Re: [外電] Tyson Chandler on Mavericks' struggles

看板Mavericks (達拉斯 小牛)作者 (游魚絲的決定)時間14年前 (2011/12/28 07:45), 編輯推噓14(14023)
留言37則, 16人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《popstarkirby (有梗的POP)》之銘言: http://tinyurl.com/clk9o6c One of the members of the NBA champion Dallas Mavericks isn't too worried about the 0-2 start. That's because he plays with the New York Knicks. 冠軍成員拳王,並不為小牛開記不順而感到憂心(worried),因為他的新東家在紐約 Tyson Chandler, the big man for Dallas in the 2010-2011 season who took his game to New York in free agency this fall, didn't feel like the Mavericks tried to bring him back. When that happened, he also didn't feel like Dallas was going to be competitive this season. 以自由球員身分與紐約簽約的拳王,並不覺得小牛有嘗試把他簽回去。因此,他並不覺得 小牛的新球季會很有競爭力。 註:這聽起來好像很自大,但對照以下的以下的說詞,卻不是那個意思 "Honestly, I'd kind of seen it coming because when you put a team in a situation and you say, 'You're the defending champions and we're not necessarily trying to repeat,'" Chandler told ESPNNewYork.com's Ian Begley, in a post on ESPNDallas. "When I say that, I'm not saying that they don't have the pieces there. I obviously think very highly of those guys. But I say that because they offered everybody one-year deals so they knew nobody was going to necessarily accept that. So you're basically telling all the players in the locker room we're playing for free agency next year after a championship." 「老實說,我早有預感會如此,因為小牛的狀況是(庫班迷之聲):你們是衛冕冠軍喔! 但我卻不想要再來一次了啦!」「當然,這不代表球員們不夠格,他們都很優秀,但是 因為球隊對每個人都只提供一年的合約,就暗示了球隊方面早知道球員不一定會接受這 種報價。這基本上就是在告訴球員說,今年是打爽的,為的是明年的自由球員」 註:覺得拳王是說,小牛球團早放棄了今年球季? Despite the fact that he no longer plays with guys like Dirk Nowitzki and Jason Kidd, he still wishes his teammates well. 球員然後希望小牛們打出好球 "I'm hoping for those guys that it turns around because there's truly good guys in the locker room," Chandler said. 「希望事情有轉機,因為他們都真正的好人」 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 68.46.20.99 ※ 編輯: shehand 來自: 68.46.20.99 (12/28 07:47)

12/28 08:25, , 1F
感動
12/28 08:25, 1F

12/28 08:36, , 2F
某方面也是中肯..大家也心知肚明一堆一年約是啥意思
12/28 08:36, 2F

12/28 08:51, , 3F
推拳王!!!
12/28 08:51, 3F

12/28 10:11, , 4F
他第三段其實滿中肯的吧= =
12/28 10:11, 4F

12/28 10:24, , 5F
中肯阿~所以就輕鬆看球看看卡帥能把現在這樣的陣容
12/28 10:24, 5F

12/28 10:24, , 6F
帶到何種程度起到何種作用吧
12/28 10:24, 6F

12/28 10:41, , 7F
給VC複數年就更不能諒解了
12/28 10:41, 7F

12/28 11:28, , 8F
跟我想的一樣 我也覺得今年小牛是為了明年陣容準備
12/28 11:28, 8F

12/28 12:55, , 9F
VC後兩年的部分保證約是可以低價買斷的意思嗎?
12/28 12:55, 9F

12/28 13:16, , 10F
搞不好馬哭伯真的想放掉這一季 Dirk的巔峰還有多久
12/28 13:16, 10F

12/28 13:36, , 11F
他的打法應該可以很久吧
12/28 13:36, 11F

12/28 14:04, , 12F
也...也是啦 給一年約的意思~
12/28 14:04, 12F

12/28 15:29, , 13F
其實用字聽得出他蠻感念小牛的時光,但就是不滿意1
12/28 15:29, 13F

12/28 15:29, , 14F
年鳥短約..只能說好聚好散~我相信他回小牛時大家還是
12/28 15:29, 14F

12/28 15:29, , 15F
會非常感謝他當時的貢獻~畢竟一次次的捨身位司機單檔
12/28 15:29, 15F

12/28 15:30, , 16F
以及鎮守禁區的悍將畫面,會深植球迷心中~
12/28 15:30, 16F

12/28 19:26, , 17F
他不只不滿意一年短約,他是想要大約,像跟尼克簽的
12/28 19:26, 17F

12/28 19:26, , 18F
那種接近LBJ薪水的大約...
12/28 19:26, 18F

12/28 20:50, , 19F
VC薪水是有多爛.後兩年球隊選擇權..小牛不想要就可以
12/28 20:50, 19F

12/28 20:52, , 20F
要..反觀haywood才是爛
12/28 20:52, 20F

12/28 20:52, , 21F
12/28 20:52, 21F

12/28 21:57, , 22F
沒人說爛,只是他是覺得要給VC複數年為啥不留Rudy
12/28 21:57, 22F

12/28 21:58, , 23F
還有不是球隊選擇權...
12/28 21:58, 23F

12/29 00:16, , 24F
跟樓上有同感@@ 本想看到Rudy在小牛打球的
12/29 00:16, 24F

12/29 00:52, , 25F
當初簽VC因為後2年是部分保障所以大家沒有太大反彈
12/29 00:52, 25F

12/29 00:53, , 26F
但是後來因為省錢(??)和後場人手爆滿而選擇交易掉
12/29 00:53, 26F

12/29 00:54, , 27F
Rudy和Brewer才對簽VC這個動作產生狐疑
12/29 00:54, 27F

12/29 00:56, , 28F
畢盡2個是才26跳跳人~而VC是個35歲老飛人
12/29 00:56, 28F

12/29 00:57, , 29F
簽老的把年輕的踢掉~這是最令人匪夷所思的地方
12/29 00:57, 29F

12/29 01:07, , 30F
讓人感覺就是清掉Rudy和Brewer是因為簽了VC關係
12/29 01:07, 30F

12/29 01:13, , 31F
套一句政客最愛用的話:給人的觀感不佳
12/29 01:13, 31F

12/29 04:10, , 32F
瓜田李下
12/29 04:10, 32F

12/29 07:27, , 33F
其實不留Rudy是早有的說法,但簽VC跟拿Rudy跟金塊交
12/29 07:27, 33F

12/29 07:28, , 34F
易幾乎是同時發生,我倒覺得也不算是為了VC而交易
12/29 07:28, 34F

12/29 07:28, , 35F
Rudy,只是一種過渡期的操作而已
12/29 07:28, 35F

12/29 13:01, , 36F
那簽VC到底是為了什麼..OTZ~
12/29 13:01, 36F

12/29 16:54, , 37F
感謝dmd大大的解說
12/29 16:54, 37F
文章代碼(AID): #1E-bYrOn (Mavericks)
文章代碼(AID): #1E-bYrOn (Mavericks)