[外電] Nuggets inbox

看板Nuggets (丹佛金塊)作者ignisfatuus (R You talk'in to me?)時間19年前 (2007/01/30 16:58)推噓5(5推 0噓 2→)

留言7則, 5人參與討論串1/1

Nuggets writer Chris Tomasson answers readers' e-mails every Wednesday. Nuggets not ready to dominate 金塊還沒做好主宰的準備。 Monday, January 29 at 2:21 PM | Trackbacks Eric Maul asks about a timetable to domination. 這位讀者問金塊何時才能主宰比賽呢? Q: Can you please give your opinion on what you think the Nuggets need to do to take that next step? Losing to Utah shows the Nuggets aren't quite ready to dominate. I know it will take some time for Carmelo Anthony and Allen Iverson to get fully acclimated, but do you think that they have the pieces to be able to dominate like San Antonio, Phoenix and Dallas do right now? If not, what are they missing? Q:你能說說你的意見嗎?你認為金塊接下來該怎麼做?輸給爵士隊顯示金塊還沒做好主宰比賽的準備。我知道甜瓜和AI兩個人需要花點時間互相適應，但你認為金塊擁有像馬刺，太陽和小牛那樣讓他們主宰比賽的"東西"嗎?如果沒有，那金塊是欠缺了哪些東西? A: Thanks for the question, Eric. It's way too early to put the Nuggets in the same category with the three Western bullies. Anthony and Iverson at least need a training camp together to be mentioned in that breath. As for this season, Nuggets coach George Karl is still struggling with his rotation. He wants his team to play better defense, but his top perimeter defender, Yakhouba Diawara, and one of his top post defenders, Reggie Evans, don't provide much offense. Among the things Karl is grappling over is whether to play those guys more and lose offense or play them less and lose defense. So I'd call a missing piece a solid defender who can carry his weight on offense. A:先感謝你的問題，Eric。把金塊和西區前三強相提並論還太早了。甜瓜和AI至少需要一起打一次訓練營才能和他們相比。在這一季，卡爾教練還在為人員的調度掙扎。他希望隊伍能有更好的防守，但是隊上最好的外圍防守者-Diawara，最好的低位防守者-Evans ，都無法在進攻端有太多貢獻。卡爾教練煩惱的是，該讓他們多上場但犧牲一些進攻，或讓他們少上場但犧牲一些防守。所以我認為金塊隊所欠缺的是一個堅實的，而且在進攻端能有穩定貢獻的防守者。(這麼好用的人難找啊~"~) Todd Thompson wonders about the sleeve. 這個人對球員的護具有問題= = Q: Why do players such as Carmelo Anthony and Allen Iverson wear a sleeve on their arm? Q:為什麼甜瓜和AI要在前臂帶上護套? A: Thanks, Todd. I had to do exhaustive research on this one. OK, so I checked with the equipment manager. I had remembered Anthony had suffered a hyperextended elbow a few years ago. And that is indeed the primary reason he wears it. But it also has become like a security blanket for Anthony. As for Iverson, he likes to keep his shooting hand warm. It must be working considering Iverson just scored his 20,000th career point. A:謝啦，Todd。我必須做做研究才知道。OK!所以我會去問問器具經理。我記得甜瓜的手肘幾年前有過度伸直(extention和flexion就是大體上的伸直和彎曲)的問題。這的確是他帶護套的主要原因。但這也成為甜瓜的一種安全毯(你在學Linus嗎XD)。對AI來說，他希望投籃這隻手可以保持溫暖。這一定很有效，畢竟他剛得到生涯第兩萬分。 Justin Stewart thinks the Nuggets should have their eyes tested. 這位讀者覺得金塊的眼光應該被人質疑 Q: Can you please tell me what the Nuggets are thinking with the Jan. 11 trade of Earl Boykins and Julius Hodge to Milwaukee for Steve Blake. We've been waiting for Hodge to come back, and he plays four games and they trade him away. And Earl was the second-leading scorer during the suspension. I don't see what the Nuggets see. Q:你能告訴我金塊在1月11日用孩子王和Hodge換來Blake，這是在想什麼?我們一直在等 Hodge回來(從發展聯盟)，然後他回來打了四場就被交易掉了。而孩子王是禁賽時期的第二得分手。我搞不懂金塊隊的想法。 A: Well, Justin, George Karl initially would have agreed with you. He wanted to hold onto Boykins. But Karl has been pleasantly surprised with Blake. He has started him all but one game since he has arrived and has played him significant minutes, including when the game is on the line. Karl called the trade "90 percent" about money. If the Nuggets avoid the luxury tax, that trade could end up saving more than $8 million. I have no problem with dumping Hodge. I know being shot last April set him back, but I've always thought he was a drafting mistake. As for Boykins, I thought the Nuggets could have gotten more for him, but I have been impressed with Blake. And saving money now could result in the brass spending in the future to bring in a pivotal piece. A:呃..賈斯丁，卡爾教練一開始可能會同意你，他不想放掉孩子王。但他對Blake的表現相當驚豔。Blake來到以後除了其中一場，其他每場都得到先發的位置，並且一直表現出色，包括關鍵時刻。卡爾教練說這個交易"百分之九十"是為了省錢，這個交易可以讓金塊避開豪華稅，省下超過八百萬美金。"放棄Hodge我完全沒問題，我知道去年四月的槍擊讓他表現不佳，但我一直認為他是一個失敗的選秀"(好狠啊!卡爾老爹。)，至於孩子王，我覺得金塊隊應該拿到更多(卡爾覺得只得到Blake有點虧)，但我對Blake印象深刻。而且省下來的錢未來可以用來得到重要的拼圖。 And that relates to our final question -- from Stanley Fair. 最後一個問題也與這個交易有關。 Q: Will the Nuggets use the exception they got from Milwaukee this season or next? Q:金塊隊會在這季或下季用掉從公鹿拿到的TE(有興趣的板友可以到NBAGM版研究TE是啥?) A: Thanks, Stanley. I'd say the odds are against the Nuggets this season using the $2.95 million trade exception they got in the Boykins trade. It looks as if Nuggets owner Stan Kroenke would prefer to try to get under the luxury tax this season before the payroll goes crazy the next two years. But, if Kroenke believes the Nuggets could be one key player away from doing some playoff damage this season, he might give the OK for management to use it. If not, the Nuggets will carry it into the offseason and perhaps next season. If the Nuggets are willing to take on extra dollars, it's a valuable piece to use in a deal with a team trying to shave payroll. A:謝了，屎蛋力。我認為金塊這季用掉2.95M的TE的機會不大。金塊老闆屎蛋這季好像想避開豪華稅，因為接下來兩年薪資會徹底的爆表。但是，如果屎蛋覺得金塊今年只差一個關鍵的球員就能在季後賽造成衝擊的話，他可能會答應TE的使用。如果他不這麼認為，這個TE會保留到季後或下一季。如果金塊願意多花點錢，這個TE在跟想省錢的隊伍交易時會很好用。 READER COMMENTS 讀者評論(老外鄉民時間) What does Blake contribute to the Nugs offense? His minutes are the most wasted minutes on the club. Camby, 'Melo, and Iverson can all distribute the ball, and Iverson is a much much better point guard. Has Blake ever made multiple passes in a game where a teammate received the ball in a position to score? With the talent on this team what the heck is he getting minutes for? The offensive struggles are a result of playing 4 on 5, and his defensive woes leave us with 4 defending 5. This player isn't even close to NBA level. Blake怎麼可能對金塊的進攻有所貢獻?他上場只是在浪費時間。Camby，甜瓜，AI三個人球就分光了，而AI毫無疑問是個好上千萬倍的控球後衛。Blake曾在隊友有得分機會時把球傳到嗎?在這隻這麼有天分的隊伍裡，Blake是啥狗屁可以上場打球?進攻上的掙扎就是因為我們在4打5。而他的防守讓我們4個守5個。這傢伙根本不夠格進NBA。 Posted by Greg on January 29, 2007 11:14 PM (好猛的鄉民啊，大概是以前馬子被Blake搶走了吧XD) ============================================================================= The Nuggets are proving to be a better team without Carmelo. His forcing everything destroys the rythmn on offense and the stagnation permeates the defense then too. The coaching staff appears to be a joke, they are clueless. It's a shame, because Iverson can be scintillating if he has some motion to work with. With all the players out there, it's ridiculous to have players who can't make a shot for anything. Hello Eddie. 金塊沒有甜瓜時打得好多了。他摧毀了全隊的進攻節奏，動都不動也讓防守漏洞百出。教練群顯然是個笑話，他們都是蠢蛋。太丟臉了，如果AI可以跟一些有活力的人打球一定會激出許多火花。隊上有這麼多球員，卻有人連出手的機會都沒有，這太荒謬了。 Posted by Red Holzman on January 29, 2007 11:02 PM (老實說你是Diawara吧!!) ================================================================================ I have to take issue with this statement: "He wants his team to play better defense, but his top perimeter defender, Yakhouba Diawara, and one of his top post defenders, Reggie Evans, don't provide much offense." 我對你上面提的關於Diawara和Evans的意見有些看法。 I think they'll be OK if Diawara and Evans just focus on defense and rebounding. In fact, since neither one can shoot a lick, they should be encouraged not to even consider lofting the ball toward the basket unless they are a foot away. 'Melo, Smith, Iverson, Camby and Blake average a combined 97.1 PPG - meaning not a lot more offense is needed. As long as Eddie Najera, Nene (worst contract ever) Hilario and Mein Kleiza can throw in a few buckets each, the offense should be fine. 我認為如果Diawara和Evans只專注在防守和籃板，那多上場是OK的。事實上，既然這兩個人都不會投籃，應該有人告訴他們"千萬別拿球面對籃框，除非你離籃框只有一呎"。甜瓜，老二，AI，勉族，Blake五個人每場平均拿到97.1分，這表示進攻端不需要太多幫助。只要馬市長，Nene(史上最爛合約)和Kleiza空檔進得了，進攻端就沒問題了。 Posted by Flip Washington on January 29, 2007 05:55 PM (最後還是要酸一下才是鄉民) ================================================================================ http://0rz.tw/452ov -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.160.247.105