[新聞] DH rule unfairly penalizes AL in playoffs

看板NY-Yankees作者 (Damn)時間17年前 (2008/06/17 11:51), 編輯推噓9(907)
留言16則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
And now we come to the necessary, but not painless, discussion of baseball for\ an event that crowns its champion under two sets of rules. Of all the major sports that grace the American landscape, only our national p\ astime changes the actual number of participants in the starting lineup during\ its ultimate championship. There are people who think this is sort of preciou\ s, but there is an excellent chance that these same people also think that day\ time television enriches the soul. The DH rule was instituted by the AL in 1973 as a vehicle to increase offense.\ The increase in offense, it was thought, would increase attendance. The NL wa\ s in ascendance at the time -- that was a long time ago, wasn't it? -- and it \ took the purists' approach, that this was a gimmick unworthy of the grand old \ game. You can argue that the NL was protecting the integrity of the game or yo\ u can argue that the NL was being snooty. Either way, fans ended up with the t\ wo leagues playing by different rules. The DH should go now, but it probably won't. There has not been a problem with\ creating offense for some time. The reasons for that could constitute several\ other columns. It is sufficient to say that the basic reason for the creation\ of the DH is long gone. If your position is that watching pitchers hit is fundamentally boring, you're\ missing the point, and you're also missing your favorite programming on the s\ nowboarding channel. The inherent worth of the successful sacrifice bunt shoul\ d not be diminished. And on those occasions in which the pitcher changes the c\ ourse of the game with his bat, we are all the better for their relatively rar\ ity. Beyond that, it is reasonable to say that the designated hitter rule dramatica\ lly reduces the number of variables involved in pitching changes, and thus red\ uces the texture and the nuance and the thought that is required to manage a g\ ame. And it also reduces the texture and nuance and thought that is required f\ rom those who watch a game. The DH rule does provide a vehicle for one-way players to greatly extend their\ careers, and their fiscal well-being. The purists' view is that if you're goi\ ng to ascend to the lofty level of a Major League regular player, you ought to\ be able to catch the ball and throw the ball, along with being able to hit th\ e ball. The DH has in that way lowered the bar for what a Major Leaguer can be. Why does this situation persist? Because the DH provides 14 of what can be som\ e of the highest-paying jobs in the game. If you were the Major League Basebal\ l Players Association, you wouldn't want to lose the DH, either. The fellow ho\ lding down that spot is going to drive up the salary structure much more than \ a utility infielder or a long reliever could. http://tinyurl.com/55wrat 全文 -- 永保赤子之心! SO. LET US BE OURSELVES! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.141.40.227

06/17 11:55, , 1F
完全沒有這種感覺, 國聯球隊的隊型通常會考慮調度因素
06/17 11:55, 1F

06/17 11:56, , 2F
可以使用 DH 的時候跟美聯球隊比火力反而是吃虧
06/17 11:56, 2F

06/17 11:56, , 3F
而且投手習慣每八棒夾一個弱棒不見得是好事
06/17 11:56, 3F

06/17 11:58, , 4F
去年牛肉還兩分打點勒 哪裡來吃虧了
06/17 11:58, 4F

06/17 12:00, , 5F
這種事情都很不一定的,不是投手人人都是大Z跟Owings
06/17 12:00, 5F

06/17 12:07, , 6F
Cabrera vs Wang
06/17 12:07, 6F

06/17 12:35, , 7F
對阿 拿個案出來講很沒說服力吧
06/17 12:35, 7F

06/17 12:45, , 8F
遇到危機先敬遠再解決投手打擊,前幾天比賽戰術運用
06/17 12:45, 8F

06/17 12:46, , 9F
兩出局二三壘有人,敬遠後滿壘抓投手打擊...
06/17 12:46, 9F

06/17 12:48, , 10F
比賽又在前四局,你要把投手換下來還是讓投手上去出局?
06/17 12:48, 10F

06/17 12:49, , 11F
在美聯比賽情況又不一樣了...沒有DH,打擊的斷層遠比
06/17 12:49, 11F

06/17 12:51, , 12F
Cabrera vs Wang還大...
06/17 12:51, 12F

06/17 12:54, , 13F
這兩場比賽讓大門跟阿布輪流休息,難道沒有替代投手打擊
06/17 12:54, 13F

06/17 12:56, , 14F
的考量..
06/17 12:56, 14F

06/17 13:24, , 15F
輪到八棒一壘空著幾乎都是敬遠, 能打的投手數量不多啦
06/17 13:24, 15F

06/17 13:25, , 16F
話又說回來, 連閉著眼睛都可能照樣打到球變成安打 XD
06/17 13:25, 16F
文章代碼(AID): #18LpIdHG (NY-Yankees)
文章代碼(AID): #18LpIdHG (NY-Yankees)