[外電] 2025 溜馬夏季聯盟觀戰手則 - 二年級生

看板PACERS (印第安那溜馬)作者PiGFAcE (被遺忘在沙灘上的腳印)時間21小時前 (2025/07/09 03:03)推噓3(3推 0噓 2→)

留言5則, 3人參與討論串1/1

付費文章.. 分享過來並翻譯給板友看, 喜歡的可以去訂閱 Caitlin Cooper 最專業的女性溜馬分析師 - 喜歡她的文章和分析的話請訂閱她支持她原文:https://tinyurl.com/5n7ptszy 請支持溜馬寫手 Please subscribe/support her 2025 Pacers Summer League: Sophomores 2025 溜馬夏季聯盟觀察：二年級生篇 Taking a look at what to watch for from the Summer Pacers 看看夏季版溜馬有哪些重點值得關注 By: Caitlin Cooper I @C2_Cooper 作者：Caitlin Cooper（@C2_Cooper） In the wake of Game 7, it seems as though time is both standing still and flying by. Although fans of the Pacers may still be trying to process the harsh conclusion to what was a fairy tale-like run to the NBA Finals, the league has continued to march on. Somehow, the NBA Draft already came and went, and the calendar has flipped to July, when in addition to the slow burn of free agency, rosters chock-full of young players and short on familiarity come together in the scorching heat of Las Vegas to play something vaguely resembling basketball. 自從第七戰落幕後，時間彷彿既靜止又飛逝。溜馬球迷或許還沉浸在那段如童話般卻最終遺憾收場的總冠軍之旅裡，不過 NBA 世界早已持續前行。選秀轉眼結束，七月的日曆也已翻開，除了自由市場的慢火悶燒外，各隊也將湊齊一堆年輕、彼此不太熟的球員，在拉斯維加斯的酷暑中，打一種「看起來像籃球」的比賽。 For the Pacers, who project to be more focused on development as they enter a new Tyrese Haliburton-less reality with Myles Turner also leaving a void at center (welcome, Jay Huff), the week of exhibition play should provide an early glimpse at whether any of the players from the 24-and-under crowd (shoutout to 26-year-old Quenton Jackson) are primed to take steps forward next season with some mighty big shoes to fill, presumably, by committee. 對溜馬來說，在邁入沒有 Tyrese Haliburton 的新篇章、又失去 Myles Turner 的中鋒位置（歡迎 Jay Huff）之際，這週的熱身賽將是一扇窗口，讓人提前窺見 24 歲以下（也向 26 歲的 Quenton Jackson 致敬）這批年輕人是否有人準備好來填補這些大空缺 — — 可能會是集體協作的填補方式。 As such, after already taking a peek at the rookies, what follows is an attempt to provide a guide of one micro-skill and/or macro-concept to watch for from all of the second-year players and veterans who have direct connections to the team either via standard contract, two-way deal, or qualifying offer. 因此，繼上篇菜鳥觀察之後，這裡我將延續同樣的方式，列出所有與溜馬有正式合約、雙向合約或資格報價連結的二年級生與資深球員，值得關注的一項小技巧或整體概念。 Enrique Freeman - Positioning & Position Enrique Freeman —— 站位與定位的挑戰 There's no questioning Enrique Freeman's motor. When the Pacers rallied for a 126-118 double overtime victory over the Cleveland Cavaliers in the final game of the regular season after trailing by as many as 27 points, Freeman entered with 9:09 to play in the third quarter and never came out. He played 31 consecutive minutes! Enrique Freeman 的拚勁無庸置疑。例行賽最後一戰，溜馬曾落後騎士多達 27 分，卻在雙加時逆轉勝出（126 比 118）。那場比賽 Freeman 在第三節剩 9 分 09 秒時上場，從此就沒再被換下 —— 他連打了整整 31 分鐘！ And he did stuff like this. 他場上做出的貢獻，就是像這樣的拼命三郎式表現。 https://i.imgur.com/Lfhgj9v.gif

Boxing out. Diving on the floor for loose balls. That's all part of the Enrique Freeman experience. Also part of the Enrique Freeman experience? Notice that he's still on the floor there when four players for the Cavs are already headed the other way. 卡位搶籃板、飛撲地板球，這些都是 Freeman 風格的一部分。但這種風格也包括另一件事：當騎士已有四人往前場快攻時，他還留在後場觀察。 And yet, look at who still manages to sprint from behind into a deep seal at the rim. 但你看最後是誰從後場追上，在禁區完成「深封位」。 https://i.imgur.com/ALYAofo.gif

Enrique Freeman! That's how his skill of playing hard fits how the Pacers aim to play, at least in transition. 是的，就是 Enrique Freeman！這種拼命追趕的態度，非常契合溜馬在快攻時所強調的風格。 What's less clear is how his overall game translates to the half-court, not only with regard to his positioning but also what position he should be playing. 但比較不確定的是，他在半場進攻中的角色與站位安排是否適合，甚至包含他究竟該被歸類為哪個位置。 On the one hand, he's everywhere, all at once -- creating chaos. On the other hand, he's everywhere, all at once -- creating chaos. 一方面，他無所不在、永不停歇 —— 製造混亂；另一方面，他無所不在、永不停歇 — — 也是製造混亂。 For example, there is no reason for him to be diving to the block, here, where Pascal Siakam is already standing. 舉例來說，這球他完全不需要衝進低位，因為 Pascal Siakam 已經站在那裡了。 https://i.imgur.com/fK6TDlI.gif

When Jarace Walker sets the push screen for T.J. McConnell to attack baseline, Freeman is supposed to stay at the top of the key. That way, the spacing isn't spoiled when McConnell turns the corner, triggering Johnny Furphy's 45-cut from the opposite wing to the basket. And that was with him pinch-hitting at the five position. Things get more complicated when he attempts to share the floor with another big. 當 Jarace Walker 幫 T.J. McConnell 做推擋（push screen），讓他可以從底線發動攻勢時，Freeman 原本應該留在弧頂。這樣一來，McConnell 繞過掩護轉角切入時，才不會破壞場上的空間配置，也能順利引發 Johnny Furphy 從對側 45 度角切入禁區的戰術。值得注意的是，這一球 Freeman 是以中鋒身份在場上。若他與另一位內線球員同時上場，情況將更複雜。 As a four, it isn't exactly natural for him to rise and fire off a flare screen after setting a step-up screen for the ball, but that doesn't mean he can't stay at the top of the key and flow into a second side hand-off as a connector. 如果是以大前鋒身分出戰，Freeman 並不擅長在完成 step-up 掩護後馬上埋伏外線、接球跳投。但這不代表他不能站在弧頂、串接第二段進攻、順勢做 hand-off。 Instead, he's a magnet for the block again, which creates a hitch in the offense. 然而他又不自覺地被吸回禁區低位，這就讓整體進攻卡住了。 https://i.imgur.com/esKJp80.gif

Look at the difference with Quenton Jackson in that same role. See how he stays high as a release valve after slipping out into space? 對比一下 Quenton Jackson 執行同一戰術的樣子 —— 你會看到他滑步後停在高位，當作進攻的洩壓點，完美拉開空間。 https://i.imgur.com/DVCdm1c.gif

Freeman is the player in the corner, and Quenton Jackson is Quenton Jackson, which means the ball is getting turned downhill rather than transitioning into the second-side hand-off, but that type of fluidity and attention to detail with regard to positioning is what allows the Pacers to play with tempo, stacking actions in the half-court. 當時 Freeman 在底角，而 Quenton Jackson 是主要執行者，也就是說這球是直接往下打而非傳到另一側串聯。但 Jackson 在站位上的流暢與細節處理，正是讓溜馬半場進攻能持續堆疊動作、打出節奏的關鍵。 Also, they don't normally play with a four who doesn't space the floor, with "spacing" referring not only to the positioning of the four-man but also the degree to which they are guarded when they aren't shooting. 此外，溜馬陣中幾乎不會讓一位「不拉開空間」的大前鋒上場。這裡的「空間」不只是指站位，也包括當球員沒出手時，對手是否願意貼防的程度。 Cleveland switches up the line against him on this stagger, and Walker does well to knock down the tough, self-created three, but the intention of this action is to remove the low-man and occupy the help for a downhill drive. 這一球克里夫蘭針對 stagger 掩護進行調整，Walker 最終靠自己能力命中困難的三分球，表現不錯。但這整個戰術設計的初衷，其實是要拉開底線協防，為切入創造空間。 https://i.imgur.com/Na0jnBN.gif

Freeman shot 1-of-6 on spot-up threes with the Pacers, and 7-of-24 on spot-up threes in the G League. So, he barely takes them, and doesn't often make them. Freeman 在溜馬出手 6 顆定點三分只進 1 球，在 G League 的定點三分則是 24 投 7 中 —— 整體來說，他不常投，也不太會進。 It's possible that could change. After all, Obi Toppin and Pascal Siakam have both seen a significant boost in their overall conversion rates from deep since being traded to Indiana. Here's the splits, including the playoffs. 不過這或許有機會改善。畢竟像 Obi Toppin 和 Pascal Siakam 在被交易來印第安納後，他們的三分命中率都有顯著提升。以下是包含季後賽的數據分項： Siakam: 32.7% with Toronto, 38.6% with Indiana Siakam：多倫多時期 32.7%，印第安納時期 38.6% Toppin: 32.5% with New York, 37.3% with Indiana Toppin：紐約時期 32.5%，印第安納時期 37.3% Of course, not all of that is just environmental. Siakam also made a tweak to his shot last summer, but the point still stands that the Pacers have a track record of mining shooting development at the four spot. 當然，這些變化並不完全是環境造成的，例如 Siakam 去年夏天就調整了出手動作。不過不可否認的是，溜馬確實有一套培養四號位投射能力的成功經驗。 For now, though, Freeman is a bit undersized as a five at the NBA-level (i.e. he had as many blocked field-goal attempts as he had blocks), but he also doesn't quite profile as a four. 但目前來說，Freeman 在 NBA 打五號位偏小（他的火鍋次數跟被火鍋次數一樣多），但也還稱不上是典型的大前鋒。 Still, the Pacers have a two-way qualifying offer on the table for Freeman, and it appears as though there are going to be plenty of minutes up for grabs at the center spot. 儘管如此，溜馬仍對 Freeman 提出雙向資格報價，並且看起來球隊的中鋒位置將有不少上場時間可以競爭。 Even so, he'll make himself more viable at either position, if he can become more pristine with his positioning. 如果他能更精準掌握自己的站位與角色定位，那他在四號或五號位的生存空間都會大大提升。 Again, there's no questioning his motor, but there's a lot left unanswered as to what spot in the lineup he can fill and what spots he occasionally wanders to on the floor. 再說一次，他的拼勁無庸置疑，但他能在輪替中扮演什麼角色、以及他場上有時跑到哪裡去，這些仍然是未解之謎。 Quenton Jackson - Off-ball defensive restraint Quenton Jackson —— 無球防守的自制力考驗 The same can apply to Quenton Jackson at the other end of the floor. He is a combative defender at the point of attack who throws himself into drawing moving screen violations, but his hyper-aggression can boil over when he's defending away from the ball. He just has a tendency to seep into areas where he doesn't belong. 在球場另一端，Quenton Jackson 也面臨類似問題。他在一對一時是相當強悍的防守者，會主動製造進攻犯規、拼命穿越移動掩護。但當他離開持球人進行無球防守時，那股過度積極反而會讓他跑到不該去的地方。 For example, when Pascal Siakam ran into contact on this hand-off for Deni Avdija, Jackson attempted to "next" onto the ball, despite the fact that he was guarding Anfernee Simons as the shallow cutter. 舉例來說，這一球 Pascal Siakam 在做 hand-off 給 Deni Avdija 時遇到防守壓迫， Jackson 竟然選擇主動補上去「next」協防，儘管他當時原本應該盯防的是做淺切的 Anfernee Simons。 As a result, with Siakam continuing to pursue the ball, Turner has no choice but to switch out to Simons on the perimeter. Not great! 結果就是，因為 Siakam 還在跟防 Avdija，Turner 只好被迫拉到外線去守 Simons。這畫面不太妙！ https://i.imgur.com/uEhYtBd.gif

A few minutes later, Jackson attempted to smash down on a drive from Toumani Camara, even with Simons one pass away. 幾分鐘後，Jackson 又嘗試補防 Toumani Camara 的切入，即使 Simons 只在一傳距離外的空位。 https://i.imgur.com/spYjPSs.gif

And, a few minutes after that, he attempted to jump-switch on a baseline attack from Avdija, leaving Simons alone at the top of the key, even though Turner was available under the basket to protect the rim. 再過沒多久，他又試圖在 Avdija 的底線進攻中主動換防，結果放掉弧頂的 Simons，當時籃下其實還有 Turner 可以護框。 https://i.imgur.com/pdcje1i.gif

For the sake of emphasis, that all happened in the same quarter over a span of less than six minutes. 重點是，這三個錯誤全都發生在同一節、短短不到六分鐘內。 Tellingly, although Tyrese Haliburton and Bennedict Mathurin certainly aren't always watertight defenders, the Pacers gave up 119.7 points per 100 possessions in 314 minutes with Haliburton, Mathurin, Siakam, and Turner on the floor without Nembhard, compared to just 105.6 in 435 minutes with Nembhard. 值得注意的是，雖然 Tyrese Haliburton 和 Bennedict Mathurin 並不是防守最穩固的組合，但當他們與 Siakam、Turner 同時上場、卻沒有 Nembhard 在場時，溜馬每百回合失分高達 119.7 分；而當 Nembhard 有上場時，這數字降到 105.6 分。 That's a massive swing! As in, the difference between a top-rated defense and the worst-ranked defense. 這差距非常巨大！等同於從聯盟頂級防守隊，變成墊底防守隊。 To be fair, that isn't just about the presence/absence of Nembhard, as there were also several other concurrent factors that led to the team's turnaround on that end of the floor, but Quenton Jackson's lack of off-ball restraint certainly compounded some of the early season struggles with cohesiveness. 公平來說，這不完全是因為 Nembhard 在不在場，球隊防守端的轉變也有其他因素。但 Jackson 在無球端缺乏自制力，的確加劇了球隊季初在防守協調上的混亂。 Like Freeman, the Pacers also have a qualifying offer on the table for Jackson, with plenty of unexpected opportunity at his position. 就像 Freeman 一樣，溜馬也對 Jackson 提出了資格報價 —— 而他的這個位置目前也存在不少出乎意料的上場空間。 For a player who can't always resist the urge to put his hand to a hot stove on defense, he is relentless when it comes to attacking the paint, driving as though every bridge behind him has burned. 他在防守端總是忍不住想「伸手碰火爐」，但在進攻端卻非常果決，切入時就像身後的橋都被燒斷一般毫無保留。 In fact, among the 12 players on the roster who recorded at least 700 touches during the regular season, the only players who reached the paint more frequently than Jackson (23.2 percent) were Pascal Siakam (29.3) and T.J. McConnell (26.3). 實際上，整季溜馬陣中至少觸球 700 次的 12 位球員裡，只有 Pascal Siakam（29.3%）和 T.J. McConnell（26.3%）切入油漆區的頻率高過 Jackson（23.2%）。 As was the case in Vegas last summer, he's more of a dynamic slasher than primary initiator, as his aggressiveness can be both a virtue and a vice, but there's rarely a question of whether he'll get to the rim or try to help; it's just a matter of what he might've missed along the way or whether the help was actually needed. 就像去年夏季聯盟一樣，他更像是個動態型切入者，而非主控發起者。他的侵略性有時是優點，有時卻是麻煩。對他而言，問題從來不是「會不會衝進禁區」或「會不會幫忙」，而是「在這過程中，他是不是錯過了什麼？或者，那個幫忙真的有必要嗎？」 Ray J Dennis - the rundown on runner Ray J Dennis —— 浮空拋投的觀察筆記 Ray J Dennis, who played last season on a two-way contract for the Pacers after Tristen Newton was waived, attempted more runners in the G League (85) than any non-Tyrese Haliburton guard put up for the Pacers. Ray J Dennis 在 Tristen Newton 被釋出後，以雙向合約加入溜馬。他上季在 G League 出手了 85 次浮空拋投（runners），比所有非 Tyrese Haliburton 的溜馬後衛都還要多。 That may not come as much of a surprise. After all, T.J. McConnell takes his floaters as jump-shots, and Andrew Nembhard, although he has a quirky, exaggerated release on his floater, prefers to mosey to his spots as a pull-up shooter from mid-range. 這點也許不算意外。畢竟 T.J. McConnell 的拋投比較像跳投出手，Andrew Nembhard 則喜歡慢慢運到自己習慣的位置，以中距離急停出手，儘管他的拋投出手動作有點誇張又奇特。 As such, the only non-Haliburton guard who comes close to "touching" that type of volume on runners is Bennedict Mathurin (75), with his jump-stop floater off two feet. 因此，唯一在浮空拋投出手量上接近 Dennis 的非 Haliburton 型後衛，是 Bennedict Mathurin（75 次），他的拋投常來自雙腳急停的跳步動作。 In fact, among G League players, Dennis ranked in the 99th percentile in terms of the percentage of his shots he attempted as runners, nearly hoisting more runners (85) than layups (93). 事實上，在 G League 所有球員中，Dennis 拋投佔整體出手比例高達第 99 百分位 — — 幾乎比上籃還常出手拋投（85 次拋投 vs. 93 次上籃）。 As a smaller guard, that's somewhat of a necessity. The only problem is... at the NBA-level, he also isn't the quickest guard. 對一位身材不高的後衛來說，這種出手選擇有其必要性。但問題是……到了 NBA，他也不是速度最快的那一型。 Remember that possession when Enrique Freeman outran the Cleveland defense to sprint into a deep seal under the rim? This is how it ended. 還記得那一球 Enrique Freeman 衝刺快攻、卡進籃下封位嗎？Dennis 當時就是持球者。結局如下—— https://i.imgur.com/fEvdjDd.gif

Freeman never touched the ball, and Dennis also never got to his touch shot. Notably, that block didn't even require a weak-hand contest from Nae'Qwan Tomlin. He got to the shot reaching across his body with his right. Freeman 沒接到球，Dennis 的「手感拋投」也沒投出來。更關鍵的是，Nae'Qwan Tomlin 甚至沒用非慣用手就能完成封阻，他用右手跨身直接蓋掉。 The fact that he converted over 40 percent of his pull-up threes in the G League will help him get downhill into the thicket of the paint, but he still has to finish and make plays around the trees once he gets there. 雖然 Dennis 在 G League 的急停三分命中率超過 40%，這有助於他吸引防守、加速下球切入禁區。但真正挑戰是——他切進去之後，是否能在禁區「森林」中完成終結或做出正確判斷。 In that regard, second-round draft pick Kam Jones has obviously yet to play a single minute of action, but his combination of footwork and touch already projects to give him a leg up, just by virtue of his Lance Stephenson-like size. 從這點來看，雖然二輪新秀 Kam Jones 還沒在正式賽場上出戰過一分鐘，但他扎實的腳步與柔和手感，加上體型與 Lance Stephenson 相仿，讓他在切入與終結方面看起來已經領先一步。 Johnny Furphy - Leveraging gravity Johnny Furphy —— 利用自身引力打出價值 The most memorable moment of the season for Johnny Furphy was his poster dunk over old friend Goga Bitadze. Johnny Furphy 本季最讓人印象深刻的一球，是他隔扣老朋友 Goga Bitadze 的海報級灌籃。 The most telling moment of the season, however, arguably came from the ugly loss to the Charlotte Hornets, just before the four-day layover during the NBA Cup. 但最具有啟示性的一刻，可能是在 NBA 杯四天休兵前，溜馬對夏洛特黃蜂的一場慘敗中發生的。 At the start of the second quarter, Jarace Walker lost connection with Brandon Miller on an off-ball screening action, resulting in a corner three. 第二節剛開打，Jarace Walker 在一次無球掩護中失去對 Brandon Miller 的盯防，導致 Miller 輕鬆投進底角三分。 On the next possession, T.J. McConnell was guarding Miller, despite the fact that he's six inches shorter. Meanwhile, Walker took on the assignment against Vasilije Miciat the point of attack. 下一回合，T.J. McConnell 接手防守 Miller，儘管他身高矮了足足六吋。同時， Walker 去守持球的 Vasilije MiciC Eventually, after Walker gave up dribble penetration attempting to navigate over the top of consecutive ball-screens, he then got shifted onto Cody Martin. 然後，Walker 在連續繞掩護後仍被突破，只好被調去盯 Cody Martin。 The new player guarding the ball was Johnny Furphy, and the same thing had already happened a few games earlier in Brooklyn, when he also found himself opposite from Dennis Schroeder. 此時改由 Johnny Furphy 防守持球人。其實幾場前在布魯克林，也發生過類似情況，他最後也被迫對上 Dennis Schroeder。 And, when he did this against old friend Malcolm Brogdon. 還有對上老朋友 Malcolm Brogdon 的那場比賽，也是如此。 https://i.imgur.com/uDLnzhd.gif

Granted, none of those teams were exactly formidable opponents last season, and Walker made a tantalizing, late-season surge on the defensive end, but the fact that Furphy was drawing those types of assignments, as a 6-foot-9 forward, during non-garbage time was meaningful nonetheless. 當然，這些對手上季都稱不上強隊，Walker 在球季尾聲的防守表現也令人眼睛一亮。但 Furphy 身為一位 6 呎 9 吋的前鋒，卻能在非垃圾時間被交付這些防守任務，仍具有指標性意義。 In that way, while Walker's physicality doesn't always match his physique, Furphy's physique as a rookie wasn't quite ready to match his physicality. 某種程度上，Walker 的對抗性有時跟不上他的體格，而 Furphy 則是身體條件看似到位，但身體對抗強度還沒跟上。 Where Walker is more of an event-creator on defense, with his hand-eye coordination and ability to contest at the rim, whether rotating there as a secondary helper or out of necessity when trailing from behind, Furphy is generally more apt to play in contain, cutting off drives with his length while also poking his nose in the action to come up with and retrieve loose balls. Walker 更像是防守端的「事件製造者」，憑藉他的手眼協調與籃下協防能力，無論是提前補位還是從後方追防。而 Furphy 則偏向「限制型」防守者，善於用臂展封鎖切入，同時靈敏地撿起場上的零散球。 When Furphy was drafted and even in the aftermath of Summer League, most of the conversation centered around his fit for the team's play-style as a shooter and in transition. Furphy 被選中時，甚至夏季聯盟結束後，外界討論最多的是他作為射手與快攻終結者，是否適合溜馬的整體體系。 The fact that the defense is what popped for him as a rookie is also sort of the inverse of Walker's trajectory, when his shooting progression is more so what captured attention during his first-season, despite being pigeonholed more so as a toolsy, defensive wing stalwart. 結果新秀年 Furphy 最讓人驚艷的卻是防守，這剛好與 Walker 的軌跡相反 —— Walker 雖然原本被定位為防守型鋒線，但第一季反而是他的投籃進步受到最多關注。 That said, the shooting is still going to need to come along for Furphy at some point, particularly above the break. 話雖如此，Furphy 的投籃還是得補上來，尤其是三分弧頂的出手。 Unlike Freeman, it's reasonable to think that the 20-year-old Aussie should be able to rise-and-fire out of that same previously discussed action, especially with his defender actually trailing over the stagger. 不同於 Freeman，這位 20 歲的澳洲新星理論上應該能夠從先前提到的 stagger 戰術中接球起跳出手，尤其當防守者已經被掩護擋住、追在後面時。 And yet, his footwork coming off the screens is wonky, and he doesn't even consider curling into the catch to put the ball on the deck for one or two dribbles. 然而，他繞掩護時的腳步不夠流暢，甚至不曾考慮 catch-and-curl（接球後往內彎切）來運個一兩下球創造機會。 https://i.imgur.com/Pe1zAfA.gif

Of course, that would require doing so with his left hand, which he still hasn't quite mastered at speed, at least not while also keeping his eyes up. Oh hey, Enrique! 當然，那需要他用左手運球 —— 而這點他目前還掌握得不太好，尤其在快速移動中要同時抬頭觀察場上狀況時更困難。（嗨，Enrique，又見你出鏡了！） https://i.imgur.com/5RWBEQS.gif

Needless to say, these shoot-or-drive decisions have to be quicker. 不用多說，這類「投還是切」的決策速度必須更快。 https://i.imgur.com/RkTZbv8.gif

On the season, he shot 7-of-28 on above the break threes and recorded a total of 15 drives from above the break. 本季他在弧頂三分出手 28 次、命中 7 球，從弧頂發動的切入總共也只有 15 次。 In contrast to Freeman, the defense responds to him in closeout situations and when he's moving off screens, but he still has some growing to do, both literally and with regard to his frame, to make the most of that gravity. 與 Freeman 不同，Furphy 在外線接球與繞掩護時能吸引防守者的 closeout，但他在身體對抗與體型發展上仍有待成長，才能真正把這股「引力」轉化為場上的威脅。 Right now, his own defense suggests that he can be more than just a floor spacer. 就目前來看，他的防守表現顯示他絕對不只是個「外線定點射手」。 The question at Summer League should be whether he can space the floor to such a degree that the defense also has to guard when he has the ball -- and not just when he doesn't. 接下來夏季聯盟的觀察重點在於：他能否提升自己的外線威脅，讓對手不只是他沒拿球時要貼防，而是他一拿球對手就必須緊盯不放。 ---- 付費文章.. 分享過來並翻譯給板友看, 喜歡的可以去訂閱 Caitlin Cooper 最專業的女性溜馬分析師 - 喜歡她的文章和分析的話請訂閱她支持她原文:https://tinyurl.com/5n7ptszy 請支持溜馬寫手 Please subscribe/support her -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 68.208.88.86 (美國) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PACERS/M.1752001412.A.B0C.html

推

lavida

07/09 09:57, 14小時前 , 1^F

07/09 09:57, 1^F

推

yushi

07/09 23:01, 1小時前 , 2^F

07/09 23:01, 2^F

推

ppacers

07/09 23:45, 59分鐘前 , 3^F

07/09 23:45, 3^F