Looking Forward to 2005: Washington Nationals Preview
by Sean McNally
Last year at this time, the Montreal Expos were a team without a country –
subject to the whims of 29 other groups with which they were supposed to
compete . . . so naturally, when writing their season preview I wrote the
following three paragraphs:
If Nick Johnson and Brad Wilkerson stay healthy, if Carl Everett stays
healthy and happy, if Jose Vidro and Orlando Cabrera just stay, if Tony
Batista, Juan Rivera, Brian Schneider and the rest of the offense stay in
spitting distance of league average it’s possible the offense could
improve on last year’s run total of 711 runs.
The pitching outlook isn’t nearly as rosy, and a regression from their
716 runs allowed seems likely.
If I had to guess, the Expos finish near .500 again, which is no small feat
, and could be something to build on. Somewhere.
So, how did I do?
Well, for starters Nick Johnson did not stay healthy, Carl Everett was
shipped to the Southside of Chicago midseason, Jose Vidro got banged up,
Orlando Cabrera never has to worry about buying a beer in Southie again
and the rest of the offense… blech, it cut its run output by about 10%
to 635 for the season.
The pitching regressed, allowing 769 runs in 2004, or just about 7%. So
what do you get when you score fewer and allow more, well in the case of
the Expos you get a 67-95 record – a 16 game decline from 2003.
But enough with the bad news, after years of letting the cities of Montreal
; Washington; Dulles, Va., Portland, Ore.; San Juan, P.R.; Monterrey, Mexico
; Saratoga Springs, N.Y; and Cheyenne, Wyo. twist in the wind, the Lords
of Baseball placed the Expos in Washington, D.C., then they didn’t, but
the city government blinked, swallowed hard and took what MLB had to offer –
namely, offering them a risk-free stadium to place their 67-95 last place ward.
So what’s happened since? Well, MLB took the safe, boring, non-controversial
, non-historical route and named the new Washington franchise the Nationals.
Though the merchandise has been flying off the shelves by all reports, the
name was widely panned – with the sentimental choice being the Senators and
the mayor’s choice (and my personal favorite) being the Grays. However, the
Nats it is and shall be for now.
The team is still rudderless however, still a ward of the state, so all the
revenue from those new script “W” hats and jerseys is probably flowing
straight to the commissioner’s office and eventually to the Brewers, but
that’s another story.
And the fact that that money is heading away from the Nats front offices is
probably for the best in the short term. Why? Well, because it's as if the
29 other owners decided to get one last shot in before Washington becomes a
big market powerhouse in the National League – they turned the keys over
to Jim Bowden.
I am now convinced that there is no scarier sight in baseball than Jim Bowden
at the helm of your franchise with nothing but house money in front of him.
Hired in November, seemingly straight off the set of ESPN’s Cold Pizza,
Bowden started with actually a glimmer of promise, by cutting show-up-in-
the-ninth pitcher, and the last reminder this team had of Bartolo Colon,
Rocky Biddle. Then, he got all crazy.
Bowden brought in one of the anchors of the AL Central Champion Twins,
shortstop Christian Guzman, and when I say anchor, I mean that he was much
like a several ton lead weight holding the team back. This only cost the
team $16.8 million over the next four years, but that’s just in terms of
real dollars, but more on that later.
The Guzman signing portended the signing of Vinny Cash-stealer, RBI King?
to an insane 2-year $6.2 million contract. Naturally both of these signings
were hailed as a great start to the Bowden administration when they should
have been cause for impeachment.
Just two days after Bowden gutted the left side of his infield, he continued
the festival of insanity by bringing in a certified crazy person – outfielder
Jose Guillen. As a player, I like Guillen, I happen to believe he made real
strides in 2003 when he smacked 31 homers and threw up a line of .311/.359/.569
for the Reds and A’s, and I think he was consolidating them in 2004 where he
hit .294/.352/.497 for the Angels before he went mental, fought his manager
and got suspended for the season for basically being a knucklehead. That last
part is the problem, though maybe Frank Robinson is to surly outfielders what
Leo Mazzone is to mediocre pitchers and this will work out.
The real problem with the Guillen trade is what “Bodes” gave up to get him
– namely former uber-prospect Juan Rivera and 24-year-old shortstop Macier
Izturis.
Rivera basically is Guillen. Or, at least he was last year, when he hit .307
/.364/.465 for the Spos. Rivera is also three years younger and a few million
a year cheaper than Jose. The other problem is Izturis – who basically is
better than Guzman right now.
In AAA Edmonton last season, Izturis raked for a line of .338/.428/.423. The
last time Guzman hit .338 at any level? Never. The last time Guzman slugged
as high as .423 at any level? His injury shortened 2001 when he posted a .477
slugging percentage fueled by a league-leading 14 triples. The last time
Guzman posted an OBA as high as Macier’s .428? NEVER. In fact, the closest
he’s ever gotten is .341 with the Yankees Gulf Coast League affiliate!
What does Guzman bring to the table exactly? Lots of triples? Yes, but not as
many as he used to hit – as evidenced by the paltry total of four he hit last
year. Great defense? His fielding percentage was high in 2004 - .983, good
for second in the circuit, but his zone rating and range factor were decidedly
average or below average for the year.
So what was the result of all Bowden’s fury, well a whole lot of nothing,
er, a couple of more expensive players who essentially downgrade the team
tremendously.
Adding to the chaos around the Beltway, the Nats still have no television deal
as a week before opening day, so they’ve got that going for them.
On the upshot, anecdotal evidence (READ: my own roaming through the city and
suburbs) Nationals merchandise seems to be doing very well among the populous,
local press have reported opening night tickets going for 300% of face value
and the team has sold more than 20,000 season tickets.
That last number is significant because its more than twice the average the
Nationals drew last season as the Expos … that number is significant because
over the last three seasons the franchise drew more than 20,000 fans a total
of 16 times – and six of those were the Montreal home opener and final home
games of the season.
So what are all these newfound fans going to see – well not to get all Tony
Reali on you, but let’s go around the horn…
1B – Nick Johnson (2004 – 73 Games .251/.359/.398)
Some say health is a skill, and if that’s the case, then you can take that
out of Johnson’s toolbox, along with speed. For all the bluster that Yankee
fans (myself included) made about Johnson, its safe to say that Johnson is
dancing on the line of being a bust.
In his career, Johnson has averaged roughly 250 at bats per season, to the
career line of .255/.372./.418 – and most of that owing to his 2003 where he
went crazy with a .284/.422/.472 line in 324 ABs.
With a brittle wrist, a balky back and a collection of other maladies, Johnson
is threatening to treat the stathead community like most of us were presumably
treated by girls in high school – tease us with nice behavior so we say or
do nice things for him and then break our hearts by never returning our
affections consistently.
2B – Jose Vidro (2004 – 110 Games .294/.367/.454)
Vidro is the face of this franchise, but he’s not the all star he once was.
His average has fallen by 10 or more points each of the last four seasons and
his OBA fell 30 points last season as he battled knee injuries. His slugging
has slid as well, and he’s never been one to burn the basepaths.
That said, while Vidro is no longer the best player on the team, he’s still in
the top tier of NL keystone sackers. His .294 average was good for 8th in the
league, as was his OBA and slugging percentage came in at 10th in the circuit.
However, at 30, Vidro is probably facing his decline, which is a shame – more
people deserve to see what kind of player he was. Perhaps moving from the
concrete of Olympic Stadium to the grass of RFK will help, but time will tell.
As it stands, Vidro is the Heart and Soul? of this team, signing a long-term
deal when the team was at its nadir in early 2004 and deserves the new start
the team is getting as much as anyone.
SS – Cristian Guzman (2004 – 145 Games .274/.309/.384)
At least he’s durable… but otherwise, Guzman is a black hole and a pox on
the Nationals new house (as described above in detail).
3B – Vinny Castilla (2004 – 148 Games .271/.332/.535)
On the surface, Vinny looks like a solid pickup, but not playing 81 games on
the moon is going to make him look like the fading 37 year old that he is.
In Colorado, Castilla hit .321/.379/.575, but everywhere else he hit .218/.281
/.493. For those of you keeping score at home – the Nats only play three games
on Planet Coors.
LF – Brad Wilkerson (2004 – 160 Games .255/.374/.498)
Bar none the Nats best player. Brad played all over the field for the franchise
of the last few seasons – left, right, center, first base – hell, I think he
even booked the team’s flights and hotels.
Wilkerson does three things very well – walk, hit for power and strikeout. As
a 27 year old, as at times the Nats primary offensive weapon last year, he hit
32 bombs and 39 doubles. He drew more than 100 walks but fanned 152 times.
All players have warts and one of the lessons of sabermetrics is to look beyond
them toward what a player does well. Wilkerson is durable, has pop, plays
several positions passably and with recent roster developments and Johnson’s
affinity for season ending injuries could end up in center or at first base.
He’s the best position player in Washington, and should be the cornerstone of
the team as they build toward respectability.
CF – Ryan Church (2004 – 98 Games .343/.428/.620 at Triple-A Edmonton
– 30 ML Games .175/.257/.238)
If I had made Dan S. happy and turned this in on time, Endy Chavez would be
in the space… instead, the powers that be in the Washington front office
decided that having a leadoff hitter with a .300-ish OBP was a bad idea.
Church is 26 and had an impressive season at Triple-A, then crashed and
burned upon being called up the bigs. Drafted by Cleveland in the 14th round
of the 2000 draft out of Nevada, Church was the schwag picked up by Montreal
a heist of a trade with the Indians (Scott Stewart for Macier Izturis and
Church). In five minor league seasons, Church has never had an OBP lower than
.325 and a slugging percentage below .429.
Church had an outstanding year at Triple-A at age 25, an age that’s a bit
old for the level, but I think it’s a bold move by the Nats. Chavez has
proven he’s incapable of getting on base at an acceptable rate, and
anecdotally he has Willie Mays Hayes Syndrome, i.e. swinging away and not
playing to his strength of blinding speed. Chavez stole 32 bases last year,
Church has swiped about half that number in his career.
If Church can’t hold the job, Chavez or Wilkerson may be called upon, but
the organization is pretty thin in centerfield.
RF – Jose Guillen (2004 – 148 Games .294/.352/.497)
After breaking out in 2003, Guillen cracked up in 2004. Guillen’s meltdown
may or may not have contributed to Anaheim’s playoff loss last season, but
it didn’t help.
After years as a poster child against premature callups of toolsy outfielders,
Guillen made real strides in the past two seasons, besting his career average
OBP by 30 points in each season while posting slugging percentages of .569 and
.497.
Acquired for Juan Rivera in one of Bowden’s trades for the purposes of
trading someone, Guillen’s a fine player – just the cost is too high. He
should provide some interesting moments for Nats fans – hopefully in the form
of eye-popping throws from the outfield and moonshot homers and not in the
form of, well, fits of insanity.
Bench
C – Gary Bennett (2004 – 75 Games .224/.297/.329)
INF – Tony Blanco (2004 – 58 Games .245/.300/.455 in Double-A
– 62 Games .306/.403/.588 in Single-A)
INF – Jamey Carroll (2004 – 102 Games .289/.378/.372)
OF – J.J. Davis (2004 – 25 Games .143/.225/.171)
OF – Terrmel Sledge (2004 – 133 Games .269/.336/.462)
If Congress wants to investigate something, it should be this bench. Bennett
has his backup catcher card, which isn’t saying much because so does John
Flaherty.
Blanco is a 23-year-old Rule V draftee from Cincinnati who has the potential
to grow into something useful.
Carroll at all three non-first base positions in the infield as well as some
outfield while providing a popless bat off the bench.
Davis was acquired for Antonio Sucre, Bowden apparently needing to fulfill his
toolsy outfielder habit.
Sledge is most famous for, in no particular order: A) testing positive for
steroids B) providing decent pop in a part-time role last season C) Getting
made fun of by Tony Kornheiser and D) modeling the Nats new uniforms.
Of this group, Sledge is the best player, but with Guillen and Wilkerson
manning the corners, he’s in the toughest spot to win playing time. But
with most things, the answer is just an injury away.
Rotation
RHP – Livan Hernandez (2004 – 255 IP 3.60 ERA 186/83 K/BB)
Livan defies science. He’s thrown 200 innings in every season since 1997 (
OK, he actually threw 199.2 in 1999, but I’m rounding here). The most
underappreciated starter in the National League in the last two seasons, when
he’s posted ERAs of 3.20 and 3.60 respectively, while increasing his
strikeouts and throwing 17 complete games. So long as he stays healthy, he
should continue to be a great starter for the Nats. Just 30 years old,
Hernandez is signed through 2007.
RHP – Tomo Ohka (2004 – 84.2 IP 3.40 ERA 38/20 K/BB)
Ohka had good seasons in 2002 and 2003 and was on his way before getting hit
on the arm with a line drive in June and breaking his pitching arm.
As second starters go, for the price ($2.75 for one-year), the Nats could do
worse than Ohka.
RHP – Esteban Loaiza (2004 – 183 IP 5.70 ERA 117/71 K/BB)
Will the real Esteban Loaiza please stand up? Loaiza was a replacement level
pitcher until 2003, when he went nuts, started the All-Star Game, finished
second in Cy Young voting and posted a 21-9 record with an ERA+ of 154 and
striking out 207 while walking just 56.
The sudden spike in performance was chalked up learning a cutter, but in 2004
, all the gains departed and reverted to league average (or worse as a Yankee
– see an ERA+ of 53).
If Loaiza can approach his 2003, or at least improve on his 2004, he can be
an asset during the length of his one-year $2.9 million contract.
Best case scenario, Loaiza goes nuts again and gets traded at the deadline
for parts of the first good Washington Nationals team.
RHP – Zach Day (2004 – 116.2 IP 3.93 ERA 61/45 K/BB)
The booty for trading Milton Bradley to the Indians, Day is young (27) and has
been decent but brittle in his career – never pitching more than 131.1 innings
in any of his three seasons. He doesn’t strike out very many batters and gives
up about a hit per inning, which is not a recipe for long term success.
Again, as a fourth starter Day could be successful if his defense does well by him and he stays healthy.
RHP – Tony Armas Jr. (2004 – 72 IP 4.88 ERA 54/45 K/BB)
I could start by saying Armas has potential if can stay healthy, but since
he’s already on the 15-day DL, I won’t. One of the few players traded from
the Yankees to the Red Sox, Armas is most famous for being he son of a big
leaguer and being traded along with Carl Pavano from Boston for Pedro Martinez.
When healthy, Armas can be a decent starter, but like Day he’s 27 and outside
of 2002, he doesn’t strike a lot of guys out.
The fifth slot will be held down by John Patterson. Patterson is another 27-
year-old righty who can’t seem to stay healthy, but unlike Day and Armas, he
does whiff some people, more than a punchout per inning last season before
being felled by a groin injury. With an, at times electric breaking ball,
Patterson could make some real strides in 2005.
Bullpen
CL – Chad Cordero (2004 – 82.2 IP 2.94 ERA 83/43 K/BB)
Cordero went from pitching in the College World Series in 2003 to the majors
in 2003 and acquitted himself very well thank you. He continued that success
in 2004.
A tender 22 years old, Cordero struck out a batter an inning, but walked about
one over every eight batters he faced. Installed as the closer, Cordero has
outperformed his fellow fast tracked “signability” pick, the Reds’ Ryan
Wagner, and there’s no reason to think he’s going step back.
RHSU – Luis Ayala (2004 – 90.1 IP 2.69 ERA 63/15 K/BB)
Ayala followed up his spectacular 2003 with an equally good 2004. A Rule V
draftee, Ayala is the poster child for taking promising power arms for your
bullpen in the Rule V draft.
In two seasons he’s been durable (161.1 total innings) and good (a 2.79 ERA
and a 4:1 strikeout to walk ratio). The bullpen is probably Washington’s
strength and Ayala is a big reason why.
LHSU – Joey Eischen (2004 – 18.1 IP 3.93 ERA 17/8 K/BB)
Eischen’s 2004 was derailed by bone spurs, but in the previous two seasons,
the angry lefty was excellent. In 2003, he fanned 40 in 53 innings and allowed
just 18 earned runs and in 2002, Joey was even better. Two years ago, Eischen
struck out 51 batters in 53.2 innings and pitched to a 1.34 ERA.
The Rest
RHP T.J. Tucker (2004 – 67.2 IP 3.72 ERA 44/17 K/BB)
RHP Antonio Osuna (2004 – 36.2 IP 2.45 ERA 36/11 K/BB)
LHP Joe Horgan (2004 – 40.0 IP 3.18 ERA 30/22 K/BB)
Manager Frank Robinson is bringing just 11 pitchers north this season, which
is rare this season.
With this bullpen, the Nats should hold most of the leads their starters turn
over to them. Tucker and Horgan had success last year, and though injuries
kept Osuna to just 31 games last season, in the past, he’s been better than
league average reliever and there’s no reason to believe that he shouldn’t
continue that track record.
The Year Ahead
So what chance does this team have? To win the NL East – well, slim and none
and slim looked to be packing his bags to leave town. But, another run at .500
isn’t out of the question, but it’s not probable. The deck is still stacked
against the team until a new owner sets up shop. A new owner, and a new stadium
in 2008 should keep the bloom on the rose for D.C. baseball through the end of
the decade, however winning is ultimately the bottom line in drawing fans.
So, what should the Nationals be looking to do? Well, prepare for 2008 – if
Loaiza jumps out to a good start, he and perhaps one or two of the non-Cordero
bullpen arms should be shipped to whatever contender is willing to part with
the best parts of the first good Washington Nationals team.
The important thing for this squad is that they have some certainty in their
future, which is something they haven’t had in a while. Bottom line, somewhere
between 75 and 83 wins would be a good season for Washington and is certainly
an attainable goal.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.81.198.50
Nationals 近期熱門文章
10
13
PTT體育區 即時熱門文章
