[外電] Oklahoma City’s Poor Pick And Roll …已回收

看板NBA (美國籃球)作者 (今天總算有太陽)時間15年前 (2011/05/03 17:15), 編輯推噓36(36015)
留言51則, 35人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 Thunder 看板 #1DlyUUp5 ] 作者: poning (今天總算有太陽) 看板: Thunder 標題: [外電] Oklahoma City’s Poor Pick And Roll Defense 時間: Tue May 3 17:15:08 2011 http://tinyurl.com/6gxnbr7 Oklahoma City’s Poor Pick And Roll Defense 奧克拉荷馬的爛P&R防守 While everybody is talking about the Grizzlies’ post offense (and rightfully so, because they were awesome yesterday), the Grizzlies also excelled in other aspects of their offense, specifically their pick and roll game. According to Synergy Sports Technology, the Grizzlies scored 33 points on 26 possessions, good for a PPP of 1.26. When watching through the Grizzlies’ pick and roll offense, it becomes obvious who the Grizzlies were attacking, and that is Kendrick Perkins. 大家都說灰熊的低位攻擊灰熊厲害(說的也沒錯,G1真的很可怕),不過灰熊拿手的還不只 這一招勒,特別是他們的P&R。根據Synergy Sports Technology統計,灰熊G1靠著26次P&R 得到33分,PPP(Point Per Possession)為1.26。觀察灰熊整場的P&R之後,我們很明顯可以 知道他們專打哪個點—放話一哥Kendrick Perkins The reason why the Grizzlies were attacking Perkins is because he isn’t the quickest big man around, and Memphis was hoping getting Perkins moving around would result in open shots, and they were right: 之所以打他這一點是因為Perk是個移動很慢的大個子,灰熊希望讓Perk多移動來製造空檔, 這個戰略很正確: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTPeveglttI&feature=player_embedded
This play early in the first quarter shows you exactly why the Grizzlies were looking to involve Kendrick Perkins in pick and roll defense, and that is because they were looking to exploit his poor foot speed. Here, Perkins is hedging, looking to keep Mike Conley out of the lane, which he does. However, this leaves Marc Gasol open, and Perkins is unable to range over and challenge the shot. 這是第一節剛開始沒多久的影片。我們可以很清楚的了解到灰熊很想要讓Perk上來做P&R的 防守,他們顯然是想利用Perk緩慢的移動速度。在上面的影片中,Perk對位Conley,成功阻 止他切入,然而Marc空檔卻像砂鍋般大,而且Perk完全來不及回去干擾他投籃。 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8brUK3ErxlU&feature=player_embedded
After that first play, Perkins starts becoming concerned with getting back to Gasol. Here, Conley comes off of the screen and Perkins shows. However, it’s only a half show as he wants to get back to Gasol. He leaves before Russell Westbrook can get close to Conley, freeing him up for the jump shot that he makes. 接下來來看這個play。Perk得到了教訓,不敢離Marc太遠。上面的影片裡,Conley得到掩護 ,於是Perk出來堵住Conley切入路線。然而,他為了顧住後面的Marc,擋的不是很確實,讓 Conley在Russ回防前出現外線空檔機會,Conley也把握住了。 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tfD5CuNkig&feature=player_embedded
In my opinion, what really hurt Perkins was the pick and pop ability of both Grizzle bigs. Whenever Perkins would commit to hedging on the ball handler, the man setting the screen (in this case Zach Randolph) would simply pop out. The result was too much distance between the man popping and Perkins, and he just wasn’t quick enough to get back in time and successfully challenge the shot. 作者認為,Perk防守灰熊大個子的P&P能力讓雷霆很受傷。每當Perk出來防守P&P的運球者時 ,掩護者就很容易出現空檔(上面的影片是Z-Bo)。看影片就能夠看得出來灰熊這次執行P&P 成功,讓Perk離Z-Bo非~~~~~~常遠,Perk的速度不足以讓他趕回去防守Z-Bo。 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqQ7NPjxTKw&feature=player_embedded
We’ve seen this play before, and it is not coincidence that it was run with the man Perkins was defending as the screener. Again, Perkins gets himself caught helping and found himself in a position where he was unable to get back to his man, freeing up Gasol and forcing his teammate to pick up the foul. 上面這個影片似曾相似,這不是巧合而是Perk防守P&R的一貫情形。再一次,Perk去幫忙防 守帶球者,讓他離掩護者太遠,Marc利用這個機會做Ibake的犯規。 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1IPuuu-NAw&feature=player_embedded
The brilliance of using Perkins man as the screener is because it negated just about everything the Grizzlies wanted to do on the defensive end concerning screen and rolls. If it was Ibaka in all of these hedging situations, he is probably athletic enough to stop some of these plays. This final pick and roll is another great example. The Thunder are trailing late in the fourth quarter here, so they are looking to trap Conley as soon as he comes off of the screen. However, because Gasol (who Perkins was defending) was the man setting the screen, Perkins is the one forced to execute the trap. He takes too long (and actually starts to hedge too early), allowing Gasol to get free on the slip. 把與Perk對位的人作為掩護者之所以如此成功是因為Perk的特性讓灰熊破解雷霆P&R防守非 常成功。如果換做Ibaka,因為他速度夠快,運動力好,應該有機會擋住幾次灰熊的P&R。最 後一個影片是個很好的例子。第四節快結束雷霆仍落後,所以他們想儘快包夾Conley不讓他 利用掩護。然而,因為負責掩護的是Marc,使Perk必須要負責上前包夾。Perk跟Marc的距離 拉的太開(事實上他也太快上前包夾),讓Marc又出現中距離空檔。 The Grizzlies definitely saw something on tape concerning Ibaka when defending pick and rolls, and they came out and put him in that position time after time. The Boston Celtics’ help defense was good enough to hide these deficiencies (like Perkins’ slow feet), but I don’t know if the Thunder’s defense is. Look for the Thunder to try and adjust, but this could be a problem all series for Perkins and Oklahoma City. 灰熊肯定有對Ibaka防守P&R的能力做了功課,所以才能成功執行P&R,讓Ibaka無從使力。C 's的協防很好,足以遮蓋他們陣容的缺點(像是Perk的龜速),但我不知道雷霆的防守做不 做得到。期待雷霆可以嘗試與調整過來,但這點在這個系列戰裡對雷霆與Perk都可能會是個 麻煩。 -- 『也許你想從我身上尋求許多東西。可是我卻一點也沒有感覺自己有什麼被需求。』 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 211.22.7.197 poning:轉錄至看板 Grizzlies 05/03 17:15 -- 『也許你想從我身上尋求許多東西。可是我卻一點也沒有感覺自己有什麼被需求。』 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 211.22.7.197

05/03 17:19, , 1F
專打一哥KP ㄎㄎ
05/03 17:19, 1F

05/03 17:20, , 2F
看了這篇還有人認為多了KP BOS就會更容易守MIA雙槍嗎
05/03 17:20, 2F

05/03 17:20, , 3F
雷霆要ㄎㄎ了
05/03 17:20, 3F

05/03 17:20, , 4F
不錯!! 推
05/03 17:20, 4F

05/03 17:21, , 5F
KP不是很多U質寫手說他到雷霆雷霆防守超強的, 怎麼
05/03 17:21, 5F

05/03 17:21, , 6F
Perkins守那種一對一還不錯硬 其他的就別期待了
05/03 17:21, 6F

05/03 17:21, , 7F
現在都在挑他毛病0.0
05/03 17:21, 7F

05/03 17:22, , 8F
kp速度太慢只能守籃下遇到中距離整個被吃死死
05/03 17:22, 8F

05/03 17:22, , 9F
KP強是強在跟其他隊大隻的卡位吧
05/03 17:22, 9F

05/03 17:23, , 10F
又在挑毛病了,大部份寫手是說KP提供很強的「低位」
05/03 17:23, 10F

05/03 17:23, , 11F
防守好嗎
05/03 17:23, 11F

05/03 17:24, , 12F
KP很硬啊 的確補了雷霆不足 但Ibaka沒KG那麼無所不在
05/03 17:24, 12F

05/03 17:29, , 13F
很強的"低位"防守是多強??? 為什麼被Z-BO用"低位"
05/03 17:29, 13F

05/03 17:29, , 14F
分析的很好,P&R的確是這類內線的罩門,在老賽有KG所
05/03 17:29, 14F

05/03 17:30, , 15F
進攻打敗??? 那Z-BO的"低位"要用甚麼形容詞???
05/03 17:30, 15F

05/03 17:30, , 16F
以這個問題不是太明顯
05/03 17:30, 16F

05/03 17:30, , 17F
A+和S級的差別QQ
05/03 17:30, 17F

05/03 17:31, , 18F
Ibaka已經足夠無所不在了 沒有他的封蓋跟籃板
05/03 17:31, 18F

05/03 17:33, , 19F
雷霆至少輸20分 禁區都是他在扛的
05/03 17:33, 19F

05/03 17:33, , 20F
柏金斯這場比賽作用太大
05/03 17:33, 20F

05/03 17:34, , 21F
Perkins 不過是個苦工也敢放話。
05/03 17:34, 21F

05/03 17:34, , 22F
很少
05/03 17:34, 22F

05/03 17:35, , 23F
這一篇寫得還不錯耶 @@
05/03 17:35, 23F

05/03 17:35, , 24F
Z-BO打敗柏金斯都是使用面框進攻跟跳投
05/03 17:35, 24F

05/03 17:36, , 25F
低位爆的少
05/03 17:36, 25F

05/03 17:41, , 26F
Ibaka是很會封蓋但防檔拆還有得學 光有活動力不夠的
05/03 17:41, 26F

05/03 17:42, , 27F
推!
05/03 17:42, 27F

05/03 17:44, , 28F
好像在打電動一樣 一直跑就會有空檔
05/03 17:44, 28F

05/03 17:44, , 29F
專業文 該爆
05/03 17:44, 29F

05/03 17:46, , 30F
這篇好優質 長見識了
05/03 17:46, 30F

05/03 17:51, , 31F
WOW~推
05/03 17:51, 31F

05/03 18:05, , 32F
BOS團隊守P&R或P&P很好
05/03 18:05, 32F

05/03 18:11, , 33F
專業,這樣打下去,雷霆被橫掃都不奇怪
05/03 18:11, 33F

05/03 18:17, , 34F
好文不推嗎?
05/03 18:17, 34F

05/03 18:21, , 35F
熱火又不打P&R 多數都碼是輪流清開放無雙
05/03 18:21, 35F

05/03 18:25, , 36F
推 JoshSmith :Perkins 不過是個苦工也敢放話。
05/03 18:25, 36F

05/03 18:25, , 37F
PK在BOS的用法跟他們不一樣阿 團隊協防能力也不同
05/03 18:25, 37F

05/03 18:25, , 38F
這篇很棒~
05/03 18:25, 38F

05/03 18:36, , 39F
Ibaka一對一根本被Zach擠好玩的
05/03 18:36, 39F

05/03 18:37, , 40F
看完這場 覺得McDyess真的好屌 下盤超穩
05/03 18:37, 40F

05/03 19:06, , 41F
如果KP在C's 團隊的輪轉防守會補起這點 結果不會相同
05/03 19:06, 41F

05/03 19:21, , 42F
感覺不是Perkins是個洞 而是灰熊找出這個缺點故意
05/03 19:21, 42F

05/03 19:22, , 43F
打他的 感覺功課作很多
05/03 19:22, 43F

05/03 19:28, , 44F
這神奇了...灰熊打完馬刺之後包括休息時間..離打雷霆
05/03 19:28, 44F

05/03 19:28, , 45F
也只有40小時...扣掉休息...到底哪來的時間研究...
05/03 19:28, 45F

05/03 19:29, , 46F
Hollins打得好像把整隊帶進精神時光屋練戰術似的...
05/03 19:29, 46F

05/03 19:31, , 47F
沒有人想到之前KP可是搭配KG?
05/03 19:31, 47F

05/03 19:52, , 48F
拿打馬刺那一跳直接用吧
05/03 19:52, 48F

05/03 20:03, , 49F
空檔像砂鍋般大..................(那其實蠻小的吔!)
05/03 20:03, 49F

05/03 21:37, , 50F
Perk速度慢 不過在BOS守擋切有KG幫忙...
05/03 21:37, 50F

05/03 21:44, , 51F
這樣看真的是守的不太好...
05/03 21:44, 51F
文章代碼(AID): #1DlyUtOp (NBA)
文章代碼(AID): #1DlyUtOp (NBA)