[外電] Mitch and Media Q&A (大意)

看板Lakers (洛杉磯湖人)作者shch (小瓜瓜)時間14年前 (2011/12/13 06:54)推噓14(14推 0噓 17→)

留言31則, 16人參與討論串1/1

http://www.nba.com/lakers/news/111212mitchkupchak.html Q: On L.A. still actively pursuing potential "big" trades: Kupchak: "We are pursuing big deals right now. That has not changed. More than one big deal. But there could be more than one big deal that involves players other than the two you're thinking about. 庫: 湖人目前還在籌畫大型交易這並沒有改變不是大幹一票是好幾票(譯者: 你最好不要是嘴砲...) 但是這些大案子很可能動到你們已經知道的人員以外的球員 - Kupchak was asked what brought about the shift in looking for big deals, when he's maintained this offseason that the team could win as was constructed. His simple answer: "Opportunity." To go further, once all of the teams were finally cut loose to talk to players/agents and the like, and figured out what the rules were, things began to present themselves. - All big trades or small trades have the same goal for Kupchak: "A team that can be better than the team that got beat in the second round last year." 庫胖說他交易的目標是建構比去年止於二輪更有戰力的Lakers Q: On if the roster is worse than it was last season at present day: Q:輪替是不是比去年糟? Kupchak: "We're trying to improve our position (from last season). I think if we had gone to the Finals or won the Finals, you could say that we've taken a step back. But we got beat in the second round. Losing Lamar and not having Shannon Brown is a blow in terms of talent for this team, but it's not like we're breaking up a championship team … We will look to add to this mix." 庫: 我們在尋求比去年更進步如果我們去年進冠軍賽或拿到冠軍你可以說我們現在是退步了但是我們去年止於二輪(應該是說須要改進) 失去Lamar和Shannon對球隊是個大搬風但我們並不是把冠軍隊拆散而是努力要比去年的貳輪更進步 Q: On the proposed trade from last week presumably involving New Orleans and Houston: Kupchak: "There was never a trade that was announced, but clearly we were working towards something with other teams that we thought would result in a trade. It was disqualified by the NBA. (That was) completely unexpected … unique circumstances with the (Hornets) being run by the NBA. We did the best we could to express our displeasure, and to date there has been no change." 庫: 以上都是鄉民已知的經過描述 Q: On Odom being sent to Dallas: Kupchak: "Lamar was sent to Dallas because he requested to be traded. That's not to say that we wouldn't have done something down the road. But the timing was such, and it's all tied into what took place last week, the unfortunate circumstances of Thursday and Friday. Lamar is probably more sensitive and emotional than most people, in particular our players, and that's a plus more than it's a minus. But in this case, he couldn't get over the fact that something like that took place. We were hoping that things would change in a day or two, but his representative called me on Saturday and said it's not going to change, and requested that (Odom) be traded. We worked together to find a spot that would give us the most flexibility going forward. There are a lot of teams in the NBA that would take a player like Lamar and you could probably do it in a day, but you'd have to take back players, and you might not like the players you were getting back, and there might be long (financial) commitments going out. That's not something we were interested in doing. All that does is handicap us going forward. To find a slot where you can just create complete flexibility and get back a pick (is unique). Q: 對於Odom前往達拉斯您的看法庫: Lamar被送到Dallas是因為他要求被交易這並不是說我們絕不曾考慮交易他這一切都跟上禮拜的籃球考量有關 Larmar是很感性的人特別是對於隊上的球員感情很深但是在我們現今的狀況下他沒辦法消化這一切我們原本期望過一兩天他可以調適過來但是他的代理人星期六打電話跟我們說這行不通 Lamar希望被交易我們研究了方案除了Dallas以外確實有其他選則但不是爛約就是長約或是球隊不需要的位置其他選擇並不會有更好的操作空間總之保持操作空間是現在情況下我們的因應對策 Q:Kobe跟你講了什麼庫:我跟老科天南地北的聊也有聊Odom的事我能理解老科的不爽因為...(以下略) (記者:幹你什麼屁都沒透露) -- 補了漏掉的部分 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 128.208.10.64

→

spko

12/13 06:56, , 1^F

12/13 06:56, 1^F

→

spko

12/13 06:57, , 2^F

12/13 06:57, 2^F

※ 編輯: shch 來自: 128.208.10.64 (12/13 07:02)

→

spko

12/13 06:57, , 3^F