[情報] Tom Seaver對用球數的看法

看板MLB (美國職棒/大聯盟)作者時間14年前 (2012/01/24 12:22), 編輯推噓1(102)
留言3則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://bats.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/q-a-with-tom-seaver/?ref=baseball Q. Ryan has campaigned against pitch counts. Do you agree? A. There’s nothing wrong with pitch counts. But there’s an addendum to that. I presume Nolan thinks the same way. But it isn’t a blanket pitch count. People say, “I bet the pitch count drives you nuts.” Heck no. I had a pitch count. My pitch count as a general rule was 135. And I knew how many pitches I had when I went to the mound for the last three innings. And I wasn ’t going to spend eight pitches on the No. 8 hitter. On the second or third pitch, he should be hitting a ground ball to shortstop. It might not work like that all the time. But theoretically, you have an approach about how you ’re spending your bullets. There’s nothing wrong with pitch counts. But not when it’s spit out by a computer and the computer does not look at an individual’s mechanics. And you can’t look at his genes. It should come from the individual and the pitching coach and the manager. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.25.133

01/24 17:21, , 1F
有數等於沒有數...
01/24 17:21, 1F

01/24 22:11, , 2F
對不同球隊壓力會不同。
01/24 22:11, 2F

01/25 00:10, , 3F
Baker must agree
01/25 00:10, 3F
文章代碼(AID): #1F7Z8P6_ (MLB)
文章代碼(AID): #1F7Z8P6_ (MLB)