[外電] 2013-2014 new roster-Darren Collison

看板LaClippers作者totemist (totem)時間12年前 (2013/10/21 21:44)推噓10(10推 0噓 4→)

留言14則, 9人參與討論串1/1

小魯T歷經昨天7個小時的期中考，還好今天成績出來是不負眾望!!! 這科大魔王就這樣躺在我畢業的路途上!!! 後面還有一次期中一次期末大家幫小魯T祈禱順利畢業吧!!!!!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 這幾場熱身賽下來，被大家評為CP3分身的DC的貢獻大家也有目共睹前兩場更是開了無雙~ 趁現在DC有火熱手感趕快來介紹一發只是不要像我剛翻完木蘭的文，隔天馬上烙賽給我打臉 = = 原網址：http://ppt.cc/q8Vp DC key stats： PPG RPG APG TPG SPG FG% 3P% FT% TS% 2012-13 12.0 2.7 5.1 2.1 1.2 47.1% 35.3% 88.0% 57.5% Career 12.1 2.8 5.2 2.3 1.1 46.3% 36.0% 86.2% 54.7% When the Clippers completed the three-team-trade that resulted in the losses of both Eric Bledsoe and Caron Butler, my immediate reaction was extremely positive with one little area of concern: the back-up point guard position. While Chris Paul is amazing and most certainly athletic, he doesn’t have the type of 40-minutes-per-game-endurance that a guy like Russell Westbrook has. So naturally, I was worried when looking at those available to back him up. 當快艇3方交易結果出爐：我們交易了布雷獸+巴特勒，除了有點擔憂我們該找誰當PG替補外，我的看法是非常樂觀的。雖然CP3在場上總是讓人驚豔也有活力，但他不像西河那樣可以打個場均40分鐘。想當然爾，我們當然會擔心有誰能當CP3的替補。 After spending most of their Mid-level Exception on Matt Barnes (deservedly so, of course), the best the Clippers were going to be able to offer someone was about $2 million per year. There was always Chauncey Billups, but that never seemed like it worked well, given his feelings about coming off the bench. There were expensive guards like Jarrett Jack, Jose Calderon, Monta Ellis, and Darren Collison, all starters (or 6th men), but the Clippers wouldn ’t be able to afford them. That left middle-of-the-road guards like Aaron Brooks, Rodrigue Beaubois, Toney Douglas, and Daniel Gibson. Toney Douglas seemed like a solid choice, but he was snatched up by the Golden State Warriors. I even briefly thought about Shaun Livingston, but I’d basically already written off the back-up point guard position as nothing special, and maybe even a weak point on the Clipper roster. 在我們給咩棒中產條款後(咩棒用中產條款簡直物超所值)，讓快艇還有年薪2百萬鎂的扣打可以支付某個人的薪水。原本這2百萬鎂可能是要留給槍西的，但槍西卻不想轉成當板凳。那時還是FA的PG不少是先發等級或是第6人角色的：J.Jack、卡蝶龍、蒙塔艾莉絲、DC，當然想要找這些球員價碼一定很高，我們沒有多餘的金額付給他們。剩下的就是一些比較普通的PG：Aaron Brooks, Rodrigue Beaubois, Toney Douglas, and Daniel Gibson. Toney Douglas看起來是裡面不錯的選擇，不過最後加盟了勇士。我甚至想起Shaun Livingston，不過當我在看快艇裡的替補PG，只能說沒甚麼亮眼的部分，甚至是快艇的弱點一環。 (要不是因為卡蝶龍防守很爛，我還蠻喜歡他的XD，蒙塔在2K系列中我覺得好鬼神) Then, to my surprise, the Clippers were able to sign Darren Collison, a point guard who started for a .500 team, but somehow had no problem with backing up Chris Paul, for that tiny $2 million salary. The guy had played pretty well in Dallas and was due for a decent payday with a lower-echelon team, but he decided to join the Clippers. 出乎我意料之外，快艇居然簽了DC，DC可是有能力在其他隊擔任先發的，卻毫不在意對於擔任CP3的替補，而且要支付的薪水也就是2百萬鎂。上一季DC在小牛先發打得非常好，不過卻決定加入了快艇。 Offense Collison, like Bledsoe before him, is a creator of chaos. But in Collison’s case, it’s a controlled chaos. He’s not much in the way of future potential, as we know what he is. He’s always been an efficient, low-volume scorer, with a mid-50’s true-shooting percentage, peaking at more than 57% last year. According to basketball-reference.com, he takes most of his shots either at the rim, or in the mid-to-three-point range. He’s a decent shooter, strong (but not elite) from both long-range and mid-range, and he’s an excellent finisher at the rim for a point guard. You’re never going to rely on him for scoring, but he’s also not a guy the defense can leave open, especially off the ball, where he scores about a third of his points. DC就像布雷獸那樣，是個容易使對方造成混亂的人。不過又不像布雷獸的是，這混亂是可以控制的。DC的潛力大概就像現在我們看到的這樣，不太會再有甚麼突破了。他擁有非常有效率且低調的得分能力，有著中距離50%的命中率，在去年更提升到5成7。根據 basketball-reference.com，他最常在籃下或是中距離出手。他是個很穩定的射手，擅長中距離，他在籃像也是優異的finisher。你或許不會依靠他當得分主力，但對方也不能不防守他，尤其是在空手跑位時，這可是占了他3分之1的得分來源。 Oh, and he’s fast. Really fast. Last year, I remember watching him running circles around Eric Bledsoe, one of the fastest guards in the league. Collison ’s style will fit in great with the Clippers’ second unit, assuming it continues to feature both Crawford and Barnes, two of the better on-the-fly players in the league. While I have high hopes that the Clippers will not go 10-deep into the line-up anymore, I think the guard and wing bench players will be utilized just as much, mostly due to the Clippers running more small-ball lineups. When Collison is in with these lineups, it’s going to be pure, blissful chaos on offense, with tons of running. 對了，DC真的非常快，他可是在聯盟速度數一數二的，我還記得上一季他可以繞著布雷獸跑。DC非常適合快艇的第二陣容，有尻佛、咩棒這兩個善於跑快攻的球員。我對於快艇的期望不會是那樣有深度的陣容，而是後衛和兩翼的替補球員也能有所貢獻，特別是快艇很常打小球陣容。當DC在這個隊伍中，我們有很多機會可以執行快攻。 Of course, despite everything mentioned above, there are a few concerns about Collison. His assist-turnover ratio leaves something to be desired, with almost 1 turnover per 2 assists. That’s not too different from Bledsoe (it’ s better) but he’s also not going to get you as many possession-creating steals, blocks, or rebounds as Bledsoe did. But I think we already knew he wasn’t going to be as dynamic as Bledsoe, right? I mean, for a huge portion of last year, Bledsoe was second only to Chris Paul in PER among point guards, and that meant it was a huge waste that there weren’t enough minutes for him. This year, Collison only playing 15-20 minutes a night isn’t going to be much of a waste at all. 當然除了上述談到的優點，DC還是有一些會讓我們擔心的地方。他的A/T比大約只有2，這點和布雷獸差不多，但他沒有像布雷獸那樣可以抄截、阻攻、籃板。所以我想我們應該知道他可能沒辦法像布雷獸那樣，我的意思是，去年布雷獸在控衛裡PER是僅次於CP3的，這代表我們沒有那麼多的時間給他上場是一個浪費。而這季DC一場只要打個15~20分即可，不會造成過多的浪費。 Defense Having watched Collison since his days as a Bruin, he’s always had solid defensive fundamentals, but it wasn’t until he played his first season behind Chris Paul in New Orleans that he learned his defensive identity. Like Paul, Collison is quick, and able to probe on defense without leaving his man wide-open. Like Paul, Collison likes to annoy the crap out of anyone and everyone. DC在Bruin就有著扎實的防守能力，但直到第一年當CP3的替補DC才學到防守的精隨。就像 CP3一樣，DC速度非常快，不會讓對手有空檔，喜歡干擾對手。 He’s not going to slide his feet and force the offensive player into the corner, trapping them and forcing a timeout/turnover, like the two Erics Gordon and Bledsoe once did for the Clippers. Instead, he’s going to constantly go for the steal, and I mean constantly. He’s going to chase defenders through the paint, but then double back and try to sneak one away from the big men. He’s going to use his long arms to pick on second-string point guards, creating fast-break turnovers as they cross the half-court line. He’s going to bother every big man in the post, every single time. 他不會像布雷獸和狗蛋那樣滑動腳步壓迫進攻方到角落，使其暫停或失誤。但是，他會一直嘗試要抄截，他會緊跟著球員到油漆區然後一個轉身包夾試著從長人手上抄到一顆球。當對方替補PG過半場時，DC會有他手長的優勢令對方失誤製造快攻。他也會去干擾每一次在要位的長人。 But doesn't that mean he's going to leave his man open a lot? Well, yeah, but that's the price you pay for chaotic defense. And let's keep in mind that he still only gets 1.5 steals per 36 minutes (solid, but not great) and he will still get easily bowled over on any defensive switches. He's no defensive stalwart, but he’s not nearly the defensive liability that he’s sometimes made out to be. He's found his way to make an impact on defense, and it makes up for most of his defensive liabilities. 但是這樣不就代表DC讓他對位的球員有空檔?我想那就是你想使對方進攻亂掉的代價。注意一下DC在每36分鐘有1.5抄截(穩定但不傑出的數據)而且在防守轉換過程中往往能迫使對面失誤。他不是防守的一面高牆，他有時候會忘了他該有的防守責任(為了抄截而漏人) ，但他在防守上的影響往往彌補了他這方面的不足。 Conclusion Collison at $3.5 million per year would have been a good deal. Collison at $2 million per year is borderline highway robbery. Along with Barnes and Crawford, the Clipper bench looks to be potentially game-changing at the guard and wing positions. Unlike last year, the Clippers will be relying more on their starters to generate leads, as opposed to the bench. However, on any given night, the bench still has the capability to completely overwhelm their opponent with some good old controlled chaos, especially if they run small-ball lineups (which are designed to be chaotic). DC如果我們給他一年3.5百萬鎂這已經是非常好的價錢，一年2百萬鎂這我們根本是撿到寶。再換上後衛以及兩翼的替補上場，尻佛、咩棒還有DC是讓板凳具有非常的深度。不像去年，多半還是要依賴先發領先再交給替補。不論如何，當快艇每一晚擺上小球陣容，我們的板凳群仍有能力擊倒對方。 As I said before, Collison could’ve started on a lottery team, but he chose to back up the best point guard in the league while contending for a championship. I, for one, think he made the right choice. And so, to show my appreciation, I think it’s time to usher in a new age. 就像我前面說的，DC在樂透區的球隊一定是可以當先發的但卻為了爭取冠軍選擇當最好控衛的替補。對我來說這是非常明智的選擇，正因如此，我想是時候該迎接快艇的時代了。短評：DC 加油~ 看你在熱身賽的表現只能說猛一個!!!!快艇需要你!!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.25.190.74

推

ken3616001

10/21 22:16, , 1^F

10/21 22:16, 1^F

我也覺得，畢竟人真的不能不服老阿，回到場上跟之前真的差太多

推

ken3616001

10/21 22:19, , 2^F

10/21 22:19, 2^F

不不不小魯T在跟畢業搏鬥阿 ...

推

hardwawy