我們可能要先看看眼前的問題。Evans和Landry能不能合體成功呢？ -- 本文沒有重點，因為沒有貼圖。謝謝亂翻，謝謝指正，謝謝，謝謝。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.116.219.191

推

Knicks

09/23 20:21, , 1^F

09/23 20:21, 1^F

推

felmizan

09/23 20:26, , 2^F

09/23 20:26, 2^F

推

yitong52

09/23 20:31, , 3^F

09/23 20:31, 3^F