[外電] 也許Keith Van Horn 屬於猶他爵士

看板Mavericks (達拉斯 小牛)作者 (巧巧)時間19年前 (2006/08/27 00:07), 編輯推噓11(11010)
留言21則, 9人參與, 最新討論串1/1
By David J. Smith for HOOPSWORLD.com There have been some rumors locally that link former University of Utah Ute Keith Van Horn and the Utah Jazz. Many are hoping these rumors have some semblance of substance. Here are some reasons why it's an extremely logical fit. 猶他爵士大學出身的Van Horn近來傳出可能和爵士隊合作的傳聞,很多人希望這傳聞能成 真,以下是Van Horn為何適合猶他爵士的幾個理由 First, Keith Van Horn is a proven veteran with great Playoff experience. He played significant roles on two NBA Finals teams, a few years back with the New Jersey Nets and last June with the Dallas Mavericks. While he's not been the go-to guy on either of those teams, he demonstrated the ability to play well in some crucial games. He could help a young, inexperienced Jazz squad take that next step into postseason play. 第一點, Van Horn在季後賽已是經驗豐富的老鳥,他打過2次總冠軍賽,一次是在幾年前他 還在籃網時,另一次就在不久前剛結束的達拉斯小牛的第一次總冠軍賽,雖然他不是這2隊 在比賽中的關鍵人物,但他確實再某些重要時刻有所表現,也許他能提升年輕的猶他爵士 在比賽中的經驗 Second, he would provide another much-needed outside shooter. Last year's perimeter attack was sporadic at best (minus C/F Mehmet Okur, who sadly enough was Utah's main threat). Jazz brass is banking on Derek Fisher providing the deft outside touch that has been missing, complementing an ever-improving Deron Williams. Still, a team can never have too many shooters. Van Horn has always been a good spot-up three-point shooter, and would allow Sloan some flexibility in creating mismatches in his frontcourt. 第二點,他能提供外線支援,去年爵士在外線只能說偶有佳作(除搖擺人Okur無人有威脅性 ),爵士高層本打算用Fisher的外線能力改善Williams的主意失敗了,而射手永遠不嫌多, Van Horn總是一位好的3分外線定點射手,也能使Sloan在前場更能製造進攻機會 Third, Van Horn is a talented offensive weapon. Although he is not as spry as he once was, he can still create his own shot. He has length at the three spot and is just wily enough to get to the hole a few times a game. There were many times last season where the Jazz offense sputtered. They need a player like Van Horn with the ability to make some things happen offensively. 第三點, Van Horn在進攻上有天份的球員.雖然沒有以前猛,但他仍能自己製造機會,他的 高度讓他在3分線上具優勢,也能抓住比賽中的空隙而得逞,上季爵士在進攻上常遇到瓶頸, 他們需要像Van Horn這樣的進攻球員 Fourth, he would join Fisher and Matt Harpring in providing some leadership off the bench. Going down the stretch, Utah needed much more production from its reserves. Van Horn played admirably well behind and alongside Mavs star Dirk Nowitski and could do the same with Carlos Boozer and Andrei Kirilenko. 第四點,他能跟Fisher an和 Matt Harpring從板凳席跳出來領導,猶他需要更多板凳, Van Horn在小牛成功扮演Dirk的板凳,同樣的他也能扮演好Carlos Boozer and和Andrei Kirilenko.的板凳角色 Lastly, Van Horn is a local product and is still wildly popular amongst Utah fans. His presence alone would sell some tickets. Many have yearned for the day the former Ute would don a Jazz uniform. While he may be in the twilight of his career, it would be enjoyable for many fans to see one of their own return 最後一點,. Van Horn在猶他還是蠻受歡迎的 ,他能帶動一些票房,這位猶他校友很想穿上 爵士的球衣,儘管他不在處於高峰,但球迷樂見他再次回巢 On top of all these reasons, Van Horn could probably be had very inexpensively. Utah still has the cap room and could insure themselves by simply offering a two-year contract, with the latter year being a team option. 最重要的一點是Van Horn的薪資可能會大幅降低,猶他在薪資上仍有空間,基於之後的球隊 選擇也許能簽個一兩年的合約(不知怎麼翻這句,怪怪) Keith Van Horn in a Jazz uniform? It makes a lot of sense to me… Van Horn會穿上猶他的球衣嗎?一些感觸浮上心頭… 翻的不好請見諒,總之就是Van Horn適合爵士是因為他的 1.經驗2.外線3.進攻能力4.增加板凳深度5.票房和人氣6.最後是薪資 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.70.144.131

08/27 00:38, , 1F
搖擺人Okur...(筆記)
08/27 00:38, 1F

08/27 01:05, , 2F
成功扮演Dirk的板凳...(筆記)
08/27 01:05, 2F

08/27 01:08, , 3F
原文沒寫搖擺人(swingman), 原po可能是誤會意思了
08/27 01:08, 3F

08/27 01:09, , 4F
合約那段,最後一句是指合約最後一年可有球隊選擇權
08/27 01:09, 4F

08/27 01:17, , 5F
不過在他受傷前成功扮演Dirk的板凳這點我同意~
08/27 01:17, 5F

08/27 01:22, , 6F
好八好八..我承認是我個人對他有蠻深的偏見....= =+
08/27 01:22, 6F

08/27 01:23, , 7F
常看他在大空黨時投個大麵包...心裡就有氣壓... =口=+...
08/27 01:23, 7F

08/27 01:24, , 8F
檔 <--- (錯字歹謝...)
08/27 01:24, 8F

08/27 09:58, , 9F
進攻上面有天份...(筆記) 真是這樣那小牛怎麼不留他 XD
08/27 09:58, 9F

08/27 10:19, , 10F
Nowitzki來吧
08/27 10:19, 10F

08/27 11:11, , 11F
抱歉阿第一次PO外電,我說搖擺人是因為他說C/F..SORRY
08/27 11:11, 11F

08/27 11:17, , 12F
不過也覺得這篇有點太看的起Van Horn了
08/27 11:17, 12F

08/27 15:33, , 13F
搖擺人的位置通常是在 F/G 比較常見喔~
08/27 15:33, 13F

08/27 15:36, , 14F
我是覺得Van Horn沒那麼糟 他進攻是還不錯的 問題在防守
08/27 15:36, 14F

08/27 20:42, , 15F
C/F正常都是翻中前鋒,搖擺人這個詞幾乎都是指2、3號球員
08/27 20:42, 15F

08/27 20:46, , 16F
“一份兩年長度而在第二年有球隊選擇權的合約“
08/27 20:46, 16F

08/31 22:16, , 17F
我還蠻希望他走的 坐領高薪卻沒什用
08/31 22:16, 17F

09/01 10:41, , 18F
有沒有用這個詞很難定義吧,他除了易碎了點,該做的事都做了,
09/01 10:41, 18F

09/01 10:42, , 19F
剩下就只能問AJ到底想怎麼用他了,以此類推,MD應該是最沒有用
09/01 10:42, 19F

09/01 10:43, , 20F
的了
09/01 10:43, 20F

09/01 22:50, , 21F
同意樓上的說法 不過他真是太貴了說
09/01 22:50, 21F
文章代碼(AID): #14y76iVc (Mavericks)
文章代碼(AID): #14y76iVc (Mavericks)