Fw: [外電] Padres considering John Lackey

看板Padres作者 (澄響幸輝絕品泉水)時間13年前 (2011/10/21 06:56), 編輯推噓1(101)
留言2則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 MLB 看板 #1Edrdz74 ] 作者: celipliz (犀利痞子) 看板: MLB 標題: [外電] Padres considering John Lackey 時間: Thu Oct 20 07:15:05 2011 http://www.soxspacenews.com/article/897 Padres considering John Lackey, by Jared Carrabis The thought of sending John Lackey to the Padres gets a lot of people excited, right? 這想法很美妙對吧? 把發球機丟到聖地牙哥去? But not so fast. The San Diego Union-Tribune has reported that the San Diego Padres "have internally discussed the possibility of acquiring starting pitcher John Lackey from the Red Sox, if the Red Sox agree to eat most of Lackey’s contract." 等等,聖地牙哥的報紙說教士高層討論過換來發球機的可能性,前提是紅襪吞掉大部分 合約。 That's great, right? Well, not really. Like in the case with Julio Lugo, to get rid of a stinker of a signing, you have to eat a lot of their contract to make them appealing to the receiving club. In Lackey's case, you're probably going to have to eat a majority of what he's being paid, buy the acquiring GM a Lexus, and buy a Rolex for everyone in the baseball operations department. 聽起來不錯啊?其實不。跟眼神殺手一樣要吞掉有夠多的薪水,才能讓其他隊伍上鉤 發球機的話,吃掉薪水不說,可能還要買一台凌志給GM,還是給高層一人一支勞力士 Lackey still has three guaranteed years remaining on his contract worth $45.75 million, and his contract states that the Red Sox must pay him an assignment bonus of $500,000 if he is traded. Lackey also has a club option for 2015, but if there is a trade, I'm assuming that the Red Sox will negotiate with any receiving team that they will having nothing to do with paying for that option, so exercise at your own risk. 發球機還有三年約,所以大概四千多萬美金,被交易還可以多賺五十萬,還有球隊選擇權 不過紅襪交易掉他的話應該會想辦法把選擇權丟給對方吧 So here's my take on the whole thing: Don't trade Lackey to a National League team. My reasoning is simple. Essentially, you're going to be paying between $30-40 million just to open up a rotation spot if you send Lackey to the National League. Is that what you really want? Because you still have to pony up to fill the void. 所以我覺得,不要把他丟給國聯。 你花三四千萬,只為了空出一個先發投手的位子? 你還要付錢找另一個先發耶。 The point that I'm trying to make is that if you absolutely have to eat a significant amount of money to get rid of Lackey, at least send him to an American League team. That way, you're weakening the enemy. And I know this sounds mean, and possibly that I'm joking, but I'm 100% serious. 所以我要說的是,你要交易的話,交易給美聯球隊吧。 這樣至少還可以弱化對手球隊。我是認真的。 If you're going to be paying Lackey to pitch for another team, at least pay him to pitch against you. In the long run, the Red Sox will have a better chance at winning more games during a season with Lackey pitching against them and not for them, and that's the harsh truth. 你都要付錢讓發球機到別隊了,至少把球發給自己吧。 長期下來搞不好對上發球機比沒對到發球機還要贏更多球。 If you're going to be paying Lackey to pitch for another club, at least pay him to sabotage a competitor's chances of winning every five days, and not some National League team that has no bearings on the outcome of the Red Sox' season. With the worst single-season ERA of any pitcher in Red Sox history and more personal problems than Lindsay Lohan, the man is a ticking time bomb. Let him explode somewhere else in the American League. 真的,你要賠錢賣的話,至少讓自已的競爭對手少贏起場球賽,五天炸一次 而不是丟給哪個影響不到紅襪球季的國聯球隊。 紅襪史上單季最糟糕 ERA,問題比琳賽蘿涵還多的傢伙,是個不定時炸彈 要炸就讓他在美聯炸吧。 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 琳賽蘿涵/眼神哥:躺著也中槍... --

09/27 02:00,
叭叭叭﹌﹌〒a(#‵□′)f〒﹌﹌叭叭叭
09/27 02:00

09/27 02:14,
我可以把這篇推文拿去發嘛?
09/27 02:14

09/27 02:15,
└─|──┘
09/27 02:15

09/27 02:15,
靠腰 請給作畫者一點時間好嗎
09/27 02:15

09/27 02:27,
其實他已經給你14分鐘了
09/27 02:27
#1EWAxjz9 (joke) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 206.12.52.221

10/20 07:23, , 1F
好機車喔XDDD
10/20 07:23, 1F

10/20 07:24, , 2F
Lindsay Lohan用的真是畫龍點睛XD
10/20 07:24, 2F

10/20 07:25, , 3F
弱化對手球隊 XDD
10/20 07:25, 3F

10/20 07:29, , 4F
超酸的啦~ XDD
10/20 07:29, 4F

10/20 07:31, , 5F
姜炸雞....
10/20 07:31, 5F

10/20 07:34, , 6F
........XD
10/20 07:34, 6F

10/20 07:53, , 7F
至少把球發給自己XDDD
10/20 07:53, 7F

10/20 08:28, , 8F
搞不好送走了 明年拿東山再起獎 科科
10/20 08:28, 8F

10/20 08:36, , 9F
丟去美聯弱化對手 有夠酸 會丟到光芒藍鳥金鶯去嗎
10/20 08:36, 9F

10/20 08:37, , 10F
XD 超酸的...
10/20 08:37, 10F

10/20 08:43, , 11F
一整篇整個超好笑XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
10/20 08:43, 11F

10/20 08:45, , 12F
我想紅襪迷一定很樂見其成
10/20 08:45, 12F

10/20 09:19, , 13F
本來以為是翻譯好笑而已 XD
10/20 09:19, 13F

10/20 09:25, , 14F
好啦 襪襪出12M 教士出6M ^.<
10/20 09:25, 14F

10/20 09:27, , 15F
酸度爆表
10/20 09:27, 15F

10/20 09:30, , 16F
好笑XD
10/20 09:30, 16F

10/20 09:35, , 17F
起碼貼八成薪水,不然免談。教士隊又不是做慈善事業。
10/20 09:35, 17F

10/20 09:37, , 18F
XDDDDDDDDDDDD
10/20 09:37, 18F

10/20 09:43, , 19F
酸鹼值至少2.4以下
10/20 09:43, 19F

10/20 09:53, , 20F
這要換的話剩下46M起碼要吃掉40M 他貢獻根本負的
10/20 09:53, 20F

10/20 09:54, , 21F
如果是美聯球隊,又能保證每五天先發一次....
10/20 09:54, 21F

10/20 09:54, , 22F
要紅襪吃下全部薪水大概也不是難事XDD
10/20 09:54, 22F

10/20 09:54, , 23F
教士:就算免費送我發球機 怎麼感覺我還是虧...
10/20 09:54, 23F

10/20 10:33, , 24F
教士的打線的確需要一點危機感, 交易Lackey是不錯的選擇
10/20 10:33, 24F

10/20 10:40, , 25F
至少把球發給自己 XD
10/20 10:40, 25F

10/20 10:51, , 26F
來費城 費城打線可能需要點刺激的投手 (誤)
10/20 10:51, 26F

10/20 10:52, , 27F
費城打者需要刺激嗎 1分都打不回來... 遑論超過5分...
10/20 10:52, 27F

10/20 10:53, , 28F
發球機要是去費城,那布胖怎麼辦呢?
10/20 10:53, 28F

10/20 10:54, , 29F
還有阿Ken怎麼辦呢?
10/20 10:54, 29F

10/20 10:57, , 30F
去費城可以阿 轉型當打者
10/20 10:57, 30F

10/20 11:16, , 31F
丟去水手刺激一下打線看看??
10/20 11:16, 31F

10/20 11:21, , 32F
水手喔, 他一場掉的分水兵大概要花三場打回來..........
10/20 11:21, 32F

10/20 11:31, , 33F
丟去別隊AL 這句真的很酸XD
10/20 11:31, 33F

10/20 11:34, , 34F
可能不只三場...
10/20 11:34, 34F

10/20 11:39, , 35F
有夠酸的~XDDDD!!記得交易到美東,基基:嗯?
10/20 11:39, 35F

10/20 11:39, , 36F
與其買來給別人打,還不如讓自己打!!
10/20 11:39, 36F

10/20 12:03, , 37F
弱化對手?不要變成一遇到他自己場場被打爆就好
10/20 12:03, 37F

10/20 12:03, , 38F
大家都忘記宵夜威能了
10/20 12:03, 38F

10/20 12:08, , 39F
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
10/20 12:08, 39F

10/20 12:09, , 40F
去了教士就準備競爭CY了
10/20 12:09, 40F

10/20 12:09, , 41F
酸到暴表 甚麼都吃就是不吃局數 XD~~~
10/20 12:09, 41F

10/20 12:38, , 42F
把球發給自己 真是有夠機車 XD
10/20 12:38, 42F

10/20 12:41, , 43F
機車XD
10/20 12:41, 43F

10/20 12:56, , 44F
丟美聯還可以發球給自己XDDDDDD 好好笑XDDDDDDDDDDDDD
10/20 12:56, 44F

10/20 13:29, , 45F
把宵夜請很大的發球機丟到水兵去應該很有趣....
10/20 13:29, 45F

10/20 13:32, , 46F
"這樣至少還可以弱化對手球隊" XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
10/20 13:32, 46F

10/20 13:42, , 47F
丟到NL才有機會丟他觸身球阿...
10/20 13:42, 47F

10/20 17:37, , 48F
至少還可以弱化對手球隊。我是認真的。 XDDD!!!
10/20 17:37, 48F

10/20 19:28, , 49F
琳賽蘿涵躺著也中槍XDDDDD
10/20 19:28, 49F

10/20 21:23, , 50F
XD
10/20 21:23, 50F

10/20 23:05, , 51F
3A土狼蝙蝠隊:小聯盟選手缺乏發球機!!!
10/20 23:05, 51F

10/21 00:21, , 52F
超酸的這篇XD
10/21 00:21, 52F

10/21 01:02, , 53F
XDDDDDD
10/21 01:02, 53F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 轉錄者: sapphireBOB (140.113.10.40), 時間: 10/21/2011 06:56:55

10/21 06:59, , 54F
我是覺得不要找他來.....先補打擊火力比較實在
10/21 06:59, 54F

10/21 22:14, , 55F
襪子吃掉9成薪水就收
10/21 22:14, 55F
文章代碼(AID): #1EeASuzX (Padres)
文章代碼(AID): #1EeASuzX (Padres)