[新聞] Sabathia Does Not Intend To Opt Out

看板NY-Yankees作者 (ネギ)時間15年前 (2011/02/15 00:09), 編輯推噓21(21020)
留言41則, 20人參與, 最新討論串1/1
TAMPA -- CC Sabathia has made a subtle shift in tone that could be a preview of a more devastating setback to the Yankees rotation next offseason than the team suffered this offseason with Cliff Lee going to the Phillies and Andy Pettitte retiring. Sabathia has an opt-out clause in his contract after this season and, in the past, he always definitively said he would not use that clause to negotiate another free-agent contract with either the Yankees or another team. However, Monday, Sabathia did some dancing around the issue and, for the first time, opened the door that he might deploy the opt-out. In a mass interview with reporters, Sabathia indicated he would not use the opt out without directly saying so, then shut down further inquiry by saying he was concentrating on this season and repeating the phrase, “I’m here." But in a one-on-one conversation with The Post afterward, Sabathia was given a few chances to definitively say he would not opt out -- as he had previously -- and did not. On one occasion he said, “Anything is possible in a contract.” In another, the big lefty said, “Who knows what is possible, but I am not thinking about anything beyond Opening Day.” Asked if his agents had advised him to stop saying he would not opt out, Sabathia said, no, he was answering the questions as he saw fit. Interestingly, in explaining why he lost 25 pounds in the offseason, Sabathia said on a few occasions that he wants to pitch another eight to 10 years. He is entering Year 3 of his seven-year, $161 million contract with the Yankees. The Yankees have not made any contact with Sabathia or his agent about re-working his contract. It's the Yankees policy not to make contact until a player becomes a free agent. "We wouldn't expect him to say anthing else," one Yankees official said. Sabathia would have incredible leverage both on the Yankees and in the marketplace if he were to opt out. The best starters due to be free agents next year are C.J. Wilson and Mark Buehrle, which is hardly stellar. In addition, the Yankees already are desperate for top-of-the-rotation assistance to Sabathia after the rejection by Lee. If Sabathia were to leave, the Yankees would be left ace-less. Sabathia’s $161 million contract remains the largest ever rewarded a pitcher. However, Lee’s contract is paying him $25 million annually, which trumps Sabathia. So it is possible Sabathia could seek an extension that restores both greater length and/or annual value to his deal. 真是..屋漏偏逢連夜雨.... http://nyp.st/f99euT 之後又發表了以下這篇....... Oh, CC again says he will not opt out. And he says that's the last time he's adressing it. We shall see. http://twitter.com/Ledger_Yankees/status/37165036535422976 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.121.17.18 ※ 編輯: stonemonkey 來自: 122.121.17.18 (02/15 00:18)

02/15 00:21, , 1F
現在說的都是屁~時間到了再看吧
02/15 00:21, 1F

02/15 00:22, , 2F
看今年投怎樣再說吧
02/15 00:22, 2F

02/15 00:33, , 3F
現在說的都是聽聽就好
02/15 00:33, 3F

02/15 00:33, , 4F
投個3.20 230IP 不跳就棒槌了
02/15 00:33, 4F

02/15 00:38, , 5F
如果真要跳 FA市場上還真找不到王牌工作馬
02/15 00:38, 5F

02/15 00:40, , 6F
明年FA的SP最好的是Mark Buehrle 時機超好的XD
02/15 00:40, 6F

02/15 01:04, , 7F
反正跳了一定會再簽回來啊 怕什麼@@
02/15 01:04, 7F

02/15 01:21, , 8F
如果只是用錢就可以解決的事 那不是洋基該擔心
02/15 01:21, 8F

02/15 01:31, , 9F
確定一定簽得回來嗎 Lee不是也被認為簽得到 結果呢
02/15 01:31, 9F

02/15 01:37, , 10F
我猜樓上會跳 但會跟肉神一樣荷包飽飽再回來洋基
02/15 01:37, 10F

02/15 07:25, , 11F
自己加這條款也不能叫別人不要跳吧
02/15 07:25, 11F

02/15 07:26, , 12F
反正也沒時光機確定當初沒加這條款到底簽不簽的到人
02/15 07:26, 12F

02/15 12:22, , 13F
Lee錢沒出比別人高阿 簽不回來正常
02/15 12:22, 13F

02/15 12:23, , 14F
如果CC成績好到足以跳脫 那明年的市場洋基沒理由不
02/15 12:23, 14F

02/15 12:23, , 15F
梭哈把他簽回來
02/15 12:23, 15F

02/15 14:27, , 16F
今年冬天沒花什錢就是準備給他xd
02/15 14:27, 16F

02/15 15:41, , 17F
費城人給Lee那張明明就是最多的...NYY算是不想給太多
02/15 15:41, 17F

02/15 16:24, , 18F
外電說NY的稅重,扣稅之後,洋基給李的價錢不是最高
02/15 16:24, 18F

02/15 18:38, , 19F
不用扣稅就輸了
02/15 18:38, 19F

02/15 18:53, , 20F
跳就跳阿 目前能給他一年23M+薪水的也沒幾隊
02/15 18:53, 20F

02/15 18:55, , 21F
隔壁要吃姜雷基跟北極 費城吃下Lee了 放眼看看 只剩
02/15 18:55, 21F

02/15 18:55, , 22F
梅子跟小熊有能力競爭吧 問題梅子近年又不想灑大錢
02/15 18:55, 22F

02/15 19:57, , 23F
不要再講Lee了,洋基是三家出價最低的XDDD
02/15 19:57, 23F

02/15 21:27, , 24F
跳不跳應該不是錢的問題!!應該是合約年限問題
02/15 21:27, 24F

02/15 22:16, , 25F
LEE哪是出最低的 最低還是費城人阿
02/15 22:16, 25F

02/15 22:21, , 26F
想當初大概也沒人料到費城還會來搶Lee呀....
02/15 22:21, 26F

02/15 22:31, , 27F
費城那張約的總值是最高的
02/15 22:31, 27F

02/15 22:40, , 28F
費城如果執行第六年的話總值是135M
02/15 22:40, 28F

02/15 22:40, , 29F
洋基的最後出價是7年148M
02/15 22:40, 29F

02/15 22:41, , 30F
因為個人偏好跟平均年薪 所以到了費城
02/15 22:41, 30F

02/16 01:55, , 31F
要是有簽到Lee 派派說不定也不會退休 季後賽前三號是
02/16 01:55, 31F

02/16 01:56, , 32F
CC Lee 派派 多強大的左殺陣容啊 更何況紅襪還補了
02/16 01:56, 32F

02/16 01:58, , 33F
A岡和尻拂這兩個左打 一來一往差真多 唉
02/16 01:58, 33F

02/16 09:32, , 34F
BOS得到A-Gon跟CC,但也失去了V-Mat跟Beltre
02/16 09:32, 34F

02/16 09:33, , 35F
然後什麼LEE來派帥就不會退休,那是國內記者的幻想文
02/16 09:33, 35F

02/16 09:33, , 36F
他本人都說Lee沒來是讓他一直到季初都沒辦法決定要不
02/16 09:33, 36F

02/16 09:34, , 37F
要退休的原因
02/16 09:34, 37F

02/16 22:25, , 38F
把稅考慮進去,洋基的確是三家中最低的啊
02/16 22:25, 38F

02/17 15:55, , 39F
樓上,不把稅考慮進去洋基也不是最高的
02/17 15:55, 39F

02/17 22:15, , 40F
總版有三隊Lee合約的試算 有興趣可以去爬 的確我們
02/17 22:15, 40F

02/17 22:16, , 41F
是輸的應該
02/17 22:16, 41F
文章代碼(AID): #1DMLEYS8 (NY-Yankees)
文章代碼(AID): #1DMLEYS8 (NY-Yankees)