[外電] The Joel Peralta non-tender explained

看板Nationals作者 (悠)時間15年前 (2010/12/04 02:28), 編輯推噓13(13015)
留言28則, 5人參與, 最新討論串1/1
關於 Peralta 為什麼沒有獲得續約的疑問目前似乎有眉目了。 根據 Adam Kilgore 所聽到的解釋,球團提供給 Peralta 一年的保障合約避免薪資仲裁 ,不過 Peralta 想要兩年。鑒於他今年已經年滿34歲,給他兩年的合約似乎有些冒險, 加上他今年又投出了生涯最佳的成績(今年成績:ERA 2.02,WHIP 0.796,ERA+ 201。而 生涯平均則是 ERA 4.22,WHIP 1.219,ERA+ 106),如果最後走上仲裁法庭想必 Peralta 會要求高薪,到時候球團輸掉仲裁的可能性應該是蠻高的。於是最終球團決定讓 Peralta 成為自由球員。 Kilgore 又在文章中舉出 Mike MacDougal 當作例子。09年球季 MacDougal 被國民隊從 白襪隊撿來,並且繳出了相當不錯的成績。這一年 MacDougal 吃下了50局,ERA 3.60, ERA+ 119。球季結束後球團也向 MacDougal 提供了年薪2M的一年合約,不過遭到拒絕。 後來 MacDougal 就離開國民改投靠馬林魚隊,不過卻在春訓時就遭到釋出。 (之後 MacDougal 又輾轉到了紅雀隊,不過成績不太理想,今年他的 ERA 高達 7.23。) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 感想:基本上我無法同意拿 Peralta 來和 MacDougal 作比較,光是這兩個人的控球就 差多了,簡直是天壤之別。 我並不清楚如果仲裁的話 Peralta 究竟能夠拿到多 高的薪水,但我想應該也不至於高得太離譜。一個中繼投手能夠拿到多少?何況 Peralta 今年簽的還是小聯盟約,想在薪資仲裁時漫天喊價實在不太可能。 Anyway,對於 Peralta 的離開只想說好聚好散, 也感謝他今年在牛棚的貢獻。 無論這項決策是對是錯,都祝福他能夠拿到他所想要的合約並且明年能有個不錯 的球季,以上。 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://tinyurl.com/28lo9kv By Adam Kilgore This morning, I heard the explanation for why the Nationals non-tendered Joel Peralta, an initially surprising decision based on his 2.02 ERA, 49 strikeouts and 0.796 WHIP in 49 rubber-armed innings last season. The Nationals offered Peralta a one-year, guaranteed contract in an effort to avoid arbitration. Peralta, 34, tried to parlay his excellent season into a two-year deal from the club. That's a lot of risk for a 34-year-old middle reliever who just had, by far, his best season. The Nationals decided they couldn't take that risk, or the chance of going into arbitration with him, so they non-tendered him. Honestly, I can't blame the Nationals and I think Peralta will regret his decision. Look at what happened to Mike MacDougal last year; he could have taken a $2 million from the Nats for one year, but he turned it down and ended up signing a minor-league deal midway through spring training after he was released by the Marlins. Hopefully it works out better for Peralta, a good guy who can fill a number of roles out of the bullpen who's got a good story -- did you know he actually was signed as a shortstop as a teenager out of the Dominican Republic? Hopefully he becomes a late-bloomer and keeps dominating like he did this year. If he does that with some other team, I don't think you can fault the Nationals. They made a tough, probably unpopular decision. But it was also, in my estimation, a sound decision. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.37.67.183

12/04 09:04, , 1F
差個幾百K也在省 他那麼像fluke嗎 @@
12/04 09:04, 1F

12/04 09:18, , 2F
他今年的BABIP只有.219,而且他的直球今年突然進化了...
12/04 09:18, 2F

12/04 09:19, , 3F
只看數字的話甚至是全大聯盟中繼投手中直球投最好的。
12/04 09:19, 3F

12/04 09:26, , 4F
所以或許他並沒有帳面上成績那麼優秀,但是花1M左右去賭
12/04 09:26, 4F

12/04 09:28, , 5F
我覺得OK,同時他應該很難拿到2M以上的薪水。
12/04 09:28, 5F

12/04 09:30, , 6F
不過說到後援投手,農場裡倒是有不少人可以頂...所以算了
12/04 09:30, 6F

12/04 10:06, , 7F
我把FG的連接刪掉好了,回過頭來看那篇寫得不是很好 XD
12/04 10:06, 7F

12/04 18:25, , 8F
明年牛棚確定的有 Clippard、Burnett、Storen,沒意外
12/04 18:25, 8F

12/04 18:26, , 9F
Balester 也會入選,他的選擇權已經用完。剩下位子春訓會留
12/04 18:26, 9F

12/04 18:28, , 10F
給其他人競爭,現在最缺的是終結者,以上幾位看起來都不是
12/04 18:28, 10F

12/04 18:31, , 11F
最佳選擇,可能會向外尋求人選。這時候回頭看 Peralta 就
12/04 18:31, 11F

12/04 18:32, , 12F
變得 expendable,留或不留損失相對較小。
12/04 18:32, 12F

12/04 18:36, , 13F
RP表現常一年好一年壞,Peralta 年齡不小,今年成績又三級
12/04 18:36, 13F

12/04 18:38, , 14F
跳,Rizzo 選擇放掉賭其他人選倒也無可厚非,我的看法。
12/04 18:38, 14F

12/04 19:09, , 15F
突然覺得很有道理 XD 的確,反正RP用農場洗就好,謝V大。
12/04 19:09, 15F

12/04 19:11, , 16F
不過終結者的部分不讓 Storen 嘗試嗎?自由市場上的好RP
12/04 19:11, 16F

12/04 19:12, , 17F
如果要簽代價都不會太低...
12/04 19:12, 17F

12/04 20:49, , 18F
看完9/19被費城人大逆轉,Storen 那種賽臉,希望先不要啦!
12/04 20:49, 18F

12/04 20:59, , 19F
Bobby Jenks 不錯,一年約5~6M有機會。
12/04 20:59, 19F

12/05 00:14, , 20F
Peralta 個人認為沒有花一點點小錢留下來,還是損失
12/05 00:14, 20F

12/05 00:31, , 21F
拜託要丟掉RP可以,至少要交易個強的回來
12/05 00:31, 21F

12/05 00:32, , 22F
Soriano、Putz 都不錯; 後者都沒消息
12/05 00:32, 22F

12/05 00:54, , 23F
簽下 Soriano 的代價頗高,除了他是 Type A 之外想簽下他
12/05 00:54, 23F

12/05 00:55, , 24F
至少 20M/2Y 以上跑不掉。(雖然他的確值得這個價)
12/05 00:55, 24F

12/05 00:58, , 25F
而 Jenks 和 Putz 的確都滿不錯的。不過我到現在都還沒有
12/05 00:58, 25F

12/05 00:58, , 26F
看到外電有寫說FO想找一個正職 Closer...
12/05 00:58, 26F

12/05 00:59, , 27F
幫R大修一下推文。
12/05 00:59, 27F
※ 編輯: s9527206 來自: 114.37.67.183 (12/05 01:09)

12/06 21:27, , 28F
借轉襪版
12/06 21:27, 28F
KoAnne:轉錄至看板 RedSox 12/06 21:28
文章代碼(AID): #1C-JR7p_ (Nationals)
文章代碼(AID): #1C-JR7p_ (Nationals)