[外電] 達拉斯鄉民不太爽

看板Mavericks (達拉斯小牛)作者Yeswitzki (也是位司機)時間18年前 (2008/03/07 07:51)推噓11(11推 0噓 4→)

留言15則, 10人參與討論串1/1

達拉斯鄉民不太爽 Dallas Mavericks fans make it known: They're peeved 本週鄉民論壇由David Moore為您解答對小牛的疑惑. (譯按:Moore的特色就是喜歡咬文嚼字又常穿跟天才老爹一樣的毛衣人稱 David “Cosby sweater” Moore) 基八鄉民甲: 小將軍的黑腦袋是裝屎嗎? 為什麼在對湖人OT時還讓奇德上場? 雖然奇德找到Dirk的空檔, 讓他投進追平的三分. 可是他不知道關鍵時刻不能信任奇德嗎? :) 好啦!!!我承認我是來亂的. 其實我想問的是Josh是不是也一起被交易走了? 不然為什麼場上老是感覺不到他的存在? 他是在不爽Devin被交易走了? 還是小將軍叫他保留實力, 為季後賽做準備嗎? 我沒有在酸誰喔… 揪咪 =.= Q: How could Avery keep Kidd in for the last few seconds and overtime against LA? My goodness, has he lost his Cajun mind? Of course, Kidd passed the ball to an open Dirk for the tying three, but you sure cannot count on him in crunch time. OK - I am just Kidding, pun intended. My real question is, when we traded for Kidd was Josh Howard included in the deal because I have not seen him since the trade? Is there something wrong with him or is he just pouting? Or perhaps this is some super secret strategy by Avery to confuse our opponents and he is saving him for the playoffs. No poisonous journalism intended. 大衛: 好濃的戰意! 首先, Howard 沒被交易. 雖然他的馬吉Devin走了, 但我覺得他不是在不爽這個. 簡單的說, 他的背傷還沒好. 當你背痛時連打bbs 都要躺著了. 更何況是上籃這種很靠背的動作!!! MOORE: Do I detect a dash of Cajun sarcasm, or is that a pinch of poisonous fandom creeping in? Howard was not included in the deal, although Devin Harris was his best friend on the team. Does that mean he's been pouting? I don't think so. The back contusion Howard suffered before the All-Star break shouldn't be minimized. He said Wednesday he felt twinges from time to time and estimated the back was only 85 percent healthy. I don't even like to type with a bad back. I can't imagine what it would be like to attack the basket. 基八鄉民乙: 打國王時, 小將軍說是他叫奇德要多投籃. 結果奇德拿到了超水準的21分 , 準名人堂的奇德突然變得會得分, 難道馬冏… 我是說難道小將軍不用負責嗎 !!!??? 我不是來亂的喔! 我是覺得小將軍在狡辯啦! 是不是因為Kidd傳球給Dirk投進對湖人的追平分, 小將軍才改變心意, 在OT時留Kidd在場上? 如果他覺得關鍵時刻要擺五個得分手, 那他就要堅持下去. 不然就要認錯道歉呀!!! 小將軍太驕傲, Dallas會拿不到冠軍呀!!!! 揪咪 *.< Q: Avery Johnson said after the Kings game that he told Jason Kidd to be more aggressive with his shot. Kidd scored an unbelievable (sneer) 21 points in that game versus the sad Sac Kings. Taking into account that Kidd played more minutes versus the Kings than against the huge rival Spurs the night before, and that he is a sure fire Hall of Famer, does Johnson think he deserves credit for Kidd's scoring performance? Isn't this a childish attempt to divert attention from his ridiculous decision to keep Kidd out of the last seconds of the game against the Spurs? Did Kidd's assist to Dirk on his last second, game-tying shot against the Lakers change Avery's mind? If he really believes in the scoring lineup, then he should defend himself. Otherwise, he should admit he was wrong. I wonder if Avery's maniacal arrogance is ahead of interior scoring in keeping this team from a championship. 大衛: 你們倆真的很機八! 我相信小將軍不是在邀功. 但是他要表達的是: 如果Kidd在對馬刺時有像對國王時那麼積極投籃, 他就不會叫Kidd去守開特力了! 還有, 叫Avery公開道歉, 你不如叫奇拿公開全部的影片, 可能還比較快一點! MOORE: Did you conspire with Randy in Spicewood? I don't believe Johnson was trying to take credit for Kidd's 21 points. But I do believe he was into the next phase of justifying why he put the point guard on the bench in the final 34.5 seconds of that loss to San Antonio the night before. The implication: if Kidd had looked for his shot against the Spurs like he did against the Kings, he wouldn't have been on the bench. Instead of waiting for Johnson to admit he's wrong, you might want to campaign for Ralph Nader for president. That will happen before Johnson backs off his decision. 鄉民: Josh 怎麼好像都不切入的? Kidd 的到來, 應該讓Josh更容易有切入空檔呀? 如果受傷了, 為什嗎不讓他休息養傷? 他不上場的話 Dallas表現可能會好一點耶… 季後賽前他會恢復以前的身手嗎? Q: By reading your oh-so-perceptive observations over the last couple of weeks something hit me: You guys were right about something. Watching Josh Howard over the last few games has been frustrating. He rarely drives and slashes anymore. Wasn't the Kidd acquisition supposed to make him better at getting to the rim? Why can't he be shelved for a few games if he's not 100%? I know guys play hurt all the time, but he only seems to be hurting them when he's out there. Where's the old J-Ho and will he be ready for the playoffs. 大衛: Josh 的確不像開季那麼猛, 主因是背傷. 但他最近跳投太多, 變得比較好守住. Josh 的確是那種切入打爛仗的. Kidd的到來, 應該會讓他更好發揮. 但是呢… 季初的時候, 小牛常常讓他持球單打. 他可以接球後, 決定要切要投再下球. 但現在他要多跑位找空檔, 還要適應在行進間接球, 然後得分. 在負傷狀況下. 他調整是慢了點 … 但是, Howard 是很多才多藝的! 我相信他在季後賽之前會調整好! MOORE: You're right. The Howard you saw to open the season is nothing like the player you see now. The back injury is a factor. He has settled for jump shots lately and defenders are sitting on that shot. Johnson showed him tape of how his game had slipped before the Utah game and he responded with 25 points. Howard is the kind of athletic perimeter player who should flourish with Kidd pulling the trigger, and I think he will. But there is something else to consider right now. Howard was at his best early in the season when the Mavericks isolated him, let him get set and then decide how to attack the defense. He's being asked to move more and score on the run now. That's an adjustment, with a bad back, he's been slow to make. But Howard is versatile enough to adapt. Unless he suffers a setback or another injury, he should be ready for the playoffs. 鄉民: 我一直很喜歡蛋皮的臨危不亂! (揪咪) 還有他幫忙擋拆, 防守籃下, 接球外傳, 以及搶籃板的能力. 在Kidd之前, 只要隊友傳球給它, 他的奶油手症一定發作. 但現在蛋皮變了!!! 他只有一半的球會失誤, 另外一半會灌進耶!!!!!! 他不再只會投60%命中率的小拋投了!!!! 而且蛋皮防守也變強了! 這種狀況會維持多久呀!?????? Q: I've always liked Erick Dampier for his unflappability and for those things he's always done well: setting picks, defending the key, outlet passing and rebounding. But before Kidd I always felt that anyone who threw a pass to Damp should immediately be charged with a turnover. Things have changed. Now he only fumbles away half the passes and dunks rather than shooting that 10-inch lay-up at a 60% clip. And he's all hustle. Lookin' good. Can it last? 大衛: 應該會維持蠻久的吧… Diop 走後, 蛋皮上場時間增加了. 只要他不要太早陷入犯規麻煩, 他的表現一定會比以前好. 蛋皮打的比較好的時候是當他還在勇士隊時. 只要能讓他參與進攻, 他的防守就會更積極. 小牛隊也曾試著把他加入進攻, 但是成效有限 (可見好控衛能醫治患有奶油手症的中鋒!) Kidd能夠把行進中的球傳給蛋皮. 例如在高位擋拆的時候, 這樣蛋皮就不用下球了. MOORE: Why not? He's going to get more time now that DeSagana Diop has been traded. If he stays out of early foul trouble, he'll be in position to do more than he's done since his first season with the Mavericks. His recent success goes back to what people in Golden State said after the trade was made. If you get him involved on the offensive end early, you get a more active defensive player. The Mavericks have tried that through the years with limited success. The difference with Kidd is that he hits Dampier with the ball on the run. He gets it to him high on the pick-and-roll where he doesn't have to put it on the floor. That's made a difference. 鄉民: 為什麼Dirk 跟Kidd 不打擋拆? 是默契不夠嗎? 一個準名人堂控衛跟優秀大前鋒不打擋拆好像怪怪的… Q: Where is the pick-and-roll between Dirk and Kidd? Is this a play that takes time to get right between two players? I'm surprised that the Mavs have not been able to find success in the half court with a Hall-of-Fame point guard working with a Hall-of-Fame power forward. 大衛: Kidd跟蛋皮打擋拆. 之後也會跟Josh打擋拆. 但是跟Dirk打球可能要pick-n-pop ( 擋切的變形; 控衛把球傳給面對mismatch防守者的前鋒前鋒進入二樓跳投模式). Dirk喜歡跟 Nash玩 Pick-n-pop. 這能讓他掌握接了就投的節奏. 當然Dirk偶而也會切入, 但基本上無法防守的二樓跳投是Dirk的無敵模式. MOORE: You've seen Kidd run the pick-and-roll with Dampier. You'll probably see him run it more with Howard. He runs it with Nowitzki, but it's more a pick-and-pop. That was the play Nowitzki loved to run when Steve Nash was the point guard. It allows him to catch the ball in rhythm and shoot. He will drive some off that play, but an uncontested jumper is the first option. 鄉民:Dallas 在Kidd還在適應時打了好幾場硬仗, 都還沒跌出八強. 之後賽程較好打, 他們應該會越打越好! Dallas季賽戰績會有前四名? 或是前兩名嗎? 還是我們應該放眼未來了~ 揪咪*.< Q: First, would it be possible for David to quit using the crutch phrase, 'I would argue'? Second, I would argue that the Mavs have weathered the hardest part of their schedule (with Kidd adjustment phase) and are still in the top eight. The remaining schedule is much easier, and I can see them finishing strong. Is a top-four finish (even top two) in the West out of the question? Or should we begin focusing on next year? 大衛: 之後還是有硬仗! Dallas會連續對上湖人, 超賽, 跟馬刺. 但是是在小牛無敵主場. 之後可能會輕鬆一點. 但還會對到: 兩場勇士, 還有太陽, 爵士, 跟黃蜂. 前兩名大概是不可能了~ 前四名倒是有機會… MOORE: That was a tough part of the schedule. Another one comes up later this month when the Mavericks face the LA Lakers, Boston Celtics and San Antonio Spurs in consecutive games. The difference is all of those games will be played at the American Airlines Center. After that, the schedule does ease up a bit. But the team still has two more games with Golden State, another with the Lakers and games against Phoenix, Utah and New Orleans. I think a top-two finish is unlikely. But a top four isn't out of the question. Come to think of it, I would argue ... Sorry. I almost made it all the way through. 鄉民: 我不認為Mavs玩完了. 但是現在一直輸… 在變態西區, 小牛季後賽會不會沒機會 ??? Kidd-Harris 交易對小牛會不會划不來?? Q: I am not on the Mavs-are-doomed bandwagon - yet. But what do you realistically think the Mavs' chances in the playoffs are? This Western Conference is so tough this year, and so thrilling to watch, but with each loss I'm starting to think they won't even be in the playoffs. Will that say anything about the Kidd trade and sending Devin Harris away? 大衛: 目前看來小牛要在西區出線爭總冠軍的機率不高, 但也不是不可能啦! Kidd加入才八場, 其中客場對到馬湖爵都纏鬥到最後. 對教練團來說這是好現象. 問題在於, 小牛攻守兩端都太不穩了! 在季後賽前要解決這問題… 難度有點高. “不穩” 大概就是小牛的代名詞了… 今年沒拿冠軍, 不代表那就是個爛交易. 但是小牛如果沒在Kidd退休或轉隊前拿冠軍, 那他們付出的代價(Harris)就太高了. MOORE: It looks more and more unlikely that the Mavericks will come out of the West this season, but they have a chance. The fact Kidd has only been here for eight games and they were as competitive as they were on the road against the Spurs, Lakers and Jazz is an encouraging sign for the coaching staff. The problem is that this team has been so inconsistent on both ends of the floor. Clearing that up before the playoffs start is probably unrealistic. It just seems to be part of this team's identity. If the Mavericks don't win the title this year, it doesn't mean the Kidd deal was a bust. But if the Mavericks don't win a title before Kidd retires or moves to another team, they will have given up too much. From than standpoint, the trade will have been a bad one. 鄉民: 我之前不喜歡這交易, 現在是越來越討厭. Kidd不是個射手, 防守者可以放他投. Devin比Kidd好一點, 而且還在進步! 在進攻上它給小牛隊更多出手選擇. 小牛最近的輸球就是在於最後進攻的出手點太少! 很明顯的, Kidd不會是小牛投進致勝球的那個人!!! Q: I didn't like the trade from the beginning, and now I like it less. Here is why. Jason Kidd is not a good shooter. The defense does not have to come out on him. Devin Harris is a better shooter and is improving too. He really gave the Mavs more options. The Mavs have lost two close games now and did not really have very many options for the last shot. It's obvious that Kidd is not going to make a big shot to win a game. Harris 的投射能力是比Kidd好一點. 他的速度也快一點. 對於對方年輕快速的持球控衛 , 防守上也較有一套. 但是跟Kidd比起來, 他並不會在比賽末端為小牛帶來更多進攻選擇! Kidd比任何人都會製造空檔!!! 不管防守者守不守他, 他都有辦法把球傳給該出手的人 . MOORE: Harris is a better shooter than Kidd. He's quicker and a better on-ball defender against young, fast point guards. But he didn't give the Mavericks more options at the end of the game than Kidd. Kidd makes plays that no one else in the game makes. I don't care if the defense comes out on him or not. He will get the ball into the hands of the person who should take the shot. 鄉民:我們何時會看到大貓上場? 他會是升級版的Diop嗎? Q: When do you think we are going to see Jamaal Magloire? How much of an upgrade do you believe he will be over DeSagana Diop, if any? 大衛: 大貓今年沒怎麼打到球. 小將軍說大貓還在場邊調整. 蛋皮最近打很好, 所以替補中鋒的問題暫時不大. 但小牛季後賽時終究需要大貓! 大貓比較壯, 比較會進攻. Diop活動力比較好, 比較會煽鍋. 大貓不能說是升級版的Diop, 但是他對小牛有用處. MOORE: Magloire hasn't played much this season, and Johnson has spoken of the need to get him into basketball shape. It sounds like that will come in practice, not games. Dampier has played so well of late that's not an issue. But the Mavericks will need to get something out of Magloire heading into the playoffs. He's stronger than Diop and a little better offensively. But he's not nearly as athletic or the shot blocker that Diop is. He's not an upgrade. But he should be able to help. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 68.94.194.59