Fw: [情報] C.J.Watson到溜馬

看板Nets (布魯克林籃網)作者 (Miner)時間12年前 (2013/07/02 04:01), 編輯推噓1(101)
留言2則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1HqSIFqB ] 作者: lusunsky (lusunky) 站內: NBA 標題: [情報] C.J.Watson到溜馬 時間: Tue Jul 2 02:03:57 2013 消息來源: https://twitter.com/AlexKennedyNBA/status/351758855203590149 C.J. Watson can make his agreement with the Indiana Pacers official on July 10. RT @quietstorm_32 Keep up with the pace!!!! C.J.Wason到溜馬看來應該成定局了。 另外,溜馬對尼克的Copeland非常有興趣 http://tinyurl.com/ksl4ybr Pacers strong candidate to land Chris Copeland The Indiana Pacers and New York Knicks free agent Chris Copeland have a strong mutual interest, league sources told Yahoo! Sports. Copleland, 29, played his career overseas until making a successful leap to the NBA last season. Multiple teams are in pursuit of him, but the Pacers are emerging as a strong possible destination for him, sources said. Adrian Wojnarowski, 1:27 p.m. ET, July 1 短評或心得: 1.難得看到溜馬的新聞 2.目前對Copeland實際上採取行動的有爵士、湖人、和溜馬 47W底薪男大翻身了嗎?@@ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.169.146.223 PiGFAcE:轉錄至看板 PACERS 07/02 02:04

07/02 02:07, , 1F
頭推
07/02 02:07, 1F

07/02 02:08, , 2F
臀推
07/02 02:08, 2F

07/02 02:08, , 3F
所以不留Augustin了?
07/02 02:08, 3F

07/02 02:09, , 4F
Copeland應該要爭取先發的機會才對~他有那實力
07/02 02:09, 4F

07/02 02:10, , 5F
剛看到Alex Kennedy推特說應該是2年約
07/02 02:10, 5F

07/02 02:10, , 6F
可能某人要掰了...
07/02 02:10, 6F

07/02 02:11, , 7F
三流球員
07/02 02:11, 7F

07/02 02:14, , 8F
Augustin走會比較好 溜馬一直不太會用他
07/02 02:14, 8F

07/02 02:15, , 9F
應該說 控衛到溜馬都很慘 就PG墳場
07/02 02:15, 9F

07/02 02:17, , 10F
George Hill好像還不差...
07/02 02:17, 10F

07/02 02:22, , 11F
Hill是PG皮 SG骨 能在溜馬活下來的 大多是雙能衛
07/02 02:22, 11F

07/02 02:49, , 12F
還可以臘 畢竟都東冠了 微調就好 妙麗也要回來了
07/02 02:49, 12F

07/02 02:51, , 13F
補後場洞!!!
07/02 02:51, 13F

07/02 02:53, , 14F
DJ真的是適應不良 其他隊更適合他
07/02 02:53, 14F

07/02 02:55, , 15F
George Hill沒這麼好扳倒吧 季後賽已證明他能耐
07/02 02:55, 15F

07/02 02:59, , 16F
應該多加幾個字 傳統類型的PG都比較不適合溜馬
07/02 02:59, 16F

07/02 03:07, , 17F
尼克竟然不留Copeland嗎..
07/02 03:07, 17F

07/02 03:21, , 18F
留不住吧
07/02 03:21, 18F

07/02 03:24, , 19F
DJ走對他自己也好吧
07/02 03:24, 19F

07/02 03:29, , 20F
應該說傳統型PG不適合現在NBA了
07/02 03:29, 20F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 轉錄者: species (128.59.63.187), 時間: 07/02/2013 04:01:33

07/02 08:21, , 21F
籃網替補PG要不要考慮?
07/02 08:21, 21F

07/02 08:22, , 22F
X考慮DJ Augustin?
07/02 08:22, 22F
文章代碼(AID): #1HqU0VIk (Nets)
文章代碼(AID): #1HqU0VIk (Nets)