[情報] Pacers Soften Stance On Granger

看板PACERS (印第安那 溜馬)作者 (哉哉)時間15年前 (2011/01/08 11:48), 編輯推噓17(17016)
留言33則, 14人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/71010/20110107/pacers_soften_stance_on_granger/# http://0rz.tw/qQ2Yt Pacers Soften Stance On Granger (RealGM的標題下的挺嚇人的 0_o) Marc Stein of ESPN.com reports that the Pacers have softened their stance on Danny Granger, who has had a disappointing season. Indiana has considered Granger untouchable in the past. "The Pacers have generally resisted trade interest in Granger, including feelers from Denver earlier this season about Indiana's willingness to include Granger in multiteam Carmelo Anthony trade scenarios," Stein wrote on Friday. The Pacers have lost 11 of their last 17 games. ESPN的原文出處: http://espn.go.com/nba/dailydime/_/page/dime-110107-09/trimester-awards 3. Eastern Conference Perhaps it comes as little surprise after Danny Granger earned a spot on Professor Hollinger's All-Disappointing Team, but there are some fresh rumbles in circulation that the Pacers are softening their no-trade stance on the Team USA swingman. The Pacers have generally resisted trade interest in Granger, including feelers from Denver earlier this season about Indiana's willingness to include Granger in multiteam Carmelo Anthony trade scenarios. One source with knowledge of Indiana's thinking, however, said this week that the Pacers -- 6-11 and fading since their big November wins over the Heat and Lakers -- have not dismissed every recent proposal that includes Granger. Another source insisted to ESPN.com that the Pacers, although they naturally would be seeking a lot in return, quietly listened to a few Granger pitches last season, as well. It seems far safer to suggest that the Pacers would make a move before the Feb. 24 trading deadline with one of their expiring contracts, such as Mike Dunleavy or T.J. Ford, but here's another way to put it: Roy Hibbert, despite his own December fade, has emerged as the more untouchable piece in Indiana's eyes than Granger, who is shooting just 41.6 percent from the field, is going to the free throw line just 5.1 times per game as he too often settles for jumpers … and has three pricey years left on his contract after this season valued at $40 million. 以下是重點: 1.過去小葛是溜馬的非賣品 (廢話!) 金塊本季想賣Melo曾問溜馬是否願意加進小葛做三方交易遭拒 2.近來小葛的狀況極差 (還是廢話!) 溜馬最近似乎不再堅持小葛是非賣品 (落井下石,媒體就是如此呀~) 3.Hibbert 比起小葛看起來更像是溜馬的不動產 -- ─ 能宅是種幸福,不能宅卻是種享受 ─ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.43.197.146

01/08 11:51, , 1F
短期內應該還是不可能...大鳥這麼龜毛
01/08 11:51, 1F

01/08 12:01, , 2F
今天看到未來雙塔的希望嗎?
01/08 12:01, 2F

01/08 12:02, , 3F
大鳥之前做過跟勇士超鳥的把隊上全出清交易應該沒啥不可能
01/08 12:02, 3F

01/08 12:03, , 4F
賣掉小葛 大鳥就從腦殘進升到 恩 不能再更殘
01/08 12:03, 4F

01/08 12:10, , 5F
大鳥花那麼多年才如意以乖乖牌為核心,沒那麼容易換吧
01/08 12:10, 5F

01/08 12:13, , 6F
難講他又看上哪個白人就腦衝了=.=
01/08 12:13, 6F

01/08 12:17, , 7F
只希望不要看上什麼JJ瑞迪克然後拿佛爺換就好...
01/08 12:17, 7F
※ 編輯: larson 來自: 114.43.197.146 (01/08 12:22)

01/08 12:34, , 8F
白人 呵呵 爵士有一個哦~~~
01/08 12:34, 8F

01/08 14:11, , 9F
賣掉Granger..我就去把下面那篇噓到XX
01/08 14:11, 9F

01/08 14:16, , 10F
tahikuro:白人 呵呵 爵士有一個哦~~~(而且是到期大約)
01/08 14:16, 10F

01/08 14:36, , 11F
下面那篇本來已經是XX的,是因為交易到了DC才會變X7~
01/08 14:36, 11F

01/08 16:53, , 12F
====趕快把Paul George練成溜馬台柱吧!!!===============
01/08 16:53, 12F

01/08 16:53, , 13F
我只希望不要再出現什麼大鳥接班人 因為根本不可能 = =
01/08 16:53, 13F

01/08 17:59, , 14F
最近一陣子,有些外國鄉民開始討論交易Granger,甚至是交
01/08 17:59, 14F

01/08 18:00, , 15F
易Hibbert,當然聲音最大的是"Fire JOB",大家看看就好.
01/08 18:00, 15F

01/08 18:02, , 16F
我猜這兩篇會出現可能也跟這些討論有點關係.
01/08 18:02, 16F

01/08 18:12, , 17F
但我想這個消息也不代表近期內Granger就會被交易,頂多是
01/08 18:12, 17F

01/08 18:13, , 18F
說管理階層的態度從 "聽到要Granger直接掛電話",變成 "好
01/08 18:13, 18F

01/08 18:13, , 19F
吧,我來聽聽看你開什麼價錢",小葛表現雖然陷入低潮,但要
01/08 18:13, 19F

01/08 18:15, , 20F
找到效價比更優秀的球員,也不是說要找就一定找得到
01/08 18:15, 20F

01/08 20:57, , 21F
要賣小葛,你也看看能換啥貨...........
01/08 20:57, 21F

01/08 20:58, , 22F
換教練比較實在
01/08 20:58, 22F

01/09 01:18, , 23F
不過從小葛的言論看來 說不定他真的不想當馬王了
01/09 01:18, 23F

01/09 01:19, , 24F
只是不敢講得太明而已
01/09 01:19, 24F

01/09 01:24, , 25F
只怕鳥爺繼續自我感覺良好 看不出小葛的真正想法
01/09 01:24, 25F

01/09 07:47, , 26F
Granger發表了哪些言論啊?
01/09 07:47, 26F

01/09 12:51, , 27F
樓上 5482篇有 當然我也有可能是過度揣測了
01/09 12:51, 27F

01/09 12:53, , 28F
有沒有過度揣測我是不知道啦,不過我知道最近這些輸球的
01/09 12:53, 28F

01/09 12:54, , 29F
比賽後的訪問裡,Granger都是以檢討自己和球隊的缺點,而
01/09 12:54, 29F

01/09 12:54, , 30F
且重點是他想要拼季後賽,他也覺得以球隊的實力應該要打
01/09 12:54, 30F

01/09 12:55, , 31F
進季後賽. 倒沒聽說他有什麼不滿.
01/09 12:55, 31F

01/09 12:57, , 32F
而且Pacers也不怕球員自己要走 看看之前想走怎麼處理吧
01/09 12:57, 32F

01/09 13:49, , 33F
小葛應對媒體算是蠻得體的 不會隨便跟媒體放話
01/09 13:49, 33F
文章代碼(AID): #1D9zvq2j (PACERS)
文章代碼(AID): #1D9zvq2j (PACERS)