[外電] Dallas Mavericks' Dampier still baffled by ejection

看板Mavericks (達拉斯小牛)作者popstarkirby (中肯正直不嘴砲 POP)時間16年前 (2009/12/20 12:27)推噓5(5推 0噓 2→)

留言7則, 6人參與討論串1/1

http://tinyurl.com/ydgmllk A day later, Erick Dampier still couldn't figure out what happened when he got ejected from Friday night's loss to Houston. It was the play at the root of the Mavericks' protest of the game, which was being formally prepared Saturday evening. The Mavericks had 48 hours after the game to get the protest and the $10,000 fee to the league. Dampier has replayed the situation in his mind and watched the film and still doesn't get it, though he does see the humor in it. "I've never been in that situation before, where a player gets fouled and they get a technical and then they get ejected," Dampier said with a chuckle. "How is that possible? OK, if you want to eject me, can I at least shoot my two free throws? And it was a flagrant [committed against Dampier]? But the result of that play is they kick me out?" Strange, indeed. The referees were convinced Dampier threw an elbow and went to the videotape to review the play, but did so before they had decided Aaron Brooks was responsible for a flagrant foul-penalty 1 against Dampier. Flagrant foul-penalty 2 infractions can be reviewed, but not penalty 1 flagrants. The Mavericks were convinced that the elbow officials said Dampier threw was not discovered until the review, which they say never should have happened. "I think it was a nice Christmas present from the refs to me," said Dampier, who said it was the first ejection of his career. "Somebody grabs you from behind and pulls you down. They said it looked like I threw an elbow, but I didn't. He pulled me in a way that my momentum took me to the right and made it look like I threw an elbow. But I didn't. I think it was a wrong call and it really could have been a difference in the game. "You could tell watching their review and how long it took them to go over it three or four times that nothing good was going to come out of it. I mean, I'm thinking he's going to review the foul and all of the sudden he says there's a T on No. 25 and he's ejected. I didn't really understand it. But we're not going to blame the game on that one call." The Mavericks were fortunate to get to overtime and didn't make enough plays in the extra period to win. But the elbow call on Dampier, not to mention a clear-path foul on Jason Terry and a discrepancy on how much time was left when the ball went out of bounds on the last possession of regulation, all were part of the Mavericks' protest. The league had no comment other than to say the protest had not been filed. "The only thing I'll say is they'll get it right in New York," coach Rick Carlisle said of the league office's review. "They [the referees] indicated some things, but so as not to lead to further confusion, I won't repeat what they said. "I'm not going to spend money [get fined] talking about what those guys did or didn't do. If there were wrong calls, technicals will be rescinded and whatever happens, happens. Everyone's money is better spent doing something else." 蛋皮還沒搞清楚狀況時他已經被請出場了達拉斯官方有48小時可以抗議還有繳交一萬鎂的罰款對此蛋皮笑著表示我從來沒遇過這種情況人家犯我規然後我被判技術犯規驅逐出場 "至少讓我先把兩罰罰完吧" 小牛這方說蛋皮並沒有出拐裁判則是堅持有蛋皮說我覺得這是裁判送我的聖誕節禮物人家把你扯下來然後說你出拐要打人我沒有出拐我被拉下來看起來像有出拐但我沒有 Carlisle說我相信官方會處理的我不想冒著被罰款的風險去發表任何意見錢不該花在這種事上(被罰款) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.38.50.112