[外電] 各隊期中評鑑

看板PACERS (印第安那 溜馬)作者 (Pacers #55 Center)時間15年前 (2011/01/27 01:57), 編輯推噓5(509)
留言14則, 5人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://www.nba.com/reportcard/midseason/2011/pacers/ 從Celtics板上看到有這東東,就去看了一下順便發個文討論一下, 隨便翻了一下,如果翻得不好或是有差錯敬請見諒,也請提出修正,謝謝 :) Frontcourt 前場 C- Roy Hibbert hitched up expectations over the summer, but any thought of Most Improved or All-Star status has fizzled over the past six weeks. Danny Granger has his dial cranked to 11 when it comes to volume shooting. Roy一度讓我們在暑假期待了,但最佳進步獎或全明星之夢在這六周內已經宣告破碎。 小葛那句看不懂 orz Backcourt 後場 B- Darren Collison, in his natural state, is at odds with how Jim O'Brien wants the Pacers to play, but they wanted him, they got him and they have to thrive with him. Collison在JOB的戰術下打起來有點綁手綁腳,他們仍需要慢慢習慣Collison的用法。 Defense 防守 B- (我們比較OK的一項) The Pacers' tendency to play hard shows up most at the defensive end (who wouldn't play hard with boss Larry Bird watching?). After a rocky start Indiana has held foes to 43.2 percent shooting in its past 36 games. 溜馬的強悍之處在防守端最能表現出來(在大鳥眼中誰敢亂來?) 溜馬在過去36場比賽裡讓對手只有43.2%的投籃命中率。 Bench 板凳 C- A changing crew, given O'Brien's 10 different starting lineup. The Pacers' bench is both old and young. Rarely outplays opposing reserves. 一個蛻變的團隊,讓JOB用了10種先發組合。 我們的板凳有老將和新生代小將。很少在替補方面具有優勢。 Coaching 教練 C (真的有C?) O'Brien isn't a touchy-feely, modern kind of head coach. He doesn't hide his displeasure well and he expects players to conform. All admirable traits ... that require more success than we've seen here in four seasons. JOB不是那種可以和球員搏感情的教練。 他無法掩飾他的不爽,且他希望要求球員都要遵守他那套。 最後一句不會翻 orz Overall Grade C (就是個不上不下的評價) Summary 總而言之呢 When this season began, most people looked at the Pacers' roster and figured they were set at three positions: Center (Hibbert), small forward (Granger) and point guard (Collison). But at various points each has stalled, regressed or been held back, reminders that Indiana is not yet ready. Grasping and executing O'Brien's preferred offense of ball movement with cutters has been frustrating for this crew. When that stuff doesn't come instinctively, the Indiana attack bogs down and can be hard to watch. The Pacers have avoided long losing streaks -- long winning streaks as well -- and seem on track only to muddle into some East-enabled first-round pain. -- Steve Aschburner 當球季開始大多數人看了我們的Roster後,多數人注意的是我們的三嫩頭, 中鋒Roy、小前鋒小葛、控衛Collison,但三個點都莫名地熄火失常了, 顯示我們其實還沒準備好。 我們的球員始終不能融入JOB的戰術,不能自然地執行戰術便使我們的進攻陷入泥淖, 讓我們的比賽變得難看。我們沒有連敗,但也沒有連勝(屁啦5連敗了), 看起來頂多能在季後賽第一輪攪局。 -- 史提夫。亞須柏納 看起來是寫得還算中肯,很明顯我們的癥結仍在JOB上,JOB與團隊的配合仍是重點, 真覺得是該炒了,畢竟帶了這幾季也看得出來他的戰術看起來我們還是不習慣, 希望是帶完這季就可以換人作作看! 另外三嫩頭也是我們的亮點,開季時我打得還不錯,不過最近狀況又蠻差的, 加上JOB有時又不太愛用我,所以還需要一些時間才能慢慢回穩。 DC現階段我覺得做得還不錯了,只是好像也是跟JOB的戰術有關, 有的時候在場上總是不太穩,感覺會有點腦充血,希望能慢慢融入進步。 小葛不用說了,狀況倒是比較好的一個,只是常發現得分高的比賽都會輸球, 贏球的反而都是些16分左右的比賽,也是希望可以控制一下融入團隊, 不要老是只有小葛在開無雙然後輸球,這樣也沒啥意義吧。 想講的大概都是這些老話了,大家有沒有想討論的地方? 謝謝收看我的破爛翻譯與廢話般的心得,這篇看得很吃力,我的英文到底是在唸啥... ※ 編輯: RoyHibbert 來自: 124.12.199.134 (01/27 02:03)

01/27 09:39, , 1F
我倒是覺得小葛這季的表現是令人最失望的一環了
01/27 09:39, 1F

01/27 09:56, , 2F
最失敗的部分就是球迷太過期待了 乾
01/27 09:56, 2F

01/27 10:31, , 3F
小葛我是覺得有進步 但他體能絕對是維持得很退步..
01/27 10:31, 3F

01/27 12:22, , 4F
原來......我們的防守竟然還OK?!
01/27 12:22, 4F

01/27 12:22, , 5F
這真是出人意料耶,是對手FG低,但是總得分高嗎?
01/27 12:22, 5F

01/27 22:42, , 6F
對手總得分排在聯盟中段,對手FG(eFG)壓制得不錯,第7(8)
01/27 22:42, 6F

01/27 22:44, , 7F
但是對手3Pt高達.381(26),對手總籃板(27)
01/27 22:44, 7F

01/27 22:45, , 8F
對手罰球數(24)
01/27 22:45, 8F

01/27 22:46, , 9F
重點是本季進攻爛到極點,拜託別再愚蠢得打Motion了
01/27 22:46, 9F

01/27 22:48, , 10F
Princeton Offense或是MO這半季已經證明完全失敗
01/27 22:48, 10F

01/27 22:50, , 11F
進攻數據聯盟排名: eFG(24),Eff(25),3Pt(18),3PtA(4)
01/27 22:50, 11F

01/27 22:52, , 12F
失誤率(22) 請改用別種戰術吧
01/27 22:52, 12F

01/27 22:54, , 13F
IndyStar甚至有文章建議Simon直接下令Bird接任總教練,不
01/27 22:54, 13F

01/27 22:54, , 14F
然就讓Bird跟JOB都滾蛋
01/27 22:54, 14F
文章代碼(AID): #1DG61xG4 (PACERS)
文章代碼(AID): #1DG61xG4 (PACERS)